Olympics 2012 London

Sabir

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
2,116
Likes
793
Unfortunately there will be no 48 kg in Olympic where Mary became WC so many times. In 51 kg she has to fight against taller and heavier opponents. Still couple of months ago she defeated Ren Cancan , number 1 in this category. Now, hope for the best.
 

Sabir

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
2,116
Likes
793
Mary Kom has qualified for London Olympic.

Go for Gold Mary. You defeated Ren Cancan (The No 1 in 51 Kg) Last month; you gave a fierce battle to the second one (lost 11-13) couple of days ago despite competing in a higher weight category. You can do it in the Olympic too. Whole India stands behind you.
 

Sabir

DFI TEAM
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
2,116
Likes
793
Indian Hockey team is starting its Azlan Shah campaign tomorrow against NZ. The tournament will be played in blue turf and there are high ranked teams like S. Korea, Pakistan, NZ, Argentina, Britain- surely a valuable opportunity before Olympic to fine tune the team.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Won't go to Olympics with 'backstabber' Paes: Bhupathi

BANGALORE: Leander Paes and Mahesh Bhupathi are officially India's doubles entry for the London Olympics, but it's by no means certain that they will actually turn up as a team there. Even as All India Tennis Association general secretary Anil Khanna made the eagerly awaited announcement on Friday, saying the pair was the 'unanimous choice', Bhupathi told a TV channel that the pairing was 'the worst possible in the interest of the country.'

Bhupathi and Rohan Bopanna, who have been playing together for some time now, issued a joint statement even before Khanna's press conference had ended.

"We have worked tirelessly on our pairing, choosing to break winning partnerships and put aside personal interests to combine forces to represent the nation. We have maintained our position as one of the top men's doubles teams in the world. We have repeatedly communicated to the AITA our desire to be considered for selection only as a team. To not send one of the best tennis teams in the world to the Olympics and to instead nominate one that has had four previous unsuccessful attempts fails to put the interests of the nation first," they said.

Earlier, Khanna had separately teleconferenced with Paes, Bhupathi and Bopanna. Paes said he would accept the committee's decision. Bopanna and Bhupathi, already in London for the Queen's Club tournament, reiterated that they would play in the Olympics as a team or not at all.

Asked how he could announce a partnership when one player had refused to play with the other, Khanna said there was still time for the ITF's June 21 deadline for entries. He added that Bhupathi was 'emotionally disturbed' at the moment and would eventually come around.

The committee will inform the players in writing of their selection. The players will then have to communicate their stand in writing. Should they refuse to play, they will be served with a showcause notice which would be followed by disciplinary action. "The government has spent money on the players to prepare them for the Olympics. If the players decide not to take part, then the grant they have received for the Olympics preparation, which is $6,000 per month, will have to be returned," he said.

But Bhupathi dared the AITA to ban him, calling Paes a 'back-stabber' - a reference to the latter's decision to split at the end of last season. It's clear that personal egos and group loyalties may already have compromised India's chances of winning a coveted Olympic medal.

When asked why the selection committee had chosen to field players who are not even on talking terms, Khanna said, "The option was between fielding two teams or one that would win a medal. If we were to pair Leander with the number fourth or fifth-ranked Indian, especially with Somdev (Devvarman) sill doubtful, it would not be fair to expect a medal from Leander. We think Leander and Mahesh are our best bet for a medal."

Bhupathi and Bopanna don't agree with Khanna here. "We are hopeful that better sense will prevail before the ITF's team nomination deadline of June 21. We will continue to make our case to all concerned over the next few days," they said in their joint statement.

Working on the premise that the players have always fought, but have eventually risen above their differences to represent the country, Khanna agreed that the announcement was based more on hope than practicality.

It is clear that the AITA is expecting the players to back down from their stand, but they may be in for a surprise this time.

Paes camp accepts decision 'unconditionally'

Meanwhile, the Paes camp decided not to retaliate. Dr Vece Paes said they had accepted the AITA's decision and that "Leander will play unconditionally, as he has always done".

Expressing surprise at Bhupathi's refusal to play for the country in the Olympics, Dr Paes said that their (Bhupathi and Bopanna's) campaign all these days leading to the team selection has landed them in such a predicament. Leander, who is playing with South African Kevin Anderson in the Queen's Club meet, could not be contacted.

SPLITSVILLE

2000: Bhupathi underwent went shoulder surgery in November 1999 and returned to the Tour in May next year. He was supposed to team up with Paes on return, but found that the Kolkatan had moved on. Coaching issues were believed to be the problem. The pair then reunited just before the Sydney Olympics.

2002: Following constant bickering, they split for the second time in April. The two had issues from keeping schedules to indiscipline and miscommunication.

2004: Came back together for Athens Olympics, where they lost the battle for bronze. There was talk of the pair returning to play together on the Tour, but they went separate ways the following year.

2011: Came back together with an eye on the London Olympics. They briefly even took over as the number one team in the world. In November, Paes decided he wanted to play with a younger player on the Tour, triggering yet another split.


Won't go to Olympics with 'backstabber' Paes: Bhupathi - The Times of India
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Re: Won't go to Olympics with 'backstabber' Paes: Bhupathi

ON a side note, all the shit storms about London Olypics and Dow chemicals turned to be what was expected out of it- Absolutely nothing
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Re: Won't go to Olympics with 'backstabber' Paes: Bhupathi

Unless there is rapport between the players why should such a team be selected to represent India at the Olympics?

Even if such a team goes, it will lose without much of a fight since the fight is within.

Typical idiocy of the Indian selectors!
 

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
Re: Won't go to Olympics with 'backstabber' Paes: Bhupathi

Have we not had enough drama from these two for the last 10 years. Even if it is going to cost us a medal, we should not be sending either of them in the contingent. Enough already with the bickering. Its an embarrassment. Egomaniacs!
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
For how long do we expect Paes and Bhupati to get us a medal? And what sense does it make to threaten them to play together when they clearly don't want to. But then Indian selectors across the board irrespective of the sport are known to be idiots. :facepalm:
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Re: Won't go to Olympics with 'backstabber' Paes: Bhupathi

India tennis champions are still nowhere near being the drama queens found in American tennis.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
London 2012 Olympics: David Cameron says too many top British athletes went to public

London 2012 Olympics: David Cameron says too many top British athletes went to public school
David Cameron has expressed concern that the British Olympic team is too dominated by privately-educated athletes because of a failure by state schools to encourage sporting excellence.


David Cameron has expressed concern that the British Olympic team is too dominated by privately-educated athletes because of a failure by state schools to encourage sporting excellence.

The controversial remarks come days days ahead of the start of the Olympics. The Prime Minister questioned why it was that independent schools accounted for "more than their fair share of medal winners".

But one British Olympic hopeful said Mr Cameron should not "knock" public schools and accused him of unfairly criticising all athletes when only a small number of sports were dominated by athletes educated at private school.

Mr Cameron said he wanted to redress this balance, and use this month's Olympics in London to inspire more state school children to take up sport.

Around a third of the athletes competing at the Olympics are thought to be privately educated, despite the Government spending over £1billion in recent years to encourage state school pupils to become top athletes.

In some of the most successful sports such as rowing, modern pentathlon and sailing, those educated at fee-paying schools the proportion could be even greater.

Public school educated athletes who are set to appear in the Olympics include sailor Ben Ainslie, who attended Truro School in Cornwall and cyclist Sir Chris Hoy, who attended George Watson's College in Edinburgh.

In a speech in Loughborough, Mr Cameron said he was worried about the high proportion of athletes who went to fee-paying schools. He said: "Sport can change lives. So why is it that, in so many schools, sport has been squeezed out and facilities run down?
"The result is that independent schools produce more than their fair share of medal winners, and too many children think taking part in sport just isn't for them. We've got to change that."

He pointed to the example of state school-educated British athletes who are tipped for gold this month, such as runner Mo Farah who went to Feltham Community College in west London, and cyclist Victoria Pendleton, who attended a comprehensive school in Letchworth, Herts.

He said: "I'm not claiming one Olympics will turn every child into tomorrow's Mo Farah or Victoria Pendleton. But just look where our great athletes have come from: Seb Coe started running with the Hallamshire Harriers. Amir Khan started boxing at Bury ABC."
He said he wanted the Olympics to be used to break down barriers which stop poorer children from becoming elite sports stars.
Mr Cameron said he wanted to increase the number of after school sports clubs at secondary and primary schools from 7,500 to 13,500 by 2015.

He added: "It's not just about helping young people develop a sporting habit for life. We've got to nurture the best talents for the future, too"

At the Beijing Games in 2008, 37 per cent of those who brought home medals benefited from some form of fee-paying education.

Of the rowers and sailors who won medals at Beijing, 50 per cent were educated at fee-paying schools, including every medal winner in equestrian events.

Last night, Sally Gunnell, the Olympic hurdling gold medalist who went to a state school in Chigwell, said public school children were given an advantage because they were taught by specialist sports teachers.

She said: "With athletics, it boils down to enthusiastic teachers. I do wonder whether independent schools have more specialist teachers and smaller classes.

"Maybe that is why they engage kids at a young age more. So often in primary schools you just have a generic teacher who is teaching them every subject and they don't know enough basic skills to teach sport."

Britain was missing out on a talent pool of disadvantaged pupils who could make better athletes, she said.

He said: "With independent schools, some of these kids have had very privileged lives. Some of the best athletes would come through the state system and from rough areas - they are the ones you've got to get."

But Lawrence Clarke, an Old Etonian and an heir to a baronetcy who will represent Great Britain in the 110m hurdles at the Olympics, told The Daily Telegraph: "It is a very specific set of sports that have an over-representation.

"You shouldn't knock the public schools that create these athletes but the problem is there isn't enough funding within the state sector to provide for some sports.

"I agree with Cameron's point but it is on specifics - athletics is the polar opposite from sports like rowing, sailing, equestrianism and shooting."

He said that while horse riding and tennis were the preserve of athletes who went to private schools, athletics was not because "anyone can run on a piece of grass".

Sir Clive Woodward, the former England rugby coach and Team GB's deputy chef de mission, added: "Sport to me is all-inclusive and I would encourage it for everyone, including people from state schools.

"I can only back up what David Cameron said. It is a no-brainer - of course you want to do that."

Sue Campbell, the chairman of UK Sport, said it was often luck if talented children at state schools became top athletes.

She said: "State schools might have a PE teacher but they don't have someone to manage the after school opportunities, to hire some coaches, to organize the inter school sport, that is what is missing in state schools.

"This means athletes from state schools get there by 'happen chance' - they happen to chance upon a coach and a sport where they are given good coaching, whereas the independent schools have structured, clear pathways and quality coaching."

Following the publication of the Telegraph's report of Mr Cameron's speech, Olympic rower Andrew Triggs Hodge wrote on Twitter:

"Then perhaps the government should take sport in state schools more seriously? Not that I ever excelled at school sport."
Mr Triggs Hodge attended a secondary school in north Yorkshire and only took up rowing when he studied a masters degree at Oxford in Water Sciences policy.

Mr Cameron said he wanted the UK to "break records" in the legacy of the Games, and insisted that none of the Olympic infrastructure would be "white elephants".

He said he expects the Olympics and Paralympics to boost the UK's economy by £13 billion over the next four years – far more than the £9.5billion cost of the Games.

He said he had asked the British Olympic Association and the International Olympic Committee to relax marketing rules and let firms boast about their work at the Games.

Mr Cameron added that he was convinced that despite other Olympic cities failing to find uses for Olympics facilities there would be "no white elephants" in London.

He said: "With mix of permanent and temporary facilities, we will only be left with what we can use. We mean what we say when we say no white elephants."

David Cameron says too many top British athletes went to public school - Telegraph
So the privileged people are good at sports in the UK!

An interesting observation by the British PM.
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

Shocker! Court allows CWG accused Kalmadi to visit London for Olympics | Firstpost

A Delhi court has given permission to sacked Commonwealth Games Organising Committee chairman Suresh Kalmadi to travel to London for the Olympics, says an NDTV report.

Kalmadi has been accused in the CWG graft case but still obtained permission after being asked to give a bond of Rs 10 lakh. The tainted MP's counsel gave an assurance that he would be available for every hearing and would not seek adjournments.

Kalmadi's plea said that he was required to attend certain meetings and conferences because he was a member of the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF) Council.

His application said: "Applicant (Kalmadi), in his capacity, as a member of the IAAF Council and as president of Asian Athletics Association (AAA), is required to attend certain meetings, conferences and matters of the IAAF during the London 2012 Olympics from July 26 to August 13.

How could the court agree to let such a big fraudster go to London. His reason is that as member of IAAF and President of AAA he has to attend meetings. The only thing the others can learn from him is----------------------------------. BS

A few of the cases relate to companies in London including the case of Queen's Baton Relay. Based on this reason alone he should not have been allowed to go otherwise he may influence the outcome of the case.
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

the question that needs to answered is that did CBI not raise objections in the Court, or as usual Congress Bureau of investigation presented such a weak case that the Ho. Judge had no other option??????????
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

the question that needs to answered is that did CBI not raise objections in the Court, or as usual Congress Bureau of investigation presented such a weak case that the Ho. Judge had no other option??????????
sports/shocker-court-allows-cwg-accused-kalmadi-to-travel-to-olympics-376788.html]Shocker! Court allows CWG accused Kalmadi to visit London for Olympics | Firstpost[/url][/U][/B]

Dear sob ( and other members) - really i watched the whole business of the accusations of kalmadi and his righthand man bhanot (?) by the most wondeful maike barber and mike fennel and all that sports companies SMAM ( why not call it SCAM instead ? ) - i feel it has been as real gang-up by the anglo-saxon colonials and made Kalmadi a scape -goat ( not to mention some indians might have been involved and benefited too ) ... i guess there might have been threads about that , but i didnt participate in dfi at that particular time so i missed out on the opinions of this forum - not to re-raise the tiopic but just to spout my NSHO ( not so humble opinion ) .
 
  • Like
Reactions: sob

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

sports/shocker-court-allows-cwg-accused-kalmadi-to-travel-to-olympics-376788.html]Shocker! Court allows CWG accused Kalmadi to visit London for Olympics | Firstpost[/url][/U][/B]

Dear sob ( and other members) - really i watched the whole business of the accusations of kalmadi and his righthand man bhanot (?) by the most wondeful maike barber and mike fennel and all that sports companies SMAM ( why not call it SCAM instead ? ) - i feel it has been as real gang-up by the anglo-saxon colonials and made Kalmadi a scape -goat ( not to mention some indians might have been involved and benefited too ) ... i guess there might have been threads about that , but i didnt participate in dfi at that particular time so i missed out on the opinions of this forum - not to re-raise the tiopic but just to spout my NSHO ( not so humble opinion ) .
You are correct, this is an angle that has not been discussed about, at all. Maybe the white man mentality.

Mike Fennel was sitting on his ass overseeing the project here in Delhi and all the time he never raised any objection. Maybe he was taken care off right from the onset and he ensured that he had Covered his ass properly.
It is ia murky tale, which the CBI and the Govt. have no incentive to unravel.
 

lcatejas

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2010
Messages
710
Likes
256
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

National Shame...:tsk:
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

You are correct, this is an angle that has not been discussed about, at all. Maybe the white man mentality.
Mike Fennel was sitting on his ass overseeing the project here in Delhi and all the time he never raised any objection. Maybe he was taken care off right from the onset and he ensured that he had Covered his ass properly.
It is ia murky tale, which the CBI and the Govt. have no incentive to unravel.
glad you see it as possibly being that way too - btw just a small aside - it's not "white man " but anglo-saxon - you see many indians and middle -easterners are "white " too - which is why i used anglo-S ( or more appropriately the "AS'es" ! )

another interesting point is that the africans here ( when angered ) tell the "white " people - that toilet paper is white - (!) ( btw i dont see myself as "white" or anything - just human - neither more nor less ) ....cheers sob !
 
Last edited:

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

I love the toilet roll thing..
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
Re: Great Mr.Kalmadi off to London Olympics

Shocker! Court allows CWG accused Kalmadi to visit London for Olympics | Firstpost






How could the court agree to let such a big fraudster go to London. His reason is that as member of IAAF and President of AAA he has to attend meetings. The only thing the others can learn from him is----------------------------------. BS

A few of the cases relate to companies in London including the case of Queen's Baton Relay. Based on this reason alone he should not have been allowed to go otherwise he may influence the outcome of the case.



well you can not challenge court decision.he is free man can go anywhere:taunt::taunt:
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
2016 is only two games away, and Olympic games is real, not something like pissing-contest we are so used to over this ), well it may turn out to be another pissing-contest, who knows. Anyway, good luck.
i wouldnt be surprised if prc takes the top spot - and also in peeing .
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
Can MODS add POLLS for how many gold, silver and bronze India will win in london
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top