Does India Have the Strongest Navy in Asia (excluding Russia)

[aramsogo]

what you claim to have and actually have are two distinct opposites as is so often the case
for repressive dictatorships like china
i dare speculate that the us knows all about your spy's and you got fake blueprints if any at all

The FBI, DIA and CIA would disagree with your assessment. Although, I have to admit, China probably comes in second to France and Israel when it comes to military espionage against the US.

 

[Adux]

military ship building need the support of much longer and abundent supplying-chains than civilian ship building....

that is why S.korea is good at LNG and other high-end civilian ship,but can just "assemble" DDG with imported key components from USA.

India's supply chains are much more broken than S.korea......

You are not getting it chicom, In today's war scenario, where it will not last more than 3 weeks, it doesnt matter. Can you replace a sunken ship in 3 months. Also, Indians do have better armaments and sensors, that means you will require all that supply chain you keep harping about.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

Does any nobody in history know of any Chinese naval operation??

 

[Adux]

The FBI, DIA and CIA would disagree with your assessment. Although, I have to admit, China probably comes in second to France and Israel when it comes to military espionage against the US.

So there is a secret ranking for the best spy agency which is available on the internet. Wow , Can I see it.

 

[aramsogo]

You dont even read what you type do you.

I do. Do you ? You may want to take a logic class or even a college level algebra class.

 

[Adux]

Does any nobody in history know of any Chinese naval operation??

They have a Radio Control Miniature Boat by the Bejing Pond. They ram into each other and sinks them, like the Ep-3 Incident.

 

[Adux]

I do. Do you ? You may want to take a logic class or even a college level algebra class.

Wow Algebra, That is just awesome jose, you need to know algebra to write and comprehend english. Go read it again, chicom.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

They have a Radio Control Miniature Boat by the Bejing Pond. They ram into each other and sinks them, like the Ep-3 Incident.

or bullying neighboring countries in South China seas.

 

[badguy2000]

You are not getting it chicom, In today's war scenario, where it will not last more than 3 weeks, it doesnt matter. Can you replace a sunken ship in 3 months. Also, Indians do have better armaments and sensors, that means you will require all that supply chain you keep harping about.

hahaha.

first, China's nuke weapon rules out the possblity that Chinese native land and industry base are to be attacked directly,unless the attacking state wants one nuke war.

second, no one ,including USA,can beat China in a all-full war,after CHina fully mobilze its enormous industry capacity.

unless India were to set up its own independent industry base , India would have never chance to beat CHina in one all-full way against China....whether on land,on sea or in air.

 

[Adux]

or bullying neighboring countries in South China seas.

Mostly civilian vessels.

 

[aramsogo]

So there is a secret ranking for the best spy agency which is available on the internet. Wow , Can I see it.

There are court cases and leaks to journalists in the WSJ, NYTimes & WashPost. For example, we know from Noshir Gowadia's conviction that he was helping China with stealth cruise missiles, etc.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

hahaha.

first, China's nuke weapon keep any enemy attack out of Chinese native land and industry base,unless the attacking state wants one nuke war.

second, no one ,including USA,can beat China in a all-full war,after CHina fully mobilze its enormous industry capacity.

second, no one can

You are saying China will survive a nuclear war against USA? A simple reminder USA has 7,000 nukes compared to 30-50 Chinese operational nukes (DF-31). There won't be any China left to build anything back up.

 

[Adux]

hahaha.

first, China's nuke weapon keep any enemy attack out of Chinese native land and industry base,unless the attacking state wants one nuke war.

second, no one ,including USA,can beat China in a all-full war,after CHina fully mobilze its enormous industry capacity.

second, no one can

You decide who goes nuke or not. the Damn Vietnamse kicked your asses, 10,000 Indians didnt loose a territory to your 80,000. You are so bad , its not even funny, human wave chicom. US can just flip some switches, and you wont exist. India could make glass bowls out of your damn nation. Especially since we have you all in the eastern seaboard, we can save the Tibet.

 

[aramsogo]

You decide who goes nuke or not. the Damn Vietnamse kicked your asses, 10,000 Indians didnt loose a territory to your 80,000. You are so bad , its not even funny, human wave chicom. US can just flip some switches, and you wont exist. India could make glass bowls out of your damn nation. Especially since we have you all in the eastern seaboard, we can save the Tibet.

Dude, you need to read a military strategy book, badly. China was after and got Aksai Chin. South Tibet/AP had very little strategic value except more hungry mouths to feed.

 

[badguy2000]

You are saying China will survive a nuclear war against USA? A simple reminder USA has 7,000 nukes compared to 30-50 Chinese operational nukes (DF-31). There won't be any China left to build anything back up.

well, there were no winner of nuke wars. neither USA or CHina would be the winner of one nuke war.


However, unless USA were to destroy CHina industry bases before China moblized its enormous industry capacity, USA would eventually be crushed by CHina's industry capacity in a non-nuke war.

so, USA in fact is in a embarrassing staus......it can neither be the winner of nuke war nor the winner of nono-nuke war against CHina.

 

[LETHALFORCE]

well, there were no winner of nuke wars. neither USA or CHina would be the winner of one nuke war.


However, unless USA were to destroy CHina industry bases before China moblized its enormous industry capacity, USA would eventually be crushed by CHina's industry capacity in a non-nuke war.

so, USA in fact is in a embarrassing staus......it can neither be the winner of nuke war nor the winner of nono-nuke war against CHina.

US would be the clear winner simple reason USA could survive any collateral damage china maybe able to do ,China will not.

 

[Adux]

Dude, you need to read a military strategy book, badly. China was after and got Aksai Chin. South Tibet/AP had very little strategic value except more hungry mouths to feed.

Lol! Yup, That is the case. Brilliant analysis.

 

[badguy2000]

US would be the clear winner simple reason USA could survive any collateral damage maybe able to do China will not.

you should have told your new theory to President Obama...hehehe

 

[LETHALFORCE]

you should have told your new theory to President Obama...hehehe

He's going to kill you guys by defaulting, HA HA HA HA

 

[Adux]

US would be the clear winner simple reason USA could survive any collateral damage maybe able to do China will not.

US was built to kill the Soviet Union and survive in an all out Nuclear War. Before the Chinese know it, Missiles would have been unleashed from all directions of the known world into China, Hours later, China will be no more. If US fears China is going to let loose 10 nukes into US, then you expect the US to unleash hell.