- Joined
- Aug 21, 2010
- Messages
- 5,842
- Likes
- 1,837
Sounds gay to me..@gk jesus loves you
Sounds gay to me..@gk jesus loves you
This is uncalled for.........:shocked:Cow pee connieseurs will be masturbating reading this news as a victory of hinduism
you do not like post #1 ?Cow pee connieseurs will be masturbating reading this news as a victory of hinduism
It is a hypothetical construct to explain how these languages are inter-related. Don't ever think that humans would have the real ability to peek into the ancient times even before known history was born, until they can make a time machine.
You were referring to Proto-Indo-European I suppose?It's already well known how these languages evolved.
The ones who don't accept some controversial findings of mainstream history, archeology etc often think otherwise.
You were referring to Proto-Indo-European I suppose?
Well I was talking about the Proto-Indo-European, which is only there to explain the common origin of all these inter-related languages.According to the link posted in the first page Sanskrit evolved from this language.
So I was referring to both.
So how can a language called Proto Indo European be the predecessor of Sanskrit, that is supposed to have ivolved in India and used by the original sanskrit speakers whom many claim did not migrate from outside?Well I was talking about the Proto-Indo-European, which is only there to explain the common origin of all these inter-related languages.
Can you be more clear rather than speaking in poetry ?So how can a language called Proto Indo European be the predecessor of Sanskrit, that is supposed to have ivolved in India and used by the original sanskrit speakers whom many claim did not migrate from outside?
Now if you say that we need a time machine to find that out, I'll say that the reason is already known but not accepted by many because the truth causes discomfort.
....which is?So how can a language called Proto Indo European be the predecessor of Sanskrit, that is supposed to have ivolved in India and used by the original sanskrit speakers whom many claim did not migrate from outside?
Now if you say that we need a time machine to find that out, I'll say that the reason is already known but not accepted by many because the truth causes discomfort.
Where did Sanskrit language evolve?....which is?
Is that an answer?Where did Sanskrit language evolve?
Just like I do not get direct answers how can others expect one from me?Is that an answer?
Not sure what you are referring to.Just like I do not get direct answers how can others expect one from me?
I know. I was not even expecting anything else.Not sure what you are referring to.