How India can lead the South Asian Century

SPIEZ

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,508
Likes
1,021
Country flag
At first glance, South Asia's prospects look grim. Pakistan is trapped in a cycle of violence. Bangladesh emerged from an Islamist government led by Khaleda Zia and successive caretaker administrations only three years ago. Sri Lanka is still recovering from the debilitating 27-year-old a civil war with the LTTE. Nepal and the Maldives are in political ferment. Afghanistan remains mired in war.

And India? The fulcrum of South Asia is at a fork in the road.
A wrong turn could set it back years in its battle against corruption, political misgovernance and policy inertia. The converse could help it build South Asia into an economic and geopolitical power within a decade.

The informal talks last Sunday between the Indian prime minister and the Pakistani president have reinforced the growing conviction in Islamabad that peace in South Asia is a necessary condition to extricate Pakistan from its economic quagmire.

South Asia houses 23.50% of the world's population. But its 1.65 billion people are among the poorest in the world with per capita incomes ranging from $ 1,250 (Nepal) to $ 5,100 (Sri Lanka). Even adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP), South Asia's median per capita income is around $3,000 – one-tenth of Greece, Europe's most distressed economy.

Apart from poverty, the region shares the same afflictions: widespread corruption, shambolic infrastructure, inadequate healthcare and huge socio-economic inequalities. So how can 23.50% of the world's population, packed together in just 3.20% of the world's land mass, steeped in poverty, sectarianism and fundamentalism, turn things around?

The countries of South Asia have a common civilisational heritage. Four of the world's nine great religions – Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism – evolved here. Two others – Islam and Christianity – arrived in the subcontinent mere decades after their founding in west Asia and established deep roots. A seventh and eighth – Judaism and Zorastrianism – came here through believers escaping persecution in Palestine and Persia. Only the ninth, Confucianism, stayed away. But its monks travelled frequently from China to India to exchange ideas and debate theology.

In such a plural subcontinent, conflict is inevitable. However, from violence a syncretic society can emerge, bound by a common heritage and common wounds. The scars of partition, the more recent trauma of state-sponsored terrorism from Pakistan and old memories of Mughal and Protestant conquests give all sides cause to be deeply suspicious of one another.

But now South Asia is at a turning point. Pakistan has belatedly realised that using terror as an instrument of state policy has brought it close to bankruptcy. Whoever wins the next general election will seek cooperation not confrontation with India, despite the rhetoric over Jammu & Kashmir. The military has no constituency or goodwill left. Islamic fundamentalists are feared but reviled. Thus the three "As" that defined Pakistan for decades – Allah, Army and America – are no longer omnipotent. From the wreckage, Pakistan can rebuild itself as a prosperous and peaceful nation – but only as part of a prosperous and peaceful South Asia.

Pakistan, in various back-channel talks, concedes that the militancy it unleashed on Jammu & Kashmir in 1989 has bled Pakistan, not India. It would, however, be unwise to underestimate the fanaticism that lurks within the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and other state-sponsored Pakistani terrorist groups, including Hafiz Saeed's JuD into which the LeT has morphed.

Bangladesh has meanwhile, under the secular leadership of Prime Minister Hasina, pulled itself back from the fundamentalist precipice former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia had pushed it towards. Sri Lanka too, freed finally from its devastating conflict with the LTTE, though not from the taint of alleged human rights violations against ethnic Tamils, is ready to move towards a better future for its people.

India is the key to South Asia's emergence as one of the world's most powerful regional blocs. It constitutes 75% of South Asia's total population and 82% of its combined GDP ($4.10 trillion out of $4.96 trillion, at purchasing power parity). How can India provide leadership to a region beyond the dated, bureaucratic confines of SAARC? Pakistan's grant of MFN status to India is a starting point. At an average annual GDP growth rate of 7.5%, India's economy will more than double in 10 years to over $8.50 trillion. Pakistan's own economy – even assuming annual GDP growth of 4% (twice its current rate) — would by then have hauled itself up to just $0.70 trillion – one-twelfth India's GDP.

In this statistic lies the future of India, Pakistan and the rest of South Asia. To counter the nuanced challenge of a rising China taking America's place in Pakistan's post-2014 geopolitical strategy, India will have to overcome political misgovernance at home and emerge globally as the third angle in the Isoceles triangle with China and the US.

The world's geopolitics will be dominated in 2022 by three economic zones: the American Economic Zone, bridging the Atlantic from North and South America to Europe; the Chinese Economic Zone, tracing an arc across the Pacific Ocean; and the Indian Economic Zone, sweeping through South Asia to West Asia and Africa. In this unfolding century, South Asia has the opportunity to overcome terrorism, corruption and poverty to give a quarter of humanity the life of peace and dignity so long denied them.


How India can lead the South Asian Century : Minhaz Merchant's blog-The Times Of India
 
Last edited:

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Are you sure the economy alone is enough for India leading the South Asia?

What about the geo- politics, political will power, friends and other stuff?
 

SPIEZ

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,508
Likes
1,021
Country flag
Are you sure the economy alone is enough for India leading the South Asia?

What about the geo- politics, political will power, friends and other stuff?
Please read it fully. And all the others we can do, when we have the "economy"
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Please read it fully. And all the others we can do, when we have the "economy"
But the problem is, we already have a good economy. Still we are not doing what we are supposed to do with it. And there are some basic assumptions that so many things will go right in that article. "SO many". Thats why i asked, if economy alone is enough?
 

SPIEZ

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,508
Likes
1,021
Country flag
But the problem is, we already have a good economy. Still we are not doing what we are supposed to do with it. And there are some basic assumptions that so many things will go right in that article. "SO many". Thats why i asked, if economy alone is enough?

From the article

A wrong turn could set it back years in its battle against corruption, political misgovernance and policy inertia. The converse could help it build South Asia into an economic and geopolitical power within a decade.
 

Godless-Kafir

DFI Buddha
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
5,842
Likes
1,837
Country flag
Pakistan is already leading in many areas like Terrorism, Suicide bombing, Hate, Miss Information on Non-Muslims etc.,

We dont need to catch up but what other nation is there in South Asia to lead?
 

SPIEZ

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2011
Messages
3,508
Likes
1,021
Country flag
Pakistan is already leading in many areas like Terrorism, Suicide bombing, Hate, Miss Information on Non-Muslims etc.,

We dont need to catch up but what other nation is there in South Asia to lead?
The article talks about South Asian Century as against Chinese Century or yet another American Century.
Peace and stability will have a lot more to do for a stable economy, what say?
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
Bangladesh has meanwhile, under the secular leadership of Prime Minister Hasina, pulled itself back from the fundamentalist precipice former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia had pushed it towards.
:rotflmao:. This i what i meant. It assumes everything will be alright. What if fanatics take over again?

Sri Lanka too, freed finally from its devastating conflict with the LTTE, though not from the taint of alleged human rights violations against ethnic Tamils, is ready to move towards a better future for its people.
This is a big joke really:laugh:. Come on, you know it right? It has moved past its violations? May be because there wont be any need for that, if you know what i mean:noidea:

Pakistan's own economy – even assuming annual GDP growth of 4% (twice its current rate) — would by then have hauled itself up to just $0.70 trillion – one-twelfth India's GDP.
This is said "after" these lines

Thus the three "As" that defined Pakistan for decades – Allah, Army and America – are no longer omnipotent. From the wreckage, Pakistan can rebuild itself as a prosperous and peaceful nation – but only as part of a prosperous and peaceful South Asia.

Pakistan, in various back-channel talks, concedes that the militancy it unleashed on Jammu & Kashmir in 1989 has bled Pakistan, not India. It would, however, be unwise to underestimate the fanaticism that lurks within the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and other state-sponsored Pakistani terrorist groups, including Hafiz Saeed's JuD into which the LeT has morphed.
How can the Pakistan be Peaceful, have an economic growth at 4% and that too without changing the ideology, which keeps it together in the first place, which is not happening soon?
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
The article talks about South Asian Century as against Chinese Century or yet another American Century.
Peace and stability will have a lot more to do for a stable economy, what say?
South Asian Century is not happening any time soon. Thats my point.

It can be Indian Century if and only IF we play it right.
 

panduranghari

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
1,786
Likes
1,245
Are you sure the economy alone is enough for India leading the South Asia?

What about the geo- politics, political will power, friends and other stuff?
My personal opinion is as stated by the great Shehnai performer Late Ustad Bismillah Khan , ' Aap itne aagey aa jao, log peechein he rahe, aagey na aa paaye'.

Indian economy will make the neighbouring countries accept our superiority. We need good leadership to impose this though. With a strong economy, we can give them shed load of aid and make them dependent on us.
 

Mad Indian

Proud Bigot
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Messages
12,835
Likes
7,762
Country flag
My personal opinion is as stated by the great Shehnai performer Late Ustad Bismillah Khan , ' Aap itne aagey aa jao, log peechein he rahe, aagey na aa paaye'.

Indian economy will make the neighbouring countries accept our superiority. We need good leadership to impose this though. With a strong economy, we can give them shed load of aid and make them dependent on us.
Exactly :rolleyes:
 

Godless-Kafir

DFI Buddha
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2010
Messages
5,842
Likes
1,837
Country flag
The article talks about South Asian Century as against Chinese Century or yet another American Century.
Peace and stability will have a lot more to do for a stable economy, what say?
No it wont, Economy is war to, its another form of competition. The US achieved its pinnacle of scientific break through in the cold war, all those weapons and technology is product of the cold war, including the GPS and Internet, right now it is slipping down and they dont even have an replacement for the Space Shuttle.

Today India would not even have Agni-1 if not for constant pressure and a knife to the throat of our corrupt nethas from Pakistan. We would be worse than Haiti in terms of arms development or for that matter even roads and infrastructure, if not from a very real threat like Pakistan.

What we need is an even bigger threat not lesser one..lol.
 
Last edited:

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
The world's geopolitics will be dominated in 2022 by three economic zones: the American Economic Zone, bridging the Atlantic from North and South America to Europe; the Chinese Economic Zone, tracing an arc across the Pacific Ocean; and the Indian Economic Zone, sweeping through South Asia to West Asia and Africa.
This prediction is radical but the most questionable. On Indian EZ part there seems not a road map to achieve that end in the whole write-up. BTW Confucianism is not a religion but more like a life compass IMO
 

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
^^^ Well India has been taking some important steps on improving economic ties with SAARC countries particularly Bangladesh for example. India-GCC economic ties are one of the biggest economic relations in the world already and India ASEAN economic relations are increasinly becoming important as well. India-Africa trade is also another area where high growth has occurred in the last couple of years.

Infact, while India - EU and India US trade has been slowing down, trade relations with all these countries has been ramping up exponentially.
 

pankaj nema

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,158
Likes
38,007
Country flag
India already accounts for more than 80 % of south Asia's GDP

We dont need these useless and INCOMPETENT neighbours for our ECONOMIC growth

They need us

We dont need them

That is why we see both ISLAMIST nations pakistan and Bangladesh making overtures to India
for more trade and economic cooperation
 

pankaj nema

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,158
Likes
38,007
Country flag
@ Nitesh Absolutely right

These stupid western people some how think that our useless neighbours are economically
relevant to India

They are just a nuisance

Either they want to create trouble or they want MONEY for NOT INVITING China in their countries

They are either troublemakers or blackmailers or freeloaders
 

peacecracker

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
294
Likes
41
look out for srilanka, that country will have the highest chance for economic growth IMO. pakistan and bangladesh will remain the nuisance what they are. if India can stop radicalization in bangladesh, that will be a great thing. but how?
 

nitesh

Mob Control Manager
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2009
Messages
7,550
Likes
1,307
No pankaj the orignial pupose of the term south asia was to some how decrease the value of India. Both in economic and political terms. We need to put this in our people's mind also, that this is Indian sub continent
 

pankaj nema

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
10,158
Likes
38,007
Country flag
For a very long period India has quitely suffered the INDIA PAK Comparision done by Western
Nations

But No MORE

Today we stand MILES taller than these USELESS Neighbours pakistan and Bangladesh

India Pak RACE IS OVER

There is a NEW race in this World

It is the India China race Though China is ahead of us on most counts yet India 's POTENTIAL is
Now globally recognised

And Pakis should first learn to make railway Locomotives before they can even think of comparing themselves
to India
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top