No links with Samjhauta bomber: Aseemanand

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,307
No links with Samjhauta bomber: Aseemanand

Panchkula: Swami Aseemanand, under arrest in connection with right-wing terror acts, on Wednesday denied any links with Kamal Chauhan, the alleged Samjhauta Express bomb planter.

Aseemanand denied knowing Chauhan when he was produced before the court today. "I don't know him"¦it is a conspiracy by the agency (NIA)," he told mediapersons while being escorted out of the court.

As per the NIA, Kamal Chauhan, a disgruntled RSS worker, had planted bombs on Samjhauta Express in 2007 that left 68 people, mostly Pakistanis. He was produced in the court on Feb 14 and was sent in NIA's custody till Feb 24.

"Yes, I have done it on my will," Chauhan had said.

After a four-year probe, the NIA had on June 20, 2011, charged Aseemanand, Sunil Joshi (now dead), Lokesh Sharma, Dange alias Parmanand and Kalasangra for hatching a criminal conspiracy which resulted in blasts in Samjhauta Express near Deewana railway station in Haryana's Panipat district, about 80 km from Delhi.

According to the NIA, the conspiracy involved six persons: Lokesh Sharma who planted the bombs in the train along with Chauhan; mastermind Sunil Joshi, who was murdered in December 2007; Aseemanand, the financier and ideologue; and Sandeep Dange, a close associate of Joshi, who along with Ramchandra Kalsangre had procured the raw material and made the bombs. Dange and Kalsangre are still at large.

NIA is also investigating the role of Sadhvi Pragya Thakur and Indresh Kumar in the blasts.

Swami Aseemanand and Sharma are already in judicial custody.

Apart from Ajmer Dargah blast, which claimed three lives and left 15 others injured, Aseemanand and Sharma are accused in several other blast cases across the country, including those at Hyderabad's Mecca Masjid and Malegaon.

One of the main accused in the case, Swami Aseemanand, alias Naba Kumar Sarkar, had confessed to his role in the attack after his arrest by the CBI in November 2010, but later retracted his statement, saying it was made under duress.
 

Galaxy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
7,086
Likes
3,934
Country flag
These people are kept under detention since 5 years on mere suspect. May be, They all will be proved innocent or maybe Government will prove that they are culprit in order to prove their point.

It's all Congress Vote bank Politics. The word "Saffron/Hindu Terror" are all created by Paid media and Congress.

Government is doing all these deliberately for some vested interest. But Time will change.....
 
Last edited:

arya

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
3,006
Likes
1,531
Country flag
how can he be innocent congress need muslim votes they need some one show that hindus are also terrorism while they treat ajmal as an national guest

well probelm with that we are confused that we are living in india, bhart or hindustan and majority peoples are victim of congress vote bank ploicy
 

balai_c

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
420
Likes
462
Sadhwi pragya (arrested for the same malegaon blast case) has been said to undergo 14 narko tests. Right now she is a cancer patient. Strangely enough, after the malegaon blast, not a single event has been blamed to the alleged " hindu terrorists". Food for thought!
 

sesha_maruthi27

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
3,963
Likes
1,803
Country flag
Aseemanda was tortured by the police and the CBI for the past 5 years and now the make him to agree that he was involved in the act of terror. All the INDIANS and THE HINDUS are suffering because of these christian rulers. The ISLAM MUGHALS ruled us for over 200 years and then these christians came in and are still ruling us and are indicting our own people as terrorists by provoking us to fight our MUSLIM BROTHERS. Shame on them to call themselves as CHRISTIANS. LORD JESUS never said to convert people into CHRISTIANITY, nor he said to raise a RELIGION IN THE NAME OF CHRISTIANITY. These fools are not CHRISTIANS, instead they are ANTI-CHRIST, but they call others as ANTI-CHRIST.
 

sesha_maruthi27

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
3,963
Likes
1,803
Country flag
and they ask why we hate cons...????:facepalm::facepalm:

Hatred is in their blood boss. First they kill lord jesus by themselves and then they say that they are the real christians. The romans were the people who crussified jesus and now they say that they are roman catholics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Hatred is in their blood boss. First they kill lord jesus by themselves and then they say that they are the real christians. The romans were the people who crussified jesus and now they say that they are roman catholics.
Dont give them more :bs: to talk about... They will say that they have realized their sins:rofl::rofl: and now they want us to realize our sins(whatever fu(k that is:toilet::toilet:) by accepting Christianity.... Do you really want that????:lol::lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Vyom

Seeker
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
1,041
Likes
329
Hatred is in their blood boss. First they kill lord jesus by themselves and then they say that they are the real christians. The romans were the people who crussified jesus and now they say that they are roman catholics.
Please don't generalize and paint everyone with the same brush. That is uncalled for.
 

balai_c

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
420
Likes
462
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamitic

Hamitic is an historical term for the peoples supposedly descended from Noah's son Ham, paralleling Semitic and Japhetic. It was formerly used for grouping the non-Semitic Afroasiatic languages (which for this reason were described as "Hamito-Semitic"), but since, unlike the Semitic branch, these have not been shown to form a phylogenetic unity, the term is obsolete in this sense.

In the 19th century, as an application of scientific racism, the "Hamitic race" became a sub-group of the Caucasian race, alongside the Semitic race, grouping the non-Semitic populations native to North Africa, the Horn of Africa and South Arabia, including the Ancient Egyptians. The Hamitic theory suggested that this "Hamite race" was superior to or more advanced than Negroid populations of Sub-Saharan Africa. In its most extreme form, in the writings of C. G. Seligman, it asserted that all significant achievements in African history were the work of "Hamites" who migrated into central Africa as pastoralists, bringing technologies and civilizing skills with them. Theoretical models of Hamitic languages and of Hamitic races were interlinked in the early twentieth century.

........................................ .......................................................
........................................ .......................................................

Curse of Ham
Further information: Curse of Ham

The term Hamitic originally referred to the peoples believed to have been descended from the biblical Ham, one of the Sons of Noah. When Ham dishonors his father, Noah pronounces a curse on him, stating that the descendents of his son Canaan will be "servants of servants". Of Ham's four sons, Canaan fathered the Canaanites, while Mizraim fathered the Egyptians, Cush the Cushites, and Phut the Libyans.[1]

During the Middle Ages, this was interpreted to define Ham as the ancestor of all Africans. The curse was regularly interpreted as having created visible racial characteristics in Ham's offspring, notably black skin. According to Edith Sanders, the sixth-century Babylonian Talmud states that "the descendants of Ham are cursed by being Black and depicts Ham as a sinful man and his progeny as degenerates."[2] Both Arab and later European and American slave traders used this story to justify African slavery.
 
Last edited:

sesha_maruthi27

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
3,963
Likes
1,803
Country flag
Please don't generalize and paint everyone with the same brush. That is uncalled for.
It is true that ROMANS are the one s who killed LORD JESUS and now they call themselves as CHRISTIANS...........
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top