superior weapons.please name me those superior weapons?
remember that even read neutral source.the strength of aircraft in IAF in 65 was 5 times more than PAF.
Sabre was a decade old fighter than Gnat.
Do you have basic knowledge about F-86?? F-86 was superior to Gnat in all most all aspects. Gnat could not carry AAMs. Sabers could, Gnat's pay load was extremely low. F-86 saber could carry about 2300 Kg bombs. Not to mention rockets 6 .50 cal machine guns. Gnat was actually a trainer aircraft. it was only good in Dog fighting it is much like in WW2 A Japanese Zero is pitted against American P 51 or F6F.
Gnat was small and had very tight turn radious useful basically only in dog fighting. But it was not an advantage because F 86s were armed with AAMs.
You may dont trust me, but you cant deny what your countryman said-"In the same incident, an IAF Gnat, piloted by Squadron Leader Brij Pal Singh Sikand, landed at an abandoned Pakistani airstrip at Pasrur and was captured by the PAF. The Two Lockheed F-104 Starfighters, that closed in at super sonic speed, forced the Gnat down.[This Gnat is displayed as a war trophy in the Pakistan Air Force Museum, Karachi. Sqn Ldr Saad Hatmi who flew the captured aircraft to Sargodha, and later tested and evaluated its flight performance, was of view that Gnat was no 'Sabre Slayer' when it came to dog fighting."
Indo-Pakistani Air War of 1965 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
leaving everything aside.pakistan was a hindu land.we have occupied the land.can you do anything?we are killing you from your own land?now tell me what is this
we broke india into 2.captured your land.kills you on occasional basis.threaten your existance
now this is something i term as bravery.
actually the stupid is non other than you.
Uh, typical Pakistani, hello mate your forefathers were Hindu, all Muslim invaders who attacked India, they mainly devastated the area what is now Pakistan.
You are saying like you are from Arab or West Asia, not true, Pakistan was created for Indian Muslims. If you do that then you are immigrants with no connection with those who created Indus Valley Civilization. Then you cant claim any more Indus Valley Civilization.
You argue it is in Pakistan and it was created by your ancestors, then why dont you claim Vedic civilization part of which was also situated in present Pakistan? You dont because it is Hindu.
If you want to claim yourself as heir of Indus valley civilization as you live in the area where Indus Valley Civilization flourished, then stop claiming Arab invaders were hero and Hindu kings were villains because your ancestors were in side of Hindu kings or were tortured and terrified by invaders, stop claiming Muhammad Bin Qasim as first Pakistani, because he is from 8th century AC and Indus Valley civilization was before 2000 BC. You cant claim Muhammad Bin Qasim as first Pakistani and Indus Valley civilization as Pakistani simultaneously, because there is a huge time difference between them. I hope you understand.
And if you say you are the descendants of creators of Indus Valley Civilization then you need to accept your Hindu heritage and how your forefathers were tortured by Muslim invaders, then you cant claim Muhammad Bin Qasim as first Pakistani and other Muslim invaders as Hero, then they will be considered as Criminals for their crime against your ancestors like we consider them as criminal for their atrocity on our ancestors. Then existence of Pakistan will be utterly ridiculous. Because it is created to oppose Hinduism.
Can you accept your Hindu heritage and be proud of it?
THE ONLY REASON TO CLAIM INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION AS PAKISTANI BECAUSE THE RELIGIOUS SIDE OF THIS CIVILIZATION STILL NOT CLEAR. PAKISTANIS TO CLAIM ANY THING AS PAKISTANI AT FIRST SEE WHETHER IT IS CONNECTED TO HINDUISM OR NOT, SO VEDIC CIVILIZATION IS NOT PAKISTANI.
Dear Moderators please dont censor it, (Pakistanis show no mercy when they bash India, then why should we?)
Whether RAW may support Sindhis or not they are decades behind in this activity compared to Pakistani ISI.