Indian villagers celebrate victory over big business: a land acquisition precedent?

Discussion in 'Economy & Infrastructure' started by Rage, Mar 15, 2011.

  1. Rage

    Rage DFI TEAM Stars and Ambassadors

    Feb 23, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Indian villagers celebrate victory over big business

    Supporters of SEZs say they allow businesses to develop with less bureaucracy

    In a small village outside India's commercial capital of Mumbai (Bombay) a group of villagers are celebrating a remarkable victory over a multi-billion dollar business empire.

    Farmers and housewives in the sleepy hamlet of Diu took on a powerful coalition which included the state government of Maharashtra and billionaire magnate Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries.

    The Diu villagers lived on land which had been earmarked to be developed as a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

    But after a vociferous campaign opposing the development of their land, during which the deadline for acquiring the land lapsed, the state government finally denotified it.

    Only about 3,700 acres out of a potential 20,000 could be acquired by the authorities in the end. If the development had come into being, it would have been spread over 20,000 acres and bordered about 45 villages.

    Now the villagers are free to use it as they wish: they can cultivate it, sell it or mortgage it for loans.


    "We want to cultivate this land for generations to come," said village elder LJ Thakur with palpable emotion.
    Kiran Mhatre Kiran Mhatre says that agriculture can provide employment

    He said he had fasted for several days as part of a sustained protest against the development. The villagers gathered together looked relaxed and triumphant - they are aware they have achieved something quite rare.

    Only a handful of SEZs in India have been halted because of local protests. But although the villagers' campaign was unusual, it does highlight why many people who work on such land in India are against such development projects.

    They are seen as taking away local livelihoods for little or no compensation.

    But the government argues that SEZs are an efficient and bureaucracy-free way of releasing India's economic potential - enabling exporters in particular to get their produce speedily onto the world's markets.

    There are now almost 100 SEZs in India at different stages - many functioning but many still at the controversial land acquisition stage.


    It is not clear whether this case will set a precedent.

    If those behind the scheme still wish to have a SEZ, they will need to go to back to the beginning of a very convoluted process.

    This particular zone was hailed as being significant because of its proximity to India's financial capital Mumbai and its access to ports and sea routes. A new international airport is proposed to be built nearby.

    The residents of Diu are eager to savour their victory and recall their struggle.

    For Atmaram Mokal it was the longevity of the campaign that was key to its success.

    "Except for stray incidents, it was never violent. All the farmers were united and we held demonstrations in Raigad as well as Mumbai. Women participated," he said.

    "My grandson is studying in the US. I don't see how an SEZ is better than our present lives”

    Kusumbai Thakur ​

    In September 2008 an overwhelming majority of farmers from 22 of the 45 affected villages - voted against the zone in a rare public exercise not carried out in most of the other proposed SEZ areas.

    Former local school headmistress Kusumbai Thakur - who played an integral part in the struggle - said that everything possible was done to save the land.

    "It gives excellent rice," she said. "All of us have ponds in our fields to breed fish. Not only is it enough for our family's needs, we make enough money for our children's education.

    "My grandson is studying in the US. I don't see how a SEZ is better than our present lives."

    Celebratory song

    She even composed motivational songs for women in the region who were opposed to the SEZ.

    When asked if they oppose all development, unanimously they said no.

    "Sure development is important but at what cost? The government should set up factories in infertile and barren lands. Create opportunities there. Isn't food production important too? They should enhance agricultural production in this area. Make it profitable and empower farmers," Mr Mokal said.

    Kiran Mhatre, another villager, points out that it is not only industries that create jobs.

    "With knowledge of modern techniques and appropriate help from the government for support prices, agriculture can create many opportunities in farming and subsidiary occupations," he says.

    Maharashtra State Revenue Minister Balasheb Thorat said that his department had not received any communication from Reliance Industries regarding the matter since the deadline to acquire the land lapsed.

    As Kusumbai Thakur breaks into a celebratory song, others join in. For now, the villagers seem convinced about their stand against the SEZ and are confident of their long-term success.
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2011
  3. Tolaha

    Tolaha Senior Member Senior Member

    Nov 28, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Not a good news in my opinion.

    US is where it is because of rapid industrialization. Rather than our folks go all over the world in search of oppurtunities, they could have made the country richer. Wouldnt it be hypocratical on our part to oppose this?
    Ofcourse, it is very easy to say this for someone like me who isnt going through the emotional trauma of having to loose one's land. But even then, dont think we are going in the right direction.

    As one great man said: "Industrialize or Perish!"
    The sooner we realize it, the better it is for our future generation.
  4. GPM

    GPM Tihar Jail Banned

    Mar 5, 2011
    Likes Received:
    Agriculture alone cannot take the country very far.

    Soon better senses would prevail, I hope.
  5. Flint

    Flint Senior Member Senior Member

    Mar 10, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Development has to involve local people. You can't throw them off their land and then give all the profit to some faceless private company. If they are willing, then fine. If they are not willing, then respect their right over their own land.
  6. mayfair

    mayfair Elite Member Elite Member

    Feb 26, 2010
    Likes Received:
    100% agree. Let people decide what to do with their land and how and to whom should they transfer their own property. People are not all fools. If they see the move as beneficial they'll be most happy to part with their property provided they are well compensated and they see the situation for them improving for better.
  7. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Mar 10, 2009
    Likes Received:
    EST, USA
    Whatever happened, one must be happy that there was no violence, unlike in Nandigram, where there was a virtual war between two well armed groups using assault rifles, bombs, mortars and mines.

Share This Page