What is this punishing?
Will this mean PA will be damn scared of IA in future?or what is the reason behind punishing?
they would fight either win or loose.but dont you think this is somewhat funny of how will india penetrate the defense of pakistan and retreat back after few days
please make me clear that
what special weapon or training do you have
we have thousands of tanks deployed,artillary deployed,mrl deployed,half a million troops deployed,we have the long range radars on the border..including weapon locating one,few years before battle field radar are also developed by Nust similar to the indian rajendra if i am naming it correctly.to be mass produced soon,we have attack choppers,so how will india penetrate the border?
my personal understanding of CSD is
CSD will be limited to the LOC and usuall firing and PAF-IAF engagement.before the cease fire is declared if it ever happened.
The punishing is to decimate the PA/PAF forces to the extent that they loose whatever offensive capability they currently have. And that means the three principle corps of PA. The confidence of the PA must be crushed, and brutally at that.
The IA and GOI believes (rightly or wrongly is another matter) that Pakistan continues to support hostile groups against India based on its perceived sense of security due to possession of its nukes (which some internet terrorists and a certain Agency believe gives them a free ticket all times) and their conventional capability to stall Indian armed forces.
There is a feeling within PA and the ISI that they can get away with anything. There is a need to remove this sense of security and the CSD is the syringe to inject this dose of reality.
You may dispute this and refuse to accept the viability of such a strike, but that, as with all your previous statements is worthy of CRAP.
And you do realise that our Army is just 1.5 times (1,060,000 vs 700,000) yours, our AF is just 2 times yours, and yet we spend as much as 6 times ( excluding our strategic budget amd the R&D budget) as much as you on defence.
Where do you think this money goes?
Quick answer: this money goes into capability building. A low funded army is just that, a low funded, less capable army. Those additional $35-40 billion improves our capabilities faster in a year than you can in 5. Same goes for China vs India.
Some people compare the available/rumoured specs of the T-90 vs Alkhalid and declare that T-90 is no match for the Pak tank. Just think logically for a second.
Why would an army, with a budget a multiple times larger than his adversary, with access to the best platforms in the world, would choose an inferior tank? That too a force which will aquire IFVs worth some $10-12 Billion. With that budget we can simply junk the T-90s if they are inferior. Beats common sense. The people involved in the aquisition would be charged with treason if our tanks are found to be inferior.
The only reason you are ahead in artillery is because the IA had the ghost of Bofors haunting the political class. But that too is about to be changed.
As for Attack helis, we can put 9 gunships for every one you can put. And in any case yours are old Cobras, and anyone with knowledge of second hand equipment will tell you, their availability is low at the best of times.
As for Radars, we see right upto Iran, yet you still claim to be able to strike Indian Airbases, why so? Anytime the IAF powers up the THD-1955 radars to full, we can spot any and all AC flying in Pak airspace. The Swordfish is another story altogether.
There is clear assymetry in force capabilities, even if force numbers are relatively similar. And for all your bluster, this difference will only grow.
