It really isn't the same as a JV between advanced European countries, Israel already has tech more advanced than this which is selling this other to India. India requires all major defence suppliers to form a JV to apply offsets through its venture. It is the law. India is not helping Israel develop anything with this radar as India is the client and Israel is the supplier. That is why 70% of Indian arms are imported.
Your country is not that advanced that we need light years to catch up, we do everything you do. Most of your systems on your ships like the Mistral class are imported from either UK,US,Finland,Germany or Italy and you talk of our indigenousiation of Indian ships as if France is perfect. Everything from the propulsion to the censors have a huge foreign input. Lot of your other military equipments have foreign contents as well. If this was India we would be barging thats the diffrence.
Dont bring in the argument of cost cutting or it would be cheaper to buy from others. Our argument is the same, if we had the
MONEY we would build the proper test infrastructure for R&D andd we would manufacture everything and employ a lot more scientists. So the French case is not too nuanced either.
I just loved the way you dismissed the argument by useing relative term like "advanced countries" as if we are not your equals. Its exactly this attitude that took US out of the MRCA because you either talk like equals or you dont get the money and you lose the deal and at this rate i only see the EADS winning the competition because its an consortium which is willing to treat us as more than equal partners.
You could also have never built the Concord by yourself, all of Snecmas commercial jet engines are JVs till date and the British provided the Engine technology to super cruise.