IAF Demand for 250 Tejas MK2

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
India Offers To Spend $12B To Break Monopoly



NEW DELHI — The Indian government, acting on Air Force demands, has offered to spend $12 billion to encourage private firms to establish an aircraft manufacturing facility — a move that would break Hindustan Aeronautics Limited's monopoly on aircraft manufacturing after years of delays on several projects.

Specifically, the Indian government has offered an advance order for the homemade light combat aircraft (LCA) Mark-2, a Defence Ministry source said.

The offer was conveyed to senior private sector executives during several meetings with MoD officials in the last month, the source said. India's private defense majors, Tata Group, Mahindra & Mahindra and Larsen and Toubro, are the most capable of setting up an additional military aircraft plant, either independently or in partnership with overseas firms.

Madhukar Vinayak Kotwal, president, Heavy Engineering of Larsen & Toubro, said, "Since this [building of an additional facility] is a matter currently under discussion at various levels in the government as well as in industry associations, we would like to refrain from giving any comments at this stage."

The LCA, developed by Bangalore-based Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), a laboratory of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO). The first order for 40 of the Mark-1 version of the aircraft has been given to state-owned Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL). The final operational clearance is expected to be granted in 2015, after which the aircraft can go into production.



The Indian Air Force has a future requirement for only the next-generation LCA Mark-2, which would be powered by the higher thrust General Electric GE-414 engine. But the aircraft is still in the development stage and is not expected to be ready for production before 2017-18. The Air Force has a requirement for 250 LCA Mark-2s, which the government estimates would be covered by the $12 billion advance order.



The Air Force has demanded establishment of an additional aircraft facility to break the monopoly of HAL, India's sole military aircraft manufacturer, and has complained of delays in delivery of aircraft.

"It is absolutely essential to set up an additional military aircraft facility here, as HAL is overloaded for the next 10 years and has become too unwieldy," defense acquisition expert Miral Suman said.

Vivek Rae, former director general (acquisition) in the MoD, said, "India sorely needs aircraft manufacturing capability in the private sector. We cannot afford to put all eggs in the HAL basket."

Subhash Bhojwani, retired Air Force air marshal, agreed an additional manufacturing facility is needed, but said HAL should be made more commercial.

"HAL is into the design and contemporary manufacture of fighters, transports, trainers and helicopters, as well as avionics and engines," he said. "It is possibly the only company in the world to be so diversified. However, while this may sound good in a book of world records, it isn't good as a commercial model."

Defense analyst Amit Cowshish, a retired Defence Ministry bureaucrat, said the objective should be "not to create an entity that could compete with HAL but to have additional capability in India to manufacture aircraft so that the requirement, both of the military and civil sectors, could be met in a more cost-effective manner and in shorter time frames. Of course, competition would help in improving HAL's efficiency."

India's private sector is able to set up such a facility, and could acquire the capability to build the LCA Mark-2 over time, but it could be a challenge, Cowshish said.



"LCA is a program & HAL and DRDO have worked hard on it, and the final operational clearance is expected sometime later this year," he said. "To bring in a new manufacturing agency at this stage may not be a very good idea. Though it is possible to pass on the technology to the private industry for manufacturing the aircraft, selecting such an agency may turn out to be a [technically] tricky affair."

Defense analyst Rahul Bhonsle said, "Setting up a new military aircraft facility is no doubt a Herculean task. But the new facility will be looking primarily at system integration."


Source : India Offers To Spend $12B To Break Monopoly | Defense News | defensenews.com
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
Related News from Past >>

IAF is planning to operate 14 sqadron of Tejas of both MK1 & 2 >>

In a written statement tabled in the Lok Sabha on Monday, Antony's deputy, Jitendra Singh, stated, "The MiG-21 and MiG-27 aircrafts of the IAF have already been upgraded and currently equip 14 combat squadrons. These aircraft, however, are planned for being phased out over the next few years and will be replaced by the LCA."

India's own fighter, the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA), is playing a growing role in protecting Indian airspace. On December 20, when the Tejas was cleared for operational service in the Indian Air Force (IAF), Defence Minister A K Antony declared 200 Tejas fighters would eventually enter combat service. Today, that figure quietly swelled to well above 300, with the government indicating the IAF would have at least 14 Tejas squadrons.

Each IAF combat squadron has 21 fighter aircraft; 14 squadrons add to 294 Tejas fighters. The 21 comprise 16 frontline, single-seat fighters, two twin-seat trainers and three reserve aircraft to make up losses in a war.

So far, the IAF has committed to inducting only six Tejas squadrons — two squadrons of the current Tejas Mark I, and four squadrons of the improved Tejas Mark II. In addition, the navy plans to buy 40-50 Tejas for its future aircraft carriers.
Source : IAF will buy 14 Tejas squadrons, lowering costs | Business Standard News
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
I am in favour of another assembly line to be set up by private sector. The most likely is Mahindras who have excellent manufacturing plants and a deep understanding of defence needs.
 

Twinblade

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
1,578
Likes
3,231
Country flag
I am in favour of another assembly line to be set up by private sector. The most likely is Mahindras who have excellent manufacturing plants and a deep understanding of defence needs.
There is no pvt sector company in India that can match the contributions made by TASL and L&T and their expertise, both long term subcontractors of HAL and DRDO. TASL already has a fairly modern plant that makes aero components already.
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
That would be time consuming, And in India there are countless head willing to flip such programs at any given chance ..

It would be more interesting If Tejas MK3 a stealthy design approach given to Pvt firms as you have suggested ..

We should just have the private sector develop three different versions of the LCA mk2 and have a competition American style in order to choose the best, then have all three manufacturers build the winning design simultaneously to increase numbers rapidly.The Companies whose designs lost will have to pay a royalty fee tot he company whose design won .
 

PaliwalWarrior

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
844
Likes
319
why should the fruits of years of labour of ADA / HAL be given away to pvt cos

what do they bring on table ?

whyis the IAF which was not ready to induct tejas just 2 years ago now pressing for pvt mfg line ?

ff it was not for the IN the IAF had almost killed the LCA project

No

The LCA MK2 should go to HAL only
 

power_monger

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
642
Likes
653
Country flag
Even i dont agree with Pvt companies getting a production line.Even if it gets it should pay a royalty amount to HAL.
Pvt companies should pour money for Designing of MK2.Somehow this move is like rewarding pvt companies witout any real effort from pvt companies gives wrong instructions to Public sector companies that government does not really trust them..
 

Dhairya Yadav

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
481
Likes
141
Awesome step! By the way, does anyone have any idea when Tejas Mk3 will fly ?
If its around 2024 or later, I suspect it would lose its relevance to AMCA...
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
Even i dont agree with Pvt companies getting a production line.Even if it gets it should pay a royalty amount to HAL.
Pvt companies should pour money for Designing of MK2.Somehow this move is like rewarding pvt companies witout any real effort from pvt companies gives wrong instructions to Public sector companies that government does not really trust them..
LCA Tejas is a DRDO project. HAL is only a production agency. HAL gets paid for the work it does just like any private company would.

The designer of LCA Tejas is ADA and this agency can license the design to a private company if the government wishes.

There is no question of paying royalty to HAL.

Even if a private company is roped in, that company would be a production agency or a contractor hired by GOI. The contractor will get paid for its work. It is not like this private company can sell Tejas in market. It is purely a contractor arrangement on behalf of GOI.
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
There is no pvt sector company in India that can match the contributions made by TASL and L&T and their expertise, both long term subcontractors of HAL and DRDO. TASL already has a fairly modern plant that makes aero components already.
Please check out the website of Mahindra Aerospace. They have built a factory at Kolar for aircraft manufacturing. Though this factory is for a different type of plane, having a factory is better than building a new one.

Yes Tatas are also very good candidates.
 

Zebra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
LCA Tejas is a DRDO project. HAL is only a production agency. HAL gets paid for the work it does just like any private company would.

The designer of LCA Tejas is ADA and this agency can license the design to a private company if the government wishes.

There is no question of paying royalty to HAL.

Even if a private company is roped in, that company would be a production agency or a contractor hired by GOI. The contractor will get paid for its work. It is not like this private company can sell Tejas in market. It is purely a contractor arrangement on behalf of GOI.
In other words the ADA will provide all the designs to that private company / production agency / contractor and they will build / make new Tejas as per the designs.

And HAL has nothing to do with it.

Yeah..?
 

PaliwalWarrior

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
844
Likes
319
i have a new serious conspiracy theory

Guys

gguess what if i share my ture thoughts you wont like it

this is just another way of routing of bribes from domestic indegenous products

Earlier the politicos and IAF top brass were taking bribes and kickbacks in imported products

it is open secret they are involved in so many scandals

now with advent or sucess of domestic products first they tried to kill the domestic products but they couldnt do it and for long people have said that indian products dont get orders because

HAL?DRDO/ADA/CVRDE? etc dont offer bribes / cant offer bribes no way to route the bribes and money

so now guess what

DRDO/ADA/NAL/ HAL will develop tech and practices will take pains andiron out all difficulties then it will be transfererd to pvt cos

where the pvt cos will jack up costs - from which they will make profits and they will pass on bribes and kickbacks to IAF top brass and politiocs
 

Zebra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
i have a new serious conspiracy theory

Guys

gguess what if i share my ture thoughts you wont like it

this is just another way of routing of bribes from domestic indegenous products

Earlier the politicos and IAF top brass were taking bribes and kickbacks in imported products

it is open secret they are involved in so many scandals

now with advent or sucess of domestic products first they tried to kill the domestic products but they couldnt do it and for long people have said that indian products dont get orders because

HAL?DRDO/ADA/CVRDE? etc dont offer bribes / cant offer bribes no way to route the bribes and money

so now guess what

DRDO/ADA/NAL/ HAL will develop tech and practices will take pains andiron out all difficulties then it will be transfererd to pvt cos

where the pvt cos will jack up costs - from which they will make profits and they will pass on bribes and kickbacks to IAF top brass and politiocs

:facepalm:

Sir, either you drink a coffee or pass it to me.

Seriously.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
A second production line for LCA will only serve to increase costs of the aircraft, the mess EF is in. It would be better if HAL builds all the LCAs and future aircraft like AURA is manufactured by a private company. They can start off with aircraft like Rustom, Rustom-H, Rustom-2 and so on to build up experience before being given a contract for AURA. In the meantime, a private line can be setup to manufacture trainers like the PC-7.

We are still decades away from a KNAAPO/Irkut type setup.
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
In other words the ADA will provide all the designs to that private company / production agency / contractor and they will build / make new Tejas as per the designs.

And HAL has nothing to do with it.

Yeah..?
Even if HAL has something to do with it, situation does not change. HAL can charge for its services.

If HAL can buy services, it can sell services as well.

HAL is a contractor appointed by the government. The government is free to appoint another contractor.
 

PaliwalWarrior

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
844
Likes
319
66 avro replacement contract reserved for pvt sector as per their demands and what happens

they give it a miss
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
A second production line for LCA will only serve to increase costs of the aircraft, the mess EF is in. It would be better if HAL builds all the LCAs and future aircraft like AURA is manufactured by a private company. They can start off with aircraft like Rustom, Rustom-H, Rustom-2 and so on to build up experience before being given a contract for AURA. In the meantime, a private line can be setup to manufacture trainers like the PC-7.

We are still decades away from a KNAAPO/Irkut type setup.
How? The production line cost some 1600 crore.
Even if another line costs extra 1600 crore, that is money well spent.

If GOI decides to build Mark II completely with private company, then Tejas facility can be used by IJT Sitara production.

However best solution is to have two competing lines.

This is the best way to increase production of the aircraft.

I think GOI wants to rope in private player to reduce pressure on HAL. HAL simply has too many programs and the management is not able to deal with it causing delays.

Even Rustom should be built by private companies.

Just read that Saras was built by Taneja Aerospace as per NAL design.

So there is already private companies building aircrafts in India.
 
Last edited:

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
66 avro replacement contract reserved for pvt sector as per their demands and what happens

they give it a miss
Avro contract was a dud. Everybody knew that. Fighter is a different cup of tea.

Anybody who sinks money calculates the benefit as well.
 

sgarg

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
3,480
Likes
986
The Rustom tender:

"In the Rustom contract, firms need to invest Rs400 crore in prototypes and trials that could take at least a decade, but there was no guarantee of an order from the armed forces once it is completed, said one official at a private firm who did not want to be named or his company to be identified. An HAL official confirmed this.
"If there is no assurance of an order, why should the private industry come forward and invest? We know it takes time to profit, but at least we don't want to lose money," the same company official said."

So Rustom tender was rigged. The private players are not fools who will risk their capital.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top