Yet yankees and poms have started teaching in their history books that there was no India before 1947 and using term "South Asia" again for Great Mouryan Kingdom to other historical things. Thru deleted word "India" from map.
Calm down, they won't reach this limit till resolution of SCS dispute with China.
You say that to check India...US will make Myanmar to attack India? What? Directly or by Covert?
No need to annex...incase Srilanka does some circus stunts against India..just a small civil war..That will be enough to send a message to Bongladesh, Nepal and other countries trying to hurt INdia..
Terror groups.
Agree on that.
Attack in the sense, if someone creates turmoil in your neighboring country, it causes problem for you in terms of refugee exodus. It can also hurt your economy since neighboring countries are usually involved in to-and-fro exchange of raw material anf finished goods and skilled labor. If Myanmar is gripped by violence, it will hurt our dream of integrating SAARC economies into the Indian economy. Basically it will prevent the emergence of an Indian super state if your neighboring states are under turmoil. Military insurgency can be handled militarily but the economic losses it brings in terms of lost opportunity costs is too high. It is for the same reason it is not in our interest to have an insurgency in Sri Lanka since we have a large Tamil population too and it doesn't take a lot of time for militant literature to cross borders due to internet. If any Sri Lankan civil war expands into Tamil Nadu then it will hurt us. (Things are different about Pakistan since their economy is not integrated into ours so we can start as many insurgencies there as we want.)
Pakistan always uses that word to mean itself. Even the FA Minister is ashamed to call his own heathen land by its name.@Kshatriya87 @spikey360 @Zebra @LETHALFORCE @Illusive You know guys?
I've become sick of this word "South Asia" now.
Integration such pathetic economies? And occupying them later? :biggrin2:
With Terrorists...which forms the "STRATEGIC POWER" of pakistan.
As if pakistan is STABLE ENOUGH!!Americans are like ...Lets see you do it..other than with the Junk Fighter.
The whole world is waiting to see JF-17 do real sorties to see its effectiveness.
Bangladesh has a higher growth rate, even though they might not have the absolute numbers to compare with the size of the Indian economy. I hope you realize that economies aren't like wifi hotspots which operate in isolation. They are like landline network. No matter how big your economy is, if some wire get's cut somewhere, you lose money. In fact, the size of your economy depends on how many connections and favorable trade pacts you have. That is why even the largest economy, the US, has to send their Negro to beg for trade pacts with Europe and Asia. There's no economy without economic integration and economic integration is not the same as cultural integration. There is a perfectly good way to exchange raw materials and finished goods without having to exchange people across the border. Let the pathetic people rot inside the confines of their own countries; Our concern is only the economic activity that they generate.Sorry, didn't saw it before so replying now.
Integration such pathetic economies? And occupying them later? :biggrin2:
Meanwhile, gap between India and these countries is only growing.
By the time, we'll be capable of doing so with countering international critics, I think anybody of us won't be wanting poverty in India again.
That precisely is the goal of being a larger, more advanced economy. Take their things and keep the gap growing so that they remain as your vassal states.
