Few people has habit of daydreaming, but the reality is this....
Hang on sir, what they call it.......may be.......'deep strike mission' or something.
But you cant ignore the fact that a fat big bomber (non stealth) would be a piece of cake to take down by the chinnkis.
For India , even a fleet of 5-10 bombers is sufficient. The best compromise in this case would be Su34 . That thing also has a toilet for its pilots ,crew can stand and move around the cabin, and still can fly like a fighter !
lol dude. Using of airforce/ strategic bombers wont?
No. Ballistic missiles are one of the most deadliest weapons on earth. North Korea has all permits to operate strategic bombers, but they are not authorised by UN to develop/possess ballistic missiles. Still they do have them and thus they have sanctions, rogue state status in their face...
My friend China does not need a strategic bomber to bomb India...... There current military strategy is away from India and it is on the Amerikas.... so they need long endurance bombers...... China and India are not that far. Russia and USA are far away and so they need BOMBERS. But India and China are neighbors.....India needs strike fighters which can cut deep into the chinese installations. We need speed and accuracy and not carpet bombings....Thats the reason why the chinese wanted to get their hands on Su-35's....... India should also go for Su-35 and must get at least one squadron of Su-35 in our fleet.
My friend, North Koreans are against the Americans so they face sanctions like Russia. This is a very big game between the Communists and the Capitalists, which is going on for centuries......
My friend, North Koreans are against the Americans so they face sanctions like Russia. This is a very big game between the Communists and the Capitalists, which is going on for centuries......
North Korea is the prime enemy of south korea, a major ally of USA. You cannot deny the fact that they are one of the world's most hostile countries at present, with no respect for other nations(DPRK news calls SK President Park a Prostitute and Obama her Pimp). After their Nuclear tests, Even Russia, China slapped major sanctions of them. They are one of the poorest countries and still spend 25% of their budget on military . Go and see sat pics of NK's concentration camps, you will be reminded of Hitler.
I think you mean the Su-34. I agree with you on this, We atleast need some medium bombing capacity, which can easily be provided by the big fat flanker.
Dude am saying in blown out war su(bomb truck)-agni combo would be deadly and would do the job of dedicated bombers. Maintaining pure dedicated bombers is very expensive and a luxry we might not be able to afford.
Airforce will already be in use
Use of airforce is regarded as escalating of war. So my point is if we are ready to escalate war or if enemy has then theres no stoping for using our strategic missiles.
And how will we know if plane is carring nuke mated missiles or no?
Because, A country which already has ballistic missiles would be pretty stupid to use airplanes to deliver the nukes.
Major chunk of our delivery vehicles of nukes are by airplanes.
