The Spaniards conquered the South AFAIK....the indigenous people don't really have a say there.Compared to North America, South is far more 'indigenous' in its population profile.
No man I meant that while in US and Canada the natives were completely massacred and white population replacing them completely, the South has a much more assimilation of native and European cultures especially in Brazil,Uruguay, Bolivia and the Andean countries. The only comparable countries to US and Canada in South are probably Argentina and Chile.The Spaniards conquered the South AFAIK....the indigenous people don't really have a say there.
While Europe worries itself about its immigrant Muslim population, xtian missionaries are erasing the age old cultures in Africa and Asia with industrial efficiency! In Africa the number of xtians is increasing while that of Muslims is decreasing (will try to post the link for this). Europeans are expecting that any immigrant or asylum seeker will leave his cultural baggage behind and become European in his outlook overnight! Glad they are getting a taste of their own medicine!It is clearly Muslims changing the demography in Europe.
Most people in the West don't associate yoga with religion, except for the hard-line religious right who is often ignored.I believe Hinduism and Buddhism has had immense influence on the people of the West in recent times!
In fact, Yoga is so popular that not only the evangelist Churches and even the Muslim clergy has taken exception that it was a subtle way to convert the people to the Hindu way of life, even if not converting them in a religious form!
A remnant runs the casinos.No man I meant that while in US and Canada the natives were completely massacred and white population replacing them completely...
A colleague of mine, white guy, upper middle class, a medical doctor (went to Harvard), would often go into a rant about the British in India (Raj is the establishment name he was referring to I believe). What outraged him, giving an example, would be a butcher (i.e., working class) and his family would would lord it over their Indian servants and puff themselves up in this manner. At home they would not be able to afford the servants, obviously. His point then was the working class would exploit the natives in a more pernicious manner than the Queen herself. Don't know where he got his attitude. E.M.Forster?What exactly is the reason for this hatred for Europe?
If it's about the colonial period, let me tell you the working class Euopeans had nothing whatsoever to do with it.
Why should their working class suffer because of the actions of their elite?
Are you asking for a visit, there, Naren1987?But, for the record, I agree that the Anglo Saxons are pig headed morons...
Could it be that work avoidance came along with unions?I'm not the one saying that Europeans are alcoholics who abuse their kids...
If I had to choose between hiring an Indian or hiring a Euro, in most cases I would hire the Indian, simply because the Euros have a culture of work avoidance and entitlement that invariably leads to low efficiency. I have lived and worked in the West, I know the differences between Indian work ethic and Euro work ethic.
Well, better India than China.It is not racism. It is nationalism.
Only India is supreme rest are there to be conquered and should be conquered. This will always be my philosophy.
Those are Vikings, not Anglo-Saxons.Are you asking for a visit, there, Naren1987?
Where is their boat, then?Those are Vikings, not Anglo-Saxons.
Judging by the fact that the sea is right behind them in the background, I would say that they are a raiding party that had recently disembarked. I'm sure that you could find a longboat nearby, though that particular picture does not include it.Where is their boat, then?
They more or less are limited within their reservations and the assimilation with the white anglo-saxon/European is limited in North America while its more in South America.
Yes, but some parts of South America are more 'white' than others.They more or less are limited within their reservations and the assimilation with the white anglo-saxon/European is limited in North America while its more in South America.
I have mentioned it hereYes, but some parts of South America are more 'white' than others.
Argentina and Chile are almost entirely white with minimal native admixture. Brazil and Venezuela are mixed between whites, blacks, mulattoes, mestizos, and natives ('mulattoes' have mixed white-black ancestry and 'mestizos' have mixed white-native ancestry). The countries with the largest native populations are the Andean nations that were once the heart of the Inca Empire: Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia.
In general, however, most Latinos from Mexico to Tierra del Fuego tend to be mestizos. Very few Latinos have 'pure' ancestry, except for very recent immigrants.
the South has a much more assimilation of native and European cultures especially in Brazil,Uruguay, Bolivia and the Andean countries. The only comparable countries to US and Canada in South are probably Argentina and Chile.