F-18 for India ?

Indrajit

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
4,070
Likes
15,451
Country flag
Better go for SU-35. F18 is too old a platform and americans are unreliable. More so we have seen F16's performance vis-a-vis a vintage Mig21! SU35 has latest avionics which can give competition to F22 in a dogfight.
Su35? The way everyone seems to moan about “if we had the Rafale....” I’m wondering whether the 300 something Su 30mki’s are about as useful as Hijras clapping away at traffic signals....
 

smestarz

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2012
Messages
1,929
Likes
1,056
Country flag
Su-30 MKI on their own (and we have not upgraded them since we purchaed them) are good enough to take down F-16 on their own, So, if you are comparing to F-16 as Hijras, well surely Su-30 MKI and Su-35 are more capable than the Hijras (F-16 block 52) with an outdated MiG-21 was able to shoot down in WVR combat.

Su35? The way everyone seems to moan about “if we had the Rafale....” I’m wondering whether the 300 something Su 30mki’s are about as useful as Hijras clapping away at traffic signals....
 

Gessler

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
2,306
Likes
11,192
Country flag
Better go for SU-35. F18 is too old a platform and americans are unreliable. More so we have seen F16's performance vis-a-vis a vintage Mig21! SU35 has latest avionics which can give competition to F22 in a dogfight.
Su-35 doesn't give you anything an upgraded Super-MKI can't.
 

no smoking

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
5,007
Likes
2,304
Country flag
The best way to neutralize China is to make it overspend on defense. India can help do this by ramping its own defense spending (smart and well accounted for defense programs of course). The more India (plus US, Japan, SoKor, Australia, ASEAN) spends the more China will try to respond resulting in overspending. Note that the good about checking China is that it is up against a lot of heavy weight powers. So a coordinated defense ramp up will make China go crazy. It has no choice but to catch up.

This strategy is better and will turn out cheaper than actually going to war with China (which will only happen if China percieves India is weak).
Unfortunately, that is not the reality. China doesn't worry about India, Korea, Japan, Australia, there is only one power in their mind: America. If they can match US power in west Pacific, then the rest won't be a big problem. If they can't, the rest will be a question beyond their calculation.
So, the real problem is how much forces that US can deploy in this side of world. Last time, their Asia pivot policy requires 60% of military forces, it turns out to be unrealistic: they are a global power, concentrating so much power in one region for over years will risk losing her control of other region. So, now her policy is asking her allies to do more, these countries responses are: you first. So, we see that all Asian countries are keeping quiet among the China-US dispute in SCS: no local country wants to patrol SCS with US navy side by side. Instead, they start to improve their relationship with Beijing.
India's response is even more obvious: she will stay in IOC to resist the "Chinese threat". The last thing India wants is to get Chinese attention focusing on her alone because they know: Americans will not hesitate to sacrifice last Indian in fighting Chinese.
 

mayfair

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2010
Messages
6,032
Likes
13,109
Unfortunately, that is not the reality. China doesn't worry about India, Korea, Japan, Australia, there is only one power in their mind: America.
Not quite. They are very much worried about Japan, to obsessive levels. And it's not just the politicos. It's their people as well.

Painful memories do not fade away so easily.

They are also wary about Russia.

Basically they are worried about anyone who has the ability to stand upto them or surpass them with strength.
 

Meghavan

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2017
Messages
33
Likes
7
A project like mwf need atleast 7-8 billion atleast ,you can add 12-13 further for amca
All in all 22-25 billion dollars for these 2 projects

Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk
I highly doubt any nationcan develop a true 5th gen fighter with just 12 billions.
 

vayuu1

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2015
Messages
1,031
Likes
1,765
Country flag
I highly doubt any nationcan develop a true 5th gen fighter with just 12 billions.
12 billion is not a just amount besides its a rough estimate, as you can pump more and more money don't forget lots of techs have already been developed

Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk
 

vayuu1

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2015
Messages
1,031
Likes
1,765
Country flag
Or are on the verge of being developed

Sent from my vivo 1601 using Tapatalk
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
Unfortunately, that is not the reality. China doesn't worry about India, Korea, Japan, Australia, there is only one power in their mind: America. If they can match US power in west Pacific, then the rest won't be a big problem. If they can't, the rest will be a question beyond their calculation.
So, the real problem is how much forces that US can deploy in this side of world. Last time, their Asia pivot policy requires 60% of military forces, it turns out to be unrealistic: they are a global power, concentrating so much power in one region for over years will risk losing her control of other region. So, now her policy is asking her allies to do more, these countries responses are: you first. So, we see that all Asian countries are keeping quiet among the China-US dispute in SCS: no local country wants to patrol SCS with US navy side by side. Instead, they start to improve their relationship with Beijing.
India's response is even more obvious: she will stay in IOC to resist the "Chinese threat". The last thing India wants is to get Chinese attention focusing on her alone because they know: Americans will not hesitate to sacrifice last Indian in fighting Chinese.

Of course not. Australia, Japan and othe US Pacific allies will not fight China alone. They will be part of a combined force with US forces as the backbone. So stronger Australian and Japanese forces is a huge multiplier effect against China. And China knows it.
 

Games Goblin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
116
Likes
405
Country flag
I just thought of something - The US aircraft carriers use catapult launch systems right? Our carrier uses the jump ramp system. Is the F/A-18 able to take off from a ramp?
 

vampyrbladez

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2018
Messages
10,259
Likes
26,557
Country flag
I just thought of something - The US aircraft carriers use catapult launch systems right? Our carrier uses the jump ramp system. Is the F/A-18 able to take off from a ramp?
Yup, all naval fighters can provided they have wide enough wings for lift. However this makes all naval fighters more sluggish than air force ones as transonic acceleration decreases due to boundary flow layer drag because of wider wings.
 

Gessler

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
2,306
Likes
11,192
Country flag
I just thought of something - The US aircraft carriers use catapult launch systems right? Our carrier uses the jump ramp system. Is the F/A-18 able to take off from a ramp?
Yes it can. Boeing simulated it. Dassault did the same with Rafale-M. In fact, as per Grumman, even E-2 Hawkeye can operate from STOBAR carrier.

But there is a big problem - there will be a huge payload penalty when these planes operate from ski-jumps instead of Catapults.
 

Games Goblin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Messages
116
Likes
405
Country flag
Yes it can. Boeing simulated it. Dassault did the same with Rafale-M. In fact, as per Grumman, even E-2 Hawkeye can operate from STOBAR carrier.

But there is a big problem - there will be a huge payload penalty when these planes operate from ski-jumps instead of Catapults.
Payload is a problem - but can the plane can take off with minimal fuel + full weapon loadout and afterwards fill up via mid-air refuelling?
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top