- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 9,080
- Likes
- 40,077
Not more deaths than in the present scene inflicted by India and Pakistan upon eachother. That's not even a convincing argument.you are wrong. With the reunification, we will busy cleaning the Taliban and the Islamic terrorists. With more widows to follow for decades.
Franky I don't even need to cite examples of past reunifications/sovereignty-transfers to back my argument. Reunifications are very much possible in the 21st century, as it has happened in modern, post-WWII era. As much as you want to think India and Pakistan as far too apart from each other to stage a reunification, my argument has focussed on convincing you that you cannot write-off such a probability.I am not at all talking about Hong Kong -China in physical dimensions at all.
you had Hong kong populated by people from China. It had a movie industry. Guess, it was normal.Just Chinese living in another Chinese city.
You had such similarities between West and East Germany too.
India- Pakistan are different. Some areas the culture is the same and in others it's not.
And therefore existing examples of reunification do not work and cannot be justified in INDO-PAK context.
And no, an Indian Punjabi has more things in common with a Pakistani Punjabi, than an Indian Punjabi with an Indian Tamil. We've pioneered managing a diverse country better than anyone on the face of the planet. Hence I don't see how reunification is not possible, as far as logistics and national integration go.