"No first use" to " No first use against non nuclear states only "

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
A policy shift on the crucial nuclear strike , second strike and other capabilities , could be an official reality soon.

If you have more information with links on this and its significance do share .

The statement and aim of the thread is confirmed by official policy doctrine coming soon , and dont forget where you read this first .

:- credible news sources.Defence Forum India
 

trackwhack

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2011
Messages
3,757
Likes
2,590
sonofa.....

long time coming.

Ideally, it should be

No Use against Non-Nuclear states.

covers everything
 
Last edited:

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
During the October 10-14 Senior Commanders' Conference, top army commanders discussed the "restructuring of pivot and strike corps" and theatre-based "combat support and combat service support."


In common parlance, this means that the army has done away with the concept of holding (defensive) and strike (offensive) corps level formations.

Under the new scheme of things to come, holding corps have been re-designated as pivot corps with the task to secure objectives in enemy territory and lay the foundation for launching strike formations.








New policy might be known as known as Cold start + or advanced cold start
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top