Hindu-Americans Rank Top in Education, Income

[hello_10]

in between 0.00min to 0.20min, "Indians are killing us." and why, explained in between 0.30min to 2.00min .....

Indians account for 22% of Britain's ultra-rich club

Indians account for 22% of Britain

Super-rich Indians account for more than 20% of the wealth of ultra-high net worth (UHNW) individuals in Britain, a new list showed on Tuesday. As a national group, they are second only to expat Russians.

The list, published by the Singapore-based Wealth-X group, places steel magnate and ArcelorMittal chairman Lakshmi Mittal at second place with a fortune of $15.8 billion. Mittal was pushed to the second spot this year by Russian Alisher Burkhanovich Usmanov, who is part owner of the English football club Arsenal and is worth $16.4 billion.

"Mittal has seen his net worth estimate decline along with the stock price of ArcelorMittal, losing at least $30 billion in recent years," the report said.

The two other Indians on the top 15 list are the Hinduja brothers — Srichand at number 9 with a net worth of $7.6 billion and Gopichand at 12th with $6 billion.

Taken together, the wealth of the three Indian-origin industrialists makes up 22% of the top 15 total of $133.3 billion.

Apart from Usmanov, the two other Russians in the list include Roman Abramovich (at number 3, $12.1 billion) and Leonard Blavatnik (Number 5, $9.5 billion).

According to Wealth-X estimates, there are 10,760 individuals residents in Britain worth $30 million or more, with at least 310 new individuals joining the ranks of the ultra wealthy. On an average, Britain has added one UHNW individual every day since 2011. The combined wealth of the UHNW in Britain stands at an estimated $1.3 trillion.

"The wealth composition of the United Kingdom, London in particular, is diverse," said David Lincoln, Director of Research at Wealth-X. "This is reflected in our data showing that 31% of the UHNW population in the United Kingdom is considered non-domiciled, with non-resident Indians and West AsianUHNWIs making up a significant proportion of these."

Indians account for 22% of Britain

How Immigration Has Impoverished Britain: 75% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi Children "Live in Poverty"

Claims that immigration is economically beneficial for Britain have been destroyed by news that three-quarters of Pakistani and Bangladeshi children in the UK are being brought up in families that are living on poverty-level income.

The report, issued by Millennium Cohort Study, which is tracking children born between 2000 and 2002, has found that 73 per cent of the Pakistani and Bangladeshi seven-year olds were in families estimated to be living on less than 60 per cent of the average national household income.

Just over half of the black children (51 percent) in the Millennium cohort were in such low-income families, compared with one in four white (26 percent) and Indian (25percent) children, said an official press release.

"Predictably, low income was strongly linked to joblessness among parents, say researchers at the Institute of Education, University of London, who collected information from almost 14,000 families in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2008/9."

According to the report, among fathers, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis had the highest unemployment rate (15 percent) – well above the UK average of 6 per cent. Unemployment among black fathers was also high (11 percent) but Indians were less likely to be unemployed (4 percent) than whites (5.5 percent).

Almost two-thirds (64 percent) of white and Indian mothers had jobs, compared with half (52 percent) of black mothers and only 17 per cent of Pakistani and Bangladeshi mothers.

A much higher proportion of children in lone-parent families (63 percent) were living below the study's poverty line than those with married (16percent) or cohabiting (30 percent) parents.

"The incidence of income poverty for the Millennium cohort families has not changed appreciably over the first seven years of the children's lives," says Professor Heather Joshi, the study's director.

"Despite government efforts to eradicate child poverty almost three in 10 children are still in poor families at age 7. It's particularly disappointing that around one in five seven-year-olds is in severe poverty – on incomes below half the national average."

The findings appear in a report published today by the Institute of Education's Centre for Longitudinal Studies: Millennium Cohort Study, Fourth Survey: A User's Guide to Initial Findings. Copies of the report can be downloaded here.

British National Party

Winners Vs Victims

one day the contexter of president of US, Mr Romney, also explained this issue as below. the Winners who are winning, mainly the migrants who have high qualifications from a high ranked US's/Western university too and hence a high paid jobs, while the locals are the Victims who need social security+medical security at the price of around $1.5 trillions every year. in Australia i found the Australian newspapers labeled it as 'hate crime' against those migrants who are in high income group, pay high taxes and give support to run industries/medicines, develop technologies as part of research team etc.......

thats how Winner Vs Victim competition going on in US as below:

Romney offers no apologies for "victims" remarks

WASHINGTON — Already scrambling to steady a struggling campaign, Republican Mitt Romney confronted a new headache Monday after a video surfaced showing him telling wealthy donors that almost half of all Americans "believe they are victims" entitled to extensive government support. He added that as a candidate for the White House, "my job is not to worry about those people."

At a hastily called news conference late in the day, Romney offered no apologies for his remarks, and when he was asked if he was concerned he had offended anyone, he conceded the comments weren't "elegantly stated" and they were spoken "off the cuff."

Romney to campaign donors: Obama voters "dependent," see selves as "victims"
Full coverage: Election 2012

President Obama's campaign quickly seized on the video, obtained by the magazine Mother Jones and made public on a day that Romney's campaign said it needed a change in campaign strategy to gain momentum in the presidential race. Romney aides were already working behind the scenes to calm dissension in the GOP ranks and reassure nervous donors and consultants about the state of a race some Republicans worry may be getting away from their nominee.

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what," Romney is shown saying in the video posted online by the magazine (which you can see on the left). "There are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe that government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it."

"Forty-seven percent of Americans (working age people) pay no income tax," Romney said.

Romney offers no apologies for "victims" remarks - CBS News

this is how these Victims, local 'kings', have destroyed US's/Western economies as below, with around $810 billions for Social Security, and around $750 billions for free Medical, making US to borrow at least $1.2 trillions every year this way

=> U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time

 

[hello_10]

Winner Vs Victim

Few days before I was discussing that US is a proud nation not because of its own people, but the migrants who made them 'proud'. the most successful community of US, the highest qualified and the highest income group, those who are part of different research team, developing technologies/running industries/medicines, including business professionals who advises the people like Mr B.Gates, Mr W.Buffet etc, the hired MBAs, mostly migrants, and majority of them are Indians............ we used to discuss that the back boon of US, the people who feed the common US's/UK's civilians are not the product of American Culture. they are not the American 'identity', but its the migrants, mainly Indians as discussed in this thread too. its not just the fact that they pay the highest amount of tax, as they fall in very high income group, but its more about the people who are running the US's/UK's government by running industries/medicines etc :thumb:

the society where people only want to have more and more fun in either way, just no touch with the fact they can't make their nation 'proud' this way, neither they have awareness about it as their Rulers shy to say them that they have lost that 'competitive edge', which requires in a "society" to make their nation proud. fcuking like cat/dogs, as seen on the streets, doesn't meant for something they may proud, success/progress, nor we would like to see these Western kids with the Indian kids as they only know to kiss each others in open and fcuk in toilet, as how they see their parents bring new woman/man every 2nd/3rd months, drinking in front of the kids and these Western Kids simply want to do what they see in their parents, enjoying life with the fullest. and we won't like this disease to come to India too, the Vampires are in making and want to do the same in rest of the world........... we won't like to see these happening in India, as, how does it make the society proud by fcuking new partner every month, giving wrong message to the kids by drinking etc in front of them. how can we allow those kids among the Indian Kids who don't even have a proper "Character"????? how these people find this lifestyle is a sign of success/progress????? the Western society, who have got an understanding that being successful means for having more fun, the much they may enjoy their life, but they ignore the fact that even if Mr B.Gates is the richest man of the world, he didn't get help from the Americans to develop technology/software, but its the migrants, mainly Indians, who helped his firms have high technologies. similar to other US's/Western firms, which they sold and provided employment to common Americans this way, paid high tax to US's government which, in fact, use the same money to destroy the country of origin of these migrants

and here the problem exists...... we can understand that these people have lost their credibility, competitive edge, but we can't understand why they can't see other society like India to keep proving most competent people to world????? if they can't learn from the country like India, why do they want to destroy this society? we can't understand, how will they maintain superiority after destroying all those parts of the world who may rise and help the others also in their tough time, if they are allowed to rise????

for the Western Rulers, superiority is means for "Comparative Lead" only, and if they go down, they want to pull others down also, and here the problems exists

thats the 'state' this "Single Mother Society" of Western nations have reached, as below. the highest crime rate, not enough Welfare now also to feed their kids who parents fcuk in group and dont pay for their deeds on these Single Mothers. the society which has reached the state of 30,000+ deaths due to gun violence also, which is similar to the the number of people US/West killed in rest of the world on average every year since WW2, since 1953, under their "Peace Establishment Wars", mainly in Vietnam and Iraq. first they organize Secterian Wars on the name of Shia-Sunni, Hindu-Muslim, Muslim-CHristian, Caste difference, Black-White, national difference etc and then they attack on those places to establish peace this way. a criminal society by all the means...

=> Over a quarter of US kids on food stamps, under-50s dying young – reports — RT USA

=>

About 11,100 Americans died in gun-related killings in 2011, according to preliminary data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. There were 19,766 suicides by firearms in 2011, the CDC said.

Thousands march against gun violence in Washington - Yahoo! News UK

=> Warning shot: Gun violence lands US lowest life expectancy among rich nations — RT USA

=>

=>

A report released 28 February 2008, indicates that more than 1 in 100 adults in the United States are in prison.[5] The United States has less than 5% of the world's population[6] and 23% of the world's prison population.

According to a US Department of Justice report published in 2006, over 7.2 million people were at that time in prison, on probation, or on parole (released from prison with restrictions). That means roughly 1 in every 32 Americans are held by the justice system.

United States incarceration rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[hello_10]

I discussed yesterday that, so high crime rate in US even if they get so much Social Security+ free Medical etc? this is nothing but an excellent example of a country which is going towards the hell/ towards a total destruction, just because people of bottom half want to have more and more fun, the Western Culture which taught them to have more fun only in life....... and what I predicted few days before, if US stops giving Welfare to its people of shiits "Cultural Background", they will start eating each other in place of free food they get from the US's/UK's government. US may well be converted into a Civil War society if their people won't get Welfare like India

 

[W.G.Ewald]

I discussed yesterday that, so high crime rate in US even if they get so much Social Security+ free Medical etc? this is nothing but an excellent example of a country which is going towards the hell/ towards a total destruction, just because people of bottom half want to have more and more fun, the Western Culture which taught them to have more fun only in life....... and what I predicted few days before, if US stops giving Welfare to its people of shiits "Cultural Background", they will start eating each other in place of free food they get from the US's/UK's government. US may well be converted into a Civil War society if their people won't get Welfare like India

Yes, USA is going to Hell and people from all over the planet are trying to get here to go with us.

Do we have a category to nominate the most useless DFI poster, because I've found him.

 

[panduranghari]

I discussed yesterday that, so high crime rate in US even if they get so much Social Security+ free Medical etc? this is nothing but an excellent example of a country which is going towards the hell/ towards a total destruction, just because people of bottom half want to have more and more fun, the Western Culture which taught them to have more fun only in life....... and what I predicted few days before, if US stops giving Welfare to its people of shiits "Cultural Background", they will start eating each other in place of free food they get from the US's/UK's government. US may well be converted into a Civil War society if their people won't get Welfare like India

Its unfortunate for a country for whom it was said-


Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

is gradually in a decline. It is good for India that the power of the still lone super power wanes. Only if our leadership has the foresight to capitalise on it to encourage reverse migration!

Is it too much to ask?



Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk

 

[hello_10]

Its unfortunate for a country for whom it was said-

It is good for India that the power of the still lone super power wanes. Only if our leadership has the foresight to capitalise on it to encourage reverse migration!

Yes, USA is going to Hell and people from all over the planet are trying to get here to go with us.

Do we have a category to nominate the most useless DFI poster, because I've found him.

look, on this graph as below, I explained it before also, you had a major flow of migrants since late 70s only, as in case of neighboring country Mexico also. (common people of Australian even say that the condition till the 70s was so bad that even if you put cloths outside to get it dried, it can be stolen if you take out your eyes for a while.) the in-out between Mexico-US was almost same between 1930 to 1970....... Indians have been source of skills for the British/US even since the late 19th century but, after WW2, and making a level of destruction in other countries, US/West did became a good place to live, get good experience and earn money in the UK/US who had robbed the whole world during 19th and 20th century. but it still doesn't prove that American/British civilians themselves make the nations they are living in. its no secret that the science awards were given to the bosses of those migrants who worked under them....

its just depends to the extent you may borrow debt and feed your that population which can't live without support from the government as they lack a 'Cultural Background', which may guide them. and even if 40% population of India is living in slum, compare yourself with Indians in terms of crime rate as below too. I said before, people like Salman Khan, Akshay Kumar can have life like Kings but not the common people, like how the bottom 70% of US also want the same and for that they are on the path of crimes now . a society, US/UK, which can only rob other nations and maintain high life for their people this way, having talents of others to develop high technologies this way. or, wait for your fall as the same Mexicans are now going back too since 2008, there was around 0.7 million drop in the Mexican born people since then. as its no more a place to live, even for those who straight cross the border and entered in US, the Mexicans. check this same graph as above

(while even if India was a country of 2% rich and 90% poor in 1947, it has made 350million Middle Class, as much as its total population in 1947. India, which was the richest country till the 18th century, at the time when British came to India .)

and how soon you will reach the state when your people will start eating each other, when US/UK don't borrow debt for them anymore...... how soon will you reach a state when common Western People can't understand, why dont they have good life even if they maintain 'peace'? they definitely dont have the feeling like common Indians, that they may live in less as they have a "Character" due to their culture background due to being an Indian/Hindus

with that, the country like Australia/Canada have low population with high minerals so they may have a good life this way but they can't defend their countries by their limited defence infrastructure, as they aren't big enough this way to be defended by their own. while US is big enough, have enough defence infrastructure etc, but it can't feed its 330million population through the limited resources they have. their defence capabilities may only go down, as we can see right now.......

 

[hello_10]

Yes, USA is going to Hell and people from all over the planet are trying to get here to go with us.

Do we have a category to nominate the most useless DFI poster, because I've found him.

look on this man as below, what he means to say? for what he is worried, and how long all these continue as it is, even if he didn't win the election? why US's economy is going down, high crime rate etc, just because of the lack of a "Cultural Background"? and how can Mr Obama be a "patriot" by keeping these things secret, to maintain pride of Americans in either way???? why can't the people of bottom half be supported by the limited resources US has, and how borrowing debt to feed these people means for "Richness"????????

 

[W.G.Ewald]

**
Incoherent babbling post.

 

[hello_10]

Indian Americans: The New Model Minority - Forbes
02.24.09

The 2008 election barely ended before the GOP began touting the presidential prospects of Louisiana Gov. Piyush "Bobby" Jindal, the son of Indian immigrants. Tuesday, Jindal becomes the new face of his party when he delivers the official Republican response to President Obama's speech to Congress. Whether or not he actually runs for president in 2012, Jindal symbolizes a remarkable but rarely discussed phenomenon--the amazing success of Indian Americans in general, and what that success says about our immigration policy.

Most Americans know only one thing about Indians--they are really good at spelling bees. When Sameer Mishra correctly spelled guerdon last May to win the 2008 Scripps National Spelling Bee, he became the sixth Indian-American winner in the past 10 years. Finishing second was Sidharth Chand. Kavya Shivashankar took fourth place, and Janhnavi Iyer grabbed the eighth spot. And this was not even the banner year for Indian Americans--in 2005, the top four finishers were all of Indian descent.

It's tempting to dismiss Indian-American dominance of the spelling bee as just a cultural idiosyncrasy. But Indian success in more important fields is just as eye-catching. Despite constituting less than 1% of the U.S. population, Indian-Americans are 3% of the nation's engineers, 7% of its IT workers and 8% of its physicians and surgeons. The over-representation of Indians in these fields is striking--in practical terms, your doctor is nine times more likely to be an Indian-American than is a random passerby on the street.

Indian Americans are in fact a new "model minority." This term dates back to the 1960s, when East Asians--Americans of Chinese, Japanese and Korean descent--were noted for their advanced educations and high earnings.

East Asians continue to excel in the U.S, but among minority groups, Indians are clearly the latest and greatest "model." In 2007, the median income of households headed by an Indian American was approximately $83,000, compared with $61,000 for East Asians and $55,000 for whites.

About 69% of Indian Americans age 25 and over have four-year college degrees, which dwarfs the rates of 51% and 30% achieved by East Asians and whites, respectively. Indian Americans are also less likely to be poor or in prison, compared with whites.

So why do Indian Americans perform so well? A natural answer is self-selection. Someone willing to pull up roots and move halfway around the world will tend to be more ambitious and hardworking than the average person. But people want to come to the U.S. for many reasons, some of which--being reunited with other family members, for example--have little to do with industriousness. Ultimately, immigration policy decides which kinds of qualities our immigrants possess.

Under our current immigration policy, a majority of legal immigrants to the U.S. obtain green cards (permanent residency) because they have family ties to U.S. citizens, but a small number (15% in 2007) are selected specifically for their labor market value. The proportion of Indian immigrants given an employment-related green card is one of the highest of any nationality. Consequently, it is mainly India's educated elite and their families who come to the U.S.

The success of Indian Americans is also often ascribed to the culture they bring with them, which places strong--some would even say obsessive--emphasis on academic achievement. Exhibit A is the spelling bee, which requires long hours studying etymology and memorizing word lists, all for little expected benefit other than the thrill of intellectual competition.

But education and culture can take people only so far. To be a great speller--or, more importantly, a great doctor or IT manager--you have to be smart. Just how smart are Indian Americans? We don't know with much certainty. Most data sets with information on ethnic groups do not include IQ scores, and the few that do rarely include enough cases to provide interpretable results for such a small portion of the population.

The only direct evidence we have comes from the 2003 New Immigrant Survey, in which a basic cognitive test called "digit span" was administered to a sample of newly arrived immigrant children. It is an excellent test for comparing people with disparate language and educational backgrounds, since the test taker need only repeat lengthening sequences of digits read by the examiner. Repeating the digits forward is simply a test of short-term memory, but repeating them backward is much more mentally taxing, hence a rough measure of intelligence.

When statistical adjustments are used to convert the backward digit span results to full-scale IQ scores, Indian Americans place at about 112 on a bell-shaped IQ distribution, with white Americans at 100. 112 is the 79th percentile of the white distribution. For more context, consider that Ashkenazi Jews are a famously intelligent ethnic group, and their mean IQ is somewhere around 110. :ranger:

Given the small sample size, the rough IQ measure and the lack of corroborating data sets, this finding of lofty Indian-American intelligence must be taken cautiously. Nevertheless, it is entirely consistent with their observed achievement.

The superior educational attainment, academic culture and likely high IQ of Indian Americans has already made them an economic force in the U.S., and that strength can only grow. Does this continuing success imply they will become a political force? Here, Gov. Jindal is actually a rarity. Indians are still underrepresented in politics, and they do not specialize in the kinds of fields (law and finance) most conducive to political careers. Time will tell if they are able to convert economic power into serious political influence, as a Jindal presidency could.

A much clearer implication of Indian-American success is that immigrants need not be unskilled, nor must their economic integration take generations to achieve. In sharp contrast to Indian Americans, most U.S. immigrants, especially Mexican, are much less wealthy and educated than U.S. natives, even after many years in the country.

A new immigration policy that prioritizes skills over family reunification could bring more successful immigrants to the U.S. By emphasizing education, work experience and IQ in our immigration policy, immigrant groups from other national backgrounds could join the list of model minorities.

There is nothing inevitable about immigration. Who immigrates each year is a policy decision, free to be modified at any time by Congress. Constructing new legislation is always difficult, but I propose a simple starting point for immigration selection: Anyone who can spell guerdon is in! :thumb:

Jason Richwine is a National Research Initiative fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.

Indian Americans: The New Model Minority - Forbes.com

Historic Bill Hailing Hindu Americans Introduced In CA State Legislature

What is it?

Working closely with HAF, California State Senate Majority Leader Ellen Corbett introduced a Bill (SCR 32) recognizing and praising the significant contributions made by Hindu Americans.

A few few highlights from the resolution (please read the resolution in its entirety by clicking here):

"Hindu Americans have helped promote the shared American ideals of tolerance, pluralism, and religious freedom...and the Vedas, the 5000 year old texts of Hindu Americans, provide the basis for these core principles: 'Truth is one, the wise call it by many names' [Ekam sat viprah bahudha vadanti]"

"Hindu Americans believe in promoting knowledge and education for all and as a group have the highest education rate in the nation...Almost three-quarters of Hindu Americans are college graduates and nearly half of Hindu Americans have postgraduate degrees..." :tup:

Ahimsa, which is the Sanskrit word for noninjury or nonviolence, is a central principle for Hindu Americans in California, and it provides the ethical foundation for vegetarianism, environmentalism, and harmonious living"

"Hindu Americans and the Vedanta philosophy have significantly influenced notable American intellectuals..."


Why does it matter?

Recognizes contributions of Hindu culture and spirituality to American life

Allows our children to feel proud of their Hindu identity as Americans :what:

Allows the broader American society to understand and appreciate Hindu Americans and Hindu beliefs


What do you need to do?

Spread the word about the resolution to everyone you know

Call your State Senator and Assembly Member to urge them to support this resolution

Come to the State Capitol in Sacramento on June 24, 2013 as the State Senate votes on this momentous resolution

Use this resolution to educate children in schools and the broader community about Hindu Americans and Hindu beliefs :undecided:

Stay tuned for further details and action alerts!

Historic Bill Hailing Hindu Americans Introduced in CA State Legislature | Hindu American Foundation (HAF)

 

[hello_10]

double post

 

[hello_10]

:thumb: to all hindu-Americans.

its all about the cultural/ religious background of Hindus, why they have so high status in world rest of the world, highest income group, least dependent on Welfare and with the least crime rate. and the credit goes to all the Hindus living in US, which includes not only the Indian Hindus but also the Hindus from Nepal, South Africa, Bangladesh, including those converted Hindus who have American and European ethnicity too.

otherwise, along with excellent performance of Hindus/Indians in US and UK, we also have the data's of Canada where population of Hindus and Sikhs religious people is almost equal, and here we find Indian Origins to be of average level as below. this does means that lower the ratio of Hindus, lower the overall status of Indian Origins :ranger:

The latest Census data for income for 2005 revealed that Pakistan-born immigrants reported the second highest incidence for the low-income cut-off, a proxy for poverty line in Canada. In comparison, only 18 per cent of India-born immigrants in Canada reported being a low-income person or belonging to a low-income economic family.

Pakistani-Canadians: Falling below the poverty line - DAWN.COM

Since 2001, Pakistan has lost the most in its share of supplying immigrants to Canada. Pakistan was the third largest source of immigrants to Canada in 2001 supplying 6.1 per cent of the total immigrants. However, by 2010 Pakistan's share of immigrants declined by 71 per cent.

Pakistani-Canadians: Falling below the poverty line - DAWN.COM

 

[hello_10]

here, i do remember my talks with the Sikh friends, who were saying about the jobs profile of most of the sikhs based in Canada. they were truck drivers, tax drivers etc, (including a ratio in small shops to farming too, with owing big businesses too for a part of them.) but mostly they are taxi drivers/ truck drivers etc, and this has brought Overall Indian Origins in Canada on the average level this way :ranger:

 

[hello_10]

Something more on this topic, as below: :ranger:

This Is why American need Indians

 

[natarajan]

what is diggi 's response,he is going brand usa as rss proxy

 

[hello_10]

double post

 

[Armand2REP]

double post

Stop bumping your one man threads. No one cares about these traitors.

 

[hello_10]

Stop bumping your one man threads. No one cares about these traitors.

thats why we have few patriots like you on this forum :thumb:

i do wish you more contribution in this thread thanks

 

[hello_10]

.
the report as below puts Orthodox on the third income rank in US, after Hindus and Jewish. while if we have a look on UK/Britain where Russians are the highest income group, then we will find Russians may even come on the highest income group in US if we separate Russian Orthodox from rest of the Orthodox in this chart as below :ranger:

here as below, even 75K+ is a decent income, which brings 65% Indians on the high income group of US this way, rest would be mostly house wives, i think :thumb:

America's Wealthiest Religions? | The Langar Hall

=>

Super-rich Indians account for more than 20% of the wealth of ultra-high net worth (UHNW) individuals in Britain, a new list showed on Tuesday. As a national group, they are second only to expat Russians.

Indians account for 20% of Britain's ultra-rich club - Hindustan Times

its simple that a nation is made by its people, who may develop new technologies and improve the existing ones. nothing came from sky and nothing will ever come from sky, and we need those people who may make the nation proud from their knowledge/talent/ performance.

Indian migrants are those who pay very high tax as they fall in very high income bracket, least dependent on the Welfare and the least crime rate is registered from this community living in US/EU. many Indians came under business visa after investment in US/west itself, while most of them are very high qualified and are part of developing technologies to run the US's firms, and are doctors/ CA/ business professionals too to help them run businesses etc....

 

[Blackwater]

@ honeybadger

ur kind views

 

[hello_10]

@ honeybadger

ur kind views

My Comment on SATI:

It were the main 15 years, 1813 to 1828, of the top of SATI only, when we found around 1.3 murders per 1 million population of India every year. which was for 'only' 15 years of its peak, when British then controlled that "non-Hindu Regime" of Bengal....... and also, as most of those SATI were in fact because of "self willingness", it is more correct to call 'most of' those murders, the 'suicide' cases of 1.3 per million during peak of those 15 years...

(here we find, for 450million population of India by 1818, those cases on average around 550 murders due to SATI during its peak of 1818 to 1828, mainly in Bengal only....)

hence here, for example if we compare 1.3 murders per million due to SATI in between 1813 to 1828, with the financial center of Pakistan, Karachi, where we find around 3-4 'Target Killing's on average every day, means around 1000 murders per 8 million population of Financial Center of Pakistan, then it comes around 125 murders per million in today's modern time in Karachi. means around 100 times more murders than peak of SATI, due to the 'Target Killing' culture of Karachi. the SATI, which was allowed under the 'non-Maratha/ non-Hindu' regime of India, the Maratha, who controlled around 85% of India till 1819, excluding Bengal till then :coffee:

A local indication of the numbers is given in the records kept by the Bengal Presidency of the British East India Company. The total figure of known occurrences for the period 1813 to 1828 is 8,135; another source gives a comparable number of 7,941 from 1815 to 1828, thus giving an average of about 507 to '567' documented incidents per year in that period. Raja Ram Mohan Roy estimated that there were ten times as many cases of Sati in Bengal compared to the rest of the country.[41][42] Bentinck, in his 1829 report, states that 420 occurrences took place in one (unspecified) year in the 'Lower Provinces' of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, and 44 in the 'Upper Provinces' (the upper Gangetic plain).

Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

here we find, SATI was limited to Bengal area only, no where else, and for a certain time period of time only and for only those of Bengal who believe in it. even in Bengal, it was seen in "Upper Cast Hindus" only, who accounted for hardly 5% to 8% of Hindu population that time. and it was supported by those rulers of Bengal who were themselves not Hindus while even if Hindu Marathas controlled over 80% India during that time, there was no case found in their region.

=> it is because SATI isn't part of Hinduism, which was in practice by only Upeer Caste representing around 5% of Hindus, by only those of Upper Caste itself who believed in it. even the top most lords of Hindu, Ram and Sri Krishna, were against cast system. all these SATI or Caste were made by powerful people only, to feed their human mentalities to remain on top on the basis of race-differences etc, which were "Social Practice" not religious. (like how White Christians usually discriminated with Christian Blacks till mid 20th century, which is still seen.) Marathas never allowed SATI except few cases which were not known, like how the numbers were very less, almost none, in Maratha's state of India who controlled 80% Indian areas that time........


My Comment on Caste

Similarly Caste System was never part of Hindu religion, as it was again a "Social Practice", similar to how black-whites both had division for so long, and still its seen, while both of these races go to Church together...... Lord Ram never hesitated to eat half eaten fruits of an old Dalit Women to give a message that a true believer/ follower of Ram would never believe in Caste System, touchable-untouchable etc. while Sri Krishna clear said many times that, "no one up or down by birth, but only the performance take the people on high status. no matter who is your parents and where you born, if you may outperform others then obviously you are superior to them." then how can someone says himself a Hindu if he/she doesn't believe in their top 2 Lords, the Ram and the Krishna???????

(i remember his this statement, in a part of Mahabharata serial while giving a lesson to Bheem's son, whose mother was a tribal, while saying, "if you may defeat Rajput then obviously you will be superior to Rajput this way, regardless who is Upper Caste and who is belong to a tribal Caste like you....)

Marath Empire

The Maratha Empire (Marathi: मराठा साम्राज्य Marāṭhā Sāmrājya; also transliterated Mahratta) or the Maratha Confederacy was an Indian imperial power that existed from 1674 to 1818. At its peak, the empire covered much of what would become India, encompassing a territory of over 2.8 million km².[2] The Marathas are credited with ending the Mughal rule in India.[2]

Marathas remained the preeminent power in India until their defeat in the Second and Third Anglo-Maratha Wars (1805–1818), which left Britain in control of most of India.