India and Japan : Asia's Natural-Born Allies

Singh

Phat Cat
Super Mod
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
20,311
Likes
8,403
Country flag
At a time when China's economic, diplomatic, and military rise casts the shadow of a power disequilibrium over Asia, the just-concluded visit of Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda to India cemented a fast-growing relationship between two natural allies. Now the task for Japan and India is to add concrete strategic content to their ties.

Asia's emerging balance of power will be determined principally by events in East Asia and the Indian Ocean. Japan and India thus have an important role to play in preserving stability and helping to safeguard vital sea-lanes in the wider Indo-Pacific region — a region defined not only by the confluence of the Indian and Pacific Oceans, but also by its significance for world trade and energy supplies.

Asia's booming economies are coastal, so maritime democracies like Japan and India must work together to help build a stable, liberal, rules-based order in Asia. As Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said at the East Asia Summit (EAS) meeting in Bali last month, Asia's continued rise is not automatically assured, and is "dependent on the evolution of a cooperative architecture."

Japan and India — as energy-poor countries heavily reliant on oil imports from the Persian Gulf — are seriously concerned by mercantilist efforts to assert control over energy supplies and the transport routes for them. So the maintenance of a peaceful and lawful maritime domain, including unimpeded freedom of navigation, is critical to their security and economic well-being. That is why they have agreed to start holding joint naval and air exercises from 2012 — just one sign of a shift from emphasizing shared values to seeking to protect shared interests.

Indeed, despite their messy domestic politics and endemic scandals, India and Japan have the fastest-growing bilateral relationship in Asia today. Since they unveiled a "strategic and global partnership" in 2006, their political and economic engagement has deepened remarkably.

A growing congruence of strategic interests led to their 2008 Joint Declaration on Security Cooperation, a significant milestone in building a stable Asian order, in which a constellation of states linked by common interests has become critical to ensuring equilibrium at a time when ongoing power shifts accentuate security challenges.

The joint declaration was modeled on Japan's 2007 defense-cooperation accord with Australia — the only other country with which Japan, a US military ally, has a security-cooperation arrangement. The India-Japan security declaration, in turn, spawned a similar Indian-Australian accord in 2009.

A free-trade agreement between Japan and India, formally known as the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), entered into force in August. And, in response to China's punitive use of its monopoly on rare-earths production to cut off such exports to Japan during the fall of 2010, Japan and India have agreed to joint development of rare earths, which are vital for a wide range of green-energy technologies and military applications.

Today, the level and frequency of official bilateral engagement is extraordinary. Noda's visit to New Delhi was part of a commitment by the two countries to hold an annual summit, attended by their prime ministers.

More important, Japan and India now conduct several annual ministerial dialogues: a strategic dialogue between their foreign ministers; a security dialogue between their defense ministers; a policy dialogue between India's commerce and industry minister and Japan's minister of economy, trade and industry; and separate ministerial-level energy and economic dialogues.

And, to top it off, Japan, India, and the US initiated a trilateral strategic dialogue in Washington on December 19. Getting the US on board can only bolster India-Japan cooperation. As Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba said recently, "Japan and the US are deepening a strategic relationship with India," and the trilateral dialogue is "a specific example of collaboration" among the three leading Asia-Pacific democracies. Such collaboration is likely to become quadrilateral with Australia's inclusion.

Japan and India need to strengthen their still-fledgling strategic cooperation by embracing two ideas, both of which demand a subtle shift in Japanese thinking and policy. One is to build interoperability between their formidable naval forces, which, in cooperation with other friendly navies, can undergird peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. As former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe put it in a recent speech in New Delhi, the aim should be that "sooner rather than later, Japan's navy and the Indian navy are seamlessly interconnected." Currently, Japan has naval interoperability only with US forces.

The second idea is to co-develop defense systems. India and Japan have missile-defense cooperation with Israel and the US, respectively. There is no reason why they should not work together on missile defense and other technologies for mutual security. Their defense cooperation must be comprehensive and not be limited to strategic dialogue, maritime cooperation, and occasional naval exercises.

There is no ban on weapon exports in Japan's US-imposed Constitution, only a longstanding government decision, which in any case has just been relaxed. In fact, the original decision related to weapons, not technologies.

The most-stable economic partnerships in the world, including the Atlantic community and the Japan-US partnership, have been built on the bedrock of security collaboration. Economic ties that lack the underpinning of strategic partnerships tend to be less stable and even volatile, as is apparent from the economic relationships that India and Japan have with China. Through close strategic collaboration, Japan and India must lead the effort to build freedom, prosperity, and stability in the Indo-Pacific region.

Asia's Natural-Born Allies | Stagecraft and Statecraft
 

agentperry

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
3,022
Likes
690
these days relationship are so casual. 5 years back no one was heck interested in eachother and not natural-born allies.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,230
Country flag
It doesn't matter much if we were not natural born allies before, what matters now is that Japan has shown intrest in collaboration.Recently Japan has lifted defense exports ban so this can be a good news for countries like India. Japan is the most technically advanced country of Asia and "US" of Asia.Japan and India would gain a lot with such collaboration.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
A consistent and often repeated theme among a few DFI members is that Japan is a "US lackey." Should India be allied with a "US lackey"?
 

TTCUSM

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
87
Likes
44
Some Japanese scholars propose a different type of triple alliance, with China replacing the US.
From the Wiki article on pan-Asianism:

Toten Miyazaki (1870–1922) consistently supported a Chinese revolution of Sun Wen with spiritual sacrifice and sympathy under imperial Japan. Tenshin Okakura (1862–1913) criticized Western imperialism as a destroyer of human beauty, and argued for romantic solidarity with diverse "Asia as one" against Western civilization.
ASIA is one. The Himalayas divide, only to accentuate, two mighty civilisations, the Chinese with its communism of Confucius, and the Indian with its individualism of the Vedas. But not even the snowy barriers can interrupt for one moment that broad expanse of love for the Ultimate and Universal, which is the common thought-inheritance of every Asiatic race, enabling them to produce all the great religions of the world, and distinguishing them from those maritime peoples of the Mediterranean and the Baltic, who love to dwell on the Particular, and to search out the means, not the end, of life.[3]
In this Okakura was utilising the Japanese concept of sangoku, which existed in Japanese culture before the concept of Asia became popularised. Sangoku literally means the "three countries": Honshū (the largest island of Japan), Kara (China) and Tenjiku (India).
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,858
Likes
48,496
Country flag
Some Japanese scholars propose a different type of triple alliance, with China replacing the US.
From the Wiki article on pan-Asianism:
This will never happen as long as Japan is under USA's nuclear umbrella.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,858
Likes
48,496
Country flag
You really believe the USA has Japan's best interest at heart?
USA's interest come first. Japan has chosen their path and now it's too late to change anything. They have come a long way since their ww2 defeat and it has all been because of US. Compared to all the other Pacific allies US has a fortress of bases in and around Japan.
 

Godless-Kafir

DFI Buddha
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
5,842
Likes
1,837
Country flag
A consistent and often repeated theme among a few DFI members is that Japan is a "US lackey." Should India be allied with a "US lackey"?
Exactly, don't you think Japan is to much of an US lackey after WW2? They cant even get a USAF base out their land, what use is such a country? May be good for trade, honestly?
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,869
Likes
23,236
Country flag
USA's interest come first. Japan has chosen their path and now it's too late to change anything. They have come a long way since their ww2 defeat and it has all been because of US. Compared to all the other Pacific allies US has a fortress of bases in and around Japan.
And that is precisely what makes countries think twice before considering military collaboration with Japan. While these other Asian countries might be poorer than Japan in terms of development and quality of life, they are independent to take a serious decision. OTOH, Japan will have to consult USA and if USA says no, the country that entered into military agreement with Japan (hypothetically) is screwed in case some conflict brews up. No military agreement (hypothetical again) with Japan on no matter how many specific binding conditions, is higher than a USA's "NO". This is what makes other countries cautious about dealing strong with Japan.

There are a different breed of Japanese in politics too. They're the Japanese right wing and are pressured down by ruling Japanese governments as they strive for total independence from US' political occupation.

Remember, Japan was once like this:

 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I don't think they are natural allies, but allies they are given the common objectives and threats.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top