'Pakistan's Nasr missile is the most dangerous development in South Asia'

[warrior monk]

Wow what a joke of an article , though there is an ambiguity about the use of NASR by Pakistani military but rest assured any use ofTactical or Strategic weapons by Pakistan will be met by Total Armageddon type reaction from India.

A few discrepancies in the article about the power rating of Khusab reactors
Khusab 1 -50Mwt , Khusab 2 to 4 probably 75 Mwt or less . Due to Lack of efficency and fuel production capacity of Pakistan we can safely assume 65% capacity so a total capacity of producing 45 kgs of plutonium per year .
Pakistan is lacking the capacity of miniaturization of warheads and assuming lack of capacity for making Lighter warheads probably can assemble 9 warheads a year .

Currently India has the biggest capacity and probably the fastest growing arsenal in the world and trailing behind India is PRC which has reduced its fissile material production due to maturity of its arsenal. Pakistan's nuclear weapons program is a very small compared to India's program.

Pakistan's Plutonium producing capacity is Khusab 1 to 4 a total of 275 Mwth i e ( 50 + 75 +75 +75)
India's CANDU derivatives outside safeguard = 8233 Mwth .
India's capability = 30 x ( Pakistan's total plutonium production capacity )
India also has one breeder reactor with a high breeding ratio and currently making more of them.

The problem with Pakistan is that somebody has convinced that it has a bigger arsenal than India and it can attack India under the cover of nuclear umbrella well rest assured we have a far bigger nuclear arsenal than Pakistan and India has simple implosion type fission weapon , boosted fission weapon , composite core boosted weapon , staged fusion weapons and cream of the cropping boosted primary staged fusion weapons.

 

[Blackwater]

35 minutes ago#129
http://**********/data/avatars/m/138/138817.jpg?1438581994
al_asad_al_mulkFULL MEMBER
http://**********/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/2ndLieutenant.jpg
Joined:
Apr 19, 2012
Messages:
444
Ratings:
+2 / 186 / -2
http://**********/styles/default/xenforo/flags2/pk.GIF
http://**********/styles/default/xenforo/flags2/ae.GIF
↑
NIA said: Nuclear attack on Indian troops....Your single attack can decide existence of pakistan on world map.

Paki's reply:That you are saying what is our stance if your dirty force land one inch inside Pakistan we will start annihilating your cities, your forces will met Nasr and your big cities will be see our Shaheen and your military targets will be ruined by Babur, your airfield will be nuked by Ra'ad we will not spare a single missile in our inventory. And after that India might do what they can do.:biggrin2:
@Blackwater
What do u say about him!!:biggrin2:

looks like he spend more nights in madrasa than days:biggrin2::biggrin2:

 

[Screambowl]

If Nasr missile is to deliver tactical nuke then there is no point in any discussion. This will however lead to full nuclear exchange.

 

[Blackwater]

Today's wars are fought in media and diplomatic and economic front ,where pakistan lacks

These pakis are still stuck in nasr ,nukes, GAZI ,gazwa-a-hind,kufur hindu ,hindu baniya etc etc

 

[Zarvan]

Need additional view point, other than the Rediff reporter.

Is Nasr missile that dangerous then why rest of the world not taken notice of it. Jane's mentioned its development in a passing reference about four years back. Others have paid limited attention to it. If the missile is that effective, I am sure Saudi Arabia must have sent delegations to Pakistan to buy it by now.

Is Rediff joining the ranks of people who spread scare tactics. Nuclear weapons as Indian government had said repeatedly that if used will invite a massive retaliation, effectively anhiliation.

Saudi Arabia gets weapons quietly from Pakistan. As for this missile whole world knows what is this missile and How ruthlessly we will show it.

 

[Zarvan]

Clickbait garbage. Next time there's a 26/11-styled attack, Modi's reputation will be on the line. He will attack, and then Pakistan's nuclear escalation bogey will be put to rest once and for all.

People didn't elect Modi to be a "statesman" who rules by the book. People elected him to be an authoritarian.

Pakistan will be making a big mistake trying to call out his response to a major terrorist attack.

We are waiting for you to make this mistake you would know what we would do in return

 

[Zarvan]

With a 60km range and official .5-5 kiloton yield this missile is more or less useless. This a Chinese Smerch copy claimed to be mated with a nuclear warhead ? Does Pakistan have miniaturization capability?

Yes we have miniaturization capability

 

[Zarvan]

Wow what a joke of an article , though there is an ambiguity about the use of NASR by Pakistani military but rest assured any use ofTactical or Strategic weapons by Pakistan will be met by Total Armageddon type reaction from India.

A few discrepancies in the article about the power rating of Khusab reactors
Khusab 1 -50Mwt , Khusab 2 to 4 probably 75 Mwt or less . Due to Lack of efficency and fuel production capacity of Pakistan we can safely assume 65% capacity so a total capacity of producing 45 kgs of plutonium per year .
Pakistan is lacking the capacity of miniaturization of warheads and assuming lack of capacity for making Lighter warheads probably can assemble 9 warheads a year .

Currently India has the biggest capacity and probably the fastest growing arsenal in the world and trailing behind India is PRC which has reduced its fissile material production due to maturity of its arsenal. Pakistan's nuclear weapons program is a very small compared to India's program.

Pakistan's Plutonium producing capacity is Khusab 1 to 4 a total of 275 Mwth i e ( 50 + 75 +75 +75)
India's CANDU derivatives outside safeguard = 8233 Mwth .
India's capability = 30 x ( Pakistan's total plutonium production capacity )
India also has one breeder reactor with a high breeding ratio and currently making more of them.

The problem with Pakistan is that somebody has convinced that it has a bigger arsenal than India and it can attack India under the cover of nuclear umbrella well rest assured we have a far bigger nuclear arsenal than Pakistan and India has simple implosion type fission weapon , boosted fission weapon , composite core boosted weapon , staged fusion weapons and cream of the cropping boosted primary staged fusion weapons.

We are increasing nukes and with more speed than you

 

[hit&run]

Nasar is a troll missile made by trollistan.

After failing to make anything better than sub kiloton nukes and having Scud era NoKo technology for long range target they had not choice to put all the bets now on those sub kiloton nukes mounted on these rockets to hit Indian IBG.

Desperate times Desperate measures. As usual Pakistanis in order to hide their technology constraints are restoring on propaganda. Like a good man said Propaganda victory means Military defeat.

 

[tarunraju]

We are waiting for you to make this mistake you would know what we would do in return

As I began by saying, this will be a second strike doctrine. You will make the mistake of going nuclear first.

 

[Hari Sud]

Nasr missile,

It is old North Korean technology, with an easy interception possibilities.

Pakistan's pride can hit the dust as soon as this missile is intercepted and brought down over Lahore with Zarvan sitting on his computer desk waiting to hear destruction of forward Indian troops. Instead, it falls over his own head and destroysLahore and him amongst 200,000 people dead. That is a distinct possibility which Zarvan has not thought about it. At that time it cannot be classified as an Indian Bomb as it is Pakistani bomb, falling over Pakistani territory.

Remember Iron Dome which intercepts all artillery shells, Indian technology is very close to it. It will intercept Nasr in mid flight over Lahore.

 

[Blackwater]

We are increasing nukes and with more speed than you

Better increase literacy level and health system than us.

As I said today's war are fought on media, economy and diplomatic level not with nasr

Remember ussr had more nukes than America but ki Hoya

 

[Blackwater]

Saudi Arabia gets weapons quietly from Pakistan. As for this missile whole world knows what is this missile and How ruthlessly we will show it.

Why would Saudi need to get weapons from pakis that is also quietly where America is in their pocket [emoji6][emoji6][emoji6]

 

[tarunraju]

In a nuclear exchange with Pakistan (in which Pakistan strikes first), India should also take out these targets outside Pakistan:

• Mecca-Medina
• Key Persian Gulf cities (eg: Dubai, Sharjah, Abu Dhabi, Doha, etc.)
• Oilfields in KSA, UAE, Iraq, etc.). A nuked oilfield will burn for decades, till the reserves are depleted.

A nuclear exchange with Pakistan will be an end-of-the-world scenario for India (and Pakistan), so we might as well unload on those other targets, so that Paki warloads factor those, before initiating a nuclear exchange.

 

[warrior monk]

We are increasing nukes and with more speed than you

Are you brain damaged fool or is your madrasa education shut down your cognitive capability .
Pakistan's Heavy water reactor capacity to produce plutonium == 275 Mwth
India's Heavy water reactor capacity potentially to produce plutonium== 8233 Mwth
Total plutonium India has outside safeguards including fuel grade and weapons grade === 16000 Kgs
Total plutonium Pakistan has outside safeguards in weapons grade form == 125 kg to 150 kgs


Total number of bombs Pakistan can produce per year == 9 nuclear bombs
Total number of bombs India can produce per year ==== 156 bombs

In case you are brain damaged 156 bombs > 9 bombs

In here I am not including India's fast breeder reactor which only one country in Asia operate.
Pakistan's reprocessing capacity is in the gutters and most important you are running out of Uranium ore before long you will be operating on depleted tails while India has enough uranium to last 60 years of weapons program and our Three stage program can last for 500 years .

Don't listen to those Think tank reports who willfully subterfuge because i interned in one of those and i know.

 

[warrior monk]

In a nuclear exchange with Pakistan (in which Pakistan strikes first), India should also take out these targets outside Pakistan:

• Mecca-Medina
• Key Persian Gulf cities (eg: Dubai, Sharjah, Abu Dhabi, Doha, etc.)
• Oilfields in KSA, UAE, Iraq, etc.). A nuked oilfield will burn for decades, till the reserves are depleted.

A nuclear exchange with Pakistan will be an end-of-the-world scenario for India (and Pakistan), so we might as well unload on those other targets, so that Paki warloads factor those, before initiating a nuclear exchange.

Brother , I would not include Islamic holy cities or innocent Arab and Muslim states in our target list , Saudis have financed them for that we will destroy few Saudi cities not Holy places cause we are not like them and Pakistan doesn't have the the capacity to destroy India at max it can kill 50 million Indians which also includes our Muslims by targeting our urban agglomeration and we will retaliate by killing all of Pakistan .

 

[tarunraju]

Brother , I would not include Islamic holy cities or innocent Arab and Muslim states in our target list , Saudis have financed them for that we will destroy few Saudi cities not Holy places cause we are not like them and Pakistan doesn't have the the capacity to destroy India at max it can kill 50 million Indians which also includes our Muslims by targeting our urban agglomeration and we will retaliate by killing all of Pakistan .

Pakistan is a theosophical state. They'll willing to strike first (through terrorism), and then strike first (nuclear), when we respond to terrorism by taking out training camps on their soil. They don't care about their people as much as they care about their ideology. Then let's make that decision of a nuclear first-strike costly.

 

[warrior monk]

Believe me we have other ways to handle their terrorism nonsense and punish Pakistan .
For example we can easily deplete their aquifer which they share with India making Pakistan water starved . There are ways to kill millions of Pakistanis without even firing a single bullet or bomb .

 

[tarunraju]

Believe me we have other ways to handle their terrorism nonsense and punish Pakistan .
For example we can easily deplete their aquifer which they share with India making Pakistan water starved . There are ways to kill millions of Pakistanis without even firing a single bullet or bomb .

We're talking about two different subjects. I'm talking about how we can make Pakistan's decision to go nuclear first costly, and raise their stakes to our levels.

Right now the stakes are lopsided. India has more to lose in a nuclear exchange, and Pakistan is counting on the self-restraint that comes out that, to act as a deterrent to even conventional action where India crosses the LoC/IB.

In the current nuclear equation (that does not count warheads), Pakistanis get to breach LoC/IB, while Indians don't.

 

[warrior monk]

We're talking about two different subjects. I'm talking about how we can make Pakistan's decision to go nuclear first costly, and raise their stakes to our levels.

Right now the stakes are lopsided. India has more to lose in a nuclear exchange, and Pakistan is counting on the self-restraint that comes out that, to act as a deterrent to even conventional action where India crosses the LoC/IB.

In the current nuclear equation (that does not count warheads), Pakistanis get to breach LoC/IB, while Indians don't.

There is nothing to stop Pakistan's irrationality the only thing is to go on an offense by making them bleed inside and making the cost very very high for them.
Eg We will silently warn them if you do not stop your terrorism in India we will poison your aquifer with hexavalent Chromium thousands nay millions of Pakistanis may suffer from Multi organ failure and cancer in a year .