Quote me anywhere on the forum where ive said India doesn't belong to hindus and i'll quit. If you cant find it will you quit ? or atleast apologize for throwing around false accusations ?
No one needs to quit or apologize, it was actually you who started the Aryan invasion theory. You replied to Karthik's post he said:-
The owner in that case was an alien invader who had nothing to do with India and who did nothing good to India. So whats that use of dilapidated relic that stands as a gory reminder of the bloody conquest of India by barbarians from Central Asia ? In fact even the Muslims in India should have supported pulling that structure off.
Any structure built on the blood of Indians by foreign invaders in not worth protecting.ASAT.
You answered :-
lol even the aryans were aliens to India. just because they happened to come few centuries earlier doesn't make them native.
according to your analogy everyone in India came from outside except adivasis since they were the first to settle in land mass known as India.
The Aryan invasion theory which in itself denies the nativeness of majority of Hindus to this land, and origin of humans from Africa has nothing to do with the destruction of Babri Masjid it was completely an OT post which forced me to assume that you were denying the Hindu occupancy in India(you believe in Aryan invasion theory so Hindus are Aryans for you). While development of Hindu culture has been occurred thousands of years ago; and by the way I do not follow the Aryan invasion theory, though I agree with you that humans came to India from Africa. Whether you call Hindus Aryans or not but Hindus are the native residents of India.
There were no cities but there weren't forests either. The tribals were living then as they are living now. Do you know what the term "original inhabitants" means ? It means the first group of people to live on a piece of land. And aryans were certainly not that. Infact before the arrival of aryans there were organized cities near indus river. So you see aryans weren't even the 2ng group of people to migrate into India. If you know anything then there have been dozens of migrations into India through tens of thousands of years. Religion doesn't enter into it the equation im afraid. Hindus weren't always hindus and muslims in mecca weren't always muslims. Tomorrow if an adivasi being an original inhabitant converts to judaism then will judaism become a native religion ? No. Hinduism is Indian because it transpired in the Indian subcontinent but aryans came from outside. Even the hindu texts mention this so why cant you agree ?
I believe you are talking about Harappan civilization, whose religious tendencies are not clear but according to Sir John Marshall some of the sculptures found there seems to be Hindu sculptures. Swastik seals and Shiva Lingams have been found there so no doubt they were Hindus though they were in earlier stages. And it's evident that Hindus turned the land full of forests into a modern civilization.
I have already said I do not follow Aryan invasion theory, it is a clever theory created to deny nativeness of Hindus to Indian lands. Like I said before, original inhabitants of India has nothing to do with Babri Masjid's destruction. No doubt Adiwasis were here before evolution of any culture but the very first religion which evolved from India is Hinduism which brought India into present status. Hindus created a culture and religion out of such tribal fashion of living,who in no way were able to represent India you might call them Original inhabitants but it doesn't deny the fact that Hindus are the native residents of India.
Even during the times of mughals India was a golden bird...our wealth was only transferred out in mass by the english. Have i denied that muslims didn't invade ? No. I dont smudge over facts. In this forum itself ive mentioned it several times that hindu temple should be built on the very spot they want and mosque can be built in neighboring area but i bet you missed that.
Well It is possible, I might have missed your such posts, and I agree during Mughals too India was a golden bird. But this is also true that Hindus suffered most during Muslim rule.I agree the Hindu temple should be built on the very spot.