- Joined
- May 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,614
- Likes
- 6,793
Assuming there are chemical weapons and it was infact Assad who used them. It's also great to see America siding with radical nutjobs, again.Why ? what will you gain by removal of chemical weapons ?
Assuming there are chemical weapons and it was infact Assad who used them. It's also great to see America siding with radical nutjobs, again.Why ? what will you gain by removal of chemical weapons ?
Full article: Polarized Congress finds uncommon common ground over strikes in Syria - CNN.comMore than 100 members of Congress, mostly conservative Republicans but nearly two dozen liberal Democrats as well, have signed on to a letter to the president urging that he "consult and receive authorization from Congress before ordering the use of U.S. military force in Syria."
Belmont Club » SurrenderAs America's leader the old Obama handed Syria, Russia and Iran and huge victory. Gave it to them on a platter with his vaunting, invincible stupidity. In the process, not only has he shot America in the foot on the world stage but he will have emboldened the Ayatollahs to forge ahead with their nuclear ambitions. He will have encouraged Russia to make a comeback in the region. We will shortly feel these effects in Egypt, Iran and even in Europe.
He has also destroyed himself. It was painful to watch, even to those who had no particular fondness for him. There is always something inexpressibly sad about seeing a great thing die, whether it is a ship, a whale, an enfeebled giant, or a puffed up fantasy. And his "friends", so obsequious in his salad days, were silently tiptoeing toward the door has he self-destructed.
It's not about how many "scores of Syrians getting bombed and maimed by the hour". It's about the motives of regimes in different countries. US doesn't attack a country just because it's ruler or someone else is killing it's citizens. US and "the global community", whatever it means, has no problem with dictators. US had and is supporting a lot of rulers who don't mind killing their own people. It's only when that ruler stops accepting orders from US that he is turned into a villain who must be taken out.There are scores of Syrians getting bombed and maimed by the hour who would vehemently disagree with you. The humanitarian crisis in Syria is very much a real thing. Assad is a terrible dictator, siphoning off all wealth is one thing; bombing (and possibly gassing) the masses is a different matter altogether. However the real abettor here is Russia. In spite of the turmoil they're blatantly giving him more weapons that he can turn on the civilians; and in collusion with China they have blocked any attempts by the global community to intervene and stop Assad. So yea, if anyone deserves credit it's them.
Oh please cut the crap with the propaganda, we all know who are are the "freedom fighter" fighting Assad.America has little choice but join France in the call to arms. We can't let dictators set a precedent using WMD on their people.
me 2We dont indulge in thekedaari
and i do prefer wahabhis getting gassed!
All those women and children are Wahhabi? I don't believe it!Oh please cut the crap with the propaganda, we all know who are are the "freedom fighter" fighting Assad.
Who claimed that those women and children were Wahhabi?All those women and children are Wahhabi? I don't believe it!
May I know the source of this chat?Naive indeed
Sudan - Check,
Lybia - Check
Tunisia - Check
Venezula - (Chavez cancer) - Check
Syria - Aye Aye Sir.
Oil investment means oil assets that China have bought. You want the source. Go do some homework. I made the chart myself after compiling data. This is as of around mid 2012 after a closer look at "Arab spring". You can make a new chart based on latest figures. Won't change heavily though except some more money into kazhak.May I know the source of this chat?
What is the meaning of Chinese oil investment? The amount of money Chinese invested or the volume of oil Chinese imported?
Syria plays a bigger role than Russia in China's oil strategy?
Where is Saudi Arab?
The figures seem not right.
China US bhai bhai.Rebels have also been photographed standing next to Russian and Chinese-made weapons they reportedly confiscated from government soldiers. They've also been photographed with Chinese-made shoulder-launched heat-seeking missiles known as Manpads.
Syrian rebels turn to Mideast neighbors for arms amid reported delay in US help | Fox News
*****************************
If true, then it sure is a good reason for China to support Syria!
Supplying arms to Syria which have been taken over by the rebels!
That will be the day!China US bhai bhai.
For Chinese and American friendship.( Pearl Harbor, yestaday )
ä¸ç¾Žæµ·å†›å…±å¿†æ—¥æœ¬ä¾µç•¥è€…罪行_国际新闻_环çƒç½‘
He will sigh a breath of relief since he cannot be blamed for not taking action. even though at the G20 he gave a forceful speech in support of action against Syria.Events unfolding since the original post of @Energon certainly reflect the political concern over the points he made. The question now is, what will Obama do after he fails to get the approval of the US Congress?
Perhaps this changes the picture, if the US can be shown "a mechanism to implement" the proposal.I read your article. How exactly is your proposal suppose to be carried out? I saw the objectives of the proposal but no mention of the actual logistics required to undertake this venture.