My take on each MRCA contender

Status
Not open for further replies.

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,679
Country flag
My analysis of all six fighters--

first , the F-16......

what are its pros ??

its a proven combat aircraft , has a great record in both air to air and strike missions in real combat.

has AESA radar which is proven , unlike the european aircrafts' AESA radars which are not yet ready .

the block 70 version has really long range , longer even than the larger-sized sukhoi 30 that india has .

like the block 60 for UAE , it has all internally fitted pods for targetting , so weapon stations are free.

what are its cons ??

its an old , outdated airframe now ; other nations are moving towards newer aircraft .

pakistan has it , so it knows the aircraft inside out , and knows how to counter it .

US itself is going to replace it's own fleet of F-16s with F-35 , so no mid-life upgrades will be available 15 years down the line when india wants to upgrade it .

lastly , the US has a propensity of slapping sanctions on a country at any given time , which may ground the entire fleet for lack of spares , so the US remains a notoriously unreliable supplier .

the F-18......


First ,the pros.....

its has a proven AESA radar , like that of the F-16.

as a strike aircraft , it is great . it can fire a range of sophisticated air to surface weapons . india may opt for an aircraft more suited for the strike role , as it already possesses an air dominance aircraft ( sukhoi 30 MKI ) , but does not have an advanced strike aircraft , its jaguars and mig 27s being too obsolete .

it can fight BVR air-to-air engagements as well , with its AESA radar and active BVR missiles, and this is important , as more of air-to-air engagements may occur at BVR range in future ( though not all ).

its F414 engines have been selected for powering the LCA Tejas mark 2 indigenous aircraft of the indian air force , and commonality of engines could see the f-18 get ahead of other competitors .

price is lower .

cons......

its not exactly a new airframe , and america has stopped buying it , except for the electronic warfare version ( growler ).

like the F-16 , it comes from america , and americans are prone to slap sanctions that can put the entire fleet in jeopardy .

it is not so good in dogfights , and can be shot down if the adversary gets too close ..

its combat radius ( 1100 km ) is not so great , and its weapon carrying tonnage is not great either , especially if you consider that it is a large aircraft .

P.S.--

Boeing ( the aircraft's manufacturer ) has offered india a more advanced version of F-18 with conformal fuel tanks and internal targetting pods like the f-16 block 70 , which will give more combat radius .

the rafale......

the pros.....

its a nimble aircraft , good in dogfights .

it has advanced cockpit , and the formidable SPECTRA electronic countermeasures system which gives virtual stealth......the rafale promoters prefer to call it discreet , not stealthy , but it remains the aircraft hardest to detect among the 6 MRCA contenders . SPECTRA also has an advanced IRST ( infra red search and track ) .

has the longest combat radius among the 6 contenders --no less than 1850 km , due to its internal fuel capacity of 5700 liters ,and external carrying capacity ( on three external fuel tanks ) of 9000 liters .

france is offering a full range of air to air and air to surface guided weapons , with full transfer of technology .

its a formidable strike aircraft with advanced guided weapons , with true deep strike capacity .

cons......

its real problem is that it has a radar ( RBE-2 ) with a low ( by the standards of today , at least ) air to air detection range of 100 km , which is only half of the range of the radar of the F-16 block 52s that pakistan has . the range is low because france depends on AWACS , which it has in large numbers , for air to air detection , which will give the co-ordinates of incoming enemy aircraft to the rafale by data-link. but other nations like india , which have a much larger space to defend , and less AWACS in numbers ,are hardly going to accept this . this is the primary reason why the rafale has failed to win even a single export contract , and remains its biggest bane . reportedly , france has offered a AESA radar with 40 percent increase in range , but indian air force officers were not impressed by it .

reportedly , france wanted an aircraft which was more tilted to the strike role , as its earlier mirage 2000s were more suited for air to air combat ( though they had strike potential too , as india discovered in kargil war ) , but the decision was obviously wrong as the mirage 2000 had better export success due to this very factor ( of air to air capability ), while the rafale has not succeded ( so far ) due to its poor BVR capability .

its also expensive , though less than the eurofighter .

The Eurofighter Typhoon--


pros--

Its a great dogfighter , and eurofighter pilots are trained to withstand upto 12 g maneuvers as compared to pilots of other aircraft , who are trained to withstand 9 g maneuvers .

It has supercruise , that is , it can fly at supersonic speeds without switching on its afterburners , and thus can fly supersonic for extended periods than other fighters , thus outrunning other fighters. ( afterburners use up a lot of fuel )

It is a formidable beyond visual range fighter , and its combination with the meteor long range missile is truely lethal .

Next to Rafale , its not so easy to detect on radar .

It can fly at 65,000 feet , 8,000 feet above the highest height that other fighters can climb , so it can simply fly above the other fighters where their missiles will find it hard to reach it .

cons--

all these goodies come at an expensive price . if india decides to buy it , it may find it hard to fit the eurofighter in its budget.....and even harder to increase the number of its ordered planes , as it may do if other fighters are selected.

it has less ground attack potential than rafale or f-18.

p.s.-- eurofighter is doubtlessly the best of the contenders , but its only real problem is its price . can india afford it.....is the big question .

Mig 35--

This is nothing but an extensively redesigned mig 29 aircraft , but the redesign has given it capabilities that take it to a totally different league than the earlier aircraft .

pros--

let me remind that the russians are to aircraft what germans are to motorcars , and the hallmark of russian planes is power , performance and ruggedness .

coming to the main topic , mig 35 has the ZHUK-ME AESA radar , and along with that a unique optical locator system ( OLS ) . The OLS , which was developed from the russian space programme combines infra-red search and track with TV guidance , and thus can detect air and ground targets without opening the radar . as radar is likely to be detected by RWR ( radar warning receivers ) of enemy aircraft , the OLS makes it possible to detect enemy targets without informing him of the aircraft's approach . this data is fed into the helmet-mounted sighting system of the pilot.

it has overcome the deficiencies of the mig 29 , and has longer range , and its engines dont have to be overhauled regularly like the mig 29s engines , and are smokeless .

it can carry out complex missions like air combat and reconnaisance and ground strike in the same mission , and has complete multi-role ability .

it has multi-axis thrust vector controls on its engines , and can carry out astonishing manuevers with ease, stupefying those who watch them--terrific dogfighting ability .

cons --

if we buy it ,nearly our entire fleet will be based on russian aircraft , and no sane country buy everything from the same buyer . what if something happens ( like a revolution in russia ) and russia cant supply spares for example ?? our entire fleet will be grounded .

its like its old rival ,the f-16--based on an old airframe .

the mig 29 didnt give india a great experience , and the fleet was grounded for long periods for lack of spares and constant engine overhauling . though the engine has rectified the problems , its still an uprated version of the old engine--india doesn't know whether to trust it .

its AESA radar is not mature like the american's radars .

it has less ground attack potential than rafale or f-18.

JAS 39 Gripen --


pros --

its a lightweight fighter , yet it's capable of multirole warfare .

The Gripen NG version that SAAB company is offering has a combat radius of 1300 km --thats good for a lightweight aircraft .

Its capable of network -centric warfare with multidimensional datalinks .

it has a superb and advanced cockpit with 3 multi-function displays and wide angle head up display .

it's role can be changed form air combat to ground strike to reconnaissance by just changing the software of its computers .

it can take off from roads , and does not require runways or much support personell .

it is powered by the same F 414 engine that has been selected for tejas , and commonality of engine could tilt the balance in its favour .

all this comes at a lower price as far as money is concerned......so we can buy more gripens

if LCA fails , we could buy more Gripens too .



cons --

its engine is american , so sanctions slapped by america could effectively ground the fleet.

compared to eurofighter it is less capable .

has only seven weapon points .
 
Last edited:

RebateKing

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
41
Likes
0
pretty good summary, I think two areas are missing
1. Support infrastructure
F-16/18, EuroFighter and Grippen would require completely support infrastructure.
2. future upgrade / roadmap
OP mentioned F-16, but I have similar doubts on Rafale, Mig-35 and even Gripen.On the flip side, choosing one of those models probably will India the maximum on ToT.
 

ashdoc

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2010
Messages
2,980
Likes
3,679
Country flag
the best in the lot is undoubtedly the eurofighter .

but it is very costly . if we decide to buy it , we may not be able to increase the number of planes from the now planned 126 to 200 , like we have progressively increased the sukhois from the planned 190 to 272 .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i wouldn't mind the rafale , inspite of its bad export record of zero exports and deficiency in beyond visual range combat.

because , in this era of stealth , its the one aircraft which is difficult to detect on radar among the 6 contenders thanks to use of advanced composites like carbon fibre in its manufacture , and SPECTRA , its electronic warfare system with virtual stealth technology ..

secondly , it may not be a great beyond visual range fighter , but india already has one , and that too in considerable numbers--the sukhoi 30 MKI. What india needs is a long range strike aircraft , as its strike aircraft like jaguar and mig 27 are getting old, and rafale is eminently suited for the task .
in fact , it would be our first genuine strike aircraft as the jaguar and mig 27 hardly qualify as strike aircraft--their range , weapon capacity is too low , and they lack a terrain avoidance radar for low level flight which is essential for strike missions . they failed utterly in the kargil war , and in the end , india had to rely on the mirage 2000 for laser guided bombing . the jaguar and mig 27 are nothing but ' bomb trucks ' , not capable of firing advanced guided missiles .

thirdly , india is going to upgrade its mirage 2000s , and the upgrade will use the same technology as rafale ( as both are french aircraft ), creating commonality , and reducing costs --less money will be required for creating infrastructure .

fourthly , if the wishes of the IAF personnel are taken into consideration , they all give thumbs up to rafale.....they had a great experience with the mirage 2000 , and always wanted more french aircraft . the wish was never granted by our unheeding govt , but here's a chance to make amends .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

if there is a rationale for buying the eurofighter , it lies in the fact that in a two front war , if we are attacked by both pakistan and china , we may require more advanced air combat aircraft rather than strike aircraft-- the number of aircraft attacking us in such a scenario may be greater than 1500 , so air defence will be our priority .

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

when all the 126 MRCAs are delivered, we will already have all the 272 sukhois , so we will have nearly 400 advanced aircraft + Upgraded 50 mirage 2000s and 70 mig 29s......it will make our air force a major power in the asia-pacific .

it will be equal to the air forces of israel ,turkey , japan , france , south korea , germany , britain etc . the only air forces better will be china's , russia's and of course the USA .
 
Last edited:

anoop_mig25

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,804
Likes
3,151
Country flag
well till few moments before i was routing for rafale but as its low radar i think mig-35(allthough not good option) would better option as its something called OLS but not good AESA radar
 

natarajan

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2009
Messages
2,592
Likes
762
you can very well do it in mrca discussion as if each member starts a thread we will be spammed by threads
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
You can have all your takes in the MRCA threads. Please use that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top