Doha climate talks: US faces dilemma over final text

Discussion in 'Americas' started by SajeevJino, Dec 9, 2012.

  1. SajeevJino

    SajeevJino Long walk Elite Member

    Feb 21, 2012
    Likes Received:
    Inside a Cage
    Doha climate talks: US faces dilemma over final text

    There has been a historic shift in the UN climate talks in Qatar, with the prospect of rich nations having to compensate poor nations for losses due to climate change.


    The US has fiercely opposed the measure - it says the cost could be unlimited.

    But after angry tussles throughout the night the principle of Loss and Damage is now in the final negotiating text.

    Small island states at risk from inundation say they will walk out if the US vetoes the proposed deal.

    The political stakes are high. The EU's position is not yet well defined, but soundings suggest that it can live with the text.

    The US will be seeking support from other big polluters - like Canada - likely to face liability for climate damages.

    If the US is left alone fighting against the chair's text, its negotiators face a dilemma - either to bow to the majority and accept that the nations which caused climate change bear a moral responsibility to other nations damaged by it, or to refuse to sign.

    If the US vetoes the text, President Barack Obama will be accused of hypocrisy and failure after re-committing himself to tackling climate change since his re-election.
    Continue reading the main story
    Start Quote

    "I will block this. I will shut this down”
    Todd Stern
    US chief negotiator

    If he agrees the text he will face criticism from Republicans, whilst he tries to negotiate his own deal over US government finances.

    One campaign group in Doha tweeted that before the text was agreed Todd Stern, the US chief negotiator, was heard saying: "I will block this. I will shut this down."

    Saleem ul-Huq, from the think-tank IIED, told the BBC: "This is a watershed in the talks. There is no turning back from this. It will be better for the US to realise that the principle of compensation is inevitable - and negotiate a limit on Loss and Damage rather than leave the liability unlimited.

    "[President Obama] has just asked Congress for $60bn (£37bn) for the effects of Sandy - developed nations are already having to foot the bill for loss and damage of their own."

    The Qatari chair has warned delegates that only a few hours remain to sign off the deal. He says the conference will not overrun by another day.

    Principle at stake

    It is a point of principle that is at stake here for developing countries. In the end it's questionable how much extra money a Loss and Damage Mechanism might bring.

    Already poor nations are bitter that rich nations, particularly the US are dragging their feet over a promise made at the failed Copenhagen climate summit to mobilise $100bn by 2020 to help poor nations get clean energy and adapt to climate change.

    The developing countries say the original sum was too low - especially in the light of Mr Obama's request to Congress for Sandy damages of $60bn, and the UK's bid to raise £200bn for clean energy by 2020

    BBC News - Doha climate talks: US faces dilemma over final text

    World's 10 Most Polluted Places at 2006

    Linfen, China, where residents say they literally choke on coal dust in the evenings, exemplifies many Chinese cities;

    Haina, Dominican Republic,
    has severe lead contamination because of lead battery recycling, a problem common throughout poorer countries [image];

    Ranipet, India, where leather tanning wastes contaminate groundwater with hexavalent chromium, made famous by Erin Brockovich, resulting in water that apparently stings like an insect bite [image];

    Mailuu-Suu, Kyrgyzstan,
    home to nearly 2 million cubic meters of radioactive mining waste that threatens the entire Ferghana valley, one of the most fertile and densely populated areas in Central Asia that also experiences high rates of seismic activity;

    La Oroya, Peru, where the metal processing plant, owned by the Missouri-based Doe Run Corporation, leads to toxic emissions of lead;

    Dzerzinsk, Russia,
    one of the country's principal chemical weapons manufacturing sites until the end of the Cold War [image];

    Norilsk, Russia, which houses the world's largest heavy metals smelting complex;

    Rudnaya Pristan, Russia, where lead contamination resulted in child blood lead levels eight to 20 times maximum allowable U.S. levels;

    Chernobyl, Ukraine, infamous site of a nuclear meltdown 20 years ago; and

    Kabwe, Zambia, where child blood levels of lead are five to 10 times the allowable EPA maximum [image].

    World's 10 Most Polluted Places | LiveScience

Share This Page