China has proven its deep-sea submersible can travel deeper than the best US submersible.
BS . CHinese submarines are same as what Russia had in seventies. Do you want to listen to a video of Russian expert? DO you want to read an article that says that to kill one aircraft career of US, 40 % of chinese navy shall sink. Do you want to read an article saying that US F35 with some help is enough to sink Lioning?
China has proven it can send people into space. Currently, the US has to hitch a ride on the Russian Soyuz.
Do you know before how many years had US sent her Man on moon? Now it is a very old technology for US. It does not mean US can't do that. It is about outsourcing some low tech work. US satellites goes into space on PSLV. WHat does it mean? Does it mean that US can not do that?
There are many other examples, including China's far superior record in ground-based interceptor (GBI) tests.
And still you have to bag from russia the S300 and S400. Your HQ 9 is a big BS and aimed and cash cowing the idiot country like Pakistan. Tell me why did you buy S 400 from russia inspite of your so called success in intercepting?
However, India has not proven that it is superior in any technological field.
We are first to reach mars in first attempt and you failed inspite of using russian rocket. We are far ahead of you in complex fast breeder technology (Just 30 years ahead).
You bought Lavi design and ended up in making Worst disastrous J10 and we made Tejas.
We are first country to intercept incoming missile in first attempt in hit to kill mode and fourth in the world after US, Israel and russia. You are nowhere.
You have many planes. All of them are from copied or stolen designs. You do not have a single design of your own.
Your long range missiles shucks against our Agni series (Yes, forget about K series). We have just 17 ton of Agni IV which can carry 1.2 tons at 4000 KM after climbing 900 KM and hits the target with very low 2 digit accuracy. All your chinese missiles sucks against Agni which are very fast and very accurate. K series?? No i do not want to compare K series with any of your Junk Fang 1 to 100. It is insult of K series.
Our Kilo class spied 2 of your junk submarines and they knew nothing untill your plane detected it. We today have world's best cruise missile of the world and best interceptor or SAM (LRSAM) in the world which can down anything. Our LCH has more than 2 times T/W ratio of your Z10. Still you guys compare Z10 with LCH where there is absolutely no comparison. Tejas is much more maneuverable than any of your J 1 to J 100 missile. you will never heard any discussion of g limits and AOA of J10 because they are 3rd generation junk not made to compete with F 16 or Gripen. Your Type 99 is a junk and dirty copy of Russian tanks. You are muster-batting about DF21 for decades without any successful test. Where we quote our missile range like agni III with 2.5 tons and K series with 2 tons, you quote the range with 600 and 700 KG of your JL 2. JL 2 sucks infront of K series which has a depressed trajectory and takes cruise missile type trajectory in its terminal phase at mach 7 to 8 before hitting the target with almost no error.
Your ships sucks against Kolkatta class and vishakhapattanam class. They carries Brahmos, LRSAM and barak 1 to gather. Just one Brahmos is enough for your one warship. Your junk lioning to which you took 14 years to furnish an Ukraine platform but engine failed and now it is said that it is not even worth even training. When I write this, lots and lots things come to my mind which I do not want to write here to make my post even bigger.
