Indian Bofors gun's barrel bursts during trials

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Indian Bofors gun's barrel bursts during trials

A barrel of the indigenous - version of the Bofors howitzers burst during their trials in the Pokharan range, delaying plans to induct these artillery guns into the Army.

The Defence Acquisition Council had recently approved the procurement of 144 such guns by the Army which are being manufactured by the Ordnance Factory Board, Jabalpur.

During the recent trials of the gun in Pokharan, the barrel of the gun burst when the Army was conducting the user trials for approving the gun for induction in the Army, sources said here.

The OFB has now been asked to carry out a defect identification inquiry (DII) by the Defence Ministry to ascertain the reasons behind the bursting of the barrel during the crucial trials, they said.

The user trials are carried out by the Services for approving the product being tested for induction.

The gun has been performing very well so far but the mishap will delay the user trials for another three to four months, they said.
Defence Minister AK Antony has been taking personal interest in the development of this programme and has asked both the Department of Defence Production and the Army to cooperate fully for making it successful.

The gun design, provided as part of technology transfer, has been gathering dust due to the taint associated with Bofors in the light of the payoffs scam.

If successful, the project would save the country millions of rupees and give the Indian Army much needed firepower.

The Army has failed to procure even a single piece of artillery after the Bofors scandal erupted in 1980s. All attempts to procure howitzers have had to be cancelled due to one reason or another.

Indian Bofors gun's barrel bursts during trials - The New Indian Express

***************************************

Unfortunate..

However, all is not lost!

The barrel is the critical part where the steel has to be 100% pure and without impurities and the autofrettage process perfect.







Autofrettage is a process that creates an internal stress in a component, similar to the shot blasting. Autofrettage is used in most cases for the inner pressure active components without (tubes) and with cross borings (rails).

When a component is pressurized by an autofrettage pressure, which is much higher than the working pressure and is dependent on the material used, hardness, and the geometry of the component, the inner boring will be formed plastically and the deeper areas of the component wall will be formed elastically.

After relieving the autofrettage pressure from the component, the elastically formed areas try to return to their original state while the plastically formed areas prevent this process. Therefore internal stresses are created in a huge part of the wall thickness which tries to work against the stresses that arise from normal working pressure.

Under working pressure the stresses inside the component do not move between 0 and a maximal value any more, but start in the pressure area below 0 and end at a much lower maximal value.



As you can see from Figure 1, the resulting working loads (e. g. in the pipe) can be reduced considerably.

A working pressure which would have led to a failure of the component prior to autofrettage can now be used endlessly – at least for a considerably longer time – without failure. This can lead the design engineer to look for cost saving strategies (i.e. material selection, material reduction etc.).

If you want to use the same positive effects of autofrettage for bent pipes, the autofrettage has to be done after the bending. If autofrettaged after bending, the internal stresses of autofrettage will overlie or neutralize the internal stresses and the effects of autofrettage will be lost.



If you have components with cross cutting there will be an additional effect: On those areas around the drill hole there is a stress concentration. Therefore these are the weak sections inside a component. Cracks in this part are very often the reason for failure.

If you have high dynamic working pressures even the autofrettage cannot prevent a crack in these cross cuttings.



The crack will just grow up to a certain length and will then be stopped by the pressure internal stresses that are inside the wall, picture 3. The internal stresses "press" the crack together.

To receive the requested internal stresses by an autofrettage, the pressure of the autofrettage just has to be held a short time. A longer time does not increase the internal stresses inside the component, but leads to a strong widening of the inner boring.

As the pressures of autofrettage are calculated in that way that a huge part of the wall thickness is plastic, the pressure does not have to be reached with absolute exactness.

Which deviations are acceptable and which not, depends on every single case.

The autofrettage of a component in more than just one case should be avoided.

http://www.maximator-test.com/about/wp-autofrettage.php
 
Last edited:

jmj_overlord

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
694
Likes
156
any news on the deal with US to acquire howitzers ? maybe till achieving indigenisation imports is the best way..........
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Is this news worthy?
It is not really newsworthy, but one that can generate debate.

It is so rudimentary that all can participate and will calm those who say that this is a defence forum but very little is discussed of defence.

It is an opening for such people to chip in.

It could not have been easier than this to do so! ;)
 

Bheeshma

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
916
Likes
384
OFB quality control is legendary. Why not pass on the manufacturing to TATA , Godrej etc
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
Relax guys when you make it first time you are boud to have these small set backs, learn from it fast, correct the problem and make sure everything went smooth next time.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,876
Likes
48,558
Country flag
It is not really newsworthy, but one that can generate debate.

It is so rudimentary that all can participate and will calm those who say that this is a defence forum but very little is discussed of defence.

It is an opening for such people to chip in.

It could not have been easier than this to do so! ;)

You misunderstood ray I meant is this something that a newspaper saw fit to publish
Every military in the world deals with faulty equipment/weaponry, I feel there is an agenda
Against indigenous weaponry especially with so many countries bidding for big ticket
Artillery deals.
 

Dark Sorrow

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
4,988
Likes
9,931
OFB quality control is legendary. Why not pass on the manufacturing to TATA , Godrej etc
Because they don't possess adavanced metallurgy.
Why should tay payers pay for tata or godrej's modernization.
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
You misunderstood ray I meant is this something that a newspaper saw fit to publish
Every military in the world deals with faulty equipment/weaponry, I feel there is an agenda
Against indigenous weaponry especially with so many countries bidding for big ticket
Artillery deals.
I did understand what you meant.

It is just that there is so much of grouse that you find in the Suggestion thread that this is a Defence Forum and we discuss everything else.

I have tried to initiate many defence thread on weighty military issues, but they have always fizzled out and even come to the state of which camouflage uniform design is 'sexy'.

So, I tried this one which I thought will elicit comments given that there is a lot of posts on a verity of artillery pieces to include some gun by Tata or was it L&T?

So, if Tata is producing, I thought we could have a look as to our own OFB who have the blueprints and yet........;)

IOf you ask me personally, this barrel bursting is not something new.

It happens.

the 105 IFG an OFB produce also had barrel burst after production.

It was found to be because of faulty autofrettage. because the electricity was erratic during manufacture that seriously affect this very important process. Instead of rejecting the piece, they continued with the process once the electricity returned and that produced weak spots. OFB ws more keen to please the bureaucrats with record figures, which is the sad commentary of the command economy.
 
Last edited:

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
The barrel is the critical part where the steel has to be 100% pure and without impurities and the autofrettage process perfect.
milawat toh khubiat hai is desh ki :yey:
 

Neuve_Chapelle

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
13
Likes
4
the 105 IFG an OFB produce also had barrel burst after production.

It was found to be because of faulty autofrettage.
The fact that GCF Jabalpur began manufacturing IFGs in 1973, and had barrel bursts to begin with, one would imagine that they have at least implemented a basic manufacturing and QA process in 40 years. Throw in the 130/155 and FH77 upgrades too, and there was plenty of opportunity to learn. And I am sure accusations will begin flying fast and thick soon as I say that, but I ask, can a monopoly still claim not to have requisite knowledge etc even after 40 years of learning?

Code:
History of Gun Carriage Factory:

1905 : GCF received 1st order for 500 Transport Carts
1909 : First carriage produced
1947 : Manufacture of Civil Stores e.g. Steam Road Rollers, Railway Stores, Oil Expellers 
1959 : Prodion of Shaktiman, Nissan -1 Ton & Jonga 
1963 : Manufacture of 40 mm AA Gun L/70, 81mm & 120mm Mortars & 106mm RCL 
1965 : Manufacture of Vijayanta Tank Sub-Assys
1968 : Manufacture of 1st indigenously designed Gun 75/24 Pack Howitzer 
1973 : Manufacture of 105 mm Indian Field Gun. 
1984 : Manufacture of 105 mm LFG with Superior Material 
1987 : Manufacture of T-72 Gun Article
1988 : Manufacture of 51 mm Mortar
1995 : Development of 12 Bore Pump Action Gun
1996 : IS/ISO-9001:2008 Certification
1998 : NABL Accreditation of Testing Labs
2001 : 130/155 SOLTAM Upgradation 
2005 : Prahari Gun System developed for Navy & Coast Guard 
2006 : KAVACH Chaff Launcher developed.
2007 : Successful proof firing of Upgraded 155 FH B02 Gun
2008 : Manufacture of Tank T-90 Gun Article.
2009 : L-70 Upgradation in collaboration with M/s BEL
2010 : Modified Loading Trough and Apparatus Air Lifting for 105 mm LFG developed
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Relax guys when you make it first time you are boud to have these small set backs, learn from it fast, correct the problem and make sure everything went smooth next time.
That has been said for every indigenous project to date, where are they now?
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
That has been said for every indigenous project to date, where are they now?
True but perfect gun wont jump into our lap like that. It take tume and IA has learn it hard way. Thy need to work out how to achive objective in min time frame.
 

Sridhar

House keeper
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
3,474
Likes
1,061
Country flag
It was a success back in dec

Desi Bofors gun passes the test - Times Of India
The performance of the both updated prototypes has been just as expected, project director of the weapon development component and general manager Gun carriage factory GCF S P Yadav declared here. Amidst reports that GCF has already piped the rivals and bagged the Rs 6000 crore project, a jubilant Yadav said that, things were "in process", but declined to comment till he got the order in hands.

Both prototypes -155/45 caliber guns Yadav said have fulfilled all required parameters on the PXE testing orange. There were three successive field trials held in Balasore on December 19, 20 and 23 respectively at the technology intensive range, equipped to provide accurate ballistic measurements .and both specimen could hit 38-40 kilometers mark successfully in presence of Yadav his team and DG artillery lieutenant general Anjan Mukherji who represented Indian Army, along with the experts from defense research and development organization DRDO.

What happened now , is it because of the angle of fire , where it needs to withstand more pressure but failed ?
Though the initial internal trials held in May this year in Pokharan had yielded positive results the indigenous howitzer, developed by the GCF for final clearance had to pass two acid tests- at Itarasi and Balsore- before it could be handed over to Army. Taken first to the central proof establishment CPE Itarsi, it went through three day test on November 30 and December 5 and 6. However, at CPE, firing was confined to the arrester butt on zero degree elevation as against Balasore where we could go up to our maximum elevation of 70 degrees at every designed angle, Yadav said.

The prototypes have been, after the CPE firing, subjected to series of tests for assessing its structural strength. It was found that all components and assemblage could sustain the firing stress effortlessly without any damage. On its way back from Orissa, both guns would be dismantled to be examined part by part to once again to be doubly sure before being handed over to the Army next month.
or because of the new propellents they are trying

India develops propellants for Bofors

The first batch of propellants will be ready for trial by 15 August.
Sanjay Sharma Chandigarh | 20th Jul 2013


ndia will add indigenised firepower to the 155 mm Bofors guns on 15 August amidst the perceived threat from China in the Ladakh region. "A decade-long effort to develop bio-modular charges (propellants) within India has reached a conclusive stage. The first lot of propellants will be ready for trial by the Indian Army on 15 August," sources told this newspaper on the condition of anonymity.

The process of manufacturing new propellants appears to have been quickened as China is posing a threat on the mountainous Ladakh belt. The Bofors gun had demonstrated its utility during the Kargil conflict with Pakistan. In fact, experts said that the Bofors guns won the Kargil conflict for India. If the trial of the propellants proves to be successful, it will end the uncertainty over the acquisition of these charges. The development will save at least Rs 1,000 cr. The propellants will be available for all sorts of guns irrespective of their range. The propellants manufactured by Bofors got nearly exhausted after the Kargil conflict. However, the propellants provided by Bofors could only fire the shell to a fixed distance of 25 km. The new propellants provide the option of adjusting the distance based on the position of the target. India acquired new propellants after the Kargil conflict from Somchem in South Africa. The company had agreed to transfer the technology but got blacklisted before the transfer took place.

The propellants, under the Somchem licence, were to be made at Nalanda plant. However, for 10 years, the development of the propellants could not be carried out. The new indigenised propellants are based on the technology that Somchem provided to India. The tests include the firing of a shell through the propellant to see if it will fire automatically in the wake of stray shells hitting it. If the shell explodes, it may lead to casualties. Sources said that the propellants' development trials at Balasore in Orissa were flawless. If the Army is satisfied, Indian ordinance factories will have to manufacture the propellants on an urgent basis in a huge quantity. Unlike the earlier propellant, the new one will not leave any shell trace behind. It is also believed that the propellant will add quality to the American Howitzers India has acquired. The American guns are likely to reach India within a couple of months.

The technology was tried by the European forces in Afghanistan and they were satisfied with the propellants. Warheads are already being manufactured at Chandrapur in Maharashtra. A team of experts is assessing the testing facilities at the Chandigarh-based Terminal Ballast Research Laboratory (TBRL) before the propellant is ready for user trials. TBRL is a Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) laboratory.
http://www.sunday-guardian.com/news/india-develops-propellants-for-bofors
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top