INS Vishal (IAC- II) Aircraft Carrier

Discussion in 'Indian Navy' started by john70, Aug 21, 2012.

  1. WolfPack86

    WolfPack86 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    6,307
    Likes Received:
    6,761

    Does govt has any time line for INS Vishal.
     
    Tactical Frog and aditya10r like this.
  2. WolfPack86

    WolfPack86 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    6,307
    Likes Received:
    6,761
    Indian Navy plans to acquire its third Aircraft Carrier for whopping Rs 1.6 lakh crores
    The Indian Navy is moving ahead with a big-ticket proposal for acquiring its third aircraft carrier which is expected to cost around Rs 1.6 lakh crore along with the additional component of 57 fighter aircraft.

    The Navy has one operational aircraft carrier in the INS Vikramaditya while another one, INS Vikrant, is under construction at the Cochin Shipyard Limited (CSL) and is expected to join service in the next few years.

    “The Navy is planning to field its Rs 70,000 crore proposal before the defence ministry in near future which will cost around Rs 1.6 lakh crore at the approval stage itself along with the fighter plane component and the actual costs will go higher further as the programme moves ahead,” government sources told Mail Today.

    The Navy has plans of buying 57 twin-engine fighter planes for the third aircraft carrier for which American F-18 and French Dassault Rafale are in the race.

    “If one goes by the cost of the 36 Rafales acquired for the Air Force, the 57 planes are not going to cost us less than Rs 90,000-95,000 crore,” the sources said.

    Citing the Chinese threat, the Navy had been asking for construction of the third nuclearpowered aircraft carrier using American technology and systems which is going to be far more expensive in comparison with the existing systems.

    The Navy has been arguing that it should have one aircraft carrier each for the eastern and western sea boards with one aircraft carrier in reserve to take care of the time taken for refit and repair of any of the two carriers.

    However, the defence ministry is not very keen on the project due to the high costs involved in it and it would force the government to change its acquisition plans for the coming years compelling it to wait list a number of other urgently required weapon systems of the Army and the Air Force, sources said.

    The cost of equipment for the aircraft carrier take-off patented by an American private sector firm will also be a major factor in determining the final cost of the carrier for India, the sources said.

    For buying the aircraft for the aircraft carrier, the Navy had floated a request for information (RFI) but it has not got any clearance from the defence ministry for issuing the tender for the project.


    However, the Navy has already allowed the vendors to give it a presentation on whether their planes would be able to take off from the Russian-origin INS Vikramaditya or not. Defence ministry sources also said the need for further expanding the aircraft carrier fleet needs to be thought over again as all targets and routes in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) can be looked after well by the existing assets and bases in the area.

    Due to this reason, the defence ministry had refused to clear the five-year programme of the Navy as agreeing to it would required at least doubling the current acquisition budget of the ministry.

    The government of India already spends 28 per cent of its total acquisition budget on fulfilling the requirements of the three services and increasing it to a higher level does not seem possible in the near future, sources said.

    http://defencenews.in/article.aspx?id=525787
     
  3. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,892
    Fake news. No country has ever spent 25billion dollars on a carrier till today including USA. This increase of cost by 10 times over IAC-1 shows serious fake news activity. The 57 planes don't take 1lakh crore nor does a carrier take 60k crore to make, that too in India. Even the Ford class carrier took 8 billion dollars (50k crore rupees) for 1lakh ton weight. Also, there is little reason to buy fighters worth 1lakh crore if that is an impediment to cost. The rafales can come at 90 million a piece without offset or integration as that have been taken care of already. Else, LCA Mk2 and MiG29 are always available to lower the cost significantly to 2-2.5 billion dollars or 13-18k crore. Taking UK carrier cost of 4 billion dollars, Indian total cost will be 6 billion dolalrs
     
  4. VIP

    VIP Ultra Nationalist Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    5,201
    Likes Received:
    4,719
    Location:
    Gandhinagar
    Defencenews is a fanboi site reproducing articles again and again time to time. Just read the 2nd half of the article which states that govt is not willing to go ahead with 5 years plan produced by Navy.
     
  5. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,892
    It is India today article. Defencenews is just a copy paste portal
     
  6. abingdonboy

    abingdonboy Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,716
    Likes Received:
    7,744
    IAC-2 shown during IN’s R day parade float
     

    Attached Files:

    Sam Shaw and Tactical Frog like this.
  7. shiphone

    shiphone Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,891
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
  8. Filtercoffee

    Filtercoffee Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2016
    Messages:
    615
    Likes Received:
    206
    ...............................Isn't that a french carrier? God forbid some other type of fighter needs to be scrambled.
     
  9. captscooby81

    captscooby81 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2016
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    12,627
    Location:
    Bhārata
    So as per CNS Lanba IAC 2 will be CATOBAR with possible EMALS system ..Lets just hope Donald duck don t change his mind and push us out of FMS level defence partner to something low ..
     
    aditya10r likes this.
  10. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,892
    CATOBAR is just steam based EMALS. EMALS is electric motor based CATOBAR. The performance of CATOBAR is good enough for India. Also, it is a simple technology. easy to maintain, repair and build. I would not be unhappy at CATOBAR based IAC-2
     
  11. indiandefencefan

    indiandefencefan Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2015
    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    338
    The problem with conventional CATOBAR (apart from performance) for India is the the Americans use the steam generated by the onboard nuclear reactors to operate the catapult.

    Since IAC 2 will be conventionally powered, generating steam will be very difficult.

    On the other hand, electricity to power EMALS will be more efficient as the diesel electric engines will take care of that.
     
    captscooby81 likes this.
  12. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,892
    It is the other way around. The nuclear power is what generates the electricity needed for the EMALS. The steam is generated even by boiler engines. Today's modern diesel engines may not produce steam but they can also be rigged to divert the energy wasted into producing steam. The steam does not necessarily come from the propulsion or electric generation system. This was used in 1950s and in non-nuclear power.
     
  13. shiphone

    shiphone Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,891
    Likes Received:
    1,814
    lol...The naval nuclear power propulsion also generates steam FIRST....

    young Indian...please...

     
    Last edited: May 25, 2018
  14. Hari Sud

    Hari Sud Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2012
    Messages:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    1,765
    Location:
    Ontario
    Vikramaditya is steam based planes launched and so are the Chinese Carriers. Only Americans are nuclear based Catobar. So why is nuclear power on the carrier is an issue.
     
  15. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,892
    The steam by heavy oil burning boiler was older times. Now, it is replaced with diesel engines. So, the steam generation is not so straightforward
     
  16. porky_kicker

    porky_kicker Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2016
    Messages:
    2,829
    Likes Received:
    13,931
    Sorry Wrong thread...................
     
  17. undeadmyrmidon

    undeadmyrmidon Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2017
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    863
    Chingchonng pINGPONG............................................

    Nuclear

    Fission -> Coolant/Heavy Water -> Steam -> Turbine -> Dynamo -> Transformer -> Transmision -> Gearset

    CODAG/COGAG

    Combustion -> Transmision -> Gearset
     
  18. Kshithij

    Kshithij DharmaYoddha Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    1,892
    Wrong...

    Nuclear goes this way:
    Fission -> Coolant ->steam -> Turbine -> Transmission -> Gearset
    |-->Dynamo ->Electricity

    CODAG goes this way:
    Combustion ->Piston ->Transmission -> Gearset

    Secondary generator combustion -> Piston -> Dynamo -> Transformer

    CODAG has auxiliary power generator which is an extra space wastage. Nuclear power also generates much more power while saving a lot of storage space for thousands of tons of fuel.
     
  19. Manish Khan

    Manish Khan Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2018
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    27
    the same point,i was wondering where this sort of information come from?
     
  20. WolfPack86

    WolfPack86 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    6,307
    Likes Received:
    6,761
    INS Vishal program stalled once again.

    The Indian Navy’s longstanding plan to build and commission its second indigenous aircraft carrier (IAC-2) into service by 2030–32 has been further postponed due to steadily declining budgets, technological hurdles, and, above all, enduring delays by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) in approving the programme.

    The proposed 65,000–70,000 tonne conventionally powered ‘flat top’ carrier – tentatively named Vishal – capable of embarking 50–60 fixed- and rotary-wing platforms, attaining speeds of up to 30 kt, and projected to cost INR800–900 billion (USD11.65–13 billion) – is part of the IN’s Maritime Capability Perspective Plan (MCPP).

    First announced in 2005 and later updated for the 15-year period until 2027, the MCPP envisages the IN fielding three carrier battle groups (CBGs): one for each seaboard and one in reserve.
    https://www.facebook.com/pg/TejasMrca/photos/?ref=page_internal
     

Share This Page