Yes I do. Do not be shy. Go on please explain what civil disobedience and non-violent civil disobedience to you means.
Yes. Non-violent civil disobedience. You also did not ask what about the remaining 30%. For that you can refer to:
Dissolution of the Soviet Union - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ignorance is a bliss. The idea is older than India by far.
Civil Disobedience legal definition of Civil Disobedience. Civil Disobedience synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.
The philosophical underpinnings for civil disobedience can be found in New Testament writings which report on the teachings of Jesus. They also appear in works by Cicero, Thomas Aquinas, John Locke, and Thomas Jefferson. In a famous essay entitled "Civil Disobedience. You are not the first, not by a loooooooooooooooooooong shot
You had earlier said
"Pioneer in the history of China or PRC? You will be wrong on both accounts." Please mention the Pioneers in the history of PRC you refer to.
You were the one who brought it up. Share with us Your definition then.
If you don't want to answer that's fine. If you don't have an answer that's fine. If you say one thing and don't have any sustenance and substance that looks juvenile.
You mean the whole Republic of China is agreed by both PRC people and Taiwan. Everything about Republic of China is agreed by PRC people. .
Read the history of ROC. It is easy to Google.
You are saying that the constitution of Republic of China is agreed by PRC people.
Can the PRC people vote in the next Taiwan elections.
The state of affairs between Taiwan and PRC is such that is convoluted and intricate. Also the "One China Principle" is different to Taiwan person and PRC person (
how do you define Tibet and Hong Kong person under One China Principle and using the term Republic of China).
Because there is "difference" between Taiwan people and PRC people on one china principle you can equate this to why the current state of affairs cannot be a permanent state of affairs.
Here is something i read recently by Jackie Chan:
Jackie Chan gets critical kick from Hong Kong and Taiwanese politicians - Arts & Entertainment - CBC News
Have you wonder what the people in the streets of PRC, Hong Kong and Taiwan ("freaking island") think.
Read Maslow's hierarchy of needs
The current state of affairs that is holding at present - people will evaluate and discuss for how long and with what variables in place it will continue in the future. The constitution of Taiwan has a two-term limit on its President. Self-determination is exercised and will be exercised by the people of Taiwan. Will the Taiwan people stretch the self-determination paradigm. How will the regions of PRC react. What about Hong Kong and the question of universal suffrage. More and more people from PRC visit Taiwan and Hong Kong.
It is absolute (100% perfect) that all PRC people that visit Taiwan and Hong Kong will
not ask "why does Taiwan and Hong Kong deserve to have this" and "are PRC people undeserving".
I can refer you to one document that is the constitution of india. India is the governing authority of the union of 28 states and seven union territories, collectively called the Republic of India. The union and individual state governments all each consist of executive, legislative and judicial branches. The legal system as applicable to the federal and individual state governments is based on the English Common and Statutory Law. The Legislature and Executive branch of the government along with the Judiciary are important pillars in making and changing laws.
I ask you again how laws are changed in Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong, PRC and One Country China.
There are only two laws. One for PRC and one for Taiwan. The rest exist within their constitutional framework.
Also are laws important in PRC. Remember you mention "As far as I know nobody really cares. Laws can be changed. It is not written in stone."
Why are laws and systems different for Tibet, Taiwan and Hong Kong and PRC under the "One Country" principle. Are you are saying that Tibet, Taiwan and Hong Kong and PRC are like a state of "One Country China". Who is the authority and leader of "One Country China".
Yes, you can see them within the states of "one country CHina" if it is easier for you. Nobody knows who will be the authority then
The legislature of Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong, PRC and One Country China. Please refer to how one selects the participants of the legislature of Tibet, Taiwan, Hong Kong, PRC and One Country China.
Because there are different methods and rules that on its own is stretching the self-determination paradigm. The people that get elected to legislature are different to people that get selected to legislature.
No idea what you trying to say here.
Do you understand the difference in principle and its role in self-determination. people that get elected to legislature represent the people from the area they get elected.
Wrong, the different parties nominate their own candidates. They dont represent the People from the area they get elected like you claimed.
We can take Hong Kong constitution. Why did PRC people give hong kong people such articles like above mentioned (freedom of speech, freedom to assemble and demonstrate, strike, freedom of conscience, principle of democratic procedures with ultimate aim of universal suffrage.) that are not in the PRC constitution.
One country two systems. Showpiece.
Can you please mention that to the Hong Kong people and write it in the Hong Kong constitution because I cannot find anywhere in that document that says that Hong Kong is a "showpiece".
Of course you dont include that in the constitution! Read between lines.
One Country Two Principles for Taiwan:
Why Taiwan Is Not Hong Kong: A Review of the PRC's One Country Two Systems Model for reunification with Taiwan.
http://digital.law.washington.edu/d...le/1773.1/895/6PacRimLPolyJ497.pdf?sequence=1
If you do not care about PRC region(s) and do not have time to read the above document you can read the conclusion.
Please elaborate what you are saying.
Tibet and Hong Kong do not have anything to deal with. How about PRC talking to Dalai Lama representatives and PRC talking to people of Hong Kong about universal suffrage. If it is all settled please share what has been settled.
Like you said Taiwan. Please mention what has not been settled with Taiwan.
The People Republic of China was created on what principle. You are the one that said "Government isnt neccesary the same as people. At least when we talk about Hongkong and PRC."
Are the people of Tibet undeserving. Are the people of PRC undeserving. Why do people of Taiwan and Hong Kong deserve more.
Please elaborate why North Korea is treated better by PRC compared to Pakistan.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB106/NZ-2.pdf
Go to page 7.
Nixon and Zhou Enlai. (** Zhou Enlai is regarded with the most respect in PRC).
"Both of us owe something to Yahya "¦"
"He is a bridge"
Zhou Enlai says "When a man makes a contribution to the world, we should remember him".
Here is picture of Yahya Khan to hang on your wall in your home and factories in PRC:
The role of Pakistan (and Yahya Khan) were significant for the recognition of PRC by USA and UN that enabled PRC to get a UNSC seat and also consequently the economic relationship with USA and the world. The Pakis will also point out how they have been used against India. I am shocked that you say "with or without Pakistan". Why are you ashamed of Pakistan. They helped PRC a lot.
I see you cant distinguish between diplomatic slogans and real world. and thanks, I have no need of such Pictures.
Also how is the USA-PRC alliance going against the Russians.
Please mention what PRC has done for Pakistan in the past and will do in the future. Without reference to India (using Pakistan like a whore).
Surely you can find out by Your own?
The American-Pakistan relationship goes even longer and deeper. It existed for long and benefited both. But one day the Pakis started to ask and started to expect more from the Americans and once they realised that America was not giving like the Pakis had given to American (in their opinion) they reacted. The result not is the American-Pakistan relationship is different compared to before.
I repeat the Pakis will keep asking and expecting and once they realise that PRC is not giving like the Pakis have given to PRC.
They will also react when PRC tells the Pakis they had no role in PRC growth and refuse to hang Yahya Khan picture on factory walls and in textbooks like they do for Chairman Mao and Deng Xiaoping.
WHat is with the obessision of the Picture?
They will also not react well when they read comments by people like you who have said India and China are more natural alliance compare to China and Pakistan.
Will Paki make PRC change its behavior. That might be indubitable.
Will Taiwan and Hong Kong make PRC change its behavior. That might be indubitable.
When it comes to Tibet recognition India need not (have) to deal with the Tibet question because there are forthcoming authoritative issues and questions (like Taiwan, Hong Kong and relationship with Pakis) that PRC will have to face with that can have more greater impact.
India won't be the lead in making recognition of Tibet different there are others who will want to and can do. I support what India does.
The Chinese people are pragmatic.