- Joined
- Sep 28, 2011
- Messages
- 14,139
- Likes
- 8,594
There is a video of her joking on camera. I did not realize until now what a bloodthirsty bitch she is.
There is a video of her joking on camera. I did not realize until now what a bloodthirsty bitch she is.
"We have to lean on facts and international laws," Mr Lavrov said. "They say that a captured participant of an armed conflict should be treated in a certain way. And in any case, a prisoner of war should not be killed."
From the same news report:
Now, who is this Kirsan Ilyumzhinov?And the eccentric Russian politician Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, who is also the head of the World Chess Federation, said that Colonel Gaddafi's death was a "tragedy" but that he died as a martyr and would be reincarnated.
Mr Ilyumzhinov made a surreal mission to Tripoli in June, where he met with Colonel Gaddafi as an unofficial mediator and played a game of chess with him. Yesterday, he said in a Russian newspaper interview that he had spoken to the Libyan leader numerous times on the phone since. He claimed that Colonel Gaddafi had not been scared of death: "Not a bit! He believed in reincarnation."
Suffering 40 years of torment and suppression, this was bound to happen when emotions are let loose, my friend. I never said that those who are replacing him in power are a bunch of noble folks. But, I have no qualms in saying that he got a lesser death than what he deserved. Period.What is difference between both then ?
Replace one savage with another ? I thought this was about freedom, democracy, human rights etc
absolutely. They could have killed him on sight instead of doing what they did. Reminded Dharmendra in films. "kutte ko chun chun ke maroonga". Was really stupid. But I guess this is what happens when untrained or unprofessional over zealous kids are fighting.I'm not against executing Gaddafi, that guy is better dead than alive (for Lybia). But boy those NTC fighters were idiots! And clumsy! Could they have killed him more discreetly and made it appear like he was really caught in a crossfire? 8)
Because Saddam Hussain wanted to switch to Euros from US Dollars for petro trade. It would have been against French interests to annoy Saddam. Moreover, it was a US led invasion and US was going to gain most of the natural resources or benefits therefrom. On the other hand, the assault on Libya and supporting the rebels, supplying them weapons and helping them setup oil port of Benghazi was of direct benefit to France. Also, Gaddafi was trying to get companies from PRC to invest. Removing him would keep PRC out and make it easier for French (and British) companies to invest there. So they had to do this. Note, Germany did not see any gain in this invasion, so they abstained. US voted just for a show of camaraderie and were reluctant participants.We've got to give to you this Armand. You and your country deserves the credit for ending the rule of one of the ME's most notorious strongman.:thumb:
But, before this is all forgotten, how is removing Gaddafi different from removing Saddam, a much more brutal dictator? The latter was an opeartion that you are most vehemently opposed.
Excellent question, the damn organization must be disbanded!The U.N. wants an investigation on how Gaddafi was killed. Where was the U.N. when he was killing his own people?
We've got to give to you this Armand. You and your country deserves the credit for ending the rule of one of the ME's most notorious strongman.:thumb:
But, before this is all forgotten, how is removing Gaddafi different from removing Saddam, a much more brutal dictator? The latter was an opeartion that you are most vehemently opposed.
Three contenders in the list:So , who will be next one .....
Bashar al-Assad ?
Nope only Assad is a viable conteder. Pakis have nukes. Iran is not libya .Three contenders in the list:
1- Assad
2- Khamenei
3- Kayani
Actually syrian society has been spit with the coptic christians dreading anti christian pogroms as in post revolutionary egypt and the Druze and the kurds are also dreading the same these three groups are backing assad while the sunni majority is against him.Nope only Assad is a viable conteder. Pakis have nukes. Iran is not libya .
No wonder the iranians are raising the stakes.This is a wake up call for every country and regime that is in the endangered list that Nukes and WMDs are an issurance policy.
Fortunately India despite all the socio economic problems, insurgencies is not like those Banana Republics in the Mid east and North Africa.Actually syrian society has been spit with the coptic christians dreading anti christian pogroms as in post revolutionary egypt and the Druze and the kurds are also dreading the same these three groups are backing assad while the sunni majority is against him.