Pakistan: Myths and consequences

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
The Islamic and irrationally anti-Indian elements in the self-image of the Pakistani state have led it down a self-destructive path.

Salman Rushdie famously said that Pakistan was "insufficiently imagined". To say that a state is insufficiently imagined is to run into thorny questions regarding the appropriate quantum of imagination needed by any state; there is no single answer and at their edges (internal or external), all states and all imaginings are contested. But while the mythology used to justify any state is elastic and details vary in every case, it is not infinitely elastic and all options are not equally workable. I will argue that Pakistan in particular was insufficiently imagined prior to birth; that once it came into being, the mythology favoured by its establishment proved to be self-destructive; and that it must be corrected (surreptitiously if need be, openly if possible) in order to permit the emergence of workable solutions to myriad common post-colonial problems.

In state sponsored textbooks it is claimed that Pakistan was established because two separate nations lived in India — one of the Muslims and the other of the Hindus (or Muslims and non-Muslims, to be more accurate) and the Muslims needed a separate state to develop individually and collectively. That the two "nations" lived mixed up with each other in a vast subcontinent and were highly heterogeneous were considered minor details. What was important was the fact that the Muslim elite of North India (primarily Turk and Afghan in origin) entered India as conquerors from 'Islamic' lands. And even though they then settled in India and intermarried with locals and evolved a new Indo-Muslim identity, they remained a separate nation from the locals. More surprisingly, those locals who converted to the faith of the conquerors also became a separate nation, even as they continued to live in their ancestral lands alongside their unconverted neighbours. Accompanying this was the belief that the last millennium of Indian history was a period of Muslim rule followed by a period of British rule. Little mention was made of the fact that the relatively unified rule of the Delhi Sultanate and the Moghul empire (both of which can be fairly characterised as "Muslim rule", Hindu generals, satraps and ministers notwithstanding) collapsed in the 18th century to be replaced in large sections of India by the Maratha empire, and then by the Sikh Kingdom of Maharaja Ranjit Singh.

During British rule the cultural goods of the North Indian Muslim elite (Urdu language, literate "high church" Islam, Islamicate social customs, a sense of separateness and a sense of superiority to the 'natives') became more of a model for the emerging Muslim middle class. But even as many leading lights of the North Indian Muslim community fought hard to promote what they saw as "Muslim interests", they were also attracted by the emerging notion of a modern and democratic Indian whole. Some of these leaders (including Jinnah) simultaneously espoused elements of Muslim nationalism and secularised Indian nationalism and sometimes went back and forth between these ideals or tried to aim for a synthesis. Some of this multi-tasking was undoubtedly the result of sophisticated political calculation by very smart people, but it must not be forgotten that a lot of it was also a reflection of the half-formed and still evolving nature of these categories.

In this confused and somewhat chaotic setting it is hard to argue that any particular outcome was inevitable or pre-ordained. But the tension between the Muslim elite's sense of Muslim distinctiveness (a sense cultivated by the British rulers for their own purposes at every step) on the one hand and emerging Indian nationalism dominated by Hindus on the other, led some Muslims to think about various schemes of separation. Allama Iqbal, for example, imagined a separate Muslim country in the Northwest that would serve as India's martial bulwark against central Asian marauders, while also acting as a laboratory for the development of an as yet uncreated Islamicate culture of his dreams. In this dream, Islam is not a static revealed truth; it is an evolving idea, a fire in the minds of men that drives them to endlessly create something new and heroic, yet rooted and eternal. The audience for this romantic but sophisticated fantasy was necessarily small, but less sophisticated versions of this vision played a role in exciting the minds of many young and newly-educated men during the movement for Pakistan.

Other visions of Pakistan were cruder and more literal minded and imagined a state where perfect Islamic law (already revealed and written in books, waiting to be applied as it had once been applied in the golden ages past) replaced "failed heathen systems". Since no orthodox school of Sunni Islamic law had actually evolved beyond medieval models there was no way those blueprints could create a working modern state. But these mythical visions had played a prominent role in the propaganda of the Muslim league and they prepared the ground in which crude Salafist fantasies would find traction in the years to come.

The historian Ayesha Jalal has convincingly argued that Mr. Jinnah in fact wanted to use the threat of partition as a bargaining ploy to secure more rights for the Muslim political elite within united India. In this view, Mr. Jinnah and his lieutenants had never fully answered the many objections that were raised against the partition scheme because they never really expected the scheme to be carried out, but via a complicated series of mistakes and miscalculations on all sides, partition ended up becoming a reality.

Pakistan as it was created did not really overlap the domain of the North Indian Muslim elite who had been the main drivers of this demand. One way to solve this problem was to imagine the actually existing Pakistan as a transitional phase between British India and the re-establishment of some future Delhi sultanate (this crackpot scheme being the official ideology of the Zaid Hamid faction of Paknationalism). The other was to imagine that the cultural heritage of the Delhi Sultanate has now been transferred in toto to Pakistan by the North Indian Muslim elite and would grow and prosper here as the unifying culture of Pakistan. This package frequently included conscious or unconscious disdain for the existing cultures of Bengal, Punjab, Sindh, Pakhtoonkhwa and Baluchistan, and an irrational determination to expiate any sign of 'Indian-ness' in the greater cause of Urdu-speaking North Indian Muslim high culture.

The Bengalis found this so hard to swallow that they opted out of the experiment altogether. And in spite of the creation of a pan-Pakistan middle class that has been acculturated into a (necessarily shallow) version of North Indian Urdu culture, these contradictions remain potent in the West as well. Separatist movements are one consequence of this attempt to impose a shallow and partly imaginary Pakistani nationalism on existing cultures; a more insidious consequence is the accelerated decay of deeply rooted cultural frameworks and the growth of shallow Saudi or Western (or mixed-up) cultural tendencies in the resulting vacuum.

Other contradictions at the heart of the "two-nation theory" proved equally deadly in the long run. Pakistan had been created utilising the language of Muslim separatism and the millenarian excitement generated by the promise of a "Muslim state". And even at the outset, these ideas were not just convenient tools for the elite to achieve economic objectives (a view common among leftists). The elite itself was Muslim. To varying extents, its members shared the myths of past greatness and future Islamic revival that they had just used to obtain a state for themselves. In a world where modern European institutions and ideas were taken for granted even by relatively orthodox upper class Muslims, the disruptive political possibilities hidden in orthodox Islamism were not easily appreciated and dreams of Islamic revival could take on almost any form.

Most hardcore Islamists had not supported the Pakistan movement precisely because they regarded the Muslim League leadership as Westernised modernists ignorant of orthodox Islamic thought. But they were quick to realise that Pakistan was a natural laboratory for their Islamic experiments. The fact that fantasies of Islamic rule had been projected as models for the state made it very difficult to argue against those who claimed to speak in the name of pure Islam. Besides, orthodox Islamists possessed the twin notions of apostasy and blasphemy that are extremely potent tools to suppress any challenge to Islamic orthodoxy. These tools create problems in all modern Muslim states, but they are especially hard to resist in a state supposedly created so that Islamic ideals could "order the collective life of Muslims in the light of the Quran and Sunnah" (to quote the Objectives Resolution). Consequently the modern Pakistani state has slowly but steadily ceded ideological ground to Islamists who can legitimately claim to be closer to the Islam described in orthodox books and taught in orthodox schools.

This rise of Islamic politics was not an overnight process. In fact Left wing slogans had far more appeal in the first 30 years of Pakistan than any Islamic slogan. But the Islamists proved far-sighted and persistent and used a succession of wedge issues to insert their agenda into national politics. From the anti-Ahmedi agitation of 1953 to the successful effort to declare them non-Muslim in 1974; and from the free-lance enforcement of blasphemy laws in British times (albeit one that prominent Muslim leaders including Allama Iqbal supported in the Ilm Deen case in the 1920s) to the powerful instrument of legal intimidation, bullying and state-sponsored murder created by General Zia in the 1980s, the Islamists have steadily tightened their grip. Having adopted Islam and irrational denial of our own Indian-ness as core elements of the state, the 'modern' factions of the establishment lack the vocabulary to answer the fanatics. This has allowed a relatively small number of Islamist officers to promote wildly dangerous policies (like training half a million armed Islamic fanatics in the 1990s) without saner elements being able to stop them. This unique "own-goal", unprecedented in the history of modern states, is impossible to understand without reference to the Islamic and irrationally anti-Indian element in the self-image of the Pakistani state.

Pakistan: Myths and consequences
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,679
Country flag
The population explosion of muslims has made the creation of Pakistan a boon for hindus rather than for muslims . The muslims of Pakistan live in a hell hole .

But hindus are relatively safer in hindu majority India . If Pakistan had not been created the population of muslims in India would have been close to 40 percent today and the country would have been torn by constant hindu muslim tensions . But creation of Pakistan meant that muslims were reduced in number and hindus were able to dominate India upto some extent .
 

A chauhan

"अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l"
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
9,507
Likes
22,493
Country flag
I wonder if we were not divided, religious riots and 1971 like genocides could have become a common scene in this country, thanks to Jinnah for saving us from religiously mad Muslims by taking them to Pakistan. On the other hand those who moved to Pakistan turned Pakistan into a terror camp lol!
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
I wonder if we were not divided, religious riots and 1971 like genocides could have become a common scene in this country, thanks to Jinnah for saving us from religiously mad Muslims by taking them to Pakistan. On the other hand those who moved to Pakistan turned Pakistan into a terror camp lol!
me or any pakistan if called indian even at the moment will commit suicide

imagine someone call me indian..yukhhh
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
I take this opportunity to call you and your fellow 180 million Pakis as Indians. Now will you please all commit suicide and make the world a better place? :rotflmao:
in reality..not on internet

beside this we dont take indians seriously
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
I call you "Indian", now ... as said above, would you do the needful ??
in real life.
not on internet.

well i meant if partition had not happened if people calling us indians..in that sense
 

JBH22

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
6,478
Likes
17,797
The best thing to have happened partition imagine what would be the daily news in India.
However too bad we do not get rid of owaisi and his ilks...
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
me or any pakistan if called indian even at the moment will commit suicide

imagine someone call me indian..yukhhh
Baap Ke saath Jab Jhagra hota hai to Beta kahata hai Main Tumhara Beta Nahin.... Ha Ha Ha..
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Baap Ke saath Jab Jhagra hota hai to Beta kahata hai Main Tumhara Beta Nahin.... Ha Ha Ha..
Pakistan and india never had any relations..

being bigger doesnt make india baap of pakistan.
 

LordOfTheUnderworlds

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
1,299
Likes
1,379
Country flag
Lately there are lot of articles suddenly popping up from pakistani writers (who are usually westernized elite class men) directly questioning Pakistan's ideology. Is there some pattern here? I remember few months ago reading an article somewhere claiming that in drawing halls of Pakistani elites there are whispers and discussions questioning the two nation theory and Pakistan's creation itself.
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
Pakistan and india never had any relations..

being bigger doesnt make india baap of pakistan.
I was only hinting at a Pakistani's staunch efforts to wipe out the past as if past was to be the cause of present malady. Self haters
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Hehehehehe you pass hollow statements. Bloody coward :D
you mean like indian armed forces?statements without actions

that was more of an msg to give indians a idea what we think of them
 

bose

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
4,921
Likes
5,961
Country flag
me or any pakistan if called indian even at the moment will commit suicide

imagine someone call me indian..yukhhh
But my experience in Europe & USA is that many Pakistanis presents themselves as Indians... Are they scared to commit suicide ?
 

A chauhan

"अहिंसा परमो धर्मः धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: l"
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
9,507
Likes
22,493
Country flag
me or any pakistan if called indian even at the moment will commit suicide

imagine someone call me indian..yukhhh
OTOH, thanks for opposing to be called an Indian, it's really derogatory and shameful for India and Indians to be associated with any Pakistani. We are not terrorists, beggars and universal headache. You guys criticize India for recent rape cases while you and your countrymen rape en masse in lump-sum, almost 3,00,000 rapes during 1971 more than the collective number of rapes for last 50 years in India which shows another aspect of your country besides being terrorists you guys are 'racists' and 'rapists' too .:puke:

But my experience in Europe & USA is that many Pakistanis presents themselves as Indians... Are they scared to commit suicide ?
They do so to save themselves from being persecuted, prosecuted, jailed, and finally killed. :rofl:
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
But my experience in Europe & USA is that many Pakistanis presents themselves as Indians... Are they scared to commit suicide ?
lol..they could be only mistaken as indians not that they pretend to be indians
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,242
Likes
7,522
Country flag
@gotti I agree that all neighbors should be civil to each other. Each Other being the key words here.

Could you please provide logical arguments (without personal attacks please) as to why Pakistan should expect civility from Indians (beyond what is already being showered upon them), when it is not reciprocated?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top