- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 31,927
- Likes
- 148,110
Gafooriya is at another level.....Haha
30 charssssssssssssssssss
By god, this guy is going to trigger another war with his English.....
Gafooriya is at another level.....Haha
30 charssssssssssssssssss
First the Americans, then Saudi's , then Chinkis all playing around with Pak.Hahaha.. Ghafoora says Pakistan loves bondage
Pakisuar bacchabaaz bench*d Jinnah ka l*nd spottetedIndia-Pakistan air battles threaten to discredit the BJP narrative and undermine its electoral prospects. Open-source satellite imagery suggests India did not hit any targets of consequence in the airstrikes it conducted after the terrorist attack on the paramilitaries. Additionally, reporting indicates that during the Feb. 27 air battle, friendly fire from an air-defense missile brought down an Indian military helicopter, killing six military personnel.If the IAF did not, in fact, shoot down a Pakistani F-16, voters might conclude that India carried out airstrikes and has nothing to show for them but lost a pilot, a warplane, a helicopter and six other military personnel.This will no doubt raise questions both inside and outside of India about the IAF’s conventional advantage if it is unable punish a weaker adversary to reestablish deterrence.
The United States also has high stakes in the F-16 controversy because of its interest in India as a rising power in Asia. Washington would no doubt have preferred to see India acquit itself well in the recent India-Pakistan conflict. National security adviser John Bolton tacitly gave a green light for India’s February retaliatory airstrikes.
The U.S. “Indo-Pacific Strategy” envisions India balancing against China while playing the role of a regional “net security provider” in a region that is critical to U.S. economic and strategic interests. U.S. policymakers fear that the more successful Pakistan is at trading punches with India, a more distracted India is less likely to concentrate on projecting and protecting U.S. interests in the region.
LOL, debunked already.
Amongst all that horseshit, one gem stands out: Modi the"Hindu nationalist"India’s public sphere was the first to erupt with war cries. “Mess with the best,” declared one aged Bollywood action hero on Twitter, “die like the rest.” Even the few commentators ostensibly wary of Narendra Modi, India’s Hindu nationalist prime minister, succumbed to patriotic bloodlusts. India’s leading television channels vied with each other in urging more bombings and broadcasting transparently fake footage of the attack.
The cruel lesson from recent days for Modi and his reckless cheerleaders should be clear: They have catastrophically lost a sense of reality while replacing political processes -- in Kashmir and with Pakistan -- with image-making.
History has shown, from Vietnam to shock-and-awe campaigns in Iraq, that image-making through violence belongs, in the huge arsenal of human follies recorded in history. It is, ominously, the tactic that Modi, unmoored from real-world objectives and goals and trapped by his own bellicose rhetoric, has deployed against a nuclear-armed neighbor. One can only hope, as Pakistan predictably retaliates, that he knows when to stop.
So, you mean we should just tolerate all the terrorist attacks originating from Pakiland? Modi has done what no other leader had balls to do, he got his hands dirty which was the need of the hour.India’s public sphere was the first to erupt with war cries. “Mess with the best,” declared one aged Bollywood action hero on Twitter, “die like the rest.” Even the few commentators ostensibly wary of Narendra Modi, India’s Hindu nationalist prime minister, succumbed to patriotic bloodlusts. India’s leading television channels vied with each other in urging more bombings and broadcasting transparently fake footage of the attack.
The cruel lesson from recent days for Modi and his reckless cheerleaders should be clear: They have catastrophically lost a sense of reality while replacing political processes -- in Kashmir and with Pakistan -- with image-making.
History has shown, from Vietnam to shock-and-awe campaigns in Iraq, that image-making through violence belongs, in the huge arsenal of human follies recorded in history. It is, ominously, the tactic that Modi, unmoored from real-world objectives and goals and trapped by his own bellicose rhetoric, has deployed against a nuclear-armed neighbor. One can only hope, as Pakistan predictably retaliates, that he knows when to stop.
All this is nice and dandy. However, until cross border terrorism stops or wiped out there aint gonna be any peace even if both the govts sit and talk. And we have seen multiple times in the past, Pakis do not want to stop terrorists attacking India. Unfortunately India has become intolerant towards terrorism from Pakiland and will continue to pursue all possible options to defend our-self.India, the land that gave birth to four religions and enshrined both secularism and free speech in its constitution, has been having a curious debate these past few weeks: Has the world's biggest democracy become an intolerant nation? I think Pakistan wants peace with India and both should focus on health and poverty. I think both nation do not believe in war and want to solve problems through dialogue. begin a comprehensive dialogue to address and resolve all issues.
If it was so, then why other foreign cults in India don't have this extent of friction with Hindus? Why in most other cultures, not this kind of hostility is prevalent?The division between Hindus and Muslims in South Asia is nobody’s fault or plot, really, but a natural consequence of the emergence of a mass political culture.
No, its the symbol of Dharma!! Way of life. The greater Indian Religion followed by Indian polytheists, monotheists and atheists.it still draw upon much of the symbolism of ancient, pre-Islamic India, from the wheel in the middle of its flag, a symbol taken from the Mauryan Emperor Ashoka
Not really. Fact is that Indian Muslims can't differentiate between religion and culture. Nobody has problem with their religion but culture should be Indian.For example, Pakistan’s national motto features three words all derived from and written in the Arabic script, ایمان، اتحاد، نظم iman, ittihad, nazm (“faith, unity, discipline”). Clearly these are two visions that would have been hard to reconcile in the context of the development of modern identities and nation-states.
Bringing this question is irrelevant itself, nothing more than a media stunt because a right wing party is in power.Has the world's biggest democracy become an intolerant nation?
On the contrary, Modi has set a precedent from the Surgical Strikes 1 to Surgical Strikes 2 that more punishment for pakistan for harboring terrorists are to come while napakistan's nuclear bluff is called.India’s public sphere was the first to erupt with war cries. “Mess with the best,” declared one aged Bollywood action hero on Twitter, “die like the rest.” Even the few commentators ostensibly wary of Narendra Modi, India’s Hindu nationalist prime minister, succumbed to patriotic bloodlusts. India’s leading television channels vied with each other in urging more bombings and broadcasting transparently fake footage of the attack.
The cruel lesson from recent days for Modi and his reckless cheerleaders should be clear: They have catastrophically lost a sense of reality while replacing political processes -- in Kashmir and with Pakistan -- with image-making.
History has shown, from Vietnam to shock-and-awe campaigns in Iraq, that image-making through violence belongs, in the huge arsenal of human follies recorded in history. It is, ominously, the tactic that Modi, unmoored from real-world objectives and goals and trapped by his own bellicose rhetoric, has deployed against a nuclear-armed neighbor. One can only hope, as Pakistan predictably retaliates, that he knows when to stop.
Dat nigga be a false flagger. He'll stop getting fat when niggas be stop feeding da trolls.On the contrary, Modi has set a precedent from the Surgical Strikes 1 to Surgical Strikes 2 that more punishment for pakistan for harboring terrorists are to come while napakistan's nuclear bluff is called.
And given the IAF's grand success, BJP proved that military strikes into pakistan is an attractive option for any subsequent government to come.
And as the trend goes I believe that surgical strike 3 will be even more escalatory in fashion.
The consequences were humiliating for pakistan and the collective fear of an IAF strike force going inside pakistan proper to bomb the pakistani heartland and chew out the pakistan nurtured terrorists sent pakistani politicians into a frenzied call for De-escalation.
How long will pakistan keep denying the truth after India doles out punishment after punishment at some point one can deny only so much until one is perceived as a punching bag by ones own people and the whole world.
Vietnam was a full blown war and does not compare with the skirmishal nature of the current goings on.
I say look at Israel and look at how visibly it punishes its enemies and rightly so they cower and so will pakistan.
The only ones spewing rhetoric and bile was the pakistani propaganda in chief Ghafool, who finally realized what it is to give a ball by ball commentary in the midst of ensuing fog of war, and rightly so he like anyone else attempting the same would make mistakes and mistook the other 2 PAF pilots shot down by WgCdr Abhinandan as IAF pilots.
While in napakistan the gullible paki populace(in a tradition since the inception of napakistan) fooled by the collective propaganda of its leaders, reveling in the faux victories against the eternal 'kafur Hindustan' bogeyman, are diverted away from the plight of their own country which is being reduced to naught in all fronts thanks to the feudal warlords of PA.
The Fascism of pakistan too was brought out in the open, the same fascism that made bangladesh is reforming a #FreeBalochistan.
https://www.hudson.org/research/9781-cleansing-pakistan-of-minorities
Here's a typical example of a Paki sheeple brainwashed with a false narrative and propaganda spewed out by the dumb ISPR and the mullah brigade. These imbecile dicks will even believe the earth is flat if the ISPR says so!! After all, the ISPR is Pak's ultimate truth machine. Jeeez! The shit we have to put up with here!India-Pakistan air battles threaten to discredit the BJP narrative and undermine its electoral prospects. Open-source satellite imagery suggests India did not hit any targets of consequence in the airstrikes it conducted after the terrorist attack on the paramilitaries. Additionally, reporting indicates that during the Feb. 27 air battle, friendly fire from an air-defense missile brought down an Indian military helicopter, killing six military personnel.If the IAF did not, in fact, shoot down a Pakistani F-16, voters might conclude that India carried out airstrikes and has nothing to show for them but lost a pilot, a warplane, a helicopter and six other military personnel.This will no doubt raise questions both inside and outside of India about the IAF’s conventional advantage if it is unable punish a weaker adversary to reestablish deterrence.
The United States also has high stakes in the F-16 controversy because of its interest in India as a rising power in Asia. Washington would no doubt have preferred to see India acquit itself well in the recent India-Pakistan conflict. National security adviser John Bolton tacitly gave a green light for India’s February retaliatory airstrikes.
The U.S. “Indo-Pacific Strategy” envisions India balancing against China while playing the role of a regional “net security provider” in a region that is critical to U.S. economic and strategic interests. U.S. policymakers fear that the more successful Pakistan is at trading punches with India, a more distracted India is less likely to concentrate on projecting and protecting U.S. interests in the region.
this shit cuntry pakistan has to be wiped off the earth.Here's a typical example of a Paki sheeple brainwashed with a false narrative and propaganda spewed out by the dumb ISPR and the mullah brigade. These imbecile dicks will even believe the earth is flat if the ISPR says so!! After all, the ISPR is Pak's ultimate truth machine. Jeeez! The shit we have to put up with here!
Oh wow, first we had group of uneducated goatf#ckers and now we have their principal Sahab MrOxford Pakistan himself writing long winded non-sense proses depicting nothing.India’s public sphere was the first to erupt with war cries. “Mess with the best,” declared one aged Bollywood action hero on Twitter, “die like the rest.” Even the few commentators ostensibly wary of Narendra Modi, India’s Hindu nationalist prime minister, succumbed to patriotic bloodlusts. India’s leading television channels vied with each other in urging more bombings and broadcasting transparently fake footage of the attack.
The cruel lesson from recent days for Modi and his reckless cheerleaders should be clear: They have catastrophically lost a sense of reality while replacing political processes -- in Kashmir and with Pakistan -- with image-making.
History has shown, from Vietnam to shock-and-awe campaigns in Iraq, that image-making through violence belongs, in the huge arsenal of human follies recorded in history. It is, ominously, the tactic that Modi, unmoored from real-world objectives and goals and trapped by his own bellicose rhetoric, has deployed against a nuclear-armed neighbor. One can only hope, as Pakistan predictably retaliates, that he knows when to stop.
Oh Mr Oxford Pakistan , why did you write such a long PHD thesis about nothing again. In short you are saying : India should be secular, liberal so everyone can hold hands and live happily.The division between Hindus and Muslims in South Asia is nobody’s fault or plot, really, but a natural consequence of the emergence of a mass political culture. The reason for this divide is because Hindus and Muslims in the subcontinent naturally have utilized different points of reference when drawing upon history to articulate their sociopolitical goals and build their modern identities. Such thinking is not rare.
Of course none of this is to argue that Hindus and Muslims can not, and should not, get along well with each other and synthesize their cultures. They ought to, and moreover, South Asian states should continue to extend full political liberties to all people regardless of religion, ethnicity, language, or nation. But in the process of drawing upon ancient histories for creating modern national identities, it was inevitable, perhaps, that there would be some tension between the two differing visions articulated by different elites and communities in the subcontinent, because they derive from two different social and religious ideologies, and have different visions of the modern state. India was founded as a secular country after independence, it still draw upon much of the symbolism of ancient, pre-Islamic India, from the wheel in the middle of its flag, a symbol taken from the Mauryan Emperor Ashoka, to its national motto, taken from the Hindu Upanishads, and written out in the native Devanagari script, सत्यमेव जयते satyameva jayate (“truth alone triumphs”). It is not unnatural that India drew upon its ancient heritage and the Sanskrit language in the way many Western countries draw upon Latin and some Christian symbolism. But the Muslim elites of South Asia had something very different in mind. For example, Pakistan’s national motto features three words all derived from and written in the Arabic script, ایمان، اتحاد، نظم iman, ittihad, nazm (“faith, unity, discipline”). Clearly these are two visions that would have been hard to reconcile in the context of the development of modern identities and nation-states.
Thus, Hindu-Muslim conflict in South Asia derives from no one particular factor, but is a function of the friction between different communities with different modernizing visions. Such a phenomenon is hardly unique to South Asia, and can be found throughout the world, wherever there are separate peoples and nations living together in close proximity.
You know the meaning of taunting, punching, metaphors and sarcasm in a conversation? If you do, you won't be taking his sarcastic metaphor seriously.WoW, without any clue you become judgemental and passing your baseless judgment about my oxford linkage,
Fake news isn't even remotely related to our discussion. But still, fake news in India is mostly spread through conflicts between Indian Left and Right Wing political parties at multiple levels. These are of petty internal issues like love affairs or ancestory of politicians, not of invading Andromeda Nebula and becoming inta galactica supa dupa powa.from Global point of view I can understand it is not your problem but Nationalism in India is forced behind to driving fake news.
This "Nationalism" has nothing to do with fake news.Mainstream news outlets pushed people to spread information from alternative sources, without attempting to verify it, in the belief that they were helping to spread the real story. Indian People were also overly confident in their ability and It's not that you have had an intolerance for honesty, but do have an alarming tolerance for dishonesty. This deeply rooted cultural behavior comes from a desire to be polite on fake information spreading into your socetity. This tolerance for dishonesty is holding India back from realising its full potential in the world.
Indians don't need to be over confident or to overrate their capabilities against Pakistan. We know that when India doesn't even try to translate its size into military superiority and always punches below its weight, the gap of power between India & Pakistan will make Pakistan suffer big time or even collapse.Indian People were also overly confident in their ability and It's not that you have had an intolerance for honesty, but do have an alarming tolerance for dishonesty. This deeply rooted cultural behavior comes from a desire to be polite on fake information spreading into your socetity. This tolerance for dishonesty is holding India back from realising its full potential in the world.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attacks on Chinese in Pakistan | Pakistan | 10 | ||
British Tabloid says unknown gunmen killed terrorists in pakistan | Internal Security | 38 | ||
W | Pakistan to buy Chinese FC-31 fighter jets, says air chief | Pakistan | 1 | |
R | Untimely Death of Anti-India terrorists in Pakistan | Defence & Strategy | 7 |