I've started to think that you have a really bad identity crisestraditionally they have been slaves of whites and arabs like the blacks, and they look similar. does any indian identify as black?
i see roma people as indians, so i talk about us all. roma people are considered as blacks/negroes/sort of mullatos in eastern europe, they adopted it themselfesI've started to think that you have a really bad identity crises
First Roma people now Black Africans?
No Indians don't identify themselves as Blacks
We are nowhere connected and you asking that is really not relevant.
that's funny, indian wasn't slave of arab and europeantraditionally they have been slaves of whites and arabs like the blacks, and they look similar. does any indian identify as black?
You don't have to buy into Eastern Europeans' ignorance. Tell them to read Ivan Turgenev's "Fathers and Sons." Turgenev is Eastern European himself.i see roma people as indians, so i talk about us all. roma people are considered as blacks/negroes/sort of mullatos in eastern europe, they adopted it themselfes
Some of us are as black as Blacks, and some of us are as white as Whites.I think we are brown and some are whitish brown
but why the report says he is russian journalist?Some of us are as black as Blacks, and some of us are as white as Whites.
I have seen Blacks who are whiter than I.
What is more important is anthropometry, and not merely skin colour.
Look at these people. They are both "white," but the one to the right has high cheek bones, that indicates he is Asian, at least in part, if not full.
I am using a mobile so no shift key@Soul83, do you have "Shift" key on your keyboard?
I want to ask the same question to @abhi_the _gr8_maratha.
Because he is Russian.but why the report says he is russian journalist?
.
though I agree some are white and some are black and with your post
Sir, now that's funny we are taking about IndianBecause he is Russian.
I gave that as an example to support the importance of anthropometry.Sir, now that's funny we are taking about Indian
indians were slaves of portuguese and british (white) and of arabs and turks (mughals) at one point, also nowadays many indians are still (not slaves) but servants of arabs in emirates etc.@<a href="http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/member.php?u=14080" target="_blank">Soul83</a> , please tell me how Arab and European was master of Indians or Indians were slave
That would make Indians a total cockup Asians and never really Caucasian.Indians are mixed race with caucasian, negroid and mongoloid influences. Happens when there are so many invasions from outside for a prolonged period of time.