New DRDO projects

Enquirer

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Messages
3,567
Likes
9,357
Finally an absolute confirmation that Manik engine will be used on Nirbhay! (flight within a year!)
That Trishul dude can go screw himself......he's been peddling the story for 2 years that Manik is not for Nirbhay!!!!
What an arrogant bastard this Trishul asshole is!! Even after the Director and Joint Director of Nirbhay project stated on camera that Manik engine will be used in Nirbhay (and test flown within a year), this Trishul asshole is claiming that since GTRE didn't make that claim about Manik (& the fact the he didn't know about it earlier) the statement made by Nirbhay's project directors is untrue
:) :)
 

Tuco

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
2,847
Likes
12,091
Country flag
What an arrogant bastard this Trishul asshole is!! Even after the Director and Joint Director of Nirbhay project stated that Manik engine will be used in Nirbhay (and test flown within a year), this Trishul asshole is claiming that since GTRE didn't make that claim about Manik (& the fact the he didn't know about it earlier) the statement made by Nirbhay's project directors is untrue
:) :)
So according to him Manik should be some paan brand . He is an ass, claims to know everything. Links every Indian made equipment to some foreign companies. Ask him about arudra, believe me you will be entertained.
 

Aashk

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
153
Likes
486
Country flag
based on recent interview with takrmak007


pkmbpkmbpkmbpkmbpkmbpkmbpkmbpkmbpkmbpkmb
 

Attachments

Aashk

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
153
Likes
486
Country flag
Did you do this yourself????????????????????????????????????????/
Yes, actually previously also I did some work on Astra mk2 (my DP now )
I would have done a decent flow simulation if dimension were at hand
 

Aashk

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2019
Messages
153
Likes
486
Country flag
Thanks, will start work ( without sub systems)
 

porky_kicker

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2016
Messages
6,023
Likes
44,574
Country flag
7052525_39836513560f4a80da971k_jpeg778358b2d43bdaccd922b7eb30ec9f4d.jpeg


27775537298_7138e71045_b.jpg


Long time back when the SLS pictures were released , I had speculated in the DRDO thread that these launchers are under deck launchers with integrated below deck reloading system. Many refuted my assertion.

39836515200_517700323a_b.jpg


If one expands the picture above ( HMI panel for the SLS floating range ) and notes the words around the indicator lights and push buttons , one can arrive at the same conclusion.

Eg top right " deck hatch " with open and close indicator lights.

Also this SLS is a possible contender ( using the developed technology ) for Indian container based missile launch system much like the Russian club K container system
 
Last edited:

porky_kicker

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2016
Messages
6,023
Likes
44,574
Country flag
I have always wished that a long range anti ship missile variant is curved out of this missile.
Would have loved to see one too , imagine a 6.2 ton missile with a 1 ton warhead hitting a ship at hypersonic speeds of mach 7.

But there are technological hurdles on our side to overcome , eg how do you provide navigational updates to the missile moving at mach 7 . Also too much heat generated around the body > 700 degree C , need high tech conformal comms to maintain data link for navigation updates and overcome localised distortion etc.

Chinese ASBM is a hype and psyops.

We might see one in the future though based on the experience from Shaurya from DRDO when technology allows the same.
 

Vorschlaghammer

Regular Member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
337
Likes
589
Country flag
Don't know if this is too much of a conspiracy theory, but the Chinese DF-21 and DF-26 ASBMs do look a lot like the Pershing-II, which did have a terminal active radar seeker.



Back in the 80s, China and US were all lovey-dovey enough to work on joint projects like Jaguar tank, and unconfirmed reports say the J10 is derived from IAI lavi design. Whether the US supplied them with Pershing blueprints or not, is upto anybody's guess.
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
Would have loved to see one too , imagine a 6.2 ton missile with a 1 ton warhead hitting a ship at hypersonic speeds of mach 7.

But there are technological hurdles on our side to overcome , eg how do you provide navigational updates to the missile moving at mach 7 . Also too much heat generated around the body > 700 degree C , need high tech conformal comms to maintain data link for navigation updates and overcome localised distortion etc.

Chinese ASBM is a hype and psyops.

We might see one in the future though based on the experience from Shaurya from DRDO when technology allows the same.
The challenges of high-speed flight
Propulsion
  • Propulsion configurations that are efficient at high Mach numbers are not efficient for low Mach numbers. A compromise in efficiency or a hybrid system is required to operate across a wide flight envelope.
  • Hybrid engines or rocket boosters are a possibility, but they are mechanically complex – expensive and heavy.
  • Various propulsion options exist. As mentioned above, a combination of two may be the best answer:
    • Rockets;
      • Difficulty in storing liquid propellant;
      • Very wide operating envelope including orbital velocities, but not very efficient at low speeds;
      • Throttling not possible in solid motors.
    • Ramjet – Uses the forward motion of the engine to compress incoming air before combustion at subsonic speeds;
      • Very inefficient below Mach 1. Requires assistance to reach starting speed;
      • Best operation between Mach 2 and Mach 4. Inefficient outside of these limits unless optimised for a very specific combination of speed and altitude;
      • Very inefficient beyond Mach 6 due to shock-wave effects in the combustion chamber;
      • Widely tested and proven.
    • Scramjet – Uses the forward motion of the engine to compress incoming air before combustion at supersonic speeds;
      • Combustion takes place only at supersonic velocities;
      • Using hydrogen fuel and variable geometry; it can work between Mach 4 and Mach 15+;
      • Inefficient at orbital speeds. Imposes altitude constraints;
      • Largely untested – many developmental challenges remain
https://www.iiss.org/blogs/analysis/2019/03/trends-in-missile-technologies
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
Guidance
  • High speed effects limit guidance options:
    • Electro-Optical and Radio Frequency seekers unable to operate through plasma generated in front of the missile;
    • Inertial systems inaccurate over long distances;
    • Satellite-corrected guidance vulnerable to jamming / spoofing;
    • Guidance relay on rear section liable to jamming.
Aerodynamics
  • Efficient aerodynamic lift-to-drag (L/D) configurations for high Mach numbers are not efficient for low Mach numbers. A compromise in efficiency is required;
  • Thin structures are required to reduce drag, but they are harder to protect from thermal effects;
  • Shock boundary layer heating to extreme temperatures;
    • LM test vehicle reached surface temperature of 2,000°C;
    • Aluminium and titanium are not suitable. Would have to use ceramics.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top