Nagraj
Regular Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2011
- Messages
- 804
- Likes
- 254
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/epiphe...ls-lead-to-the-decline-of-arabic-science.html
The world’s first scientific renaissance took place not in Italy, but in the Arab world.
The period between the 9th and 11th centuries AD, when Islam took hold of a band of territory strategy from Spain in the West through to what is now Pakistan, saw an extraordinary intellectual flowering. Scientists in the Arab world during this period made important advances in fields as varied as astronomy, mathematics, medicine and optics – advances that fed into and stimulated the later European Renaissance.
Which makes it all the stranger that modern Islamic nations have such a lamentable record in science. Where did it all go wrong?
There are several competing theories about what happened, and Eric Chaney, an Economist at Harvard University, turned to an unusual source to try to find out which is correct (you can read his paper on the topic here).
He trawled through the Harvard Library’s catalogue of over 13 million books to identify works by Islamic authors on scientific and religious topics. What he found was that, during the ‘Golden Age’, 12% of books written in the Islamic world were on scientific topics and 30% were on religious topics.
Two hundred years later just 7% of books were scientific in nature, and that drops to 2% by 1700 (shown in the graphic below). Meanwhile, there was an upsurge in religious books.
One traditional explanation for this decline has been that outside aggressors – the Crusaders, or the Mongols – destroyed the centres of learning. But Chaney found that both the timing and the geographical distribution of the decline makes this explanation unlikely.
Chaney in fact found that scientific output increased in the Levant over the time period of the crusades. Scientific output did decline in Iran over this time period, but the decline began well before the Mongol invasions.
However, the decline in scientific output did correlate strongly with a dramatic rise in output from Islamic religious schools, or Madrasas.
Chaney believes that the decline in Arabic science a direct result of the ‘Sunni Revival’ – a kind of upsurge in religious sentiment and authority.
From the very beginning, Islam has been divided into two traditions. One of these is rationalist, stressing the importance of the use of reason in defining Islamic law. The other is traditionalist, stressing the importance of using ‘revealed wisdom’ as laid down in the Koran and the sayings of Muhammed, or Hadiths.
In the early years of Islam, during the Abbasid Caliphate there was a kind of inquisition. But this inquisition required all religious leaders to adopt rationalist approaches and reject traditionalist doctrines.
The Sunni revival was a traditionalist backlash.
Why did the traditionalist movement gain power? Chaney provides evidence that it was due to the increasing conversions to Islam.
In the early days of Islam, although the ruling classes were Muslim large numbers of the populace were not. The rulers insisted on rationalist version of Islam to appeal to their subjects and also to gain converts. Chaney shows that the Sunni revival occurred at different times in different regions, and coincided with the point at which Muslims became the majority.
The decline in Arab science was, according to this view, caused by the political empowerment of Muslim religious leaders. As a result, education and learning was focussed on the Madrasas and not in independent Universities as in the West – a key factor in the upsurge of learning in the West).
And once religious traditionalists took control of the education system, they shut down most lines of scientific inquiry. Not only were there fewer scientific works after the Sunni Revival took hold, but those that were produced in the were cited less often – indicating that they had less impact on other scholars.
Chaney quotes al-Ghazali, who lived in the 11th century and is one of Islam’s most renowned religious scholars
…he who studies mathematics is amazed by its precision and proofs. He then takes a more positive view of philosophy and reckons that all of the rational sciences are as clear and trustworthy as mathematics [...] and he says: if religion were true, then philosophers would have proved its veracity with their precise methods [...] we have seen many deviate from [Islam] in this manner.
So this is a simple case of power and control. Once the Sunnis became dominant, they clamped down on any potential challenges to their authority. And that included rational inquiry – dealing a fatal blow to the region and causing lasting damage that persists to this day.
///
please be respectful while discussing it .
The world’s first scientific renaissance took place not in Italy, but in the Arab world.
The period between the 9th and 11th centuries AD, when Islam took hold of a band of territory strategy from Spain in the West through to what is now Pakistan, saw an extraordinary intellectual flowering. Scientists in the Arab world during this period made important advances in fields as varied as astronomy, mathematics, medicine and optics – advances that fed into and stimulated the later European Renaissance.
Which makes it all the stranger that modern Islamic nations have such a lamentable record in science. Where did it all go wrong?
There are several competing theories about what happened, and Eric Chaney, an Economist at Harvard University, turned to an unusual source to try to find out which is correct (you can read his paper on the topic here).
He trawled through the Harvard Library’s catalogue of over 13 million books to identify works by Islamic authors on scientific and religious topics. What he found was that, during the ‘Golden Age’, 12% of books written in the Islamic world were on scientific topics and 30% were on religious topics.
Two hundred years later just 7% of books were scientific in nature, and that drops to 2% by 1700 (shown in the graphic below). Meanwhile, there was an upsurge in religious books.
One traditional explanation for this decline has been that outside aggressors – the Crusaders, or the Mongols – destroyed the centres of learning. But Chaney found that both the timing and the geographical distribution of the decline makes this explanation unlikely.
Chaney in fact found that scientific output increased in the Levant over the time period of the crusades. Scientific output did decline in Iran over this time period, but the decline began well before the Mongol invasions.
However, the decline in scientific output did correlate strongly with a dramatic rise in output from Islamic religious schools, or Madrasas.
Chaney believes that the decline in Arabic science a direct result of the ‘Sunni Revival’ – a kind of upsurge in religious sentiment and authority.
From the very beginning, Islam has been divided into two traditions. One of these is rationalist, stressing the importance of the use of reason in defining Islamic law. The other is traditionalist, stressing the importance of using ‘revealed wisdom’ as laid down in the Koran and the sayings of Muhammed, or Hadiths.
In the early years of Islam, during the Abbasid Caliphate there was a kind of inquisition. But this inquisition required all religious leaders to adopt rationalist approaches and reject traditionalist doctrines.
The Sunni revival was a traditionalist backlash.
Why did the traditionalist movement gain power? Chaney provides evidence that it was due to the increasing conversions to Islam.
In the early days of Islam, although the ruling classes were Muslim large numbers of the populace were not. The rulers insisted on rationalist version of Islam to appeal to their subjects and also to gain converts. Chaney shows that the Sunni revival occurred at different times in different regions, and coincided with the point at which Muslims became the majority.
The decline in Arab science was, according to this view, caused by the political empowerment of Muslim religious leaders. As a result, education and learning was focussed on the Madrasas and not in independent Universities as in the West – a key factor in the upsurge of learning in the West).
And once religious traditionalists took control of the education system, they shut down most lines of scientific inquiry. Not only were there fewer scientific works after the Sunni Revival took hold, but those that were produced in the were cited less often – indicating that they had less impact on other scholars.
Chaney quotes al-Ghazali, who lived in the 11th century and is one of Islam’s most renowned religious scholars
…he who studies mathematics is amazed by its precision and proofs. He then takes a more positive view of philosophy and reckons that all of the rational sciences are as clear and trustworthy as mathematics [...] and he says: if religion were true, then philosophers would have proved its veracity with their precise methods [...] we have seen many deviate from [Islam] in this manner.
So this is a simple case of power and control. Once the Sunnis became dominant, they clamped down on any potential challenges to their authority. And that included rational inquiry – dealing a fatal blow to the region and causing lasting damage that persists to this day.
///
please be respectful while discussing it .
