This is very good, gdp is not an accurate measure, its an even worse messure for a country like India which doesn't have a capitalist minded society n not all productive economic activity is captured in financial transactions.
Countries like India that have deep family values and a kind society always measure lower gdp than western countries where every transaction between individuals is monetary.
I.e. Ex A Family A in India. husband + wife + baby + grandma. Husband goes to work n makes $10 a day. Wife makes delicious home made food n keeps every1 satisfied. Grandma raises the kid out of love n imparts necessary samskars.
In this example, total contribution of the family to the gdp is $10.
Ex B Family in USA. Mom + Kid. Divorced single mom goes to work n makes $10 a day. Hires a babysitter to look after the baby and pays her $5. And Pays $5 to a fastfood worker for food for herself & the baby....who happens to be her ex
..the babysitter also spends her own $5 on getting food from the same fast food worker....... The fastfood maker spends his now earned $10 to get a blowjob from the babysitter. The babysitter is happy in the end n gives some of her food to the worker.
In this example, there are also 4 people. With similar results. All 4 people are fed & a couple have a happy ending.
GDP is counted every time money changes hands. So $10+$5+$5+$5+ $10= $35
Total contribution to GDP in ex B is $35. For sake of simplicity take examples these as representative of whole countries economies.
Example A has 4 people. Example B has 4 people. Indian Family As GDP per capita is $10/4 = $2.5/person.
American Bs GDP per capita is $35/4 = $8.75/person. According to GDP country B is more than 3 times as rich as country A!
Now which family do u think is better off n happy?
who would think an unknown babysitter provides a higher quality of babysitting services than own grandma? None. But grandmas contribution to GDP is zero.
So according to the flawed gdp method, in example A even though there are 4 people who are doing useful work n quite happy in their lives, they have a smaller economy n an ever lower gdp per capita. Complete nonsense! But that is how GDP is calculated. Because the wife wasnt paid officially for making food n no financial receipt produced and reported to govt, her contribution to GDP is zero. Same with grandma. Since the parents did not pay grandma for her services, according to GDP method no useful economic activity occured hence zero GDP.
If you add money multiplier effect, the gap between ex A & ex B would even increase further. And country of ex B would show as having 6-7 times the size of the economy as country A according to GDP.
So bottom line is GDP is not a method that was made to measure eastern countries economies. It was made by the west for the west to measure economies in a way that favors them. It helps them write the financial playbook of the world which unjustly favors them.
How does this happen? One way is GDP is used to borrow money by national govts & western countries with fake, inflated GDPs get lower interests rates when borrowing bc they have lower debt/GDP ratios.
Secondly it also allows western countries with high GDPs to dictate policies to so called " poor" low GDP countries n turn them in western countries favor using many international institutions. There are many other ways in which western countries benefit by writing the rule of the economic game n choosing the measuring indicators.
How it relates to India is that Indian govt should invent a different method of calculating economic activity. Do a survey of how much time individuals & families spend in a given productive activity & calculate some kind of a total manpower hours used indicator. Use this number to adjust GDP n call it modified GDP. And try to get this index get acceptance in financial world and base debts n interest rates on this indicator. This would naturally favor countries with high populations. And the western countries would never allow it. But just thinking out of the box.
A deduction from the above two examples can be that countries that have societies with high materialism, low spirituality, no family values, highly atomized individual lives have a higher GDP.
The social movements of the west in 1960s such as civil rights, feminism, encouragement of breaking down of families etc should be seen in this context. They all increase GDP n thus were encouraged by the corporates n the govts in the west. Getting more women n blacks in the workforce increased the money multiplier effect as their previously unaccounted work was now adding to the official GDP numbers. It also helps corps by increasing the labor pool n lowering wages for each worker thus more profits for the corps. This was one of the factors western govts eventually took the stand of encouraging these movements and not any genuine good feelings towards blacks & women.