Mahinda Rajapaksa Is A Sinhalese Extremist – Lee Kuan Yew

saradiel1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
86
Likes
3
Since Tamils are dirt poor people with zero capabilities and support; under oppression of racist Sinhalas they do not have right to oppose such humiliation or even endorse their genocide worth anyone's attention like Chinese are/will milk Nanking. Forked tongue Chinese are out to support Sri Lanka but ignoring genocide of Tamils for reasons we all know but wouldn't miss a chance to abuse Japanese.
How do you say Tamils are dirt poor? You have NO understanding of SL tamils.

Do you know majority of the Tamils live outside North and East among Sinhala people?

Do you know there are Tamil businessmen, professionals and high level civil servants who are Tamil in SL?

Do you know that TN administration is handled by Tamil people under MR regime?

Do you know that gov maintain well funded Tamil schools all over the island and some of them are the best in the island?

Do you know that Tamils have better living standards in Colombo than their counter parts in TN?

And some of Tamils in SL are businessmen and some are even relatives of MR?

And what genocide are you talking about?
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,371
How do you say Tamils are dirt poor? You have NO understanding of SL tamils.

Do you know majority of the Tamils live outside North and East among Sinhala people?

Do you know there are Tamil businessmen, professionals and high level civil servants who are Tamil in SL?

Do you know that TN administration is handled by Tamil people under MR regime?

Do you know that gov maintain well funded Tamil schools all over the island and some of them are the best in the island?

Do you know that Tamils have better living standards in Colombo than their counter parts in TN?

And some of Tamils in SL are businessmen and some are even relatives of MR?

And what genocide are you talking about?
Sinhala have done no favour to them if few of them have got into better opportunities. They are free people and have right to live any where on that island.

Having said that if they could have been that empowred then there was no need for them to choose extreme ways and endure such brutal genocide.

Do you know do you know ? All I know you are bluffing here with no proof presented. Even if it will be presented it can never be used to place you off the hook for genocide of Tamils.
........................

Readers, using tablet to type, please do not mind untidy English.
 
Last edited:

saradiel1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
86
Likes
3
@saradiel1: Tamils in SL cannot be compared with Malays in SG, as easily as you suggest. Chinese/Indians/etc were being discriminated in Malaysia and it is the only country that I'm aware of, that asked a portion of its territory to secede (that is SG). There was no such threat for Sinhalese in India/TN for the SL government to try to reduce Tamilian power. The actions of the Sinhalese in SL are more similar to that of Malays in Malaysia. That is, get a whole country to oneself but still worried about the minorities being too powerful.

Having said, thanks for your posts, you do bring out far better arguments for Sinhalese than the ones I had heard so far.

Added later: Just noticed that your arguments have gone downhill already. :dafuq:
Tamils in Sl and Malays in SG can be compared in the sense, both are bordered by a country that has a majority of that ethnicity. I have explained in my comments why I made this comparison.

You may not know about the history into this. TN and Sinhala Kingdoms have been at war since time immemorial. There were constant warfare between the TN and Sinhala Kingdom. As a result of continuous Tamil occupation that gave rise to a Tamil community in SL. And also Tamils may have migrated to SL. So SL and TN relationship has never been cosy.

In this scenario after colonials took power in SL Tamil and non Tamil labour was brought to SL. Not only the Indian Tamil estate workers but also workers to maintain coffee plantations.

So there was a demographic shift that is disadvantagous towards the Sinhalese. In such a context it is normal for the Sinhalese to again exert power in the island.

The events didnt start because Sinhala ppl dislike minorities. Events started after Tamils ask for North and East of SL and to declare it as the homeland of SL Tamils.

This is a tricky area.

"Added later: Just noticed that your arguments have gone downhill already"

Can you pls elaborate further.

I won't tolerate insults and racist remarks against my country and my people. So my response comes according to the person I respond.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

saradiel1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
86
Likes
3
I was expecting this answer from you.. Tamils are as natives as any loud mouth Sinhalal is to Sri Lanka. What made you think that I do not know on what I am talking about. Trust me the discussion is on the right track and is going to bring the racist bigot of you out. We have done this before with another Sinhala.
where did I say Tamils are not natives?

it was you who said civil war between natives and Sri Lankans as if Sri Lankans don't have a right to defend its legitimate territory from a terrorist.

If the discussion is on right track, congrats from me and I am happy as one of the contributors.

Dont talk about racism men. Your countrymen display racism against my people and my country in such a disgusting way in this very forum. It is clear who is the racist bigot here.

And don't try your antics with me.

As I said before people living in glass houses should not undress in open.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,371
it is a seperate topic and I l come to that later.
For me outsiders it adds up to what I think about your extremist regime who because of international pressures pretending as a genuine state otherwise was going without a check to finished innocent Tamils in detail.

There is a proverb in punjabi jadey yan kadey. Now or never. If you want to explain why your country is humiliating tamils with cheap tricks of war tourism then tell us now or you do not have answer for it. Trust me I have a theory, it is typical of all rougue states who take dictation from commie Chinese thugs. Because human values and rights are hard topics for them to understand and practise. I bet many Chinese are enjoying your hospitality during those war porn tourist tours your regime organizes.
 
Last edited:

saradiel1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
86
Likes
3
Sinhala have done no favour to them if few of them have got into better opportunities. They are free people and have right to live any where on that island.

Having said that if they could have been that empowred then there was no need for them to choose extreme ways and endure such brutal genocide.

Do you know do you know ? All I know you are bluffing here with no proof presented. Even if it will be presented it can never be used to place you off the hook for genocide of Tamils.
........................

Readers, using tablet to type, please do not mind untidy English.
Ha ha you have NO knowledge of the subject you are talking about.

what I typed is true and you can check it. I suggest you to come to SL and go for a ride in Colombo and how much of a distorted view is being spread by propagandists.

Not only Tamils had the chance to excel in SL, (I dont say everythings were perfect there were many problems). But still the propaganda being spread is wrong.

Of course Tamils have the right to live anywhere in the island that is why they are living all over the island. It is the sinhalese who have not got that opportunity.

Do you know that Sinhalese and Muslims were chased away by the LTTE from North and East.

Before war there were many Tamils in the police forces and army and LTTE murdered them calling them traitors.

Throughout the 30 year war, SL gov provided medicine, food, healthcare, wages for civil servants of administrations, pensions to the people in the LTTE held territories.

I remember at the end of the war, local TVs telecasting Prabhakaran's daughter's education certificates she got from the gov of Sri Lanka.


I didnt say every thing was perfect for Tamils. there were problems and still we do have problems. These cannot be rectified within a week or so. And if anyone thinks it can be done he is being stupid. In a previous comment of mine I discussed the discriminatory policies that were brought in by SLG through out the period. But most of them were corrected.

with a war came in, the whole scenario was changed that new problems started for the Tamils solely due to war.

And what genocide are you talking about?

These are not arguments that needs evidences, these are well known facts for anyone familiar with Sri Lanka. If you need to go into details you can simply do a google check. If not you are having pre judices.

Also another thing, the reason for the war was not lack of political rights though it was the most instrumental in gathering support among ppl. Another aspect is the TN and its constant threatening and support for Eelam. It made Prabhakaran and even LTTE remnants today to belive that Eelam can be achieved.

So they like to go for a country of their own if chances are available though their rights are met.

And dont talk about things you have no idea of. When and where was a genocide in SL?
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,371
Sorry its ~ 3 am at my place and I can't go ahead more with my tablet. Will be back in 7-8 hrs.
 

saradiel1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
86
Likes
3
For me outsiders it adds up to what I think about your extremist regime who because of international pressures pretending as a genuine state otherwise was going without a check to finished innocent Tamils in detail.

There is a proverb in punjabi jadey yan kadey. Now or never. If you want to explain why your country is humiliating tamils with cheap tricks of war tourism then tell us now or you do not have answer for it. Trust me I have a theory, it is typical of all rougue states who take dictation from commie Chinese thugs. Because human values and rights are hard topics for them to understand and practise. I bet many Chinese are enjoying your hospitality during those war porn tourist tours your regime organizes.
If you have been paying attention you would have realized by now, SLG doesnt work according to international pressures.

first of all the ones who call it war tourism are media organs and these places are not advertised as tourist places. Both Tamils and Sinhalese can visit these places.
I am not defending every action this government does. Since the end of the war this gov has done both good and bad and it is only the bad part that are given media attention becasue of high currency of such news. This gives SLG a wrong pictire.

I accept there are two sides in showing LTTE bunkers, Prabhakaran's house. Personally I do not agree with this. Like many governments we had this too runs on popular rheotics. This is something like this.
However visiting Sinhalese do not use it to humiliate Tamils as you suggest. The sinhalese are attracted becasue of simple curiosity of seeing how Prabhakaran lead his ife.
I have nt seen any Tamils making an issue out of this. The ones who are making a mountian out of a molehill are media.

The following is BBC report abt it. BBC is a media org that is extremely critical of SLG.

BBC News - Fast Track - Sri Lanka's boom in war tourism

I cant help with your hatred towards China or its people but they have been good to SL.

I bet you people were thinking Tamils live cornered in the North and East. All the Tamils in SL lived there. And all the people were dragged into the war and SLA bombed the shit out of all the Tamils and then killed a lot.

No that is not the case. There is a lot you do not know abt SL......
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
@saradiel1

I am a bit preoccupied with other issues. will be back.

Your multitude of posts cannot be given a one line answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I don't see Lankans here that much and also if u stick to a certain view of a certain country in a rather derogatory manner you should be able to defend your point at any time. You ppl aren't lazy right?
If a 'Certain country' has issues that are not laudatory and then it is discussed, then the one from that 'certain country' can hardly go bonkers and be ludicrously obtuse and fanciful by trotting out dubious 'facts' and justification!


SWRD was born a christian and I know that u neednt to take the pain of writing his full name it just makes ur response longer and more boring. SL was never a religious country the religious fever is something recent especially created by the politicians.
As a person from Sri Lanka you may know all about Bandaranaikye family. However, that does not mean that all do. After all, before the Tamil issue, Sri Lanka, was only associated with the epics and the demon King Ravana and nothing more.

Any sane person would realise that Sri Lanka is but only an island and is hardly of any consequence to the world. So, to know who the PM of Sri Lanka was is hardly a matter that is world shaking!

About his being born a Christian is important since it indicates the clout that the Buddhist have over Ceylon's politics.

Let me give a backgrounder:

Due to ignorance, even the present day Sinhala-Buddhists still believe that they are blood relatives of Buddha because, according to the Mahavamsa, their forefather Pandu-Vasudeva belongs to the Sakya clan, and is a relative of the Buddha where as the historians believe that the term 'Pandu' in Pali means Pandyans.

According to Buddhism, a person ordained as a Bikkhu should practice Ahimsa (non-violence), Karuna (compassion), Metta (affection), and Maithriya (loving-kindness) towards fellow humans, (irrespective of race or religion), not only by words but also in his thoughts and action. Unfortunately in Sri Lanka, due to the influence of the Mahavamsa, a Buddhist Bikkhu is at liberty to engage in racist politics and promote Sinhala-Buddhist chauvinism and hatred, as we see today.

here was NO Buddhism in Sri Lanka until Emperor Asoka's missionary monks led by Mahinda converted the Hindu (Siva worshipping) Naga King Tissa into a Buddhist in the 2nd century BC. Similarly, there was NO Sinhala race/tribe in Sri Lanka until the Mahavihara monks created it in the 5th century AD. When Hindu/Brahmanical influence posed a serious challenge to Buddhism and when Buddhism started to lose popular support and the patronage from the rulers, the Buddhist institutions in India came under attack. The Mahavihara monks of Anuradapura including Ven. Mahanama, the author of the Pali chronicle Mahavamsa and a close relative of the Buddhist Naga king Dhatusena witnessed the decline and disorientation of Buddhism in India. The events that took place in India against Buddhism must have prompted the Mahavihara monks in Sri Lanka to come up with a plan/strategy to protect Buddhism. Due to their strong devotion to Buddhism and desire to consolidate and protect this religion in Sri Lanka they have decided to write the Pali chronicles Deepavamsa/Mahavamsa making Sri Lanka a Dammadeepa/Sinhaladvipa (chosen land of Buddha where Buddhism will prevail for 5000 years) and creating the Sinhala race by integrating all the Buddhists from different tribes/ethnic groups into one race and making them the sustainers of Buddhism (Gautama Buddha's chosen people) to protect Buddhism in Sri Lanka for 5000 years until the next Maithriya Buddha arrive.

With the patronage of the Buddhist Kings, it is the Mahavihara monks who assimilated all the Buddhists from many different tribes together and called them Sihala (followers of Mythical Vijaya).

Ven. Mahanama has created an imaginary link between the three elements, Country-Race-Religion and made it into one unit similar to the Holy Trinity, whereby Sri Lanka (Dhamma Deepa), Buddha's chosen people (Sinhalese), and Buddhism (Buddha Sasana) should be protected for 5000 years. This is known as the Jathika chintanaya or the Mahavamsa mindset and its outcome is the 'Sinhala-Budda Deepa' and 'unitary state'. Therefore, for the next 2500 years, a Sinhala Buddhist will never allow a federal state or any autonomy for others (non-Sinhala-Buddhists) in Sri Lanka.

What we witness today is a kind of political Buddhism trying to promote the interests of the Sinhala-Buddhist people, rather than religion (Buddhism) as a path for personal salvation, and it is the main impediment to peace in the Island of Sri Lanka because it is based on the doctrine of primacy and superiority of the Sinhala race and the Buddhist religion.

From a very young age, the innocent Sinhala Buddhist children who attend the Daham Paasela (Sunday school) in the Buddhist temples are brainwashed by engraving the Mahavamsa Buddhism and Sinhala Buddhist racism into their sub-conscious minds. They are taught to believe that the non-Sinhala Buddhists (Tamils) are invaders who do not belong to Sri Lanka. All the Tamils should be chased away to Tamil Nadu just the way their ancient Kings Dutugemunu did. The country (Sri Lanka), Sinhala race and Buddhism should be protected from the Tamils. Now, from recently, they have also included the Christians in those needing to be thrown out. Due to the above conditioning, the Sinhala-Buddhist majority believes that the entire Sri Lanka belongs to them and the minorities are aliens.

One good example is the former Army Chief Lt.-Gen. Sarath Fonseka who once said that he strongly believes that Sri Lanka belongs to the Sinhalese, the minorities can live in the country with them (Sinhalese) but they must not try to demand undue things. This is the common understanding/belief not only among the Sinhalese masses (both educated and uneducated) and the Buddhist clergy but also among the Sinhalese political leaders right from the top as we see from the Sinhala Only Act in 1956, the Sinhala-Only (sri) vehicle license-plates policy in 1958 (has anyone learned anything from its aftermath that has ruined the country for many decades?) and the recent proposal to scrap the Tamil version of the national anthem and have a Sinhala-Only National Anthem, but unlike the former army chief, these politicians are extra careful when uttering in public due to diplomacy.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I don't see Lankans here that much and also if u stick to a certain view of a certain country in a rather derogatory manner you should be able to defend your point at any time. You ppl aren't lazy right?
If a 'Certain country' has issues that are not laudatory and then it is discussed, then the one from that 'certain country' can hardly go bonkers and be ludicrously obtuse and fanciful by trotting out dubious 'facts' and justification!


SWRD was born a christian and I know that u neednt to take the pain of writing his full name it just makes ur response longer and more boring. SL was never a religious country the religious fever is something recent especially created by the politicians.
As a person from Sri Lanka you may know all about Bandaranaikye family. However, that does not mean that all do. After all, before the Tamil issue, Sri Lanka, was only associated with the epics and the demon King Ravana and nothing more.

Any sane person would realise that Sri Lanka is but only an island and is hardly of any consequence to the world. So, to know who the PM of Sri Lanka was is hardly a matter that is world shaking!

About his being born a Christian is important since it indicates the clout that the Buddhist have over Ceylon's politics.

Let me give a backgrounder:

Due to ignorance, even the present day Sinhala-Buddhists still believe that they are blood relatives of Buddha because, according to the Mahavamsa, their forefather Pandu-Vasudeva belongs to the Sakya clan, and is a relative of the Buddha where as the historians believe that the term 'Pandu' in Pali means Pandyans.

According to Buddhism, a person ordained as a Bikkhu should practice Ahimsa (non-violence), Karuna (compassion), Metta (affection), and Maithriya (loving-kindness) towards fellow humans, (irrespective of race or religion), not only by words but also in his thoughts and action. Unfortunately in Sri Lanka, due to the influence of the Mahavamsa, a Buddhist Bikkhu is at liberty to engage in racist politics and promote Sinhala-Buddhist chauvinism and hatred, as we see today.

here was NO Buddhism in Sri Lanka until Emperor Asoka's missionary monks led by Mahinda converted the Hindu (Siva worshipping) Naga King Tissa into a Buddhist in the 2nd century BC. Similarly, there was NO Sinhala race/tribe in Sri Lanka until the Mahavihara monks created it in the 5th century AD. When Hindu/Brahmanical influence posed a serious challenge to Buddhism and when Buddhism started to lose popular support and the patronage from the rulers, the Buddhist institutions in India came under attack. The Mahavihara monks of Anuradapura including Ven. Mahanama, the author of the Pali chronicle Mahavamsa and a close relative of the Buddhist Naga king Dhatusena witnessed the decline and disorientation of Buddhism in India. The events that took place in India against Buddhism must have prompted the Mahavihara monks in Sri Lanka to come up with a plan/strategy to protect Buddhism. Due to their strong devotion to Buddhism and desire to consolidate and protect this religion in Sri Lanka they have decided to write the Pali chronicles Deepavamsa/Mahavamsa making Sri Lanka a Dammadeepa/Sinhaladvipa (chosen land of Buddha where Buddhism will prevail for 5000 years) and creating the Sinhala race by integrating all the Buddhists from different tribes/ethnic groups into one race and making them the sustainers of Buddhism (Gautama Buddha's chosen people) to protect Buddhism in Sri Lanka for 5000 years until the next Maithriya Buddha arrive.

With the patronage of the Buddhist Kings, it is the Mahavihara monks who assimilated all the Buddhists from many different tribes together and called them Sihala (followers of Mythical Vijaya).

Ven. Mahanama has created an imaginary link between the three elements, Country-Race-Religion and made it into one unit similar to the Holy Trinity, whereby Sri Lanka (Dhamma Deepa), Buddha's chosen people (Sinhalese), and Buddhism (Buddha Sasana) should be protected for 5000 years. This is known as the Jathika chintanaya or the Mahavamsa mindset and its outcome is the 'Sinhala-Budda Deepa' and 'unitary state'. Therefore, for the next 2500 years, a Sinhala Buddhist will never allow a federal state or any autonomy for others (non-Sinhala-Buddhists) in Sri Lanka.
What we witness today is a kind of political Buddhism trying to promote the interests of the Sinhala-Buddhist people, rather than religion (Buddhism) as a path for personal salvation, and it is the main impediment to peace in the Island of Sri Lanka because it is based on the doctrine of primacy and superiority of the Sinhala race and the Buddhist religion.

From a very young age, the innocent Sinhala Buddhist children who attend the Daham Paasela (Sunday school) in the Buddhist temples are brainwashed by engraving the Mahavamsa Buddhism and Sinhala Buddhist racism into their sub-conscious minds. They are taught to believe that the non-Sinhala Buddhists (Tamils) are invaders who do not belong to Sri Lanka. All the Tamils should be chased away to Tamil Nadu just the way their ancient Kings Dutugemunu did. The country (Sri Lanka), Sinhala race and Buddhism should be protected from the Tamils. Now, from recently, they have also included the Christians in those needing to be thrown out. Due to the above conditioning, the Sinhala-Buddhist majority believes that the entire Sri Lanka belongs to them and the minorities are aliens.

One good example is the former Army Chief Lt.-Gen. Sarath Fonseka who once said that he strongly believes that Sri Lanka belongs to the Sinhalese, the minorities can live in the country with them (Sinhalese) but they must not try to demand undue things. This is the common understanding/belief not only among the Sinhalese masses (both educated and uneducated) and the Buddhist clergy but also among the Sinhalese political leaders right from the top as we see from the Sinhala Only Act in 1956, the Sinhala-Only (sri) vehicle license-plates policy in 1958 (has anyone learned anything from its aftermath that has ruined the country for many decades?) and the recent proposal to scrap the Tamil version of the national anthem and have a Sinhala-Only National Anthem, but unlike the former army chief, these politicians are extra careful when uttering in public due to diplomacy.




No it doesnt meant the country was religious in a sense but it was SWRD whipped up the religious sentiments in order to get into power. Also there is no mention abt him getting converted openly or not even records of his conversion. Both buddhist and non buddhist politicians associate clerics of all religions. As the dominant religion is Buddhism it gets more highlight.

Buddhism was trampled upon by the British and it was a good tool to use as it was soon after the independence.
The reason why SWRD converted is not that much of a mystery.

He was aware that to become the head honcho of Ceylon, he had to curry favour of the Buddhist majority.

The Buddhist compared to the Christians in Sri Lanka were in the pits and were illiterate to a great extent. And there was resentment building up against the Christians.

Let us look at the events (From the data that I have on my computer)

In 1956 S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike, an Anglican who converted to Buddhism, was elected after a nationalistic movement in which he gathered the support of the Sinhalese people majority of the country, who were considered underprivileged compared to the Christian minority. As promised during the election Bandaranaike began a rapid Sinhalisation of all parts of the government, which culminated in the passage of the Sinhala Only Act. At the same time, he had the last of the British military bases in Ceylon removed and led a move towards a Socialist form of economy.

Prior to these changes, the officer corps of the army were composed of three-fifths Christian, one-fifth Tamil, and one-fifth Burgher. Bandaranaike moved to balance this by increasing the number of Sinhalese officers. He was noted for having the post of Inspector General of Police filled by a Buddhist officer over three other more senior Christian officers.

By 1961 resentment was building up among the Christians, who felt that they were systematically being eliminated. The country's economy worsened, resulting in increasing cost of living and rising unemployment. The military coup by General Ayub Khan in Pakistan inspired a group of disenchanted officers to take action.

The Prime Minister was due to leave Colombo to Kataragama on the evening of Friday 26 January 1962, but did not do so. The Air Force which was under the command of seconded RAF officers were not connected to the coup; nor were the Army Commander Major General H. Winston G. Wijeyekoon, theInspector General of Police M.W.F. Abeykoon or the Captain of the Navy Commodore Rajan Kadiragamar. The coup was planned mostly by reserve and retired military and police officers.

The plan was code-named Operation Holdfast. The Prime Minister, Ministers, the Parliamentary Secretary for Defence and External affairs (Felix Dias Bandaranaike), permanent secretary of the ministry of Defence and External affairs (N.Q. Dias), the Army Commander, the acting Captain of the Navy, the Inspector General of Police, DIG (CID) (S A. Dissanayake) and SP (CID) (John Attygalle) were among those to be arrested and taken to the Army Headquarters, where they would be held in the ammunition magazine, which was an underground bunker and hold the prisoners there until further instructions. Other service commanders including the Army Commander were to be restrained and prevented from leaving their houses that night after a certain hour.

Soon after midnight police cars equipped with loud hailers were to be sent out to announce an immediate curfew in Colombo city limits. The Central Telegraph Office, Colombo and other city telephone exchanges were to be put out of operation. Newspaper office buildings, Police Headquarters, the CID office and other key points were to be taken over. Armoured cars were to be stationed at certain points to ensure the success of the operation. Troops from the Panagoda Cantonment were to be prevented from reaching Colombo that night at any cost. Armoured cars and army vehicles fitted with radio equipment, were to be stationed at the two Kelani bridges, the Kirillapone Bridge and other places. Signals Corps Despatch riders, fully armed on motorcycles, were standing by from about 11pm at Torrington (Independence) Square to storm Radio Ceylon once the password 'Holdfast' was given. A special direct telephone line had been laid the previous day, from Army Headquarters at Lower Lake Road to the Echelon Barracks, for use by army personnel. Once the corp was complete the leaders would meet at the Queen's House where they would get the Governor General Sir Oliver Goonetilleke to dissolve parliament and take direct control of the state.

Stopping the coup
As the coup leaders met to finalize plans, the prime minister was visited by her nephew Felix Dias Bandaranaike and two senior police officers of theCriminal Investigation Department (CID), which included its Director DIG S.A. Dissanayake and SP John Attygalle (both would later become IGPs) who informed the PM about an attempt to take over the Government by a coup by certain army, navy and police personnel according to information received. They had earlier informed IGP M.F.W. Abeykoon about the possible coup, who due to the seriousness on the situation notified Felix Dias Bandaranaike, the Minister of Finance and Parliamentary Secretary for Defence and External affairs. A meeting was held at the minister's residence at 7.00pm where the police officers gave the minister all known information. The minister wanted to act fast to stop the coup and left for the Prime Minister's residence, Temple Trees with the two CID officers.

The information came from SP (Colombo) Stanley Senanayake (would later become IGP), head of Police in Colombo, who after being taken into the confidence of the coup leaders had informed his father-in-law, SLFP MP and party secretary P. de S. Kularatne, who in turn notified the CID.

The information took the PM by shock, however under the directions of Felix Dias Bandaranaike, all service commanders, Major General Gerard Wijekoon,Commodore Rajan Kadiragamar, Air Commodore John Barker and the IGP M.F.W. Abeykoon were called to Temple Trees for an emergency meeting. After the meeting in which Stanley Senanayake revealed everything he knew, Felix Dias Bandaranaike ordered to summon to Temple Trees the junior police and army officers who were known to be acting under the orders of the coup leaders, where they were questioned by Felix Dias Bandaranaike personally and the CID. It was revealed that the coup's military element was led by Colonel Fredrick C. de Saram of the Ceylon Artillery (he was a cousin of S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike) and Colonel Maurice de Mel the Commandant of the Volunteer Force (second-in-command of the Army); the police element was led by DIG C.C. "Jungle" Dissanayake the Senior Deputy Inspector General of Police in change of Range I (brother of DIG S.A. Dissanayake, Director of the CID) and DIG Sydney de Zoysa responsible of coordination between the services; it was planned by Deputy Director of Land Development, Douglas Liyanage of the Ceylon Civil Service and supported by Rear Admiral Royce de Mel, recently relieved captain of the navy and brother of Colonel Maurice de Mel. The coup was to be carried out by troops from the 3rd Field Regiment, 2nd Volunteer Antiaircraft Regiment of the Ceylon Artillery (almost the entire officer corps of these regiment were involved), 2nd (V) Field/Plant Regiment, Ceylon Engineers; 2nd Volunteer Signals Regiment, Ceylon Signals Corpsand Armoured cars of the Sabre troop of the Ceylon Armoured Corps. Captain Nimal Jayakody and Captain Tony Anghie of 3rd Field Artillery Regiment, Ceylon Artillery were members of the first batch of officer cadets of the Ceylon Army and had been trained at Royal Military Academy Sandhurst.

The first of the arrest of the coup was to be effected at 9.30pm when Neal de Alwis, MP for Baddegama was arrested from his residence. At this point C.C. "Jungle" Dissanayake received a call at his residence that the plan had been compromised and the leaders decided to call off the coup. At Temple Trees it was informed that the duty officer for the night at Police headquarters ASP V.T. Dickman had been replaced by a known conspirator. By this time navy's internal security personnel were detailed to guard Temple Trees, since no one was sure how deep the conspiracy had penetrated the ranks of the army and police. The PM ordered the arrest of Dissanayake and J.F. Bede Johnpillai (ASP Traffic). They were arrested that night and the following day Colonel F.C. de Saram, Colonel Maurice de Mel and Rear Admiral Royce de Mel were arrested along with many others. In all 31 conspirators, Commissioned Officers from the Army and the Navy, Gazetted Officers from the Police and one civil servant were arrested.

The aftermath
Since no shots were fired and no troops deployed, the conspirators couldn't be charged. So they were remanded, pending trial, in a special section of theWelikada Prison called the Magazine Section. A special security detachment was selected called the composite guard to guard these officers from theCeylon Light Infantry with Major A Hulangamuwa in Charge. They were held in solitary confinement in hope of getting a confession.

All the 26 charged with conspiring to overthrow the an elected government were Christians, in terms of ethnicity, there were 12 Sinhalese, six Tamils and six Burghers among them. The remaining five were not prosecuted due to lack of evidence.

The accused were defended by some of the best lawyers led by G.G. Ponnambalam, H.W. Jayewardene and S.J. Kadirgamar to counter the "inquisitor" Felix Dias Bandaranaike. However Colonel F.C. de Saram had made a confession assuming full responsibility was used by the prosecution. The government put in place a new law called "Criminal Law Special Provision Act of 1962" under which hearsay could be admitted as evidence. And to bring the coup case under the draconian law, it was given retrospective effect from January 1, 1962.

But the first Trial at Bar held in 1962, under the new law, however the judges dissolved the court saying that they were appointed by the Executive, when the latter had no constitutional right to do so. the Act was then amended to get the Supreme Court to appoint the judges. The second court also dissolved itself because of one of the judges, Hon. Justice A.W.H. Abeyesundere, QC, in his earlier post as Attorney General, had assisted the investigation of the case.

A Third Court sat for 324 days from June 3, 1963, and convicted 11 of the 24 accused including Col F.C. de Saram, Col. Maurice de Mel, Rear Admiral Royce de Mel, Douglas Liyanage, Sidney de Zoysa, Wilmot Abraham (later died in prison in 1964), B. I. Loyola, Wilton White, Nimal Jayakody, Noel Matthysz, Victor Joseph, Basil Jesudason, John Felix, David Tambyah, Samuel Jackson and Rodney de Mel. The sentence was ten years in jail and confiscation of property. However the condemned took their case to the Privy Council, In its ruling given in December 1965, it held the Special Act of 1962 ultra vires of the Ceylon constitution and said that the Act had denied fair trial. According to the Privy Council the law had been specially enacted to convict the men, under trial they did not have the protections that they would have had under general criminal law. It acquitted all the eleven.

Of the accused Col. De Saram returned to his family law firm, Douglas Liyanage was appointed Secretary to the Ministry of State in the early 1980s, Capt. John A.R. Felix went on to become the Commissioner-General of Inland Revenue and Lt. Col. Basil Jesudasan became the Chairman of Carsons Cumberbatch PLC.

It was claimed that they had hoped to replace the government with a junta of ex-Prime Ministers. Therefor some of the Crown witnesses tried to link the thenGovernor-General, Sir Oliver Goonetilleke, and former Prime Ministers, Dudley Senanayake and Colonel Sir John Kotelawala, with the conspiracy. Although this was never proven Sir Oliver Goonetilleke resigned as Governor-General and went into self-imposed exile in Britain, he was replaced by Sirimavo Bandaranaike's uncle William Gopallawa who was at the time serving as Ceylon's Ambassador to the US.

Result of the coup attempt
The primary result of the coup attempt was that it led to Sirimavo Bandaranaike's distrust of the military. Even though the Army Commander Winston Wijekoon and the IGP M.W.F. Abeykoon were not aware of the coup, the former was replaced in 1963 by Major General A.R. Udugam, the first Sinhala-Buddhist Army Commander, overlooking the more senior Brigadier (later Major General) B. R. Heyn who was made commander after him. This was entirely racially motivated, because Heyn was a Dutch Burgher, not Sinhalese. Funding for the services were cut drastically greatly affecting its growth and disabling its ability of defending Ceylon in the long term. The 1st Heavy Antiaircraft Regiment was amalgamated with 3rd Field Regiment to form 4th Regiment of theCeylon Artillery, the 2nd (V) Antiaircraft Regiment of the Ceylon Artillery and the 2nd (V) Field/Plant Regiment of the Ceylon Engineers were disbanded and the 2nd (V) Signal Regiment of the Ceylon Signals Corps was brought to form the National Service Regiment. Military hardware procurements limited. The Navy was also hard hit, many of its ships were sold and its blue water capability lost, it would not regain it former ability until the 1980s and 1990s. Inter service cooperation in the form of joint operations were suspended. As a result the military was under strength and ill-equipped to deal with the 1971 JVP Insurrection, during another government of Sirimavo Bandaranaike. To overcome the situation Sri Lanka had to rely on help from other countries. Following the Bandaranaike government's electoral defeat in 1965, Dudley Senanayake became Prime Minister. To prevent a future coup he created the Special Branch of the Ceylon Police Force charged with national security. This was however disbanded when Sirimavo Bandaranaike was again elected in 1970 which resulted in her government being caught off guard, with no early warning when the 1971 JVP Insurrection started.

Therefore,

1. SWRD onverted because he realised that the Buddhist held the key.

2. The Buddhist majority which was backward in all respect found the Christians and Burghers as usurper to their 'glorious' Buddhist past – as if God willed in his Last Word and Testament to the Buddhist the land of SrI Lanka and everyone else was usurpers!

3. Playing to the Buddhist sentiments, all Christians were replaced by Buddhists, as if Buddhists along were the sole proprietors of the land of SriLanka.

No wonder, Jathika Hela Urumaya , political party in Sri Lanka which is led by Buddhist monks, is a powerful arbiter in the political dispensation in Sri Lanka.
 

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
I would like to interrupt this debate Mr. Ray and I hope that you would reply to this too. :)

About his being born a Christian is important since it indicates the clout that the Buddhist have over Ceylon's politics.
Well this is a natural phenomenon because Sri Lanka is never proclaimed to be a secular country. There fore the majority voters choice is the most important above anything.

What we witness today is a kind of political Buddhism trying to promote the interests of the Sinhala-Buddhist people, rather than religion (Buddhism) as a path for personal salvation, and it is the main impediment to peace in the Island of Sri Lanka because it is based on the doctrine of primacy and superiority of the Sinhala race and the Buddhist religion.
Do not beat around the bush Mr. Ray let's come to the core of the issue. Prove that in Sri Lanka, Tamils have developed a separate independent nation parallel with the Sinhalese for 1000 of years.

One good example is the former Army Chief Lt.-Gen. Sarath Fonseka who once said that he strongly believes that Sri Lanka belongs to the Sinhalese, the minorities can live in the country with them (Sinhalese) but they must not try to demand undue things.
So what is wrong with this statement? Do you say Sri Lanka do not belong to Sinhalese? This is really a stupid thing to say.

If Sri Lanka do not belong to Sinhalese then who can claim the civilization of Anuradhapura to the Kandy? Who can claim all the monuments and the irrigation systems of the North-Central Sri Lanka? Do you believe that those can be shared with the minorities?

If so do minorities has openly claim to embrace their past history? But the answer is sadly no. The minorities has not embraced it but creating histories to suite the theories of their superiority in Sri Lanka.

as we see from the Sinhala Only Act in 1956, the Sinhala-Only (sri) vehicle license-plates policy in 1958 (has anyone learned anything from its aftermath that has ruined the country for many decades?)
Do tell this Mr. Ray why the Tamils rose up to the Sinhala-Only act of 1956 right after the passing of social disabilities act in 1957? Is this a coincident?
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Seriously where do u pick that garbage? Nowhere in SL meeting prelates and getting their blessings a MUST.
From Sri Lanka itself!

Can't go along with you that Sri Lanka is garbage.

Note the clout of the Prelates and the necessity of getting their Blessing for political reasons too!

GL briefs Prelates on immense benefits that would accrue from CHOGM

External Affairs Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris and Central Province Chief Ministerial Candidate Sarath Ekanayake with the Mahanayake Thera of the Asgiriya Chapter


... with the Mahanayake Thera of the Malwatte Chapter.


KANDY – The Commonwealth leaders summit to be held in November, where East and West would meet in Colombo, will bring enormous benefits to Sri Lanka, External Affairs Minister Professor G. L. Peiris told the Maha Nayake Theras of Malwatte and Asgiriya on Saturday (06).


Professor Peiris called on the two prelates to brief them on the Commonwealth leaders conference in November and to seek their blessings for the Central Provincial Council Election Campaign led by chief Minister Sarath Ekanayake.

The Island

Need I say more ?

It exposes you that for convenience sake, you are not shy to lie through your teeth.

Stop trying to fool the people all the time!

Please understand that we are not totally illiterate or lazy as some people are! :wink:

Stop being lazy and get your facts right!
 
Last edited:

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
But politicians do that as a PR initiative. Got it? In the after math of the last presidential election, prelates resisted and criticized MR's move to punish SF. but did MR give heed to it? No instead he indicated them that they need to shut up. And they did it and the Buddhists in the country did not care for two hoots.

In 2002/3, two Buddhist monks were assaulted by two gov ministers (both are catholic) inside the Parliament. Because they were against the gov at that time. Did a single Buddhist came to street against it? NO, MR did not care. Because they were criticizing MR that time.

Can a country with such religiosity be like that? If Buddhist monks had such power to dictate terms and if they commanded power among the Buddhists, would the politicians who assaulted them be free? Believe me when i say, u have NO idea what SL is though u seemed to shout out aloud a lot.

And yes there is NO clause in SL constitution that prevent a non buddhist from becoming the president. There were many non buddhist candidates in last presidential elections. How could that happen if there were any such clause.
Yes indeed Sri Lanka cannot do without the Buddhist benediction.

I have shown that the Blessings of the Prelates is a MUST and you can lie through your teeth, but the Ceylon newspapers could not have got it wrong, right?

There maybe no clause that debars anyone to stand for election as the head of the State, but then who hold the majority of Votes? The Burghers? The Christians? The Tamils? Or the Buddhists, who are most militant and parochial – Sinhala Only and such tripe!

If the vote was beyond religious affiliation it would be different. Imagine, SWRD, an Anglican realised it early and so he converted to Buddhism, having seen the beauty of Political Buddhism, so that he could bag the maximum number of votes!

Let us be frank. No one's renounces his religion for a lark. They do it for allurement or gains.

SWRD proves that it is gainful to be a Buddhist since they rule the roost and militant Buddhism that is there in SL is the a total departure from the tenets of Buddhism as is understood around the world.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
What do u try to achieve by emphasizing his Christian part? Does that make him any less of a Tamil? If u know the politics in SL, you will learn that it was MR who wanted the premiership for himself and with his underhand dealings he got it, becasue he wanted to be the next presidential candidate. This happened after JVP too campaighned for Kadirgamar. And how come SL has Kadirgamar as a foreign minister if the gov were reluctant to appoint Tamils in high positions?

Actually there were many high profile Tamils in JRs, and even Premadasa's gov.
I achieve by mentioning Kadirgamar as a Tamil and a Christian to show how a worthy person can be denied a post, because of his ethnicity and religion!

To me that is an insult to meritocracy and an indication of the disgraceful racist and religious arrogance practised in Sri Lanka.

It is not important how many are in inferior posts.

The issue is that none but Buddhist can occupy the Head of the State position because of the manipulative and Machiavellian ways of the Sri Lankan Buddhists!
 

HeinzGud

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
2,558
Likes
1,070
Country flag
There maybe no clause that debars anyone to stand for election as the head of the State, but then who hold the majority of Votes? The Burghers? The Christians? The Tamils? Or the Buddhists, who are most militant and parochial – Sinhala Only and such tripe!
Sinhala only are you sure? What about the Tamils, the Muslims?
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
@saradiel1

I hope I have addressed all of your rather weak expositions including your lack of understanding of the English lexicon!

You are but an old fogey in your mental grasp it appears.

By the way, I have a very luxuriant shock of hair, if you don't mind.

Does baffle a whole lot of young men losing theirs.

You seem to have lost yours, if one goes by your belligerent replies that are more on bluster and no fact.

Take a hold of yourself and don't have a bad hair day please!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top