You did not call Naxalites supporters as Marxists. You said, "Leftists/Marxists start anti-govt. campaign to support Naxals."
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
Nothing I did is BS. You saying so does not make it BS. You have been called out in
this post, you have nothing to counter that, so just pass it off as BS.
I told you,
if you are going to use some standard to make a point, I can use the same standard to counter your point. I just did that.
If anyone is tossing obfuscations and incoherent twaddle, it is you, right from the very first post.
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
There is nothing in your post that justifies broadbrushing Marxists.
Saying "I would extend it further to say: leftist=marxist=communist=maoist etc," is no different from saying "ISIS=BJP."
Why am I saying this? Well, ISIS has been beheading people and one BJP leader threatened to behead the Karnataka CM. So, "ISIS=BJP." (
I do not hold this view, but I am writing this to imitate your logic, and because I am debating you.)
BJP leader threatens to behead Karnataka CM if he eats beef
Some fringe elements from CPI(M)
left the party and became Naxalites, and you took the liberty to broadbrush all Marxists. By the same token, one fringe BJP leader,
still in the party, threatens to behead someone, so I can take the liberty to broadbrush all BJP supporters. (
I am doing this because I am debating you.)
A majority of the Marxists have been against the Naxalites for decades, but you chose to ignore it. Similarly, a majority of BJP leaders would not threaten to behead anyone, but I chose to ignore it. (
I am doing this because I am debating you.)
See, for the second time,
if you are going to use some standard to make a point, I can use the same standard to counter your point. I just did that.
This thread keeps getting better and better.
Next time you generalize to make a point, generalization could be used to counter your point (just like I ripped apart your arguments using your own logic in this thread). Then you will probably say, "stop making hill out of a mole," or invoke some abstract "levels of generalization," which frankly, is just a weasel word to wiggle out of the knot you have tied yourself into.
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
@Sakal Gharelu Ustad, see the post below? This applies to you as well. You don't want to know. In other words you stubbornly choose to remain ignorant. This is exactly why you should not be commenting in this thread. Leave it to the people who know a thing or two about it.
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
@Sakal Gharelu Ustad, anyway, since you brought it up, might as well respond to
this post?
