Chinese video game Glorious Mission chooses US Army for its enemy

[Kunal Biswas]

Chinese video game 'Glorious Mission' chooses US Army for its enemy !



Glorious Mission (also known as Mission of Honor) is being used a training tool for PLA recruits treads on some dangerous territory by piquing U.S. concerns of nationalism and anti-American sentiments. Using video games for military training methods is nothing new; in 2008 the U.S. Army invested $50 million to develop games for combat preparation. What's raising eyebrows with Glorious Mission is the choice to focus on American troops as China's primary enemy.

Chinese video game ‘Glorious Mission’ chooses US Army for its enemy

 

[Phenom]

As a game it doesn't look bad, the graphics need to be better, but its understandable since the Chinese game industry is still in its nascent stage. We can assume the graphics will catch up to western standards in the future.

But why on earth are the training their soldiers with this???

 

[Kunal Biswas]

But why on earth are the training their soldiers with this???

The game is degined to get the soilders as real as possible fighting Americans face on..

It helps in moral and confidence boost also the enthusiams regarding enemy strength and capability..

To me its nice, We should have too..



Operation flashpoint DRAGON rising:

 

[satish007]

Aap Kaisey Ho? Indian IT is way stronger than China, India can have more but now all India IT guys are busy at making top dollar,
and India is more maturity, only child and cowards play these game. true solders practise in war.
on the other hand, Chinese might think the best solders come from US. but they are wrong, Americans are just cowards, they only know drive planes
and bomb from high, call gunfire support or sneak attack from helicopter. I gonna tell them best solders come from Sikh, put Sikhs as this game's big boss.

 

[no smoking]

Well, to my knowledge, Chinese has been one the "enemies" in US computer game for a couple of years. Did anyone say it is anti-chinese?

It is just a computer game.

 

[asianobserve]

Prejudice

"Americans are just cowards, they only know drive planes
and bomb from high, call gunfire support or sneak attack from helicopter. I gonna tell them best solders come from Sikh, put Sikhs as this game's big boss."

Prejudiced eh? But taking off from the American action in Abottabad I don't think you can characterize Americans as cowards or remote control warriors. This claim only belongs supposedly to Islamist Pakistanis, not Indians. But for your education I suggest you dig deep into the news archives of the American forces actions in Iraq from the invasion until the pacification. Then maybe after you have fully covered those actions you have to start making an objective view of US forces and their record. I think it would not be an understatement to declare that at the moment no other military in the World comes close to US forces' battle experience and record. Definitely not China.

 

[asianobserve]

The following post Iraqi invasion battles are notable for their brutalities and the extremely dangerous manner in which they have to be executed (urban combat): Nasiriya, Fallujah, Debecka Pass, Najaf, Basra, Mahdi uprising. Armies of weaker calibre and softer cores would have easily melted in the face of the daunting tasks faced by the US forces in these battles. A lot of video clips from these battles are posted in Youtube. The house-to-house, block-to-block, city-to-city, battles waged were definitely ferocious.

 

[Solid Beast]

][[]][[[]][[]][[][][][

 

[satish007]

"I think it would not be an understatement to declare that at the moment no other military in the World comes close to US forces' battle experience and record. Definitely not China.

Only agree a little, have to show you what's best soldier.
"If anyone says he's not afraid of dying, he is either lying or he is a Gurkha."
----Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, of the Indian Army famously said.
and check this out
Lone Gurkha Soldier With a Knife Defends Woman From 40 Rapists!
Lone Gurkha Soldier With a Knife Defends Woman From 40 Rapists! ? Right Pundits
Chinese soldiers were same 50 years ago. now I have no idea.
I argree American did a good job in Iraq, but how about Vietnam,
experience can be shared , be learned, hire some veterans and CCP. just fight skills.
even able to practise in this game.
American "soldier" can not be called soldier,the courage and justice they never able to learn.
BTW,what's Gurkha's weakness?

 

[asianobserve]

"Lone Gurkha Soldier With a Knife Defends Woman From 40 Rapists!"

That was a chivalrous and very courageous act by that Gurkha. But the 40 rapists are not exactly the rampaging Islamist suicidal maniancs in Iraq and Afghanistan who are armed to the teeth, well trained and well coordinated. A comparison is futile. The simple fact, and if you entertain facts as opposed to prejudiced (blindly nationalistic)opinions, US forces are the most battle hardened in the World today. Their whole force structure is well tested in combat in both conventional and irregular warfare. Their's is a very professional force where "cowardice" is not an option. They utilize high tech weapons to minimize exposing their troops to unnecessary risk but not because they are chickens. And when their operations are outside the capabilities of their weapons or gadgets their forces will get into harms way to accomplish their mission (Abottabad is the latest proof). In fact, even as we are posting comments in this forum some units of their military are operating well inside an enemy's territory, either in Iraq, Afghanistan or Libya.

 

[asianobserve]

"I argree American did a good job in Iraq, but how about Vietnam,
experience can be shared , be learned, hire some veterans and CCP."

I suggest you really look into the facts first before you start commenting on things. If you only researched in the Vietnam war well enough you'll learn that the US forces did not lose a tactical combat in Vietnam. They won all skirmishes with the Vietcongs but they lost the war (these are 2 different things). The biggest contributor to the US' defeat in (or pull out from) the Vietnam War was the anti-war sentiment in the US. In other words, domestic US politics defeated the US military in Vietnam.

 

[Kunal Biswas]

"Lone Gurkha Soldier With a Knife Defends Woman From 40 Rapists!"

Islamist suicidal maniancs in Iraq and Afghanistan who are armed to the teeth, well trained and well coordinated. A comparison is futile.

Well IA here is also doing the same, And Gurkha are one the best, we here are more successful than Nato over Afghan and Iraq..

Gurkha are most disciplined Soldiers and most feared by Enemy i know..

Thats the reason Tangos cannot breath freely where IA exists..

US forces are the most battle hardened in the World today. Their whole force structure is well tested in combat in both conventional and irregular warfare. Their's is a very professional force where "cowardice" is not an option.

Agree..

US forces believe in small number and mass firepower, Where we have mass number and moderate firepower..

But calling them best every where is not correct, The consumption of water and other resources are more than what we consume per Km, Also other facts regarding survival tactics are yet to be exercised in US forces when compare to us..

 

[asianobserve]

"The consumption of water and other resources are more than what we consume per Km, Also other facts regarding survival tactics are yet to be exercised in US forces when compare to us.."

What this got to do with being the most capable military force? The US military can manage the volume of the needed logistical support for their military forces as they also have the most capable logistical systems in the world today. Their sealift, airlift and overland resupply systems are the most efficient in the world. Besides, basic necessities like water and food are very important for the morale of the soldiers that no professional military force can simply ignore it or reduce it without adversely impacting the soldiers fighting spirits.

 

[asianobserve]

India needs to invest on logistical support systems. A well fed force will always be an able fighting force.

 

[Kunal Biswas]

What this got to do with being the most capable military force?

Besides, basic necessities like water and food are very important for the morale of the soldiers that no professional military force can simply ignore iT or reduce it without adversely impacting the soldiers fighting spirits.

Every thing..

Infantry is the basic fighting unit and its needed to be flexible and rugged in intense environments which include low or no water conditions, A Professional Army does not Ignore simple necessity but train its soldiers without basic necessity conditions, In that sense Indian Army out preform most-most army in the world..

For Example a Indian Infantry Solider drinking 50-70ml of water per Km in Desert compare to US is a Liter..

The US military can manage the volume of the needed logistical support for their military forces as they also have the most capable logistical systems in the world today. Their sealift, airlift and overland resupply systems are the most efficient in the world.

Given Equipment and time any Army can do the same, Besides Americans always enjoyed luxury of time and no or less resistance to their supply lines ( Logestics ) Where we didnt had in our wars coz the the enemy was almost equal to our supplies lines were not constant as Americans always had,

Regarding Logistics and mobilization Indian Army made outstanding mass mobilizations in Asia by transporting Three Strike force combining a million men and thousands of tanks and equipment from all over the country to the northern front within 72hours, Now, recent exercise shows it can be done within 48hours..

Also in International crises Indian paras around 10.000 men and arty were transported within 24hours to male deeps Islands to prevent a coup,The airlift was done by IL-76MDs..

 

[nrj]

Satish007,

No soldier fighting for its state is coward. Risking their lives to protect its land reflects immense bravery on their part. And are worthy of respect.

 

[satish007]

Satish007,

No soldier fighting for its state is coward. Risking their lives to protect its land reflects immense bravery on their part. And are worthy of respect.

agree, some of they fight for their country or "for God", lots of them just for money and benefits.
those just are suckers.

 

[asianobserve]

"Every thing..
xxx
For Example a Indian Infantry Solider drinking 50-70ml of water per Km in Desert compare to US is a Liter.."

If this is your qualification for the best fighting force then the Tuareg or Sahrawi tribes in the Sahara region would be the best soldiers in the world. No other people can beat them in water intake minimization. But are these people known for being very able soldiers? I don't think so.

 

[asianobserve]

"In that sense Indian Army out preform most-most army in the world.."

Except the Chinese forces? As shown in the 1962 war... These Chinese must be more adept at fighting with less water? What do you think?

 

[Dark Sorrow]

"In that sense Indian Army out preform most-most army in the world.."

Except the Chinese forces? As shown in the 1962 war... These Chinese must be more adept at fighting with less water? What do you think?

Ask them to attack again, we will tell them what we think about fighting with less amount.