Empowering Women in India

[hello_10]

in the above post, i meant to say, "is this means for empowering people, whether men or women???? "

This way we find US's civilians around 20 times more EMPOWERED, in terms of rapes and total crimes

thanks

 

[hello_10]

10 Reasons people want to leave India.

My Comment on SATI:

It were the main 15 years, 1813 to 1828, of the top of SATI only, when we found around 1.3 murders per 1 million population of India every year. which was for 'only' 15 years of its peak, when British then controlled that "non-Hindu Regime" of Bengal....... and also, as most of those SATI were in fact because of "self willingness", it is more correct to call 'most of' those murders, the 'suicide' cases of 1.3 per million during peak of those 15 years...

(here we find, for 450million population of India by 1818, those cases on average around 550 murders due to SATI during its peak of 1818 to 1828, mainly in Bengal only....)

hence here, for example if we compare 1.3 murders per million due to SATI in between 1813 to 1828, with the financial center of Pakistan, Karachi, where we find around 3-4 'Target Killing's on average every day, means around 1000 murders per 8 million population of Financial Center of Pakistan, then it comes around 125 murders per million in today's modern time in Karachi. means around 100 times more murders than peak of SATI, due to the 'Target Killing' culture of Karachi. the SATI, which was allowed under the 'non-Maratha/ non-Hindu' regime of India, the Maratha, who controlled around 85% of India till 1819, excluding Bengal till then :ranger:

A local indication of the numbers is given in the records kept by the Bengal Presidency of the British East India Company. The total figure of known occurrences for the period 1813 to 1828 is 8,135; another source gives a comparable number of 7,941 from 1815 to 1828, thus giving an average of about 507 to '567' documented incidents per year in that period. Raja Ram Mohan Roy estimated that there were ten times as many cases of Sati in Bengal compared to the rest of the country.[41][42] Bentinck, in his 1829 report, states that 420 occurrences took place in one (unspecified) year in the 'Lower Provinces' of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, and 44 in the 'Upper Provinces' (the upper Gangetic plain).

Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

here we find, SATI was limited to Bengal area only, no where else, and for a certain time period of time only and for only those of Bengal who believe in it. even in Bengal, it was seen in "Upper Cast Hindus" only, who accounted for hardly 5% to 8% of Hindu population that time. and it was supported by those rulers of Bengal who were themselves not Hindus while even if Hindu Marathas controlled over 80% India during that time, there was no case found in their region.

=> it is because SATI isn't part of Hinduism, which was in practice by only Upeer Caste representing around 5% of Hindus, by only those of Upper Caste itself who believed in it. even the top most lords of Hindu, Ram and Sri Krishna, were against cast system. all these SATI or Caste were made by powerful people only, to feed their human mentalities to remain on top on the basis of race-differences etc, which were "Social Practice" not religious. (like how White Christians usually discriminated with Christian Blacks till mid 20th century, which is still seen.) Marathas never allowed SATI except few cases which were not known, like how the numbers were very less, almost none, in Maratha's state of India who controlled 80% Indian areas that time........


My Comment on Caste

Similarly Caste System was never part of Hindu religion, as it was again a "Social Practice", similar to how black-whites both had division for so long, and still its seen, while both of these races go to Church together...... Lord Ram never hesitated to eat half eaten fruits of an old Dalit Women to give a message that a true believer/ follower of Ram would never believe in Caste System, touchable-untouchable etc. while Sri Krishna clear said many times that, "no one up or down by birth, but only the performance take the people on high status. no matter who is your parents and where you born, if you may outperform others then obviously you are superior to them." then how can someone says himself a Hindu if he/she doesn't believe in their top 2 Lords, the Ram and the Krishna???????

(i remember his this statement, in a part of Mahabharata serial while giving a lesson to Bheem's son, whose mother was a tribal, while saying, "if you may defeat Rajput then obviously you will be superior to Rajput this way, regardless who is Upper Caste and who is belong to a tribal Caste like you....)

Marath Empire

The Maratha Empire (Marathi: मराठा साम्राज्य Marāṭhā Sāmrājya; also transliterated Mahratta) or the Maratha Confederacy was an Indian imperial power that existed from 1674 to 1818. At its peak, the empire covered much of what would become India, encompassing a territory of over 2.8 million km².[2] The Marathas are credited with ending the Mughal rule in India.[2]

Marathas remained the preeminent power in India until their defeat in the Second and Third Anglo-Maratha Wars (1805–1818), which left Britain in control of most of India.

 

[hello_10]

in the above post, i meant to say, "is this means for empowering people, whether men or women???? "

This way we find US's civilians around 20 times more EMPOWERED, in terms of rapes and total crimes

thanks

its a simple case that, "the society, where criterion of getting success in life is not education, people are then more willing to commit crimes to go high, have luxury in future." and this is how the US as a society has become like.....

 

[Energon]

Normally I automatically forego your threads due to the rancid combination of reprehensible and nonsensical opinions combined with an unparalleled mind numbing level of stupidity displayed in them (like seriously mind numbing, reading your posts results in the death of brain cells for people who actually have them). Nonetheless there was some serious irony here that I thought was worth noting.

Now if you had actually attempted to study gender issues by reading even the most rudimentary book on the subject matter, (which you clearly haven't, just like all other topics you rant about) you'd realize that historically speaking the most fundamental and universal impediment to the emancipation of women all over the world has been the imposition of imaginary and arbitrary standards of virtuosity set by self righteous yet hypocritical and clueless men who always perceive women by exclusively dividing them into two groups:"virtuous" and prostitutes. So translating this into simpler English (clearly needed based upon the intellectual level of the thread so far)... the biggest problem for women on this planet are dumbass men who think the sun shines out of their asses yet in reality are too stupid to discern their anus from a hole in the wall; and who incessantly talk a lot of $hit because they are full of it themselves. Now there have been numerous reasons explaining why certain men do this... but the most common one is believed to be a high level of insecurity and ostracization and the constant fear of being surpassed by those women (virtuous and prostitutes alike) due to their superior intelligence (which eventually happens anyways). Ironically Australia and the United States (which you constantly refer to) have actually gotten over this problem by purging such dumbassery from mainstream life. Hence when I say ostracized I mean men who pretend to be normal in the day time but are actually frustrated loners because they're unable to voice their ridiculous notions in real life for the fear of ridicule. So for instance as an immigrant to Australia if you verbally expounded about your nonsensical and offensive theories about the surrounding society especially in regards to dumb crap like 50% of women being escorts/ prostitutes or 70% of white women being skanks and illiterate etc. you would probably find your self hurling face first into the waiting jaws of the nearest salt water crocodile or at least in the case of the US, you'd have to be admitted into a psych ward for having a disjointed relationship with reality. So then obviously you have to bore people on the internet and subject the unfortunate women around you to your theories.

But to come back to my main point, the great irony here is that when it comes to the topic of women's empowerment, by definition you are the #1 problem on the list.

 

[W.G.Ewald]

Normally I automatically forego your threads due to the rancid combination of reprehensible and nonsensical opinions combined with an unparalleled mind numbing level of stupidity displayed in them (like seriously mind numbing, reading your posts results in the death of brain cells for people who actually have them). Nonetheless there was some serious irony here that I thought was worth noting.

Now if you had actually attempted to study gender issues by reading even the most rudimentary book on the subject matter, (which you clearly haven't, just like all other topics you rant about) you'd realize that historically speaking the most fundamental and universal impediment to the emancipation of women all over the world has been the imposition of imaginary and arbitrary standards of virtuosity set by self righteous yet hypocritical and clueless men who always perceive women by exclusively dividing them into two groups:"virtuous" and prostitutes. ..

The only reason that hello_10 has not been banned from DFI is that nobody, with infinitesimally few exceptions, reads his posts.

 

[hello_10]

its a simple case that, "the society, where criterion of getting success in life is not education, people are then more willing to commit crimes to go high, have luxury in future." and this is how the US as a society has become like.....

one day i made a clear statement that, "nothing came from sky and nothing will ever come from sky. whatever is new today will be old tomorrow. a nation is made by its people and we need those people who may develop new technologies and improve the existing ones." technologies of US were not developed by the American civilians, they only did business of the technologies developed by the migrants professionals, and their main strength was the Indian professionals.....

and here, with the above findings in this thread, its clear that inviting Western Culture is nothing but its all about inviting Bill Gate's fantasy of US/West as below, the richest man :ranger:

 

[Energon]

It is very rare to see someone being wrong about each and everything they say... but lo and behold you are the exception. Literally everything you say is full of crap.

 

[W.G.Ewald]

It is very rare to see someone being wrong about each and everything they say... but lo and behold you are the exception. Literally everything you say is full of crap.

After 2 years, he is finally the sole inhabitant of my Ignore List.

 

[hello_10]

After 2 years, he is finally the sole inhabitant of my Ignore List.

It is very rare to see someone being wrong about each and everything they say... but lo and behold you are the exception. Literally everything you say is full of crap.

I must agree with Brother Hello 10. I traveled and lived all over America and Europe and must say western women are very promiscuous. They usually put their pleasure over the good of the family, like Casey Antony did. Family values are lacking. Many successful white women climb up the ranks by changing beds often. For them sex is no "big deal" and if it helps them, why not? They even have more respect for men that pick them up for one night stand than man who wants a relationship. This is because American culture has too much feminism, where the family life is viewed as burden.

For the blacks its even worse and almost every second ghetto black female is a prostitute.

look, i have lived in Western nations for around 9-10 years, and i may ask a question here, "do you see them preparing for banking exams/ clerk exams/ IAS-IPS/ Engineering exams/ Medical Exams/ CA etc??????" in Australia, you may just join an institute with student fund upto $100,000 for tax free fee, but still no environment as most of them are belonging to Single Families. parents keep changing boy friends/ girl friends on time to time, who just don't care of their kids, and the kids also follow their parents...... while the kids grow under the guidelines of parents, who are the first teacher of their kids, to help them make difference between right and wrong????? too many Single Mothers of Australia have been approaching my friends even when i was an International student and once i saw, a 36-38 year old Australian girl friend of my friend, name Rebecca, with my friend david (Vivek) and her daughter passed night with his Bangladeshi friend in our common bathroom, where others kept visiting too. and in the same flat, my one 25 year old friend, Saumik Paul, became grand father when his part time girl friend Kathy's daughter got pregnant from one of the friend of Saumik itself. it was the time of late 2005 when i then preferred to go to a backpacker of the same Lidcombe suburb of Sydney, while waiting for my permanent visa that time ...

the "lifestyle" of Western People, isn't hidden to the world now , and whether this society, based on drugs and drinks, may stand as it is, and how can Indian society may defend itself from this Western Disease, its the question here . they don't use technologies developed by their own people, but its the professional migrants of developing countries who helped them have high technologies. we have been discussing "Competent Products" in our management classes in Australia, UTS, while we find only one competition in the Australian schools, who may have how many girls, good on the sports and build body, which does help them in performing good on the side of sports but certainly it doesn't mean for progress. as to have "Competitive Products", you first need to have enough "competition" on the school level to have those professional who would then perform good among them in education?????

one day i made a simple statement that, "even the 50th ranked Australian swimmer is better than the Indian best, (population 1.2 billion), as there is just no awareness for swimming in India while its the basic thing in the Australian schools. similarly Indian Female Hockey team generally win over the Russian female hockey team as Russians have more awareness on the side of Swimming than Hockey, which is the national sport of India. similarly Pakistan/ Sri Lanka type small developing countries perform good on cricket than Australian many times, as its the national game of Australia, and also of Pakistan/ Sri Lanka both."

similarly, Indians perform very high on the side of education, as its the very first thing, the Indian kids do since beginning. its so simple that, "when you have a national level of awareness/ 'competition' on anything then you do find the upper side performing very high on that certain criterion. and in Australia/ US, where 50% kids take drugs, mass sex is promoted even in schools since the age of 13-14, they only teach these teenager kids to have condoms before going to toilets with the opposite sex

no matter how much Social Security/ Free Medical you provide to these shiits of Western nations, im neither wondered to see US performing 20 times better than India on the side of crimes, post#20, neither im wondered when i see them "World Leader" on the side of Prison Population too, as its 'outcome'. and Im only waiting to see, how long this poor social structure of West may stand as it is???????

its will be interesting to see, at what level they will finally come out of Bill Gate's fantasy :ranger:

 

[Energon]

I must agree with Brother Hello 10. I traveled and lived all over America and Europe and must say western women are very promiscuous. They usually put their pleasure over the good of the family, like Casey Antony did. Family values are lacking. Many successful white women climb up the ranks by changing beds often. For them sex is no "big deal" and if it helps them, why not? They even have more respect for men that pick them up for one night stand than man who wants a relationship. This is because American culture has too much feminism, where the family life is viewed as burden.

For the blacks its even worse and almost every second ghetto black female is a prostitute.

If these are your observations after having "traveled and lived all over America and Europe" then I must inform you that your powers of logic, deduction and basic thought processing are just as pathetic as that of brother Hello 10's. Your nonsensical epithets are just as dumb as those made by ignorant Westerners about Indians (which I'm sure infuriate you).

Whenever I see the types of statements regarding feminism as you make here my first response is to laugh. But then I realize that this is the sort of nonsense responsible for the misery of countless Indian women.

 

[Energon]

As far as hello_10 is concerned... seriously every time you keep posting the same crap over and over again I genuinely doubt your mental capacity. Not only are your broad generalizations and proclamations based on silly anecdotal experiences infuriating but your persistence on blabbing this nonsense without actually trying to look at the facts just makes you sound retarded.

Yes, there are many, many westerners (which in your language means whites) who pursue education with as much rigor as people from many other ethnic groups. Second, Indians aren't responsible for all the innovation in the West. I have as yet to figure out how people develop such dumb notions. People from all over the world are just as smart and innovative including white people. So please, please stop making all these proclamations of Indian superiority because they are just excruciatingly embarrassing for the rest of us Indian immigrants who are actually trying to compete.

Third, if you're unable to understand the simple fact that educated Indian immigrants like us who migrate to Western developed nations aren't representative of the Indian population at large then you might as well just give up on any type of analyzing. If you do however ever get around to understanding this concept then you might want to look at the statistics of how many "high achieving" Indians there are compared to the total Indian population. Here's a hint, not that many, in fact a majority of our fellow Indians sadly aren't even fortunate to live a humane life.

Lastly, you keep making references to Bill Gates being a drop out but getting rich off other people's talents. Again, first try and actually read up on the facts before you start yapping. Here's a fact, Bill Gates started developing his computer programming skills at the age of 12 through a scholarship program sponsored by GE (in those days advanced computing machines were only limited to major universities and private institutions like GE). By the time he was 15 he was actually kicked out of the program because he had already figured out how to find and exploit bugs in GEs computer system. GE then hired him to fix them. By the time he reached Harvard (after obliterating every standardized test he came across) he had more programming experience (in man-hours) than people entering graduate school at that time. Paul Allen was also a drop out, but he too was far ahead of the curve by the time he got to the University of Washington because he had spent hours on end honing his skills on UW's super computer (one of 5 at the time in the entire country) as a high school student which he was able to access because his father was an employee of the University. Sergey Brin also dropped out because he already possessed the skills to device the type of algorithms even junior post graduate faculty members couldn't because he started learning theoretical mathematics and physics practically from the moment he was born from his highly educated parents who were professors and researchers themselves. Mark Zuckerberg also another dropout slacker millionaire had an ivy league comp sci post graduate tutor teaching him programming as a middle schooler when rest of the kids his age were trying to figure out why hair was cropping up around their privates. You see, there are actually people in this world who are far too intelligent for formal education which the rest of us have to strive for. These people are outliers and using them as an example to highlight laziness is about as stupid as wiping your arse with a porcupine.

If anything what this thread shows is that merely studying for exams and obtaining degrees doesn't mean crap if your reasoning skills are equivalent to that of a 7 year old.

 

[Bangalorean]

As far as hello_10 is concerned... seriously every time you keep posting the same crap over and over again I genuinely doubt your mental capacity. Not only are your broad generalizations and proclamations based on silly anecdotal experiences infuriating but your persistence on blabbing this nonsense without actually trying to look at the facts just makes you sound retarded.

Yes, there are many, many westerners (which in your language means whites) who pursue education with as much rigor as people from many other ethnic groups. Second, Indians aren't responsible for all the innovation in the West. I have as yet to figure out how people develop such dumb notions. People from all over the world are just as smart and innovative including white people. So please, please stop making all these proclamations of Indian superiority because they are just excruciatingly embarrassing for the rest of us Indian immigrants who are actually trying to compete.

Third, if you're unable to understand the simple fact that educated Indian immigrants like us who migrate to Western developed nations aren't representative of the Indian population at large then you might as well just give up on any type of analyzing. If you do however ever get around to understanding this concept then you might want to look at the statistics of how many "high achieving" Indians there are compared to the total Indian population. Here's a hint, not that many, in fact a majority of our fellow Indians sadly aren't even fortunate to live a humane life.

Lastly, you keep making references to Bill Gates being a drop out but getting rich off other people's talents. Again, first try and actually read up on the facts before you start yapping. Here's a fact, Bill Gates started developing his computer programming skills at the age of 12 through a scholarship program sponsored by GE (in those days advanced computing machines were only limited to major universities and private institutions like GE). By the time he was 15 he was actually kicked out of the program because he had already figured out how to find and exploit bugs in GEs computer system. GE then hired him to fix them. By the time he reached Harvard (after obliterating every standardized test he came across) he had more programming experience (in man-hours) than people entering graduate school at that time. Paul Allen was also a drop out, but he too was far ahead of the curve by the time he got to the University of Washington because he had spent hours on end honing his skills on UW's super computer (one of 5 at the time in the entire country) as a high school student which he was able to access because his father was an employee of the University. Sergey Brin also dropped out because he already possessed the skills to device the type of algorithms even junior post graduate faculty members couldn't because he started learning theoretical mathematics and physics practically from the moment he was born from his highly educated parents who were professors and researchers themselves. Mark Zuckerberg also another dropout slacker millionaire had an ivy league comp sci post graduate tutor teaching him programming as a middle schooler when rest of the kids his age were trying to figure out why hair was cropping up around their privates. You see, there are actually people in this world who are far too intelligent for formal education which the rest of us have to strive for. These people are outliers and using them as an example to highlight laziness is about as stupid as wiping your arse with a porcupine.

If anything what this thread shows is that merely studying for exams and obtaining degrees doesn't mean crap if your reasoning skills are equivalent to that of a 7 year old.

Good post. I liked the "wiping arse with a porcupine" part.

The other poster here though, @Khiladi420 is a Puke in disguise, and not an Indian. I can bet my arse.

 

[Khiladi420]

Good post. I liked the "wiping arse with a porcupine" part.

The other poster here though, @Khiladi420 is a Puke in disguise, and not an Indian. I can bet my arse.

I am a Buddhist from Uttaranchal, "indian" enough for you? Do you want my passport copy and my birth certificate too?

 

[W.G.Ewald]

Yeah look at your country where [censored]. Instead of name calling, actually argue against the facts I have laid out and which I have arrived at after hours of analyzing white society.

With racist posters like this unchecked and the Fifty Cent Army running amok, I am going to take leave from DFI for 30 days. I'll take a peek back here in September to see if the moderators have pulled their thumbs out of their butts.

 

[Khiladi420]

With racist posters like this unchecked and the Fifty Cent Army running amok, I am going to take leave from DFI for 30 days. I'll take a peek back here in September to see if the moderators have pulled their thumbs out of their butts.

Is not racist/hateful for posters wishing someone gets fed to crocodiles?

 

[hello_10]

The Empowered Men and Women of Western Nations

The consequences of Western Culture and its lesson for Indians

i was discussing that there is no laws in India which brings down women than men in India, while women have many reservations which provides them more opportunities than men in jobs/ exams etc. there is no need to teach having fun to those who live in slums, as they simply can't afford it...................

and what about those who can't afford luxury but want anyhow, have a look on the data's as below, is this means for people, whether men or women???? :ranger:


=>


look don't repeat the same shiits again and again. always remember, "a murder means when someone's death is caused by someone else, and a rape means when its fully penetrated etc, as we discussed before too." different circumstances are considered in India too, US is not any country living in different planet..............

here, we had first news which confirmed only 799 murders in India while the same in US was well above 11,000+ by guns only, as discussed before??? while it had a more reliable source, The Reuters????? this does mean that there might be at least 10,000 more murders in US by other sources, even if we exclude 20,000+ suicides by guns only??????

and yes, you can't compare India with Bhutan, as discusses before, as India has more than 36 states, which are more populated than Bhutan?

even in this certain news you brought here, we still find difference between non-Welfare civilized society of India, w.r.t. to uncivilized but highly armed Welfare Society of US as below:


Comparison based on per 100,000 (lakh) people


=> India tops world murder count - Times Of India

1st,
here, Rapes in uncivilized Welfare society of US = 93,934/ 3100 (100,000) = 30.3

Rapes in civilized India = 18,357/ 125,00 (100,000) = 1.47


2nd,
Total Murders in uncivilized Welfare society of US = 16,692/ 3100 (100,000) = 5.38

Total Murders in civilized India = 32,719/ 12500 (100,000) = 2.61


3rd,

total crimes in uncivilized Welfare Society of US = 2,31,13,708/ 3100 (100,000) = 7456

total crimes in civilized India = 50,26,337/ 12500 (100,000) = 402

=> India tops world murder count - Times Of India

=> and yes its a truth that all these dramatic increase in Murders, crimes, especially Rapes, started during last 7-8 years only, check the data's. we even find India to be dropped 25 points on the corruption ranking in just 5 years, out of hardly 180 countries, as below. the very first outcome of inviting the Western Culture and their all the good and bad

and i have said before, if the Indian government doesn't take proper steps to control influence of Western Culture, then soon they will have to build more jails for those people who dont even have house, and living in slums.............

India 72 in corruption index in 2007

India ranked 94th in Corruption Perception Index ratings by 2012


=> Cultural Impact on the US's Economy

While Americans represent about 5 percent of the world's population, nearly one-quarter of the entire world's inmates have been incarcerated in the United States in recent years.[3] Imprisonment of America's 2.3 million prisoners, costing $24,000 per inmate per year, and $5.1 billion in new prison construction, consumes $60.3 billion in budget expenditures.

United States incarceration rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Technology is meant by the people/professionals not the Firms who employ them

here, its worth mentioning that it were mainly "Western Christian Nations" who were widely involved in enslaving whichever country they could since 19th century and since then only we find Western economies growing, hence its give us a sense that there is always a role of those who became slaves of West and worked for them, mainly in case of UK we discuss in India which suddenly rose when it won over Marathas in 1818.....

sir, a country gets industries, high techs, when it has those people who may develop technologies or improve the existing ones and Western firms mainly 'hired' these professionals from developing countries, regardless any religious background. I mean, while drinking every day and changing with new women frequently with enjoying the life with fullest, if you may still manage to study at least 8hours+ every day, on years long hard work with having 'brain' to face competition like in India, then you do have these hard working brains/talents in your country to have high techs. but if the West can't have this type of hard working and high talented people, along with the luxury lifestyle they have, then it simply means that they have to have those 'slave' professionals/brains who may help them have high technologies, simple........

I mean to say, "Technology is meant by the people who develop the technologies, not by their bosses who are awarded these Western Scientific Awards and their firms who make profits out of it." "Technology is developed by those hard working people, 'brains/talents', regardless any religious background he/she has." and here we find its mainly the Indians who qualify in competition/interviews of US's firms, engineers and business professionals both, in big numbers. the US's firms who hire people from the whole world but they were always more willing to hire Indian origins as they could prove themselves 'worth' getting high paid employment from US's firms. along with a large number of Doctors migrated to US too to fulfill the skill shortage........

one day a made a clear statement, "the society where criterion of getting success in life is not education, people are then more willing to commit crimes to go high in life/ to have luxury in life." and this is the foundation of Western Society, little rude but very clear and straightforward statement.....

for example of Mr Bill Gates, the richest man similar to other US's billionaires, we generally talk that Mr Gates can't develop the technology his company sell, he only did 'business' of the skills he hired from rest of the world, mainly from India. even Hotmail was developed by Sabir Bhatia. US's and most of the Western firms dont have their own people to make them in profit, develop technology/improve the existing techs etc, but its the high skills of developing countries who work for these Western Firms........

and since Indian Firms have got infrastructure in India itself, similar to China/ASEAN etc, now we find so many wars organized in this world. every year a new war, Afghanistan going on, continuous violence in other parts of world due to US's funding/CIA's involvements, with targeting different countries one by one. Libya in 2010, Syria in 2011-12, and the list is too long if you add US's/Western funded wars for culture/religion/language (english)/ race etc etc....

as discussed in my thread as below too:

=> http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/religion-culture/50140-western-wars-christianity-4.html


just have a look on the shiits they have done in US and then these single mother kids are fed on the tax money of migrants, as below. can you afford to feed these Single Mother shiits in India, once their Western Culture will have got enough ground here????? can you people imagine a day when over 50% women of India will be getting pregnant without marriage, and there is no Welfare in India, like US, to feed these Single Mother kids too? is this EMPOWERING women?

Indians, who now number 3.18 millions, the third largest after the Chinese (4 million) and the Filipinos (3.4 million) have a median household annual income of $88,000, much higher than for all Asians ($66,000) and all US households ($49,800).

The share of unmarried mothers was much lower among Indian Americans (2.3 percent) than among all Asian Americans (15 percent) and the population overall (37 percent).

Indian Americans top in income and education - NY Daily News | NewsCred SmartWire

 

[hello_10]

and how the societies of US/UK have changed due to lack of "Character Background"? check these two news as below, first price of prostitution is already less in Britain, and at the same time fall of their economy has resulted in upto 50% drop in price, due to the increased competition among these Single Mother women too

A British MP's wife works as a prostitute charging 70 pounds "for oral sex without a condom followed by full sex with a condom"

British MP's wife found working as a sex worker

This has led to an increase in prostitution, which has affected the industry's economy; many sex workers are reducing their charges (sometimes as much as 50 per cent) in order to beat competition from other sex workers.

a minimum wage to their employees ([£7.45 per hour outside London and £8.55 in London, compared to the £6.19 minimum wage)

http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/europe-russia/43996-uk-eurozone-crisis-live-8.html#post791482

and thats why i have said many times, "US/UK/Australia are the countries where men are labors and women prostitutes, and this is what they want to do with rest of the societies of the world."

neither they have any type of awareness of education, nor they may think for a start from somewhere too, and increased availability of sex workers is reducing their prices too. as, 50 pounds for an "unskilled work" is still better than working for 6.19 pounds minimum wage, as most of these Single Mothers of Britain/US know english only, as a native speaker............

and any efforts to interfere in the country like India, which is growing in a healthy way, is mainly because of the "Slave Mentality" of British origins of US/UK/Australia/Canada, who will either make slaves, (by a combined national efforts, by uniting the people for the purpose to robb other nations), or, they will finally become slaves. but certainly they can't build their society by their own

 

[hello_10]

considering the above current state of Britain, and the facts that now western Porn Stars like Sunny Leone may now come to India for better price, as obviously why these Western pron stars are moving to india?????? and as prostitution is illegal in India, i have proposed that British would now start sending their women to india for better price, it will first help british economy get help this way. and at the same time, when one of their these women get preganant, similar to common unmarried mothers of Britain, then make that kid, the first indian origin british prime minister :thumb:

=> First British Indian PM will be a Tory, says Cameron - The Hindu

 

[hello_10]

Influence of Western Culture on Indian Society

India is a secular country where the people have the freedom to practice any religion and also to convert into another religion of their choice. So, all the cultures are freely accepted and respected by the Indians. It's an environment to cultivate or build oneself ethically, socially and in all other aspects that lead an all over human development.

Every culture is a combination of some good and bad features. All in one, culture means 'a way of life'. Every geographical body has its own custom viz. culture. People of different nations are recognized by their culture. One should be proud on its impressive traditions. It is the responsibility of all citizens to preserve their own ethnicity.

Indian culture is richly known in other parts of the world since the ancient age. Its multi-diverse flavour has been consistently unique in its very own way. Manners, traditions, living and trading patterns etc. are one of the graceful components of Indian culture. The most important feature of Indian culture is its values. These values are deeply rooted within the heart, mind, body and soul of its dwellers.

But, the influence of western culture started in India during the 19th century when the british established their colony in the country.
Western culture, considered as the most advanced culture on globe, has started surmounting its flavour on Indian roots. Western culture has always shown its influence on Indian society. This could be for the multiple reasons like fascination, dreamy autonomy etc., which are somehow absent in Indian culture. Western culture conveys and promotes the ideas and values of advanced civilization across people of India.

There are ample of good things found in the western culture, which every Indian should proudly learn and adopt. But what about the negative influences of the western culture? Every package comes with pros and cons. Indians should definitely use the culture strain before getting diluted under the flow of any cultural influence. The leading reasons for such impact are pursuit of wealth and power of Western media.

The culture of India has been shaped not only by its long history, unique geography and diverse demography, but also by its ancient heritages. Regarded by some historians as the "oldest living civilization of Earth", the Indian tradition dates back to 8,000 BC and has a continuous recorded history for over 2,500 years.

Westernization should not affect the core traditions of Indian society but may change the lifestyle and apparent characteristics of the society with the graceful add-ons like punctuality, trustworthiness, loyalty, professionalism should be welcomed and adored.

These changes are like the betraying our old way of life, which we obtained through our ancestors. Updating is necessary but getting washed-off in influence is wide of the mark. If this continues, days will not be far away when the famous Indian civilization would be buried not by others but by the Indian themselves.

Due to globalization the rich culture of India is disappearing. The most impact is of western culture on India culture. Western culture is based more on materialistic factors where as our culture has a spiritual base.

The culture of India is been disappearing by many ways the youths in India do not respect their elders, the families in India live separate. And thus have lost contacts with their other relatives the big point which is making the culture of India to disappear in bollywood the dressing style of the actresses, the slang word used in movies are been influenced the youth to bad step of life. The young ones try to act the same as these actors do which is very bad to the culture of India.

The lack of morals, the lacking faith in God, having late night parties, the influence of drugs and alcohols, least interest in Indian languages like Sanskrit, Hindi, Celebrating mothers day, fathers day, valentine day, fools day etc rather than celebrating our Indian festivals and thus wasting their precious time of life, Thinking to be independent at an early age

So, I strongly say that accept good from that and try to know our Indian culture more than u definitely change mind.

Western Culture Influence Indian Society | Palem Srikanth Reddy

 

[hello_10]

just have a look on the shiits they have done in US and then these single mother kids are fed on the tax money of migrants, as below. can you afford to feed these Single Mother shiits in India, once their Western Culture will have got enough ground here????? can you people imagine a day when over 50% women of India will be getting pregnant without marriage, and there is no Welfare in India, like US, to feed these Single Mother kids too? is this EMPOWERING women?

Indians, who now number 3.18 millions, the third largest after the Chinese (4 million) and the Filipinos (3.4 million) have a median household annual income of $88,000, much higher than for all Asians ($66,000) and all US households ($49,800).

The share of unmarried mothers was much lower among Indian Americans (2.3 percent) than among all Asian Americans (15 percent) and the population overall (37 percent).

Indian Americans top in income and education - NY Daily News | NewsCred SmartWire

A Nation is made by its People

its not just the today's fact that these single mother kids of US/UK are fed by the tax money of the migrants, but, its simple that a nation is made by its people, who may develop new technologies and improve the existing ones. nothing came from sky and nothing will ever come from sky, and we need those people who may make the nation proud from their knowledge/talent/ performance. Indian migrants are those who pay very high tax as they fall in very high income bracket, least dependent on the Welfare and the least crime rate is registered from this community living in US/EU. many Indians came under business visa after investment in US/west itself, while most of them are very high qualified and are part of developing technologies to run the US's firms, and are doctors/ CA/ business professionals too to help them run businesses etc


on the top of that, considering the crime ratio between the Western Democracy of US against the Eastern Democracy of India, which comes around 7456/402 = 18.5 (around), as discussed in the same post#36 and post#20, it will be interesting to see, how long does it take for India to travel from Blue to Red in the picture as below, how soon India will become completely "Westernized" Democracy as below, we are waiting to see :thumb:

United States incarceration rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia