India's clout in question as regional troubles mount

SajeevJino

Long walk
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2012
Messages
6,017
Likes
3,364
Country flag
India's clout in question as regional troubles mount



India is a world power, so allies in the West would like to believe, but recent developments in its own backyard reveal the limits of the country's influence and still weak diplomatic force, said analysts.


Even in the historically favourable parts of its volatile neighbourhood, New Delhi has suffered reversals in recent weeks, particularly in a high-profile spat with the Maldives, a tiny nation of 300,000 people.

Earlier this month, the Maldives kicked out Indian infrastructure firm GMR and cancelled its $511-million deal to run the airport, thumbing its nose at Indian threats to cut off aid.

"The Maldives deal collapse can be considered as an isolated event, but it does cast a shadow over India's ability to take care of its economic interests in the region," said Wilson John, who heads the Observer Research Foundation think-tank in New Delhi.

The alliance with Maldivian President Mohamed Waheed appears to be heading the way of ties with counterpart Mahinda Rajapakse in neighbouring Sri Lanka, a relationship which has deteriorated steadily over the last few years.

Clashes over Rajapakse's treatment of ethnic Tamils, a politically important group in India, as well as the arrests of Indian fishermen have raised tensions.

New Delhi has also been angered by huge duties imposed on imported cars. Leading Indian business group CII believes Sri Lankan tariffs of up to 200 percent could hit 15 percent of India's car exports.


In the Maldives and Sri Lanka, some see the hand of China, which has forged ties with the governments in Colombo and Male and now offers a richer and more generous alternative to India for investment and infrastructure funding.

India's new foreign minister, Salman Khurshid, acknowledged as much last week when he said that New Delhi would have to "accept the new reality of China's presence in many areas that we consider an exclusive playground for India".

This signalled a more pragmatic approach than his predecessor, S.M. Krishna and others in the Indian security establishment, who are alarmed by China's maritime strength and growing influence in the Indian Ocean.

"We know how to resolve our disputes with all the countries in the region. It is a slow-moving process but we are moving in the right direction," Indian foreign ministry spokesman Syed Akbaruddin told AFP.

"You see, we cannot send our troops to resolve them."

In its northeastern neighbour Myanmar, India trails far behind China as the army-ruled country opens up to investment, and critics say New Delhi has been slow to react to recent pro-democracy changes.

"India is still not sure how to deal with Myanmar," said Sujit Dutta, a professor of international conflict studies at Jamia Millia Islamia University in New Delhi.

"At one level India wants to do business with Myanmar, but (it) is also uneasy in dealing with the military regime."

Opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who is poised to benefit from further pro-democracy moves, made the barbed comment in New Delhi last month that she had been "saddened" by India's engagement with her country's ruling military junta.

Elsewhere in India's neighbourhood, once described by then US president Bill Clinton as "the most dangerous place in the world", the picture is bleak with the exception of Bangladesh, where previously poor relations have improved.

A peace dialogue between India and nuclear-armed Pakistan shows few signs of making real progress and despite a warming in rhetoric Indian Prime Minster Manmohan Singh recently declined an invitation to visit Islamabad.

In the deadlocked and dysfunctional politics of Nepal the ruling Maoists, who are closer to China and instinctively anti-Indian, still hold sway while even tiny Bhutan is starting to see the benefits of closer ties with Beijing.

"Small neighbouring countries find India's attitude to be very bossy," said analyst John. "They prefer China because it does not openly get involved in domestic affairs. Their tilt towards China cannot be denied."

Despite problems in the region and its tiny diplomatic service comparable in size to that of Singapore, India is looking to spread its commercial and diplomatic presence further afield with a "Look East" policy aimed at east Asia.

Such ambitions are being encouraged by the United States and other Western backers who see democratic India as a natural ally in Asia and a future counterweight to China.

But while US President Barack Obama hailed India as a fully fledged "world power" during a visit in 2010, the country's might in global affairs and ability to bring its size to bear remain in question.


India's clout in question as regional troubles mount
 

marshal panda

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2010
Messages
167
Likes
56
Country flag
It is time,ministry of defence designed limited security course for our honble MPs.
 

hit&run

United States of Hindu Empire
Mod
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
14,104
Likes
63,370
India's clout was always an over rated entity. Things were coming to us naturally. To sustain, pursue and enhance was our job but we failed to do all three. There are no free lunches. But for us, doing symbolic diplomatic hand shakes is the only satisfaction or cheap brownie point for internal consumption.

I doubt we will run extra mile for Vietnam, Burma or Afghanistan.
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
India's clout was always an over rated entity. Things were coming to us naturally. To sustain, pursue and enhance was our job but we failed to do all three. ......
Indian people have always under-rated out ability ........we have listened to others opinions of ourselves unnecessarily

the lead article talk s a bout maldives , china , burma , usa role for india as counterweight

on not one of those issues has india failed - it is doing reasonable ok given the heritage from the first govt of mr n and the present political system

what was done by n will be on the cards for the long-long-long term plan - cant be changed for the present

the system of gov - too democratic and chaotic - must be streamline - that is the main challenge plus corruption

not those mentioned in the article
 
Last edited:

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top