Norway warns India of 'political implications' if Telenor fails

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
NEW DELHI: Telenor's $3 billion investment in India will have political implications.

"Telenor is not just any company. 54% of the shares are owned by Norwegian people through state and thus, it has even further political implications that such a company will be harmed. If this investment fails, it will be probably the biggest loss a Norwegian company has in foreign investments ever. I think also it will be fair to say that it will influence the view of India as an investment country," Norwegian trade and industry minister, Trond Giske, told reporters.

Giske is the representative of Norwegian government on the board of Telenor, which holds 67.25% stake in the telecom operator, Uninor. The balance is held by realty major Unitech.

As many as 22 licences of Uninor were among the 122 licences cancelled by the Supreme Court on February 2, issued during the tenure of the then telecom minister A Raja. Uninor has been permitted to operate till September 7.

Giske added that Norway and India share good bilateral relations and expressed hope that the issues will be resolved soon.

"Bilateral relations between India and Norway are strong and they can handle any challenges. It might have effect on investors but government to government cooperation continues throughout all problems," Giske said.

"This situation after the Supreme Court ruling with the withdrawal of licences and proposals from Trai for new auction, have created obstacles to our future engagement," he said.

To continue its telecom operation, Telenor needs to acquire new licences and win spectrum through the upcoming auction. However, the company has expressed concern over the auction proposals of telecom regulator, Trai.

The Trai had suggested a base price of Rs 3,622 crore for one megahertz (MHz) for pan-India spectrum. This is around 10 times higher than the price at which 2G licences bundled with 4.4 MHz spectrum were allocated in 2008 during Raja's tenure.

According to Trai's recommendations, a minimum of 5 Mhz spectrum should be allotted, which means that pan-India airwaves in 1800 MHz band will cost Rs 18,100 crore.

Telenor has objected to the high base price recommended by Trai along with network roll-out obligations and the quantum of spectrum proposed for auction.

Giske said the Norwegian government fully respects the rights of Indian institutions' to take decisions but have "innocently harmed" the interests of Telenor and Uninor.

"I think it is truly possible to strike a balance and find a common ground where both Supreme Court decisions are fully respected, revenues to the Indian government is secure and competition and good service are provided to customers through participation of Telenor," Giske said.

Norway warns India of 'political implications' if Telenor fails - The Times of India
 

ashicjose

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
399
Likes
60
If Telenor and Uninor did anything wrong to obtain the 2G licences they have to take it.
 

kaustav2001

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
219
Likes
126
Country flag
If Telenor and Uninor did anything wrong to obtain the 2G licences they have to take it.
Actually ...what I feel is that Telenor simply wanted to do good business in India & probably left the hassles of dealing with various govt. agencies/ officials to Unitech (quite naively or they probably chose to remain ignorant) , hoping that it would be more efficient without adequate scrutiny. I really don't think they had any idea (or probably chose to look the other way) of what Unitech did to obtain those licenses.
Nevertheless ignorance/ oversight cannot really be an excuse & unfortunately they will take a (big) rap for that mistake. Sad part is that this isn't really going to help investor confidence in India (coming @ the same time as the retro-tax fiasco).
 

drkrn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
2,455
Likes
902
Norway warning India of political consequences!!

their words doesn't suit their international importance:)

what kind of influence can they have on us.if they have done something wrong they have to enjoy the fruits of their misdeeds along with others.we can't have different rules for each and every person.
idiots
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
They are more pissed off about new spectrum prices than the SC ruling on Uninor. Indian telecom market is highly competitive and if they don't have money to buy new spectrum, they should leave. Why should GOI lose potential revenue by lowering the prices ?
 

pmaitra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
33,262
Likes
19,593
Question is how did Telenor get those 22 licenses at one tenth the new pre-auction base price?

They were about to benefit out of corruption that existed in the Indian system. They should not bother about competing again, since, all other companies will also be competing on an equal footing.
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
Question is how did Telenor get those 22 licenses at one tenth the new pre-auction base price?

They were about to benefit out of corruption that existed in the Indian system. They should not bother about competing again, since, all other companies will also be competing on an equal footing.
They are bitter because SC cancelled their licence. And now their market re-entry will be costly lowering the profit margins.

Is Telenor more a sinner than sinned against?

Are Telenor's shareholders aware of its bad judgment, below average business case and excessively litigant approach in India?

Telenor is at it again. This time it is threatening to hang up on its India operations. Peeved over the high reserve price recommended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) for spectrum auctions, as well as the low quantity of spectrum put on the block, Sigve Brekke, Managing Director of Uninor, a joint venture controlled by Norwegian firm Telenor, said last week,

"If these recommendations become policy, we will be forced to exit India. It would be impossible for us to continue operations here." Uninor then challenged the TRAI's recommendations on spectrum auctions in the Supreme Court for not being in line with the 2G licence cancellation judgment of February 2, 2012.

It is hard to believe that Telenor, one of the world's top 10 telecom players, was not aware of the telecom scam in India, which was being reported on a daily basis by mainstream media for over a year before it struck its deal with Unitech to buy equity in October 2008. The momentum around the scandal in granting spectrum in 2008 at 2001 prices gathered strength since September 2007.

Unitech was in discussions with several multinationals while engaging with Telenor. While those companies walked away from the transaction, Telenor did not. Who is to blame for this foolhardiness?

Also, while Telenor paid a huge premium to buy 67 per cent of Unitech, rather than accept that this was a premium for spectrum, it allowed Unitech to pretend, including through press releases by the Central Government on October 31, 2008, and November 7, 2008, that the valuation was on account of other assets and not spectrum. A bad move in the end.

Telenor's process of due diligence is highly questionable considering that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India's report on 2G spectrum allocation of 2010 revealed that all 22 licence applications submitted by Unitech were an attempt to "fraudulently access spectrum" by submitting defective and false documentation.

On its part, the Telenor group maintains that it did indeed conduct its requisite due diligence on licences processed, scrutinised, stamped and guaranteed by the Indian Government under the same policy that had been established for years. But what of the applications themselves?

Copies of such applications must have been made available to Telenor's lawyers and due diligence team with violations ranging from simple things such as the memorandum of association (MoA) describing real estate as its business rather than telecom. Authorised share capital was found short in every single application, in some cases, merely Rs.5.2 crore, against the requirement of Rs.128 crore.

False certificates of paid-up capital were submitted by company secretaries in several applications. In others, the failure to register alteration in the main object clause of the MoA by the Registrar of Companies was suppressed. It is hard to believe that Telenor, as a large investor, was unable to locate these flaws, despite its due diligence being restricted to examination of these basic documents alone unless it was blinded by the temptation of a sweetheart deal.

AVERAGE PERFORMANCE

Telenor's performance, once it took over, while better than the other entrants, has been average. It was allocated spectrum across most of its 22 circles between April 2008 and January 2009 and was obligated to rollout networks consistent with the licence conditions and rollout obligations cast upon the joint venture.

However, by 2010, the company had started violating rollout obligations in several of its circles. This was not Unitech's fault alone.

By now, Telenor was fully in control as a majority partner. In November 2010, TRAI recommended cancellation of eight of Uninor's licences for failure to rollout while severe financial penalties were imposed on the remaining 13 (it doesn't have spectrum for Delhi) due to a delayed rollout.

The TRAI's report shows that till November 2010, Telenor merely had 16 million subscribers with zero subscribers in eight of the circles where it had received spectrum.

When the cases to cancel licences were filed, Uninor barely had 2.2 per cent market share. Even today, Uninor's market share remains a mere 4.62 per cent. Surely, it can't blame either the government or its partner Unitech for its performance.

Telenor's entry strategy also failed to recognise that participation in the telecom game in India required a serious Indian partner with deep pockets, and not just someone who had wrangled a licence through what the CBI terms as a 'criminal conspiracy'.

It is no surprise that as things got tough, serious financial differences broke out between Unitech and Telenor. Telenor was committing investments of several thousand crore in its India operations even as the CBI was filing FIRs (October 2009) and public interest litigations (since April 2010) were being heard about the legality of the licences in the courts.

The Supreme Court, in March 2010, upheld the quashing of the press release that led to Uninor's licences. While Telenor keeps flagging its Rs.14,500-crore investment, under whose advice was it taking such massive risks with shareholders' money? The relationship between the two partners is at an all-time low. Board meetings are video-graphed, lawyers accompany both sides to discussions, one arbitration on valuation has already reached Singapore, while a second one on indemnification is rumoured to be on its way. Meanwhile, Uninor's enterprise valuation has plummeted to Rs.400 crore from its 2008 high of Rs.11,620 crore.

GRUMBLING OVER AUCTION

Over the last two months, Telenor has grumbled that cancellation of its licences before the auctions occurred or delaying the auctions would hurt its interest. The Supreme Court has granted that licence cancellation be co-terminus with the 2G auctions, which has been extended to August, giving the company more time to plan and acquire. This is exactly what Telenor wanted.

However, Telenor is now protesting against the reserve price and the quantum of spectrum placed on the block. Why does Telenor expect that in a bidding process, it should be guaranteed spectrum or should be offered a price that meets its business case as a new entrant?

India has seven existing operators and though new investment is critical, allocation of spectrum will have to ensure a fair market price while meeting the requirements of the most serious players. An auction process can never guarantee spectrum for any operator.

Even India's largest operators do not have pan-India 3G spectrum, despite the fact that over three slots were offered in most circles in the 3G auctions.

The guarantees and concessions that Telenor seeks in the face of its absence of due diligence, bad judgment, terrible choice of partner and average performance, where network rollouts are concerned, need to be considered carefully before any concessions are made.

COMBATIVE LITIGATION

Finally, it is unclear what Telenor was telling its shareholders in 2008, and what story it is spinning to them now. Business sense suggests little chance of success for a new entrant in a market which already has 800 million subscribers on the networks of its competitors, even if spectrum is given at half of the current reserve price determined by the TRAI. Unless, as the TRAI chairman points out, spectrum price is a small fraction of overall operational costs. If that is true, then does Telenor really have a case for a reduction in the reserve price?

Telenor's combative and litigant strategy has not paid off either. The company is fighting the government by invoking an international litigation under a bilateral treaty, fighting the court through a review petition and now the TRAI through an interim application. It is also unclear if filing a case against TRAI recommendations in the Supreme Court is savvy strategy considering that since TRAI's recommendations are not binding on the government, they do not provide Uninor any cause of action.

Maybe shareholders need to review Telenor's mistakes and fix responsibility before allowing the company to make further allegations of unfair treatment, threaten more court cases, or even a withdrawal from India. Last week, Telenor's Chairman Harald Norvik, who was the chairman during Telenor's India entry in 2008 announced his resignation after the Norwegian Government, which holds 54 per cent majority share in Telenor, withdrew support for his leadership over the sale of TV2, Norway's main commercial television channel. It is surprising that heads are rolling over the sale of a TV channel but not for flushing $3 billion down the drain by taking unprecedented risks in the Indian market.

Meanwhile, Telenor continues to maintain that it is blameless and that several representatives at the highest level of the Indian Government have also expressed that the Telenor Group is an innocent third party. While it would be an economic loss for India to lose Telenor, the company must acknowledge that it is misplaced to whine for special consideration given its own performance and the multiple red flags that it has ignored right from mid-2008 when it began its highly questionable due diligence process in India. The only real victims here are Telenor's unsuspecting minority shareholders and Uninor's employees.
The Hindu : Business News : Is Telenor more a sinner than sinned against?
 
Last edited:

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,307
May be they will play spoil sport in NSG. Need to watch the moves
 

Adux

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
4,022
Likes
1,707
Country flag
Telenor is a victim of Indian corruption and mis-governance.
To be honest, there could be a lot of truth in it. If anything Unitech should pay, not telnor. Our reputation should be reflected as investor friendly,
After all Unitech is real estate , what else do you expect.
 

drkrn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
2,455
Likes
902
in Telugu there is a proverb
"andite juttu andakapote kallu" literally means

" trying to hold their hair on head , when not possible then hold their feet"

now they are in first part
then will come second
 

drkrn

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
2,455
Likes
902
i really didn't like the wording the Norway govt used with us.our businessmen too had many problems in other countries.i think this year only Few of our people got arrested in China due to lack of knowledge about their rules..
we didn't cry foul and got all of them back in a diplomatic manner.
why does these people can't work that way. really bunch of idiots.
 

sob

Mod
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
6,425
Likes
3,805
Country flag
Telenor jumped in and bought the stake from Unitech at very low prices. They should have realised that such cheap valuations always have a hidden cost. In this case the people who did the due diligence for the company should be held accountable for the mess, or is it that the bosses at Telenor could not resist such a price that they were willing to overlook the irregularities in the tender.

At the end of the day they are not not babes in the wood , due they are seasoned businessmen and if they loose money it is due to their own greed.
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
There are two possbilities.

1) Telenor knew everything and went ahead.
2) Its Indian partner lied to it and screwed it.

I can think of one thing for Telenor, khaya piya kuch nahi, glass phora baarana (didnt eat or drink anything, broke the glass and paid 12 annas for it)
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,307
There is no way Telenor doesn't know about the under table deals. They are just trying to show innocence, whereas they just outsourced the money laundering to an Indian subsidiary. This is common method adopted.
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
It is common practise with under table deals in India. That is the way you do business there.

You cant demand bribes and fair competition at the same time. Telenor was just caught in the middle of it.

Blame the way you doing business in India. Telenor is after all a global company.
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
It is common practise with under table deals in India. That is the way you do business there.

You cant demand bribes and fair competition at the same time. Telenor was just caught in the middle of it.

Blame the way you doing business in India. Telenor is after all a global company.
Telenor was engaged in malpractice. It submitted fraudulent documents to meet the criteria. This company failed in its business plan by loosing billions, thats pretty inefficient for a global company. Read up before you speak.
 
Last edited:

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top