Modi crossed 'red line' by talking about Balochistan: Pakistan

[Bornubus]

these pukis love to talk about how we're all a bunch of kalas but they themselves are cotton picking monkeys in reality

Paki Negro from Kazakh ancestry.

 

[aditya10r]

This will destroy CPEC................

how
please enlighten me_____________________________________________

 

[Screambowl]

how
please enlighten me_____________________________________________

When army takes over, the labour cost will increase and judiciary is already fed up with the army this will lead to protest, the TTP will become more vigil. Thus already on going investments will be affected. And hence the whole cost of Project will also increase. And Chinese cannot afford that.

 

[aditya10r]

When army takes over, the labour cost will increase and judiciary is already fed up with the army this will lead to protest, the TTP will become more vigil. Thus already on going investments will be affected. And hence the whole cost of Project will also increase. And Chinese cannot afford that.

then fuck balochistan
help raheel kutiya seize power

 

[Screambowl]

then fuck balochistan
help raheel kutiya seize power

The problem is that only. He is not listening to US like Mushy did.

 

[aditya10r]

The problem is that only. He is not listening to US like Mushy did.

he does not listen to jhantu sharif(nawaz baby)

 

[Screambowl]

he does not listen to jhantu sharif(nawaz baby)

But he listens to Chinese

And this is why he has not yet taken over. Otherwise he would have done it by now. May be nawaz Sharif asked the chinese to invest so that military could not take over.

It's a big game.

 

[aditya10r]

But he listens to Chinese

And this is why he has not yet taken over. Otherwise he would have done it by now. May be nawaz Sharif asked the chinese to invest so that military could not take over.

It's a big game.

Why in world we got such a useless and crappy neighbours and a super chutiya aadmi as our first prime minister

 

[Screambowl]

Why in world we got such a useless and crappy neighbours and a super chutiya aadmi as our first prime minister

our own fault.
The problem is in house. More over the Borders are never static.

If a leader is powerful and visionary , he can change the map

 

[rock127]

Why in world we got such a useless and crappy neighbours and a super chutiya aadmi as our first prime minister

See the pattern of History of India carefully and you would not ask the question.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Pssss: Clues are --> forgiving nature/thekedaar of peace/lack of nationalism etc.

 

[sayareakd]

finally we cross red line, now lets make it new country.

 

[vayuu1]

Red light says stop stop stop (pak)
Yellow light says wait wait wait (desperate pak)
Green light says go go go (India liberates balochistan and sindhudesh,pok and GB)

Sent from my SM-N900 using Tapatalk

 

[Zebra]

Lets see, unt kis karwat baith ta hai.

 

[Jagdish58]

Time to wipe out the red line

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Protesters to be charged under anti-terrorism laws: Pakistan on China-Pakistan Economic Corridor row

HIGHLIGHTS

• Pakistan has said that those protesting against CPEC will be charged under anti-terrorism laws.
• Gilgit-Baltistan has seen a series of protests against CPEC.
• Over 500 people have been arrested in Gilgit-Baltistan protests.

WASHINGTON: Pakistan's minister for planning, reforms and development Ahsan Iqbal has said that those protesting against the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) will be charged under anti-terrorism laws.

Quoting minister Ahsan Iqbal, Gilgit-Baltistan National Congress director Senge Hasnan Sering tweeted, "Those protesting in #GilgitBaltistan against China led #CPEC will be charged under anti-terrorism laws: Minister Dr Iqbal."

In recent months, Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir(Pok) has seen a series of protests against the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), leading a severe crackdown by the Pakistani security forces.

Due to delays in the development of CPEC, the authorities in Beijing had last month suggested Islamabad to formally rope in the Pakistan Army to ensure smooth execution of the project.

Delays in CPEC

Security official privy to the development said the Chinese were "unhappy with the overall management of the project, particularly the involvement of various ministries", which were causing unnecessary delays.

They envisioned the creation of a separate ministry or authority to deal exclusively with the CPEC. The project is currently being overseen by a special section set up at the Prime Minister's Office - with Iqbal's ministry of planning and development serving as the focal ministry.

The army has already created a special division to provide security cover to the CPEC-related projects. Earlier in January this year, China had openly expressed its concern over the lack of consensus on the CPEC across the political spectrum and the Chinese embassy in Islamabad had urged political leaders to "address their differences in order to create favourable conditions" for the completion of the project.

The CPEC actually refers to various major infrastructure works currently underway in Pakistan, intended to link China's Xinjiang province to Gwadar deep sea port close to Islamabad's border with Iran.

Apart from infrastructure, it seeks to widen and deepen economic ties with its "all-weather friend" China. The Chinese firms will invest just under $46 billion in the project over six years.

However, reports also suggest that several projects have plagued the country due to stalled development, poor infrastructure and lost investment.

 

[HariPrasad-1]

Modi has hit porkies where it hurts. Actually, Nawaz wanted a good relations with India but chota terrorist sharif escalated the situation. Now they are finding it hard to manage. Now it is the duty of whole world to liberate baluchistan, Sindh, FATA and POK from dictatorial Punjabi regime. We must integrate sindh and Baluchistan with India. Afterward, we can continue kicking the dirty @$$ of Porki punjabis and can make it a hell.

 

[A chauhan]

Good job @Modi !

Ok we have crossed the red line now what can you do Porkies ? Show us some guts attack us then we'll show you your Aukaat.

 

[Blackwater]

enough of under the table support. India should invite all balouchi and sidhi and GB separatist leader along with ameriki and Israeli leaders in Hyderabad house and invite world media and pledge support

 

[sayareakd]

Sending some sam from black market would be good start. Opperasive PA is using helicopter gunship against the innocent Balochi people. They need protection. Same way PA delivered to Afghas against Soviet Union.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Response from GoI.
India draws clear red lines for Pakistan, 5-point agenda for talks
End incitement in J&K, stop sheltering Dawood Ibrahim, prosecute Masood Azhar and Hafiz Saeed, discuss vacation of PoK, said Foreign Secy.
WRITTEN BY SHUBHAJIT ROY | NEW DELHI |Published On:August 19, 2016 3:03 AM

Hardening its stance on resuming dialogue with Pakistan, India Thursday announced it had set a five-point agenda for talks on terrorism in a letter submitted a day earlier by Indian envoy Gautam Bambawale to the Pakistan Foreign Ministry.

New Delhi asked Islamabad to end incitement to violence and terrorism from Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir, stop cross-border terrorism, detain and prosecute terrorists like Masood Azhar and Hafiz Saeed, deny a safe haven to fugitives like Mumbai underworld don Dawood Ibrahim and close terror camps where terrorists like Bahadur Ali have been trained.

India also proposed discussing “vacation of Pakistan’s illegal occupation of J&K” — a reference to Pakistan-occupied Kashmir — and sought a briefing from the Pakistan Foreign Secretary on the progress in the 26/11 trial in Pakistan and its probe into the Pathankot airbase attack.

These red lines form part of Foreign Secretary S Jaishankar’s letter to his Pakistan counterpart Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhary.

The Pakistan Foreign Ministry, which did not offer any comment on the letter, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi crossed the “red line” by talking about Balochistan and said it will “forcefully” raise the Kashmir issue at the UN General Assembly session next month.

According to a PTI report from Islamabad, Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson Nafees Zakaria, referring to Modi’s remarks on Balochistan and PoK in his Independence Day speech, said: “It is the violation of the UN Charter… He (Modi) crossed the red line by talking about Balochistan.”

In his letter, Jaishankar recalled “Pakistan’s long history of violence and terrorism against India” — from 1947 to the 1965 war and the Kargil war. He reminded Pakistan of the past commitments of its leaders and of not allowing Pakistani soil to be used for anti-India activities by terrorists.

Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Vikas Swarup said Jaishankar had conveyed he was accepting his counterpart’s invitation to visit Islamabad but discussions should focus first on the “more pressing aspects” of the situation in Jammu and Kashmir.

The Foreign Secretary’s letter listed steps Islamabad needed to take: “Cessation of cross-border terrorism by Pakistan aimed at Jammu and Kashmir, ending incitement to violence and terrorism from Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir, detaining and prosecuting internationally recognised Pakistani terrorist leaders who have been publicly active recently in exhorting and supporting such violence in that state, closing down of Pakistani terrorist camps where terrorists such as Bahadur Ali, recently arrested in Jammu and Kashmir, continue to be trained, denying safe haven, shelters and support to terrorists in Pakistan who have escaped Indian law.”

“Foreign Secretary also said that he looks forward to discussing with his counterpart the earliest possible vacation of Pakistan’s illegal occupation of the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir,” Swarup said, referring to PoK.

“The world is aware that Pakistan has a long history of violence and terrorism against India, as also in the broader region. The Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir has been its particular target. This record began with the Government of Pakistan sending armed raiders into Jammu and Kashmir in 1947 and was repeated in 1965. More than three decades later, displaying a similar attitude, military personnel were infiltrated across the Line of Control in Kargil in 1999,” he said.

“This approach to India was reflected in support for terrorist activities in Jammu and Kashmir that continues to the present day. These acts were initially denied by the Government of Pakistan and attributed to local population, only to be admitted later by Pakistan’s leaders who directed and organised such cross-border attacks on India, and assaults on the local people.”

“The Government of Pakistan is aware that the framework for interactions between India and Pakistan is stipulated by the Simla Agreement of July 1972, wherein President Z A Bhutto agreed that the two countries resolve to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations, as also the Lahore Declaration of February 1999 wherein Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif reiterated Pakistan’s determination to implement the Simla Agreement in letter and spirit. They are also based on the assurance given by President Musharraf in January 2004 that he will not permit any territory under Pakistan’s control to be used to support terrorism in any manner,” he said.

Asked about the Pakistan Foreign Office spokesperson’s statement that Prime Minister Modi crossed the “red line” by talking about Balochistan, Swarup said: “I find this an extraordinary remark from a senior functionary of Pakistan that recognises no red lines in its own diplomacy. Pakistan’s record of cross-border terrorism and infiltration is at the heart of the problems in the region today. And this is not just India’s view. You can ask some other countries in the region too.”

On Modi’s Balochistan remark, Swarup said several people from Balochistan and PoK, Gilgit-Baltistan had messaged him, had been writing to him following his comments at the all-party meeting on August 12 in which he had flagged the atrocities being committed on the people of Balochistan.

“Prime Minister had been thanked by these people for flagging their cause at the all-party meeting which represents all political segments in India. Prime Minister was sufficiently moved by these messages of gratitude to share it with the people of India in his Independence Day address,” he said.

Less pathetic than UPA cuz BJP at least takes strong decision and remains on it.