SANITY
Regular Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2014
- Messages
- 695
- Likes
- 305
Re: Gujarat govt issues Rs 2,979-cr work order to L&T for Statue of Un
If making a statue pays tribute to national leader, we should probably make statues in series all over India of all heroes who took birth here. National leaders deserve respect and it should be shown by determination to take society to further heights in its overall development. Statues are supposed to be erected when we have achieved our goals of becoming a developed, self sufficient, no poverty with excess money that can be wasted. I really don't know how much revenue are we going to earn.
Can't fully object to statue of past national leaders but it isn't required either and I am fully confident if we didn't have most of our political parties erecting their own staues and parks, this decision would have faced good criticism.
There are many ways of promoting tourism. You make a statue and people just look at it and forget it, it serves very little purpose to nation or tourist when thousands of crores is being spent for building statues of hero/leaders who themselves were never interested in it.I'm in favor of Sardar Patel giant statue. I think a country shall preserve the memory of its heros either through monuments, either through museums, history lessons, etc.
This statue also can to attract tourists for its region and aid to develop it and generate rent for its citizens
Furthermore, such big statue could become an India national symbol, a reason for country's pride, and an exhibition of Indian engineering capabilities. India lives a good economical momentum, the money is more than enough, and in such good times any country shall seek to show for world the proofs of its greatness
If making a statue pays tribute to national leader, we should probably make statues in series all over India of all heroes who took birth here. National leaders deserve respect and it should be shown by determination to take society to further heights in its overall development. Statues are supposed to be erected when we have achieved our goals of becoming a developed, self sufficient, no poverty with excess money that can be wasted. I really don't know how much revenue are we going to earn.
Can't fully object to statue of past national leaders but it isn't required either and I am fully confident if we didn't have most of our political parties erecting their own staues and parks, this decision would have faced good criticism.
Last edited: