How should India save its family values?

Discussion in 'Politics & Society' started by Sakal Gharelu Ustad, Dec 3, 2015.

  1. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    7,717
    http://devdutt.com/articles/modern-mythmaking/is-divorce-an-indian-word.html

    In India, everybody is either married or on the way to getting married. The unmarried man arouses curiosity, the unmarried woman pity.

    Traditionally, no one asks if you want to marry. The spouse is simply chosen for you. Just as you don’t get to choose your gender or your parents (hence your caste, family or inheritance), you do not get to choose your husband or your wife. You have to submit to it. You have to adjust and accommodate just as you adjust and accommodate to your gender and your family.

    But what if it does not work out. If the husband is a jerk or the wife a pain, could one terminate one’s marriage? Was divorce allowed in traditional Indian society? It’s a question that is difficult to answer.

    Vyasa, the author of the pan-Indian epic, Mahabharata, arrogantly proclaims, “What is not there in the Mahabharata is not there anywhere!” But there is no mention of divorce anywhere in the Mahabharata. In the epic there are tales of men with many wives (Arjuna), a woman with many husbands (Draupadi), women who have sex before marriage (the birth of Karna), infidelity (the beheading of Renuka), women who want a man only to have children (Uloopi), women who want a man for pleasure alone (Urvashi), men who dress as women (Brihanalla), men who force themselves on women (Jayadratha), husbands comfortable with their wives going to other men (Pandu), men who become women (Bhangashvana), men who have mistresses (Dhritarashtra). So many stories of sex and sexuality and the social context of the same, but none of a man and woman terminating their relationship as husband and wife and moving on.
     
    TrueSpirit2 and parijataka like this.
  2. prasadr14

    prasadr14 PrasadReddy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    4,562

    Divorce is a fairly new concept to Hindus.
    If a man is a jerk and a woman a pain, I see them being jerk and a pain in their next marriage as well. If a man is violent, he will be violent in the next relationship as well.

    Marriage like any relationship, be it sibling, parent, friend or neighbour needs nurturing and unlike all these relationships needs a lot of patience, understanding and forgiveness.

    So, divorce from a abusive relationship is a must. The relationship can be spousal, sibling, parent, friend or neighbour.

    Many(most) of the modern divorces happen not because of abuse. In fact people in abusive relationship out of fear of the other person tend to stick it out. Most divorces now a days happen because of lack of communication and ego. If this is the reason for divorce, I am afraid it is bound to continue in their next relationships as well.

    Not saying Hindu relationships are good. In fact, I don't see a modern day Draupadi nor do we see a Sita. We hindus have regressed a lot from our glory days of Mahabharatha vis a vis our respect and rights to woman. The centuries of bigotry and male dominance needs to be washed away but I am afraid it will take time.
     
  3. Rowdy

    Rowdy Co ja kurwa czytam! Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    3,256
    Likes Received:
    3,042
    Location:
    Milky Bar
    One a more practical note we need to fight the propaganda aimed at women. As women decide (in most cases) and are limits to reproduction. As long as they present a good enough deal most men will marry.
    If the careerist is hoping for a ready made husband at 30 and pop out a kid Just in time then lord save "Hindu" marriages.
     
  4. jackprince

    jackprince Turning into a frog Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,000
    Likes Received:
    4,153
    Location:
    soon to be Bengalistan
    Whoever the author is (I did not bother going into the link and see the name of this worthless moron), he is completely divorced with reaity. Not only in this modern age, but even in earlier times, people had their freedom of accepting or rejecting brides or grooms aelected by the parents. Albeit men had more freedom and of course it was more of a family issue rather than social issue, hence not terribly highleghted matter. The function of 'arranging' marriage was never as hard and fast as this author seems to think. He seems to have derived the idea of arrange marriage by watching too many bollywood films and serials!

    In most cases, even in past, the consent of both bride and groom's were usually taken; and they also mostly consented given marriage is a natural part of life and traditionally parents arranged those. So what was wrong in that? It was a norm in almost every civilised society which did not give open license to promiscuity.
     
  5. DingDong

    DingDong Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,499
    Likes Received:
    4,403
    Location:
    Delhi
    Marriage is a social institution, and there few very "dark reasons" behind what our ancestors brought into common practice, some of the practices were adopted to suppress our basic instincts about which we no longer talk about.

    Parallel theory about Marriage claims that Marriage as an Institution evolved to contain the high rate of "infanticide" resulting after men and women switching partners. Theories claim that rate of infanticide before "Marriages" might have been as high as 50% of all live births.

    Marriage regulated the sexual conduct, reduced sex-related conflict and allowed our race to grown in numbers faster than ever. It took our race several thousand years to touch the figure of 10,000.
     
    Agnostic_Indian likes this.
  6. aliyah

    aliyah Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    698
    Likes Received:
    838
    ban all news channels , strict sensor board for tv and films .
     
  7. Energon

    Energon DFI stars Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    764
    These assertions are contradictory to one another. Also why would you want laws to be tilted against women in order to preserve families? Why not make laws that impose insecurity and punitive action against men to preserve families instead?
     
  8. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    7,717
    How are they contradictory?

    Current US laws are tilted towards women rather than kids. The child custody goes to women in 80% of the divorce cases. The men have to pay for child and women support even when it is a no fault divorce etc. etc.
     
    alphacentury and Mad Indian like this.
  9. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,835
    Likes Received:
    7,736
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    :pound: so making a gender neutral law which removes the alimony bull shit is now punishing to women. This is what feminism has done to western men- equating female entitlements as a basic right which when denied is a denial of basic right and punishing


    This is why I never understand the morons who support feminism in India . if they wanted slow death , they could try suicide by arsenic poisoning than try to kill other men along with them:rolleyes:
     
  10. Mad Indian

    Mad Indian Proud Bigot Veteran Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    12,835
    Likes Received:
    7,736
    Location:
    Podigai Hills.
    More than regulation of sex family and marriage was important for raising the children better. That holds true even now. State can never raise the child as well as a father can.
     
    DingDong likes this.
  11. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    7,717
    They should now use birth tax on men!!
     
  12. spikey360

    spikey360 Crusader Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,554
    Likes Received:
    2,936
    Location:
    The Republic of India
    Want to save traditional values? Eradicate communist+/socialists, the filth of any progressive society. Secondly, respect women and love your woman. Thirdly, do not spare the rod and spoil the child.
     
    Coalmine and parijataka like this.
  13. Energon

    Energon DFI stars Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    764
    Because one post rails about not wanting government interference, followed by another post highlighting government playing a key role in enforcing a policy designed to make "women stick to men to ensure the benefit of their offspring". Yea boss, that's contradictory.

    I have no idea what this means. Custody generally goes to women because they are the primary care givers.
     
  14. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    7,717
    Really. Removing the assistance given by govt. to let economic and market forces decide the outcome is equal to govt. interference. Seriously, you are too brain-washed to even know what govt. interference is!! Asking to remove crutches of welfare security is govt. interference!


    Custody goes to women because this way they can extract alimony and child support for rest of their life. And modern western societies are too brainwashed to oblige them.
     
  15. Energon

    Energon DFI stars Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    764
    LOL. We're deploying "market forces" and "welfare security" here? You do realize that only women have the biologic ability and wherewithal to conceive, gestate and deliver a child yes? And you also realize that women are primary care givers for children for a multitude of complex reasons (many of them biological) yes? Which is precisely why you (like me and pretty much everyone else on this message board) should thank our lucky stars that we were born men. Oh and while you're at at also be thankful for the fact that reproduction within a familial setting (vs. surrogacy) is not subject to market forces, because if it truly were, you'd be on the losing end.

    It's interesting that you started this entire thread by raising the alarm about Western individualism and consumerism and then resorted to "market forces" to bolster a point of view. This is a bit puzzling considering individualism and consumerism are central to free market economics.
     
  16. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    7,717
    You know that you are making no sense in your first paragraph except parroting the stand taught in your classes.

    Yes, this is a thread where we are debating how to hold family as a social unit in a free market system i.e. generate incentives for having a family rather than single parents and low fertility rate. Re-read the thread again to understand the arguments and see how these are two different things i.e. sustaining a family system and free markets.
     
  17. Energon

    Energon DFI stars Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    Messages:
    1,199
    Likes Received:
    764
    Who are you expecting to generate incentives?
     
  18. Dovahkiin

    Dovahkiin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    48
    ot : bhai please help bachelors in pune, flats for family only :dude:

    bhagwaan aisi families ko thoda less family values dein :lol:
     
    Sakal Gharelu Ustad likes this.
  19. Dovahkiin

    Dovahkiin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    48
    you just spoke my mind bro :balleballe:
     
  20. Sakal Gharelu Ustad

    Sakal Gharelu Ustad Detests Jholawalas Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    7,717
    Society and govt.......................................
     

Share This Page