congrats tarun!!

[proud_hindustani]

bohot mubarak ho bhai sahab

 

[Pintu]

Congratulation Tarun, Heartiest Congrats , you have made our forum proud , Great achievement , congrats again.

Regards

 

[Singh]

Congrats Tarun, Great job.

 

[A chauhan]

Congrats Tarun !!! for winning & for the sheer knowledge you posses !!! congrats !!:icon_salut:

 

[GokuInd]

Congrats! Way to go Tarunji :icon_salut:

 

[1.44]

congrats tarun , you rock !!

 

[StealthSniper]

Congratulations Tarun. You deserve it.:goodstuff:

 

[Rahul Singh]

Congratulations Tarun. Please tell us more about your experience.

 

[sob]

Congrats Tarun for this achievement.

Btw I did not know that you were a Dr.

 

[Soham]

Tarun,

Was the debate following the Oxford or Cambridge format ?

 

[tarunraju]

Tarun,

Was the debate following the Oxford or Cambridge format ?

Its format included

-> Participants from both sides making opening statements
-> Picking out counterpoints from those opening statements using an initial argument
-> Each participant addressing those counterpoints
-> Debate Moderator broadening the scope of debate by infusing some unaddressed points to debate on
-> A 35-odd minute FFA debate
-> Closing the debate thread for a short while, announcing the winner, and opening it up as a public debate.

So it sort of doesn't resemble an oral debate format. Besides, those formats are kind of not practical on an online debate (for every participant to 'speak' (make posts), at the right point in time). With the above format, the moderator can allow members to randomly make posts as long as they're pertaining to that phase of the debate.

 

[Flint]

Wow. Congratulations. Well done Tarun!

 

[Dark Sorrow]

Congrats Tarun! You did us proud! God Speed.

 

[roma]

CONGRATS TARUN
i have missed what is was all about - any chances of someopne either telling those of us who missed it or if any pages here describing what it was about and perhaps Tarun could put in the script of the debate ?
hope not asking a ton.

( notwithstanding that i have read
Its format included

-> Participants from both sides making opening statements
-> Picking out counterpoints from those opening statements using an initial argument
-> Each participant addressing those counterpoints
-> Debate Moderator broadening the scope of debate by infusing some unaddressed points to debate on
-> A 35-odd minute FFA debate
-> Closing the debate thread for a short while, announcing the winner, and opening it up as a public debate.

So it sort of doesn't resemble an oral debate format. Besides, those formats are kind of not practical on an online debate (for every participant to 'speak' (make posts), at the right point in time). With the above format, the moderator can allow members to randomly make posts as long as they're pertaining to that phase of the debate.

from Taruns post above

 

[macintosh]

Congrats Dude !!! Well done !!!

 

[p2prada]

Nice work mate. Congrats.

 

[youngindian]

Congrats mate , well done

 

[EnlightenedMonk]

Congratulations Tarun... great job done mate !!!