Compersion
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2013
- Messages
- 2,258
- Likes
- 923
Although the West would certainly balk at allowing a complete economic collapse in a country with the capacity to produce what some call the “Islamic bomb”, Pakistan's financial straits weaken its bargaining position.
Nevertheless there are signs of an agreement of sorts: Pakistan has been co-operative in negotiations in Geneva for a treaty to place controls on nuclear material, and America, for its part, has said it will not oppose new IMF financing. Members of the Muslim League, Pakistan's ruling party, whisper that the government has come round to the idea of signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, a key American demand. In July, the government gave itself room for manoeuvre by saying Pakistan would no longer mimic India on nuclear policy. But Mr Sharif may still run out of money or into political trouble before a deal can be hammered out. Moreover, worries about the nationalist outcry a deal would provoke may prompt Mr Sharif to procrastinate until the economic consequences of hanging back look even grimmer than the prospect of yet more angry mobs on the streets.
http://www.economist.com/node/161886
(A reminder of the darker days and continued dark days and chance for a new englightened path with clear demographics.)
I would prefer that we test in Arunchal Pradesh and also with a weapon configuration that is systematic to a MIRV designed structure and also to advanced nuclear test(s) along with advanced scientific research profile to confirm and validate and evolve our technical abilities. The average number of devices unsc permanent member has done is 40 ish. Also I don't believe our device and testing was a failure and people say such things only justify more testing but the reason for us testing is more reasonable and justifiable because of nearby actions and failures especially with what we had and world accepted of our temporary moratorium that no one would test after India (along with Pakistan with its special status). I have explained also where nearby country test for political survival and not only technological advancement but i feel our takeaway will be both. Someone said a political party can select and also remove a leader because of incomptence and unnecessary unstable illumination (not in democracies usually - and this is not meant for India but others that will have internal deliberations and squabbles of a India nuclear test - what was the input for the output it is clear and present and who to blame). Our next tests will obviously be higher technologies and more advanced perhaps even more sophisticated that is in the region. But its impact would be wise and a sign that the good and proper behavior has a voice in the region and world that can call a wrong a wrong and justify and do right. Its there on the plate for us to enjoy and wait for dessert later. We Indian love to have sweet dishes and they take time to make. And yep they do taste real yummy good when done rightly. Jai hind.
Nevertheless there are signs of an agreement of sorts: Pakistan has been co-operative in negotiations in Geneva for a treaty to place controls on nuclear material, and America, for its part, has said it will not oppose new IMF financing. Members of the Muslim League, Pakistan's ruling party, whisper that the government has come round to the idea of signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, a key American demand. In July, the government gave itself room for manoeuvre by saying Pakistan would no longer mimic India on nuclear policy. But Mr Sharif may still run out of money or into political trouble before a deal can be hammered out. Moreover, worries about the nationalist outcry a deal would provoke may prompt Mr Sharif to procrastinate until the economic consequences of hanging back look even grimmer than the prospect of yet more angry mobs on the streets.
http://www.economist.com/node/161886
(A reminder of the darker days and continued dark days and chance for a new englightened path with clear demographics.)
I would prefer that we test in Arunchal Pradesh and also with a weapon configuration that is systematic to a MIRV designed structure and also to advanced nuclear test(s) along with advanced scientific research profile to confirm and validate and evolve our technical abilities. The average number of devices unsc permanent member has done is 40 ish. Also I don't believe our device and testing was a failure and people say such things only justify more testing but the reason for us testing is more reasonable and justifiable because of nearby actions and failures especially with what we had and world accepted of our temporary moratorium that no one would test after India (along with Pakistan with its special status). I have explained also where nearby country test for political survival and not only technological advancement but i feel our takeaway will be both. Someone said a political party can select and also remove a leader because of incomptence and unnecessary unstable illumination (not in democracies usually - and this is not meant for India but others that will have internal deliberations and squabbles of a India nuclear test - what was the input for the output it is clear and present and who to blame). Our next tests will obviously be higher technologies and more advanced perhaps even more sophisticated that is in the region. But its impact would be wise and a sign that the good and proper behavior has a voice in the region and world that can call a wrong a wrong and justify and do right. Its there on the plate for us to enjoy and wait for dessert later. We Indian love to have sweet dishes and they take time to make. And yep they do taste real yummy good when done rightly. Jai hind.
Last edited: