Hindu mob kills Muslim Man for allegedly eating Beef 8 arrested

[LETHALFORCE]

here getting a gun is very hard.hand gun are illegal an your only allowed a shot gun or rifle and it cant exceed a certain level of power/velocity. and if you want a more powerful weapon you need a special permit for it. and if you do want a shot gun or rifle you need a valid reason for it and a huge amount of checks done on your and regular police visits.

what about the US?

Here different states have different laws. Starting to get stricter . But customizing guns is a hobby of Americans in many states. You can buy a rifle in Walmart in most states with drivers license and a short background checks usually few weeks at most there is no federal waiting period.

 

[blue marlin]

Here different states have different laws. Starting to get stricter . But customizing guns is a hobby of Americans in many states. You can buy a rifle in Walmart in most states with drivers license and a short background checks usually few weeks.

go figure. when it gets to the point of getting a gun like your getting your groceries then theres something wrong

we can get an air gun, but you have to be 18+ but even there are restricted

 

[LETHALFORCE]

go figure. when it gets to the point of getting a gun like your getting your groceries then theres something wrong

US was founded thru a gun culture. I don't see this ever changing. All the high
schools in Big cities have metal detectors .

 

[blue marlin]

US was founded thru a gun culture. I don't see this ever changing.

what about Trump? is there anything in his manifesto regarding the restriction of guns?

 

[LETHALFORCE]

what about Trump? is there anything in his manifesto regarding the restriction of guns?

Republicans never go against the NRA.

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

Typical apologetic bullshit. So its by mere chance that all 1400+ victims were non-Muslims? Is that so?


And keep trolling and expose how pathetic you are.

Britian is predominantly christian so naturally victims were also christians.its not necessary that in every crime victims and criminals should have representstion of differant religions, or there should be a representation equal to their national population.
Btw only a few biased sources has reported that all of the victims were non muslim.genaraly whereabouts and identity of the victims is protected.all major new agencies just reported just "children".

 

[blue marlin]

Republicans never go against the NRA.

i think you get the point here, and by know you know my views on the US. as for the bbc or the guardian good things come with rewards and good publicity. same applies with the bad.

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

If anybody who doesnt know about what you are talking then its is you.

Everybody has identities...multiple identities....most prominant identity in which one guy/or a groupe is recognised is their nationality.mention of other identities are usually used only when the incident has anything to do with it.

If a a few indian hindus are arrested for a bank robbery/rape etc in uk the headline will be " x number of indians arrested ". To say " x number of hindus did this crime " will be a wrong thing to do. mention of religion is not called for..mention of any other identity including religion is used only when the crime has anyting to do with that..otherwise it sends a wrong mesaage.

Do you even understand the difference between calling people Pakistanis or south-Asians!!

Whatever happened to self-respect!

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

Do you even understand the difference between calling people Pakistanis or south-Asians!!

Whatever happened to self-respect!

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/rotherham-rape-common-sense-political-correctness/
Dude vast majority of the abusers were south asian and predominantly from pakistan.vast majority of the victims where white girls..in other words not all of them were pakistanis or not all the victims where white girls.


from british prespective calling them south asians or pakistani makes sense because they were from pakistan/south asia.
they were even reluctant to do so because of the danger of sounding racist.

 

[Mad Indian]

Britian is predominantly christian so naturally victims were also christians.its not necessary that in every crime victims and criminals should have representstion of differant religions, or there should be a representation equal to their national population.

Again, stop sprouting bullshit. the are these incidents took place was in Rotherham, which has a very significant Muslim presence.

And the victims were predominantly xtians they was not reflected as a ℅ of the population of Rotherham. And why the abusers were all Muslims? Isn't xtian majority UK supposed to have predominant xtian abusers

Btw only a few biased sources has reported that all of the victims were non muslim.genaraly whereabouts and identity of the victims is protected.all major new agencies just reported just "children".

Yes, any media which reports the truth is biased and racist.

Again, keep peddling nonsense. Naive Mindus need to know what seculars really are

 

[asingh10]

nvm...................................................................

 

[cannonfodder]

Typical arguments/post to wash off hands over Islamic terrorism.

Look there are christian crusades, Hindu, Buddhist terrorist...It is media propaganda against Islam and no reform is required.
Let us keep maintain head count then to get some statistical data.

There is an Indian constitution written under Dalit which provides equal rights to all citizens. It is not perfectly implemented and such incidents even happen in US or any developed country. Hinduism as an religion have implemented reforms that have almost abolished sati, polygamy and numerous malpractices (which is inferior religion according to most Islamist) .

Where are the reforms in Islamic countries ( to be precise Pakiland) for kaffirs(who are the most oppressed)? Shariah/blasphemy laws..

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/rotherham-rape-common-sense-political-correctness/
Dude vast majority of the abusers were south asian and predominantly from pakistan.vast majority of the victims where white girls..in other words not all of them were pakistanis or not all the victims where white girls.


from british prespective calling them south asians or pakistani makes sense because they were from pakistan/south asia.
they were even reluctant to do so because of the danger of sounding racist.

You have your head too deep into the sand, my friend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

The first few lines to make it clear to you: "Widespread organised child sexual abuse took place in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England, between 1997 and 2013. Local investigations into the abuse began in 1999, although some reports were never finalised or made public by the authorities.[1] In 2010, five men of Pakistani heritage were found guilty of a series of sexual offences against girls as young as twelve."

Ofcourse, British media will peddle their agenda to hyphenate India-Pak and losers like you will lap it up like infants. Even the article you posted only mentions Pakis because they were behind the whole screw up.

And self respecting Indians don't want to be clubbed under South Asia = India + Pak.

 

[OneGrimPilgrim]

Sir, such isolated incidents have occurred in the past but I've noticed an icrease eversince the BJP took over.
In one of earler posts last year (pre election), I voiced my concern that communal and sectarian violence in India might rise if the right wingers took over under Modi. And this is exactly what is happeneing.

Imho you're media is the biggest threat to the muslims for hyping such incidents.

herein lies the gremlin behind the brouhaha....

 

[asingh10]

You have your head too deep into the sand, my friend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

The first few lines to make it clear to you: "Widespread organised child sexual abuse took place in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England, between 1997 and 2013. Local investigations into the abuse began in 1999, although some reports were never finalised or made public by the authorities.[1] In 2010, five men of Pakistani heritage were found guilty of a series of sexual offences against girls as young as twelve."

Ofcourse, British media will peddle their agenda to hyphenate India-Pak and losers like you will lap it up like infants. Even the article you posted only mentions Pakis because they were behind the whole screw up.

And self respecting Indians don't want to be clubbed under South Asia = India + Pak.

Why I'm not a South Asian - Rajeev Srinivasan

http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/mar/19rajeev.htm

Also, the Sikh groups had been battling Pakis since 80s over grooming, this has been a problem for a while and it's only now that people are waking up to it.

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

Again, stop sprouting bullshit. the are these incidents took place was in Rotherham, which has a very significant Muslim presence.

And the victims were predominantly xtians they was not reflected as a ℅ of the population of Rotherham. And why the abusers were all Muslims? Isn't xtian majority UK supposed to have predominant xtian abusers



Yes, any media which reports the truth is biased and racist.

Again, keep peddling nonsense. Naive Mindus need to know what seculars really are

http://s.telegraph.co.uk/graphics/projects/rotherham/index.html

This is story of sarah she is one the victims.even she refused to brand all asians as rapists, and even more...a pakistani muslim was the one who protected here...but you won't see that because you are blind with religious hatred. Did that man saved that girl because he is a muslim ? Or only because he is a muslim ?

This report also uses the word " most " not "all".
Rotherham's muslim population is about 3.7 %.
one groupe of criminals coming from a particular religion is necessarily a proof religion being the motive. Another group committed another crime could be from another religion.it's utter nonsense to ask look for even communal representation in each crimnal groupe and accuse communal motivation if that's not found on that particular group.




Singlining out a incident where a gang did all this is not proof to say that its all because they were muslims.religions has as much role in this as any other factors like parents and family,friends,culture, education, and whole lot of other things..charector of a man is combination of many complex things.a crime can be attributed to somthing only when there is clearly a prima facia evidance that its by and large motivated by that particular thing.

 

[OneGrimPilgrim]

You have your head too deep into the sand, my friend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

The first few lines to make it clear to you: "Widespread organised child sexual abuse took place in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England, between 1997 and 2013. Local investigations into the abuse began in 1999, although some reports were never finalised or made public by the authorities.[1] In 2010, five men of Pakistani heritage were found guilty of a series of sexual offences against girls as young as twelve."

Ofcourse, British media will peddle their agenda to hyphenate India-Pak and losers like you will lap it up like infants. Even the article you posted only mentions Pakis because they were behind the whole screw up.

And self respecting Indians don't want to be clubbed under South Asia = India + Pak.

well, that may still be not enough. how about the warnings that muslim groups have been circulating/posting around schools in the UK, "....not to come near or interfere else we will rape and impregnate your girls and convert them to islam. we will do it"......?!

 

[Agnostic_Indian]

You have your head too deep into the sand, my friend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal

The first few lines to make it clear to you: "Widespread organised child sexual abuse took place in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England, between 1997 and 2013. Local investigations into the abuse began in 1999, although some reports were never finalised or made public by the authorities.[1] In 2010, five men of Pakistani heritage were found guilty of a series of sexual offences against girls as young as twelve."

Ofcourse, British media will peddle their agenda to hyphenate India-Pak and losers like you will lap it up like infants. Even the article you posted only mentions Pakis because they were behind the whole screw up.

And self respecting Indians don't want to be clubbed under South Asia = India + Pak.

Thats just one gang my dear..they didnt rape the all 1400 girls..there were many such cases.

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

Thats just one gang my dear..they didnt rape the all 1400 girls..there were many such cases.

The whole thing got out of control because the police had the same moron mentality like you i.e. political correctness which in these cases meant taking action against Muslim Pakis.

 

[DingDong]

Why does Media look away when bad things happen to Hindus in West Bengal and in Kerala? The ABP News has predictably initiated the "Project Sanatan Sanstha". How long will it take t heIndian Media to expose the wrong doings of Churches and Madrassas? Why has this become a pattern at ABP News to target one Hindu god-man or Cultural organization every quarter? Who funds this?

Even if the incident at Dadri was a conspiracy, in my view the real catalyst is not religion, but property. Somebody wants to drive the family away from the village and grab their land. No Right Wing group is involved, local mafia is involved.