North Korea (DPRK)- News and Discussions

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
If North Korea have reform and opening- up , I think it will be more better than know. And finally North adn South Korea will combine one.
But .......
Ssort your logic out!!!

N Korea is being suffocated under sanctions and embargo by the US led coalition. How can it open up? or reform? In that circumstances any radical change may lead to suicidal disruptions then probably floods of refugees (already so) into China. Don't forget there're US missiles and troops deployed in S.Korea!

What N Korea has been attempting is to use their nuke capability to force the US (and SKorea and Jpan) into negotiations for lifting of embargo and normalize deplomatic ties etc. as aa prerequisite.

By the way what China is requesting is denuclearification of whole Korea PENISULA, not N Korea alone!! China should stand with N Korea more than ever!
 
Last edited:

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
China arranging foreign investment deal for N.Korea: report
(AFP) – 2 days ago

SEOUL — China is arranging a huge foreign investment deal to revive North Korea's faltering economy amid an international drive to coax Pyongyang back to nuclear disarmament talks, a report said Monday.

Beijing is helping the communist state obtain more than 10 billion dollars in investment from Chinese banks and multinational firms, the South's Yonhap news agency said.

The deal was discussed a week ago when North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il met China's senior communist party official Wang Jiarui, it said.

A North Korean body known as the Korea Taepung International Investment Group plans to conclude the deal in March, Yonhap said, adding that Chinese capital would account for 60 percent of total investments.

Yonhap did not give any further details on what the investment plan would involve.

It said China was brokering the deal because North Korea is demanding economic aid from Beijing along with other incentives before returning to the six-party nuclear forum which the North quit last April.

A Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman declined to comment on the report. South Korean officials were not available for comment.

China appears to be using economic aid as leverage in negotiations with North Korea, Dongguk University professor Kim Yong-Hyun told AFP.

"China could provide humanitarian aid to help North Korea revive its economy before six-party talks resume," the professor said.

"However, any massive economic assistance or investments from China may come only after it gets strong commitment from Pyongyang about denuclearisation."

Chinese and North Korean nuclear negotiators held several days of talks in Beijing last week aimed at restarting the forum chaired by China since 2003.

Media reports said Pyongyang was sticking to its two conditions for coming back: a lifting of sanctions and a US commitment to discuss a formal peace treaty.

Washington, Seoul and Tokyo say the North must return unconditionally and show commitment to scrapping its nuclear programme before other issues are dealt with.

Tough United Nations sanctions brought by the North's pursuit of ballistic missiles and atomic weapons have hurt its economy, restricting the communist state's access to international credit.

The nation has relied on foreign aid to feed its people since it suffered a devastating famine in the 1990s.

In recent years the regime has tried to reassert state control over the economy by restricting private markets, which sprang up after the state food distribution system collapsed in the famine years.

Last November it decreed a currency revaluation to flush out private wealth but analysts said the move backfired disastrously, intensifying food shortages and fuelling inflation.

The North is relaxing some curbs on the markets because of mounting public anger, South Korea's spy agency has said.

Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved. More »
 

vinay535

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
43
Likes
6
what role does india see wrt n korea

this is my first post in defence forum
what i feel is whats role od india with respect to n korea , we all know n korea has been supplying missile tech to our neighbour in lieu of nuclear tech
how do you see future if india starts helping them and they instead stop collaborating with pakistan ?
 

ahmedsid

Top Gun
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Likes
252
this is my first post in defence forum
what i feel is whats role od india with respect to n korea , we all know n korea has been supplying missile tech to our neighbour in lieu of nuclear tech
how do you see future if india starts helping them and they instead stop collaborating with pakistan ?
Do make a Formal Introduction of yourself in the Members Intro section at the top of the forum. God Speed
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
Korean is a great people. Sincerely pray for N Korea to get bailed out of its difficulties

Will Kim Jong-il's China Visit Produce Any Useful Results?
Cheong Wa Dae has acknowledged signs that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il appears to be heading to China soon. Presidential spokeswoman Kim Eun-hye told reporters on Wednesday, "We believe there is a strong possibility of a visit to China by North Korean leader Kim Jong-il and are paying close attention." Kim may embark on his trip as early as today. It would be his first overseas visit since his stroke in August 2008.

The visit coincides with the emergency in South Korea following the mysterious sinking of a Navy corvette near the maritime border with North Korea. Although the exact cause remains unclear, North Korean involvement cannot be completely ruled out. The sinking of the vessel Cheonan must be factored into the circumstances surrounding Kim’s China visit.

Kim has visited China four times so far. He held a series of summits in Beijing in 2000 and 2004 on trips that lasted three days. During his second trip to China in 2001, Kim visited the economically booming Pudong area of Shanghai for six days and said the city had undergone "miraculous changes." During his fourth visit in January of 2006, Kim toured the Zhuhai and Shenzhen regions of Guangdong Province for nine days and is said to have been enchanted by China's economic liberalization policies. It seems likely that China recommended Kim tour the boomtowns as a broad hint that he should embrace liberalization in the North.

In July 2002, the year after his Shanghai visit, Kim implemented timid economic reforms and designated a special economic zone in Sinuiju, but the efforts flopped. The reason was a lack of understanding of China's bold liberalization and fears that such market-opening steps may weaken Kim's grip on power. Instead, the North Korean leader ended up isolating his country further from the international community and exacerbating its economic situation by conducting two nuclear tests.

At present, Kim faces an angry public following a botched currency revaluation and an acute food shortage compounded by a moribund economy. There is a strong possibility that the North Korean leader may beg for more aid from China, while South Korea and the U.S. are hoping that Beijing will secure a pledge from Kim to return to the stalled six-country nuclear talks. But if Kim's visit results in merely a pledge to return to the talks in return for yet more money from China, it will make no difference to the tense situation on the Korean peninsula.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Buddhists give North Korea food for thought



Inspiration comes easily to South Korea’s Buddhist abbots.

The Venerable Bop Ta decided in the late 1990s he should build noodle factories in North Korea, and not just because of starvation in the secular dictatorship. The factories could increase the role of Buddhism in inter-Korean rapprochement, clawing back ground from tenacious South Korean Protestant missionaries, who are eagerly seeking North Korean converts.

Religion is officially banned in North Korea and anyone who believes in any religion must practise in the utmost secrecy.

“I felt very uncomfortable the Protestants had set up so many North-South links, laying ground for unification. Buddhism has been a Korean religion for 1,500 years, while Protestantism has only been around for just over a century,” said the portly abbot, wearing the grey robes of the Jogye order.

South Korean Protestants, 18 per cent of the population, have put North Korea high on the agenda of their rich and politically influential churches, funding clandestine evangelical networks on the Chinese border. South Korean missionaries are famed for braving trouble spots and two were executed in Afghanistan in 2007.

Bop Ta, one of South Korea’s leading abbots, disapproved of such evangelists, who sometimes send North Korean converts back home to risk death as missionaries, depicted in state propaganda as child killers.

“Seducing people into defection is a business for Protestant missionaries but ultimately causes more conflict between North and South. It won’t undermine the regime. The families left behind by defectors suffer terribly,” he said in his office in Seoul. “The motivation for the noodle factory was that ideology should not matter. People just needed food.”

Anthropologists have said North Korean defectors, disillusioned with the personality cult dedicated to the founder of the nation, Kim Il-sung, yearn to fill the void with another faith. Jesus is beating Buddha.

“The difference when it comes to Christians and Buddhists approaching North Koreans is that the Christians are much more active and aggressive,” said Yoon Yeo-sang, president of a group collating data on North Korean human rights.

Bop Ta’s noodles form only one strand of Buddhist moves to make sure Christians do not monopolise the struggle for North Korea’s soul after unification. Buddhist monks are helping restore temples; only 60 of North Korea’s 500 shrines survived the 1950-1953 Korean war. The Venerable Jaseung, South Korea’s senior abbot, visited North Korea last year to arrange pilgrimages by thousands of South Korean Buddhists but Seoul, which has icy relations with Pyongyang after last year’s tests of an atomic warhead and long-range missile, vetoed them.

Bop Ta now runs two factories in North Korea, one in Pyongyang and one in Sariwon, a city 56km to the south. Sariwon has a strong Buddhist pedigree and is known across the peninsula for a song set there, “Night at Songbul temple”. Employing 70 staff, the factories import ingredients from South Korea before giving the noodles away.

During the “sunshine policy” of South Korea’s two previous leftwing presidents, Bop Ta sent 60 tonnes of ground wheat a month, feeding 7,700 people. Under President Lee Myung-bak, a conservative who is cooler towards North Korea, that has dropped to 20 to 30 tonnes every two months. The missile test also reduced donations.

Bop Ta has visited North Korea almost 100 times, sometimes checking the recipients of handouts. Still, he admits he must largely trust the noodles are given to the needy and not to the military.

Bop Ta raises funds through a Buddhist charity, registered with South Korea’s unification ministry. Like many Buddhists, he has a prickly relationship with the government of Mr Lee, a Presbyterian accused of sidelining the country’s 23 per cent Buddhist population.

Suspicion of Bop Ta runs deep among conservatives. An activist against military dictatorship, he was arrested in the early 1990s for showing excessive sympathy for North Korea. More recently, the abbot was fined – he claims unfairly – over a construction contract.

Still, Mr Lee recently has called for better relations with the Buddhists.

Although North Koreans are unaware Bop Ta’s “Keumgang Noodles” hail from a Buddhist charity, South Korea’s Buddhists are also promoting cultural exchanges to bolster the old faith. While Christians were persecuted brutally under communism, Bop Ta said North Korean attitudes towards Buddhism were more ambivalent, with some 10,000 people (out of 24m) practising some kind of Buddhist rites.

“Buddhism is regarded as a patriotic institution in North Korea, associated with the nationalist movement and fighting Japanese colonial rule,” he said, but added temples were often tourist sites.

North Korean Buddhism is waning. Hwang Jang-yop, a former senior communist official and North Korea’s most high-profile defector, says the monks at temples there are “fakes”. Bop Ta said North Korea’s outlawing of Chinese script prevented proper study of ancient texts and that monks also defy tradition by marrying.

The Catholic Church has also responded to the challenge of Protestants dominating the landscape after unification, training priests to specialise in the North from Seoul.

Hwang Soon-il, a professor of Buddhist studies at Seoul’s Dongguk university, conceded Buddhists had not mobilised quickly on North Korea but argued Seoul’s cool relations with Pyongyang could not excuse inaction.

“If the government cannot do anything about it, we – the Buddhists – should.”
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
South Korean Protestants, 18 per cent of the population, have put North Korea high on the agenda of their rich and politically influential churches, funding clandestine evangelical networks on the Chinese border.
Churches networks /NGO help those defectors /refugees to escape from NK and seek asylum with assistance of a huge Korean community ranging from NE China to Beijing and Shangdong... even routing as far as Mongolia, Philipines, and Vietnam to reach SK finally.
 
Last edited:

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
China brings Kim's secret visit into open

BEIJING: The curious drama surrounding North Korean leader Kim Jong-il's secret visit to China took a new turn as the official media released photographs showing him raising a toast with Chinese president Hu Jintao in Beijing.

But there were different reports on whether he has promised to start dismantling nuclear weapons in line with promises made at the six-party talks involving US.

Xinhua, the Chinese official news agency, quoted Kim as telling the Chinese president that the Democratic
People's Republic of Korea was keen to work towards "denuclearizing on the Korean Peninsula". The two leaders said that the peace, stability, prosperity on the Korean Peninsula is in line with common interests of China, the DPRK and the Northeast Asian countries, Xinhua said.

But there was no confirmation about this statement from North Korea's KCNA news agency.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ecret-visit-into-open/articleshow/5908268.cms
 

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
N Korea increased underwater military training in 2009: Report

Washington: North Korea has increased the number of underwater practices by a special unit of its military four times in 2009 from the previous year, according to US and South Korean intelligence agencies.

The South Korean government might refer to the finding as part of circumstantial evidence indicating North Korea's involvement in the sinking of the South Korean warship in March 26 when Seoul makes an announcement on the results of its investigation into the incident, the sources said yesterday.

The announcement is expected to be made around Thursday.

The intelligence agencies have also found that North Korea has purchased underwater radio communications equipment, believed to be for use by the special military unit, from China and Russia in 2009, the sources said.

There is also information that a North Korean military commander was promoted after the March 26 incident in the Yellow Sea.

Following an unexplained explosion near the maritime border between the two Koreas, the 1,200-tonne corvette Cheonan patrol ship was split in half and sank, killing 46 sailors.

The South Korean government has not obtained evidence that clearly shows Pyongyang's involvement, but suspicions are growing that a North Korean torpedo attack sank the ship.

North Korea has strongly denied involvement in the incident.

http://www.zeenews.com/news627313.html
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Ignore North Korea, offer Beijing a choice

Posted By William Tobey Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - 5:44 PM Share

For too long, Beijing has coddled, excused, shielded, subsidized, and appeased the indefensible -- Kim Jong-Il's nightmarish regime in North Korea.

China is the key to solving the Korean quandary. The Middle Kingdom is North Korea's largest trade partner, most generous aid donor, and only real friend. Without help from China, North Korea is not viable -- if such an impoverished and benighted nation can be said to be so. In what should be an embarrassment to modern business and political leaders in Beijing, relations between China and North Korea are still conducted by their recondite and fossilized Communist Parties.

Again, the North has crossed the line of civilized behavior -- if indeed it has ever resided on the proper side of that boundary -- by torpedoing a South Korean ship and killing 46 sailors. This is not new behavior. In October 1983, North Korean agents attempted to blow up South Korean President Chun Doo-Hwan during a wreath-laying ceremony in Burma. The attempt failed, but killed 21 people, including several of Chun's cabinet. In the 1970s and 1980s, North Korea kidnapped dozens, if not hundreds of Japanese and South Korean citizens, ripping them from their families to exploit them for their knowledge of the outside world. In the 1990s, Pyongyang's policies of meeting military needs first and autarky starved more than 1 million North Koreans. Later, North Korea exported nuclear weapons material and technology to Libya and Syria.

In response to the North's latest atrocity, Chinese Premier Dai Bingguo toured Northeast Asia, urging restraint and maintaining studied neutrality between the aggressor and the aggrieved. Surely, this is a prelude to asking the United States, Japan, and South Korea to make further concessions to Pyongyang. At the same time, North Korea seems to be implementing plans for Kim Jong-Eun to succeed his father, perhaps after a period of regency. Undoubtedly, Pyongyang consulted its Chinese patrons on this plan. But rather than perpetuating this monstrous dynasty, Beijing should seize the opportunity for change.

For nearly a decade, the United States has attempted to invest Beijing with a sense of responsibility for solving the North Korea problem. As the country with the most at stake and the most influence over the issue, China should take the lead. While hosting the Six Party Talks on denuclearizing North Korea, China has graciously provided hundreds of lunches to diplomats, but utterly failed to take any of the tough actions necessary to bring about real change in North Korea.

Beijing fears instability, and rightly so. Military confrontations, refugee flows, and political turmoil are all to be avoided. But it is time China made a choice between a failed and cruel regime, and a modern, peaceful, and prosperous Korean Peninsula. The United States can stipulate that democratic reunification of Korea would diminish the need for U.S. ground forces -- and certainly not motivate any movement of U.S. troops toward China's border with Korea. It would also lessen imperatives for regional missile defenses and closer U.S. alliances with South Korea and Japan -- providing strategic reassurance to Beijing. Advance planning and coordination on refugee flows, economic dislocations, nuclear proliferation, and security issues would mitigate the dangers of instability.

On the other hand, if China continues abet North Korea, if it refuses to use its influence in productive ways, it should expect no further help in the form of international ransom payments to Pyongyang. If Beijing seeks to block effective action by other nations -- as it can do by wielding its veto as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council -- responding to North Korea's demands should become Beijing's problem exclusively.

The United States and our allies should then band closer together to contain North Korea militarily -- as we have since the end of the Korean War -- and to defeat and deter Pyongyang's efforts at nuclear and missile proliferation. We should bring maximum pressure on the North attacking its illicit activities, which range from counterfeiting Marlboro cigarettes, Viagra, and U.S. $100 bills, to drug smuggling and gun running. We should remorselessly hunt down and confiscate Kim Jong-Il's personal overseas bank accounts, funded by his despotic and criminal activities. In short, China should know that we will no longer dance to the tune played so long by Pyongyang: create an international crisis, use that crisis to extract economic and political concessions, and apply those concessions to prop up a bankrupt system.

China is a great power, and still rising. It is already an economic colossus. Its people enjoy greater prosperity than ever before because far-sighted leaders accorded them sufficient freedom to succeed. But if China is to fulfill its enormous promise, Beijing must recognize that its interests no longer lay with the squalid and barbarous dictator ruling a country whose entire GDP and is about equal to China Telecom's revenues.

The United States must help China to choose between the promise of its future and the worst continuing manifestation of its Communist past. If we do so, the choice for Beijing should be easy.

William H. Tobey is a senior fellow at Harvard Kennedy School's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Previously, he was Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation at the National Nuclear Security Administration.
 

Parashuram1

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
57
Likes
0
From the perspective that I see, DPRK's dangerously fragile population is due to the result of a tyrannical regime of which escaped Koreans speak about. The point of Sanctions is not to undermine the Korean people but instead get rid of the tyrannical regime that oppresses N. Koreans. From the infamous camp 22 to the starvation of Koreans there, Kim Jong has shown the world his villainy against his own kind. The condition of thousands of starving N. Koreans and the influx of refugees to China, S. Korea and Japan itself shows the dangerous situation of Kim's rule.


I wonder how can Chinese be empathetic to Kim's government when they should be standing alongside the people of DPRK rather than the tyrant of a government. After all, Communism stands for the people, isn't it?
 

Patriot

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,761
Likes
544
Country flag
N.Korea warns accident during exercise could start war

by Staff Writers
Seoul (AFP) June 30, 2010
North Korea warned Tuesday that any accidental clash during an upcoming US-South Korea
naval exercise could spark war, as tensions remained high over the sinking of a South Korean warship.

Minju Josun, the cabinet's official daily, accused the South and its US ally of "fabricating" facts about the sinking to incite a war against the communist state.

"It is as clear as day that a small accident that might occur during the joint military exercise would easily spread to an armed clash and eventually, to an all-out war," it said, slamming the planned drill as provocative and dangerous.

The United States and South Korea are planning a special naval exercise as a show of strength in response to the sinking, which they blame on the North. No dates have been announced.

"If the US imperialists, gripped by their pipe dream of invading the North, ignite a new war on the Korean peninsula, our military and the people will wipe out not only the invaders but their strongholds as well and achieve a final triumph," the daily said.

Beijing last week expressed concern at the planned joint exercise, which reportedly will include a nuclear-powered US aircraft carrier battle group in close proximity to China's territorial waters.

China will start six days of live-fire military exercises off its east coast later this week, state press reported Tuesday.

South Korea, citing the findings of a multinational investigation, last month accused its neighbour of sinking the Cheonan corvette near the disputed border in March with the loss of 46 lives.

The South announced its own reprisals and also wants the United Nations Security Council to censure the North. The North has denied involvement and threatened a military response to any UN action.

On Monday it vowed to strengthen its nuclear weaponry in an unspecified "newly developed way" in the face of what it termed US hostility.

The same day Pyongyang's military accused the United States of bringing unspecified heavy weapons into the border truce village of Panmunjom.

It warned of "strong military countermeasures" at the village, a top tourist attraction for visitors from the South, unless they are withdrawn.

The US-led United Nations Command Tuesday denied any heavy weapons had been introduced and said it continues to abide by the armistice agreement that ended the 1950-53 war.

China has not backed any UN condemnation of the North and has not publicly accused its ally of being behind the warship sinking.

US President Barack Obama, in weekend comments at a G20 meeting in Canada, accused China of turning a blind eye to its ally's actions -- a claim rejected by Beijing.

"We don't favour either side and we decide our position on the merits of the issue. China's position and efforts on this issue brook no accusations," foreign ministry spokesman Qin Gang said Tuesday when asked about Obama's comments.

"We don't do anything to fan the flames."

Pyongyang on Tuesday hit back at a communique issued last week by the G8, a grouping of rich countries that does not include China, in which leaders called for "appropriate measures to be taken against those reponsible for the attack" on the warship.

In a statement carried by the official Korean Central News Agency, a North Korean spokesman said the G8 was "heading for a cemetery of history as it has been reduced to an evil group blindly conniving and defending its allies, far from taking principle and truth as a standard."

South Korea based its case against the North partly on a section of torpedo salvaged from the bed of the Yellow Sea, where the warship went down. Investigators said this matched blueprints of North Korean torpedoes.

But military investigators quoted by Yonhap news agency admitted Tuesday they mistakenly showed the wrong blueprint at a nationally televised news conference last month.

They were quoted as saying that the blueprint shown at the news conference was of a PT-97W torpedo, not the CHT-02D midget torpedo that sank the Cheonan.

The investigators called the incident a "mistake by a working-level staff member".

The South meanwhile marked the anniversary of a 2002 naval clash near the Yellow Sea border, paying tribute to six of its sailors who died. An estimated 13 North Koreans were killed.

At a ceremony Prime Minister Chung Un-Chan also demanded that the North apologise for the sinking of the Cheonan.




http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/NKorea_warns_accident_during_exercise_could_start_war_999.html
 

Patriot

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,761
Likes
544
Country flag
N Korea inching close towards nuke weapons: reportWASHINGTON (AP): North Korea may be moving ahead with a programme to enrich uranium to make nuclear weapons, according to a report by the Institute for Science and International Security.

Pyongyang "has moved beyond laboratory-scale work" and is now capable of building "at the very least, a pilot-scale" plant of centrifuges to enrich uranium, said the report based partly on information about related equipment purchases that North Korea has made from other nations.



The centrifuge programme "is an avenue for North Korea to increase the number and sophistication of its nuclear weapons and for it to proliferate to others who seek to build their own centrifuge programmes," said authors David Albright and Paul Brannan.

"As a result, the priority is finding ways to either stop the programme or to delay its progress through a combination of negotiations and sanctions."

The report is just the latest warning about Pyongyang's broader nuclear programme.

The institute already said this week that satellite images from September 29 showed new construction in the area around North Korea's nuclear reactor at Yongbyon, where the reclusive regime produced plutonium. And Kim Tae-hyo, the South Korean president's deputy national security adviser, warned in comments this week that the threat posed by the North's nuclear program has reached an "extremely dangerous level."

North Korea frequently buys equipment for its uranium enrichment programme either directly in China or by using China as a transshipment point, Friday's report said.

"There is no evidence that the Chinese government is secretly approving or wilfully ignoring exports to North Korea's centrifuge programme in an effort to strengthen North Korea's nuclear weapons programme," the report said.

"Nonetheless, China is not applying enough resources to detect and stop North Korea's illicit nuclear trade."






N Korea | Brahmand.com
 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
North Korea, the most reprehensible regime in the world, worse than the Nazis and the Imperial Japanese who commanded Unit 731 combined. Any attempts to defend such an abomination can only come from those who have lost all and any humanity, assuming they had any to begin with. However, blaming Chinese alone for supporting a psychotic despot would be meaningless as in these days of geo-strategic interests humanity is the first to be sacrificed.

China does not care for the Choseon people, there only concern is that if DPRK collapses and is absorbed into the expanded RoK, it would place a progressive liberal democracy on their borders aligned with US and with the potential to emerge as a formidable economic rival in years to come. Now the mainlanders cannot allow that can they? So the Choseons can starve to death, rot in gulags and wail in despair for all they care.
 

Patriot

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,761
Likes
544
Country flag
NKorea blasts naval drill as 'declaration of war'

SEOUL (AFP): North Korea on Saturday blasted South Korea for hosting a multi-national naval drill aimed at preventing the transfer of weapons of mass destruction, calling it an "open declaration of war".

South Korea for the first time played a full part in the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) on Thursday, with warships and aircraft from four countries staging an exercise off the southern port of Busan.

The reclusive North, where leader Kim Jong-Il is paving the way for his son Kim Jong-Un to succeed him, is nuclear-armed.

"This is an outright military provocation and an open declaration of war against us," the official daily of the North's government said in a commentary, according to Pyongyang's Korean Central News Agency.

In a separate commentary the North's ruling communist party's official daily, Rodong Sinmun, said the country would build up its armed forces 1,000-fold should the United States continue its military threat against it.

The North already has one of the largest standing armies in the world.

The South says the drill does not target specific countries.

About 10 warships and aircraft from South Korea, the United States, Japan and Australia took part in the one-day manoeuvres.

"A naval blockade, which can be seen only during wartime, must not be tolerated," it said, adding the exercise was aimed at "seizing, inspecting and searching our ships and blockading our ports."

"Illegal provocative acts such as the PSI would bring nothing but military conflicts and worse inter-Korean relations," it warned.

South Korea was previously only an observer in the initiative for fear of offending its communist neighbour.

After the North's second nuclear test in May last year, it said it would become a full member.

Seoul announced it would host the latest exercise after accusing Pyongyang of torpedoing one of its warships in March and killing 46 sailors.

The North denies carrying out the attack.




http://www.brahmand.com/news/NKorea-blasts-naval-drill-as-declaration-of-war/5192/1/10.html
 

Patriot

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,761
Likes
544
Country flag
Stepping Up Over N. Korea and WMD

Seoul's move to fully join the Proliferation Security Initiative is welcome. But it's China that really needs to be on board.


'An outright military provocation and an open declaration of war against us.' That, at least, is how North Korea's state-controlled media saw last week's Proliferation Security Initiative military exercise between Australia, Japan, South Korea and the United States.

Pyongyang has made no secret of its disdain for the initiative, especially with South Korea hosting the exercises for the first time on October 13-14 off the south-eastern port of Busan. Seoul's decision to host the exercises, this time dubbed Eastern Endeavor 10, was announced in May after its investigators concluded that North Korea had torpedoed the Cheonan warship two months earlier, killing dozens of sailors. Pyongyang has, of course, denied having done any such thing, but South Korea's position is backed by the other three participants in last week's activities.

The PSI is a voluntary multinational coalition, and was established to tackle the illegal transfer of all weapons of mass destruction (WMD), their means of delivery (e.g. ballistic missiles) and related issues. The four states participating last week are among its strongest advocates, but there's been broad support for it around Asia. Singapore and New Zealand, for example, have both joined in previous military exercises, while India, Indonesia and Malaysia have said they support the PSI's general principles, but haven't joined the PSI as formal participants due to legal and other considerations. Even landlocked Mongolia signed a ship boarding agreement with the United States in 2007. (Although Mongolia is by no means a major maritime power, its commitment signals its government's interest in deepening security ties with Washington to balance its more powerful neighbours).

Yet while the initiative has been broadly popular in the region (and has given South Korea's allies an opportunity to show some solidarity in the wake of the Cheonan incident) it has left some regional powers cold.



The North Koreans, needless to say, hate the PSI because they've been its main target. However, China also opposes the PSI, partly because it annoys their North Korean neighbour, but also because Chinese entities themselves are often accused of exporting proliferation-sensitive technologies to countries whose governments have aspirations to acquiring WMD.

Self-Defeating

What was perhaps most interesting about the latest exercise was that it saw Japan's Maritime Self-Defense Force and the South Korean Navy simulate their first joint interception so close to their home waters (their previous involvement in multinational exercises has been in the RIMPAC series, held off the coast of Hawaii).

Clearly it has been lost on the North Koreans that their aggressive behavior has helped promote unprecedented military cooperation between Japan and South Korea (and led them to set aside, for now at least, longstanding historical tensions and persistent territorial disputes). And state media outlets appear to have compounded the problem by threatening all manner of horrors on their neighbour. The Minju Joson, the official daily paper of the North Korean government, blasted the drills as a 'naval blockade' and its host as a 'puppet regime (that has) revealed its criminal plot to ruin the hard-won atmosphere for dialogue and peace and to drive inter-Korean ties to the edge of a war by hosting the PSI.'

North Korea's Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of Korea for its part termed the exercise a 'declaration of an all-out confrontation against the DPRK' and 'an extremely dangerous act of pushing the inter-Korean relations to the brink of war.' The Committee went on to warn that if the aggressors achieve 'their ambition of invading the DPRK in utter disregard of dialogue, inter-Korean relations and peace,' North Korea would 'wipe them out to the last man and blow up their strongholds.' Rodong Sinmun, the official daily of the North Korean ruling communist party, chimed in warning that Pyongyang would increase its armed forces a thousand-fold to counter these US military threats.

But for all Minju Joson's bluster about how last week's exercise was designed for 'seizing, inspecting and searching our ships and blockading our ports,' most PSI-related activities involve sharing intelligence regarding possible WMD-related shipments, collaboration on detecting financial transactions for WMD-related sales and decisions to deny export or transit rights for suspect illicit WMD materials.

The reasons why Pyongyang is concerned were underscored by the fact that it was actually a North Korean ship that helped give birth to the PSI. In December 2002, the US and Spanish governments cooperated to intercept the So San, a merchant vessel sailing under the North Korean flag but not registered there, in international waters in the Mediterranean. Although Spanish Special Forces found short-range ballistic missiles and conventional missile warheads after they forcibly boarded the ship, they had to release the vessel two days later when the Yemeni government declared it had purchased the weapons.

In fact, it wasn't illegal at that time to transfer short-range ballistic missiles (an oversight that has since been corrected by UN Security Council resolutions, which now explicitly enjoin Pyongyang from engaging in WMD and missile-related sales), but the original legal complications prompted the George W. Bush administration to launch the PSI as a way of encouraging maximum cooperation against WMD-related transfers.


But despite international concerns about North Korea's WMD ambitions, the South Korean government under President Roh Moo-hyun restricted its role within PSI to that of an observer and opposed US lobbying over PSI as it sought to improve ties with Pyongyang through engagement and reassurance. US lobbying efforts were redoubled after North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in October 2006 and resumed test launching long-range ballistic missiles that year.

It's clear that whatever the personal tensions between Roh and Bush, the main South Korean concern was to avoid confronting its neighbour over maritime security issues, and the country seemed willing to accept what were up until a few years ago quite routine armed clashes with North Korea. The Cheonan incident was, though, a step too far, because it suggested that even if Seoul kept its distance from the PSI, its vessels could still be in harm's way.

Yet although the sinking of the Cheonan was enough to persuade Seoul to reluctantly join the PSI as a full member, Beijing still opposes the initiative. Chinese officials have indicated they believe that the PSI could violate international law and national sovereignty and they also share South Korean worries that harassing North Korean shipping could prove counterproductive in efforts to persuade Pyongyang to rejoin the Six-Party denuclearization talks. In fact, while Washington was lobbying Seoul to participate fully in the PSI, Beijing was campaigning for South Korea to stay out.

Ultimately, as useful as South Korea's full support is for the PSI, China's opposition still leaves a serious problem in constraining WMD-related transfers from North Korea. The strenuous efforts made by Kim Jong-Il to secure Beijing's endorsement of his son, Kim Jong-un, as his successor show just how much sway China still has over Pyongyang's policies—more than any other country. Yet it's believed that PSI-restricted exports may still be leaving North Korea via Chinese territory, which lies between North Korea and the Middle East states (such as Iran and Syria) thought to be most eager to acquire WMD and missile technologies.

All this means that although the Barack Obama administration has been right to set aside the fact that this initiative was undertaken by the Bush administration by continuing support for the PSI, this just won't be enough. While the successful lobbying of South Korea to come fully onboard is welcome, it's important that the US administration also lobby China to comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions and limit North Korea's WMD-related exports.

Formally joining the PSI might be a step too far for Beijing, but there's still plenty it can do short of this to deny South Korea's belligerent neighbour the chance to act on the threats it routinely issues.







http://the-diplomat.com/2010/10/18/stepping-up-over-n-korea-and-wmd/
 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
The Forbidden railway: Vienna- Pyongyang

OUR STORY


In september 2008 a friend of mine and I made a trip to the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, better known as North Korea.

Not only that North Korea is quite an unusual touristic destination, the route to North Korea was even more unusual – I travelled the whole way from Vienna (Austria) to Pyongyang by train via Slovakia, Ukraine and Russia (my friend, he is from Switzerland, only joined me in Irkutsk). And we used a route into North Korea, which is said to be impossible for tourists:
We entered North Korea from Russia via the border at Hasan/Tumangan, whereas usually tourists can only use the railway line from the Chinese-Korean border at Dandong/Sinuiju to Pyongyang.
This route was open for tourist traffic only untill about 1994. It's likely that we were the first tourists who travelled this line since then.

Our trip was an experiment, we just wanted to try this route. Long planning and debates whether we should really try it or not preceeded the trip.

The state North Korean tourist company KITC did not know in advance about our route. And we did not know what would really happen to us after arrival at Tumangan.

But finally everything went well.


The highlights:


* We went 860 km by train across whole North Korea, from the most North-Eastern point till Pyongyang.

* We passed through regions, which are usually not accessible for tourists.

* We spent about 36 hours on North Korean territory without a guide.

* We walked around freely at Tumangan station, North Korean border station to Russia

detailed travelogue....
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top