J-10 or the IAI Lavi?

Shirman

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Well to everybody heres a bit of Info for those people who say J-10 is not similar to IAI LAVI.....

In 2007-2008 under Bush administration Israel was barred from joining the JSF F-35 International program b'cause They helped the Chinese in 4th Gen Fighter....But later on thanks to powerful Israel lobby in the states they were again allowed to participate in the F-35 program.......

Some years earlier when i was studying in Israel Tel Aviv to be precise one Israeli defence mag reported that Pakis had given an F-16 for J-10 program.. Same info was written in FAS Federation of American Scientist website J-10 section......:rolleyes:
 

Hemant Gaikwad

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
29
Likes
12
and how about the Z-10 attack helicopter program ?
"A Canadian subsidiary of the United States defense contractor United Technology Corporation (UTC) pleaded guilty to violating the Arms Export Control Act when it exported US military software to China."
you have definative proof here that the chinese bribed their way into the technology tree .... not to mention the 100's of soviet deisigns that you have been copying
 

Sam2012

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
743
Likes
205
Sorry I cant see that from your one liners here. Instead of juvenile one liners. how about some sources to back up your claims.

I posted official statements from Israel and China as well as statements from general designer of J-10.

What have you provided besides juvenile statements?
Ok Agreed J-10 is ur own design & result of ur hard R&D , what is the use keeping that within your borders why don't u use that & liberate Arunachal pradesh

May be u have test J-10 by bombing Tezpur & Chabua Airbase & show ur step sister Pak the capabilities :thumb:
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
here is the mentality routine map of some guys here:

J7--- a simple copy---copy

J10--a modified copy--copy

Y20- a hybird of many other birds-copy

J31&J20- a copy of other's design l in the future---copy
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
and how about the Z-10 attack helicopter program ?
"A Canadian subsidiary of the United States defense contractor United Technology Corporation (UTC) pleaded guilty to violating the Arms Export Control Act when it exported US military software to China."
you have definative proof here that the chinese bribed their way into the technology tree .... not to mention the 100's of soviet deisigns that you have been copying
as usual, we chinese mangage to have the job done ,while you indians manage to talk and accuse others.

we do while you talk.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Ignorance is a bliss.

This allegation has been denied by both chinese and Israeli authorities.

That is as official as you can get.

The general designer Song Wencong said that J-10 was a development of the indigenous J-9 which preceded the Lavi.
This was echoed by a PLAAF's major Zhang Weigang in a 2012 interview

Chengdu J-10 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is J-9 with canards.
Chengdu J-9 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh yeah! You quoting J-10s braggart with no links is about as official as you can get in China. :pound:

The Russians already busted your J-10 myth to Jane's years ago...

Chinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'

China "had already had a lot of help from Israel", said one source

Russian aerospace engineers have confirmed to Jane's that China's Chengdu J-10 fighter aircraft benefited from significant, direct input from Israel's Lavi programme - including access to the Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) Lavi aircraft itself.

In a number of interviews Jane's has talked at length with several engineers, designers and technical specialists - some of whom have been working with their Chinese counterparts for decades and have had first-hand experience on Chinese military projects. They have provided detailed accounts of the assistance given to various Chinese manufacturers and their military aircraft projects. This has included extensive design and performance modelling, wind-tunnel testing and advanced aerodynamic design input.

Senior Russian engineers who spoke to Jane's recalled their many visits to Chengdu, and elsewhere in China, some of which began in the 1980s. Jane's was told how Chengdu officials of the highest level stated how they had one of the IAI Lavi prototypes in their facilities. Describing his conversations with Chengdu concerning possession of a Lavi aircraft, one Jane's source commented: "I did not consider that to be a revelation ... doesn't everyone know that already?"

It is not possible to independently verify the Russian comments. The charge of Lavi technology transfer has been made before, but this time the claims come from individuals with sustained personal experience of the programme. Both Chinese and Israeli officials have long refuted any purported links between the J-10 and the Lavi.

Neither is it clear whether a Lavi aircraft was permanently transferred to China or if one was given to Chengdu for a specific period of time. When asked, the same Russian engineer commented that he had never heard anyone in Chengdu suggest that China had a acquired a Pakistan Air Force Lockheed Martin F-16 for study to inform J-10 development - a claim that has been made elsewhere in the past.

Officials from Israel Aerospace Industries, previously Israel Aircraft Industries, declined to comment on the Russian claims.

Jane's has heard how Russian engineers met Israeli counterparts at Chinese facilities and often saw documentation and technical drawings marked in Hebrew. When asked about the J-10, one Russian department head remarked: "What Chengdu aircraft? There is no Chengdu aircraft. Everything they have came from somebody else."

There is no doubt that some J-10 design and development work was done in Russia. For example, in 2000 - when there were still flaws in the basic aircraft - Chengdu engineers took a number of different J-10 models to Russia for extensive wind-tunnel testing. A key Russian skill was the ability to conduct detailed spin and high-angle-of-attack testing in a horizontal wind tunnel.

One Russian specialist involved in those and other tests said: "They had already had a lot of help from Israel and what they wanted most of all was to validate their own people and their testing methods rather than the design. Chengdu already has access to a huge aerodynamics facility with underground wind tunnels."

Those Russian specialists who have worked in China are often scathing about China's real level of design capabilities and have become more so as China relies less and less on foreign industrial input. They remain impressed, however, by the scale of resources and funding that has been poured into China's programmes.

"The advance in facilities at Chengdu has been astonishing over the last 20 years. They now have a huge site with completely new test and development facilities, laboratories and an entirely new production line - quite apart from what was there to begin with. Chengdu is the only Chinese manufacturer to maintain its own design bureau. At Shenyang they have only a small office that can make small changes. Chengdu on the other hand is sitting in China's Silicon Valley. The nearby town of Mianyang is a major centre for China's electronics industry and also has a big aerodynamics research facility of its own [the China Air Dynamics Research and Development Centre]," Jane's was told.

However, the potential impact of the Sichuan earthquake of 11 May on the aviation industry centred around Chengdu could be severe. There were particular fears for the research facility at Mianyang, one of the towns close to the epicentre of the quake reported to have been completely destroyed. With the disaster striking at the heart of China's aviation hub, it was hard not to see the J-10 project - and China's aviation industry as a whole - suffering considerable setbacks.

Chinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'

:laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

Hemant Gaikwad

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
29
Likes
12
as usual, we chinese mangage to have the job done ,while you indians manage to talk and accuse others.

we do while you talk.
you guys cant even get the spelling of manage right let alone make an aircraft ..... besides the Pakis were eagerly waiting for a block2 J-10, if you guys dont know how to make one why did you give false hopes to the poor Pakistanis???:pound:
 

no smoking

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,010
Likes
2,306
Country flag
"The advance in facilities at Chengdu has been astonishing over the last 20 years. They now have a huge site with completely new test and development facilities, laboratories and an entirely new production line - quite apart from what was there to begin with. Chengdu is the only Chinese manufacturer to maintain its own design bureau. At Shenyang they have only a small office that can make small changes. Chengdu on the other hand is sitting in China's Silicon Valley. The nearby town of Mianyang is a major centre for China's electronics industry and also has a big aerodynamics research facility of its own [the China Air Dynamics Research and Development Centre]," Jane's was told.
Basically, these can tell Chinese how much these "Russian experts" know about Chinese aviation industry: almost zero.
They got fact completely wrong: Shenyang has a far better designer and production facilities than Chengdu. Actually, even part of J-20's framework was helped by the people from Shenyang simply because they have more experiences.

Thanks to Chinese's least transparency, these western journlists just made their wild guess on Chinese military.
 

shuvo@y2k10

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
2,653
Likes
6,709
Country flag
copying from lavi and su-27 to make your j series aircraft is a good move to for chinese aerospace developement.but what i find bad is blatanly denying that it is a copy.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Basically, these can tell Chinese how much these "Russian experts" know about Chinese aviation industry: almost zero.
They got fact completely wrong: Shenyang has a far better designer and production facilities than Chengdu. Actually, even part of J-20's framework was helped by the people from Shenyang simply because they have more experiences.

Thanks to Chinese's least transparency, these western journlists just made their wild guess on Chinese military.
It is no guess, Russian engineers were there helping design and proof the J-10. It has their engines and radar.. they know exactly what goes on. Shenyang design is a joke... look at their product = Flanker clone claimed as indigenous. :pound:
 

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
Oh yeah! You quoting J-10s braggart with no links is about as official as you can get in China. :pound:

The Russians already busted your J-10 myth to Jane's years ago...

Chinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'

China "had already had a lot of help from Israel", said one source

Russian aerospace engineers have confirmed to Jane's that China's Chengdu J-10 fighter aircraft benefited from significant, direct input from Israel's Lavi programme - including access to the Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) Lavi aircraft itself.

In a number of interviews Jane's has talked at length with several engineers, designers and technical specialists - some of whom have been working with their Chinese counterparts for decades and have had first-hand experience on Chinese military projects. They have provided detailed accounts of the assistance given to various Chinese manufacturers and their military aircraft projects. This has included extensive design and performance modelling, wind-tunnel testing and advanced aerodynamic design input.

Senior Russian engineers who spoke to Jane's recalled their many visits to Chengdu, and elsewhere in China, some of which began in the 1980s. Jane's was told how Chengdu officials of the highest level stated how they had one of the IAI Lavi prototypes in their facilities. Describing his conversations with Chengdu concerning possession of a Lavi aircraft, one Jane's source commented: "I did not consider that to be a revelation ... doesn't everyone know that already?"

It is not possible to independently verify the Russian comments. The charge of Lavi technology transfer has been made before, but this time the claims come from individuals with sustained personal experience of the programme. Both Chinese and Israeli officials have long refuted any purported links between the J-10 and the Lavi.

Neither is it clear whether a Lavi aircraft was permanently transferred to China or if one was given to Chengdu for a specific period of time. When asked, the same Russian engineer commented that he had never heard anyone in Chengdu suggest that China had a acquired a Pakistan Air Force Lockheed Martin F-16 for study to inform J-10 development - a claim that has been made elsewhere in the past.

Officials from Israel Aerospace Industries, previously Israel Aircraft Industries, declined to comment on the Russian claims.

Jane's has heard how Russian engineers met Israeli counterparts at Chinese facilities and often saw documentation and technical drawings marked in Hebrew. When asked about the J-10, one Russian department head remarked: "What Chengdu aircraft? There is no Chengdu aircraft. Everything they have came from somebody else."

There is no doubt that some J-10 design and development work was done in Russia. For example, in 2000 - when there were still flaws in the basic aircraft - Chengdu engineers took a number of different J-10 models to Russia for extensive wind-tunnel testing. A key Russian skill was the ability to conduct detailed spin and high-angle-of-attack testing in a horizontal wind tunnel.

One Russian specialist involved in those and other tests said: "They had already had a lot of help from Israel and what they wanted most of all was to validate their own people and their testing methods rather than the design. Chengdu already has access to a huge aerodynamics facility with underground wind tunnels."

Those Russian specialists who have worked in China are often scathing about China's real level of design capabilities and have become more so as China relies less and less on foreign industrial input. They remain impressed, however, by the scale of resources and funding that has been poured into China's programmes.

"The advance in facilities at Chengdu has been astonishing over the last 20 years. They now have a huge site with completely new test and development facilities, laboratories and an entirely new production line - quite apart from what was there to begin with. Chengdu is the only Chinese manufacturer to maintain its own design bureau. At Shenyang they have only a small office that can make small changes. Chengdu on the other hand is sitting in China's Silicon Valley. The nearby town of Mianyang is a major centre for China's electronics industry and also has a big aerodynamics research facility of its own [the China Air Dynamics Research and Development Centre]," Jane's was told.

However, the potential impact of the Sichuan earthquake of 11 May on the aviation industry centred around Chengdu could be severe. There were particular fears for the research facility at Mianyang, one of the towns close to the epicentre of the quake reported to have been completely destroyed. With the disaster striking at the heart of China's aviation hub, it was hard not to see the J-10 project - and China's aviation industry as a whole - suffering considerable setbacks.

Chinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'

:laugh::laugh::laugh:
You need new troll glasses, arnand. The link is in my post. :rolleyes:

ROFL, on second look, it is in your own source. LMAO; you just got owned, arnend, Troll better next time.

Both Chinese and Israeli officials have long refuted any purported links between the J-10 and the Lavi.

Imagine to be stupid enough asking for sources when it is in your own source. ROFFFFFFFFl
 
Last edited:

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
Oh yeah! You quoting J-10s braggart with no links is about as official as you can get in China. :pound:

The Russians already busted your J-10 myth to Jane's years ago...

Chinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'

China "had already had a lot of help from Israel", said one source

Russian aerospace engineers have confirmed to Jane's that China's Chengdu J-10 fighter aircraft benefited from significant, direct input from Israel's Lavi programme - including access to the Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) Lavi aircraft itself.

In a number of interviews Jane's has talked at length with several engineers, designers and technical specialists - some of whom have been working with their Chinese counterparts for decades and have had first-hand experience on Chinese military projects. They have provided detailed accounts of the assistance given to various Chinese manufacturers and their military aircraft projects. This has included extensive design and performance modelling, wind-tunnel testing and advanced aerodynamic design input.

Senior Russian engineers who spoke to Jane's recalled their many visits to Chengdu, and elsewhere in China, some of which began in the 1980s. Jane's was told how Chengdu officials of the highest level stated how they had one of the IAI Lavi prototypes in their facilities. Describing his conversations with Chengdu concerning possession of a Lavi aircraft, one Jane's source commented: "I did not consider that to be a revelation ... doesn't everyone know that already?"

It is not possible to independently verify the Russian comments. The charge of Lavi technology transfer has been made before, but this time the claims come from individuals with sustained personal experience of the programme. Both Chinese and Israeli officials have long refuted any purported links between the J-10 and the Lavi.

Neither is it clear whether a Lavi aircraft was permanently transferred to China or if one was given to Chengdu for a specific period of time. When asked, the same Russian engineer commented that he had never heard anyone in Chengdu suggest that China had a acquired a Pakistan Air Force Lockheed Martin F-16 for study to inform J-10 development - a claim that has been made elsewhere in the past.

Officials from Israel Aerospace Industries, previously Israel Aircraft Industries, declined to comment on the Russian claims.

Jane's has heard how Russian engineers met Israeli counterparts at Chinese facilities and often saw documentation and technical drawings marked in Hebrew. When asked about the J-10, one Russian department head remarked: "What Chengdu aircraft? There is no Chengdu aircraft. Everything they have came from somebody else."

There is no doubt that some J-10 design and development work was done in Russia. For example, in 2000 - when there were still flaws in the basic aircraft - Chengdu engineers took a number of different J-10 models to Russia for extensive wind-tunnel testing. A key Russian skill was the ability to conduct detailed spin and high-angle-of-attack testing in a horizontal wind tunnel.

One Russian specialist involved in those and other tests said: "They had already had a lot of help from Israel and what they wanted most of all was to validate their own people and their testing methods rather than the design. Chengdu already has access to a huge aerodynamics facility with underground wind tunnels."

Those Russian specialists who have worked in China are often scathing about China's real level of design capabilities and have become more so as China relies less and less on foreign industrial input. They remain impressed, however, by the scale of resources and funding that has been poured into China's programmes.

"The advance in facilities at Chengdu has been astonishing over the last 20 years. They now have a huge site with completely new test and development facilities, laboratories and an entirely new production line - quite apart from what was there to begin with. Chengdu is the only Chinese manufacturer to maintain its own design bureau. At Shenyang they have only a small office that can make small changes. Chengdu on the other hand is sitting in China's Silicon Valley. The nearby town of Mianyang is a major centre for China's electronics industry and also has a big aerodynamics research facility of its own [the China Air Dynamics Research and Development Centre]," Jane's was told.

However, the potential impact of the Sichuan earthquake of 11 May on the aviation industry centred around Chengdu could be severe. There were particular fears for the research facility at Mianyang, one of the towns close to the epicentre of the quake reported to have been completely destroyed. With the disaster striking at the heart of China's aviation hub, it was hard not to see the J-10 project - and China's aviation industry as a whole - suffering considerable setbacks.

Chinese J-10 'benefited from the Lavi project'

:laugh::laugh::laugh:
Some unnamed russian source is better than the official statements of Israel and Chinese government and chief designer of J-10?

Congrats arnand, your trolling just reached a new level. :laugh:
 

no smoking

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,010
Likes
2,306
Country flag
It is no guess, Russian engineers were there helping design and proof the J-10. It has their engines and radar.. they know exactly what goes on. Shenyang design is a joke... look at their product = Flanker clone claimed as indigenous. :pound:
Well, I doubt how much these "Russian engineers" know about Chengdu & Shenyang because their observation is clearly incorrect.
 

SATISH

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,038
Likes
303
Country flag
Well, I doubt how much these "Russian engineers" know about Chengdu & Shenyang because their observation is clearly incorrect.
DIndn't the Russians build your aerospace industry? who better to ask?

After the death of the Soviet Union both China and the west pounced on the jobless aerospace engineers who were jobless in Russia providing them citizenship and of the the majority went to CHina and this has been well documented.

So Russians are the best bet to know about your aviation industry which you claim to be yours.
 

rkhanna

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
3,263
Likes
12,148
Country flag
That's a lot of copy paste steal for one country, impressive if you don't believe in legality and scientific ethics.
Oh everybody copies and steals. The Americans the brits The japenese The Koreans and now the Chinese.

In the process they have built a semiconductor and quantum computing capability that rivals the best in world. They are building a parallel tech infrastructure to compete with (America) the west and almost half the world is signing on.

Hell even the Soviets didn't come close.

We need to stop whining and get our arses moving. Enough excuses.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top