History exposed by Nazam Sethi

[Blackwater]

listen carefully,worth listening

 

[Blackwater]

 

[Blackwater]

 

[Blackwater]

 

[Galaxy]

I like videos of Nazam Sethi and Nisar. They are quite liberal and talk as par with facts and ground reality. Keep posting Blackwater!!

 

[sesha_maruthi27]

Good posts. Keep it up..........:thumb:

 

[The Messiah]

I like videos of Nazam Sethi and Nisar. They are quite liberal and talk as par with facts and ground reality. Keep posting Blackwater!!

I thought you hated liberals ?

 

[mayfair]

Just started listening, he starts off with stone-faced lies.

Well it's to be expected. Cannot go totally against the official narative can he?

 

[Blackwater]

Just started listening, he starts off with stone-faced lies.

Well it's to be expected. Cannot go totally against the official narative can he?

Which one????

 

[The Messiah]

Just started listening, he starts off with stone-faced lies.

Well it's to be expected. Cannot go totally against the official narative can he?

i was going to start watching but not now.

didn't expect paaji to post paki theories

what is being discussed in the video ?

 

[Godless-Kafir]

i was going to start watching but not now.

didn't expect paaji to post paki theories

what is being discussed in the video ?

They are discussing grown up stuff, the bollywood thread is that way.

 

[mayfair]

Which one????

1. He claims that Hari Singh had decided to join India whereas in fact Hari Singh was inclined to stay independent. Pakis sent in tribal invaders with the twin aim of grabbing Kashmir and keeping the Pashtuns of NFWP occupied elsewhere. Hari Singh appealed to India for help, to which the reply was, accede to us and we'll send in our forces. He signed the instrument of accession and that is how Kashmir became a part of India. Sethi did not say a word about this.

2. Plebiscite- It was India who went to UN. The chief requirements for plebiscite was that Pakistan withdraw its forces from the state and the demography be restored to what it was pre-1947. He claims that India went back on their word. No mention of the treachery by Major Brown of the Gilgit scouts.

3. Hyderabad and Junagadh- Refuses to accede that all bets were off after Pakis attacked Kashmir. It was only after this invasion that India decided to intervene militarily in the two princely mandates. Fails to mention the reign of terror by Razakars in Hyderabad and the people's movement against the Nizam. There was no such rebellion in Kashmir. He also fails to mention that the diwan of Junagadh..Bhutto ka baap was the one who asked India to annex the state after the Nawab had fled with the treasury. And one more thing, Sethi sahab very conveniently forgot to mention that there was a gentlemen's agreement between the two countries that neither will have any major enclaves in the other's territory (Cooch Behar was a complicated thing).

4. Paki intruders had achieved sod all in Kashmir in 1965, he makes it sound as if they were winning against the Kafirs.

I am sure there will be more as I watch more of ther interview.

 

[Galaxy]

I thought you hated liberals ?

Anyone who expose Pakistan, I like. Both expose puki Islamist on regular basis.

 

[The Messiah]

They are discussing grown up stuff, the bollywood thread is that way.

will you troll in every thread ?

 

[Godless-Kafir]

will you troll in every thread ?

WHo started it? What was your purpose of posting in this thread such a proactive statement if you where not going to see the video? So you need to.

 

[Godless-Kafir]

I am surprised how come Najem Sethi is not considered a anti-pak-muslim and a fatwa issued on his head?

 

[Blackwater]

I am surprised how come Najem Sethi is not considered a anti-pak-muslim and a fatwa issued on his head?

so many times.that's y he spends most of his time out side pak land especially USA and Dubai

 

[Blackwater]

i was going to start watching but not now.

didn't expect paaji to post paki theories

what is being discussed in the video ?

what is says is not paki theory. most of the things he says was pro Indian

 

[mayfair]

what is says is not paki theory. most of the things he says was pro Indian

Not in the first two parts of this video mate.

 

[Blackwater]

1. He claims that Hari Singh had decided to join India whereas in fact Hari Singh was inclined to stay independent. Pakis sent in tribal invaders with the twin aim of grabbing Kashmir and keeping the Pashtuns of NFWP occupied elsewhere. Hari Singh appealed to India for help, to which the reply was, accede to us and we'll send in our forces. He signed the instrument of accession and that is how Kashmir became a part of India. Sethi did not say a word about this.

2. Plebiscite- It was India who went to UN. The chief requirements for plebiscite was that Pakistan withdraw its forces from the state and the demography be restored to what it was pre-1947. He claims that India went back on their word. No mention of the treachery by Major Brown of the Gilgit scouts.

3. Hyderabad and Junagadh- Refuses to accede that all bets were off after Pakis attacked Kashmir. It was only after this invasion that India decided to intervene militarily in the two princely mandates. Fails to mention the reign of terror by Razakars in Hyderabad and the people's movement against the Nizam. There was no such rebellion in Kashmir. He also fails to mention that the diwan of Junagadh..Bhutto ka baap was the one who asked India to annex the state after the Nawab had fled with the treasury. And one more thing, Sethi sahab very conveniently forgot to mention that there was a gentlemen's agreement between the two countries that neither will have any major enclaves in the other's territory (Cooch Behar was a complicated thing).

4. Paki intruders had achieved sod all in Kashmir in 1965, he makes it sound as if they were winning against the Kafirs.

I am sure there will be more as I watch more of ther interview.

some what agree with u