- Joined
- Sep 15, 2010
- Messages
- 1,662
- Likes
- 526
Dude - I am not sure where you get your "news and views" from. Sounds like you are a Bangladeshi, fed a diet of how Hindu India could not stand up against the great Muslim onslought of Pakistan.India has lost most of the wars its fought, Why then did Pakistan capture 80,000 square KM of Kashmir in 1948 which India has been trying to get back for the past half century? An area larger than the European country of Austria, 1965 was offically a stalemate and India's great friend Russia played the mediator in Tashkent, India won only the 1971 war and that too because the Bengali people did all the work for 9 long months. The West Pakistanis were 1000 miles away from their base and were heavily outnumbered by Mukhti Bahini and Indian military, There were bound to loose. I dont regard Kargil or Siachen as wars because they are limited conflicts. If India wants to claim victory it can only do so in the 71 war and that too thanks to Bengali Mukhti Bahini.
Here's some perspective about the 1948, 1965 and 1971 India-Pakistan wars
1.
BBC NEWS | India Pakistan | TimelineThe 1947–48 War
The first Indo-Pakistani war started after armed tribesmen from Pakistan's north-west frontier province invaded Kashmir in October 1947. Besieged both by a revolt in his state and by the invasion, the Maharaja requested armed assistance from the government of India. In return he acceded to India, handing over powers of defence, communication and foreign affairs.
Both India and Pakistan agreed that the accession would be confirmed by a referendum once hostilities had ceased.
Historians continue to debate the precise timing when the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir signed the instrument of accession and the Indian army moved into the state, arguing that the Maharaja acceded to India under duress.
In May 1948, the regular Pakistani army was called upon to protect Pakistan's borders. Fighting continued throughout the year between Pakistani irregular troops and the Indian army.
The war ended on 1 January 1949 when a ceasefire was arranged by the United Nations, which recommended that both India and Pakistan should adhere to their commitment to hold a referendum in the state. A ceasefire line was established where the two sides stopped fighting and a UN peacekeeping force established. The referendum, however, has never been held.
In 1954 Jammu and Kashmir's accession to India was ratified by the state's constituent assembly. In 1957, it approved its own constitution, modelled along the Indian constitution. Since that time India has regarded that part of the state which it controls as an integral part of the Indian union.
To the west of the ceasefire line, Pakistan controls roughly one third of the state. A small region, which the Pakistanis call Azad (Free) Jammu and Kashmir, and the Indians call Pakistani-occupied Kashmir, is semi-autonomous. The larger area, which includes the former kingdoms of Hunza and Nagar, called the northern areas, is directly administered by Pakistan.
In 1962-3, following the 1962 Sino-Indian war, India and Pakistan held talks under the auspices of Britain and the US in an attempt to resolve their differences over Kashmir, but without success.
1965 War
In April 1965, a clash between border patrols erupted into fighting in the Rann of Kutch, a sparsely inhabited region along the south-western Indo-Pakistani border. When the Indians withdrew, Pakistan claimed victory.
Later, in August, hostilities broke out again in the 2nd Indo-Pakistani war, when the government of Pakistan launched a covert offensive across the ceasefire line into the Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir. In early September, India retaliated by crossing the international border at Lahore. After three weeks, both India and Pakistan agreed to a UN-sponsored ceasefire.
In January 1966, the governments of India and Pakistan met at Tashkent and signed a declaration affirming their commitment to solve their disputes through peaceful means. They also agreed to withdraw to their pre-August positions.
1971 War
Indo-Pakistani relations deteriorated again when civil war erupted in Pakistan, pitting the West Pakistan army against East Pakistanis demanding autonomy and later independence.
The fighting forced an estimated 10 million East Pakistani civilians to flee to India.
In December India invaded East Pakistan in support of the East Pakistani people. The Pakistani army surrendered at Dhaka and its army of more than 90,000 became Indian prisoners of war.
East Pakistan became the independent country of Bangladesh on 6 December 1971.
Regional tensions were reduced by the Simla accord of 1972 and by Pakistan's recognition of Bangladesh in 1974. The Simla accord committed both sides to working through outstanding issues bilaterally and through the mechanism of working groups.
In relation to Jammu and Kashmir, the two countries agreed that the ceasefire line, which was renamed the Line of Control, would be respected by both sides "without prejudice to the recognised positions of either side".
In 1974 the Kashmir state government reached an accord with the Indian Government, which affirmed its status as "a constituent unit of the union of India". Pakistan rejected the accord.
it's the BBC, so much more "balanced".
According to western scholars and military analysts, Pakistan did "NOT WIN" a single war with India, although they had early gains because they were the aggressors each and every time. When you launch attacks against your neighbor without declaration of war, you are bound to gain some territory.
In 1948, Kashmir was not even a part of India when Pakistan rolled into Kashmir. Once India got involved, Pakistan was pushed back from the Kashmir valley and the only reason it retained the Northern region was that the newly formed Indian Army did not have enough Officers and Army planners for a prolonged campaign, since the British Officers were prohibited by Britain from taking part in the conflict. So, Although Pakistan lost a third of the territory they had captured initially, by the time the cease-fire happened, they could keep the other 2/3 rds of it.
In 1965, India captured 4 times more territory than Pakistan and was gracious enough to trade most of it with Pakistan. For an aggressor nation like Pakistan, who gained nothing, lost half of their Armor and a quarter of it's Airforce, it IS defeat, just as surely it is a victory for a country like India.
Indo-Pakistan War of 1965
As for 1971, If Indian Army had not invaded East pakistan, Bangladesh would be speaking Urdu and Dhaka will be filled with Pathans by now. Your claims of "all the work was done by the Bangladeshis" - here are the stats ...
"Bangladesh Liberation war" took place from March 26, 1971 and ended on December 16, 1971
From March 26 to December 2, 1971,
Bangladeshi Mukti Bahini losses - >25,000
Pakistani Army losses - ~1000
India joined the war from December 3rd -
Mukti Bahini Losses - ~5000
Indian Army Losses - ~1500
Pakistani Army losses - ~8000
POWs ~90,000.
See something? If India had not joined in, Bangladeshi Mukti Bahini would NOT HAVE succeeded. So, "Thanks to Mukti Bahini"? I would say Bangladesh should be FOREVER appreciate the fact that India stepped in and liberated Bangladesh from the blood thirsty Pakis.
As for Geo-Politics changes - Russia befriending Pakistan is a shot in the Arm for Pakistan and should be taken VERY seriously by India - just ban a couple of Russian Arms companies and cancel a few impending deals - let's see how important "Geo-Politics" is ...
Last edited: